
Image Reveals the Most Distant Galaxy Ever Seen, From Just 280 Million Years After the Big Bang
The James Webb Space Telescope's latest find is yet another record-breaker: the most distant galaxy ever detected, shining just 280 million years after the Big Bang.
Named MoM-z14 (cue the 'your mama's so old' jokes), the galaxy was spotted by JWST as part of the Mirage (or Miracle) survey, a program designed to confirm the identities of early galaxies. MoM-z14 clocks in at a redshift of z = 14.4, meaning its light has been stretched by the expansion of the universe by more than 14 times, and offering a clue to its age. The team of researchers, led by MIT's Rohan Naidu, posted its findings to the preprint server arXiv and has submitted them to the Open Journal of Astrophysics.
This galaxy isn't just some dim smudge, either—it's unexpectedly luminous, echoing a growing theme in JWST's discoveries. MoM-z14 now joins a strange new class of young galaxies that shine far more brightly than anyone expected. JADES-GS-z14-0, discovered in a separate deep field survey, similarly stunned astronomers with its size and brilliance, spanning 1,600 light-years and harboring hundreds of millions of solar masses in stars.
Like JADES-GS-z14-0, MoM-z14 doesn't appear to be powered by a supermassive black hole, but rather by dense populations of young, luminous stars. The brightness of these objects challenges existing models of how quickly the universe could form stars and galaxies after the Big Bang.
JWST's piercing infrared gaze exceeds the abilities of the Hubble and Spitzer telescopes to peer so far back in time. The leap in capability is making it possible for Webb scientists not just to detect early galaxies, but to discern their structure and composition in surprising detail.
For example, EGS23205—a barred spiral galaxy seen by both Hubble and JWST—appeared faint and featureless in the telescope's earlier images. But JWST revealed a clear stellar bar at its center, upending assumptions that spiral galaxies—and their intricate structures—took billions of years to evolve.
Gravitational lensing is also helping JWST peer even deeper. In the case of the ancient galaxies found near the Abell 2744 cluster (nicknamed 'Pandora's Cluster'), light from early galaxies—some just 350 million years post-Big Bang—is bent and magnified by intervening mass, allowing astronomers to glimpse primordial cosmic objects that would otherwise be invisible. These faint light sources, magnified by the cluster's immense gravity, offer an intimate view of the early universe and have become essential to deep-field astronomy.
MoM-z14's chemical signature adds another wrinkle to the universe's story: it's rich in nitrogen relative to carbon—a trait shared by ancient globular clusters around the Milky Way that may have once hosted supermassive stars, according to the research. That resemblance hints at a continuity in star-forming environments stretching across more than 13 billion years.
It may also reflect a broader trend—the paper notes a split among early galaxies between compact, nitrogen-rich sources like MoM-z14, and more disparate, nitrogen-poor ones. The former may define a new class of Little Red Dots, as Universe Today reports, blazing with clues about the universe's first bursts of star formation.
While future observatories like the Roman Space Telescope may reveal even more of these early cosmic oddities, JWST has already rewritten the timeline of galaxy formation. Based on its current pace, the telescope will almost certainly break its own record again soon.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
A radio signal from the beginning of the universe could reveal how everything began
A radio signal from the early universe could allow us to understand how everything that surrounds us began. The signal – known as the 21-centimetre signal – could finally let us understand how the first stars and galaxies switched on, and brought the universe from darkness to light. 'This is a unique opportunity to learn how the universe's first light emerged from the darkness,' said co-author Anastasia Fialkov from Cambridge University, in a statement. 'The transition from a cold, dark universe to one filled with stars is a story we're only beginning to understand.' The signal comes to us from more than 13 billion years ago, just a hundred million years after the Big Bang. The faint glow is created by hydrogen atoms that fill up the space between regions of space where stars are being formed. Scientists now believe they will be able to use the nature of that signal to better understand the early universe. They will do that with a radio antenna called REACH – the Radio Experiment for the Analysis of Cosmic Hydrogen – which will try and capture radio signals to reveal data about the beginnings of the universe. To better understand how that project might work, researchers created a model that predicted how REACH as well as another project called the Square Kilometre Array will be able to provide information about the masses and other details of the first stars. 'We are the first group to consistently model the dependence of the 21-centimetre signal of the masses of the first stars, including the impact of ultraviolet starlight and X-ray emissions from X-ray binaries produced when the first stars die,' said Professor Fialkov. 'These insights are derived from simulations that integrate the primordial conditions of the universe, such as the hydrogen-helium composition produced by the Big Bang.' 'The predictions we are reporting have huge implications for our understanding of the nature of the very first stars in the Universe,' said co-author Eloy de Lera Acedo, Principal Investigator of the REACH telescope. 'We show evidence that our radio telescopes can tell us details about the mass of those first stars and how these early lights may have been very different from today's stars. 'Radio telescopes like REACH are promising to unlock the mysteries of the infant Universe, and these predictions are essential to guide the radio observations we are doing from the Karoo, in South Africa.' The work is described in a new paper, 'Determination of the mass distribution of the first stars from the 21-cm signal', published in the journal Nature Astronomy.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
If Your Baby Seems Kinda Dumb at Seven Months, Scientists Have Terrible News About What'll Happen When It Grows Into an Adult
Next time you see your baby trying to play or talk, pay close attention — because it may give you a strong clue about how intelligent the kiddo will turn out as an adult, according to a new paper in the journal PNAS. A team of scientists led by the University of Colorado Boulder have found that cognitive tests on babies as young as seven months can anticipate their future performance as 30-year-old adults on intelligence tests. "We certainly do not want to imply that cognition is somehow fixed by seven months old," said first author Daniel Gustavson, an assistant research professor at the university's Institute for Behavioral Genetics, in a statement. "But the idea that a very simple test in infancy can help predict the results of a very complicated cognitive test taken 30 years later is exciting." But all isn't lost if your baby seems slow on the uptake right now: the scientists also determined that environmental factors have an impact on childhood development. The researchers examined data from the Colorado Longitudinal Twin Study, which was started in 1985 and involved more than 1,000 twins who were followed since they were babies in order to study the impact of genes and environment. Previous research has already found that general cognitive ability doesn't shift much after a kid is eight years old or so, but this team wanted to investigate if this was also true starting from when children are very young. The researchers looked at several metrics to assess cognitive ability in babies, such as the focus and vocalization found in baby babbles. From these yardsticks, they determined that two metrics — object novelty and task orientation — strongly predicted the cognitive abilities of the tykes once they hit adulthood. They also compared identical and fraternal twins, from which they determined that 22 percent of the variance in adult cognitive ability was connected with genetic influences present in children three years of age or younger. However, they also found out that environmental influences when a child was one or two years old could explain 10 percent of variability in adult cognitive tests. Perhaps this finding will dispel the notion that genes have a total monopoly on intelligence, especially in light of right wing activists recently glomming onto race science and IQ. After all, the human brain is complex; if you feel dumb, maybe you just haven't found the right type of task yet. More on babies: The World Birth Rate Is Now Dropping Precipitously


Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Senate Can Keep Ban on State AI Rules in Trump Tax Bill
A Republican effort to block US states from enforcing new artificial intelligence regulations will remain in President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending package for now, marking a win for tech companies pushing to stall and override dozens of AI safety laws across the country. In a surprise decision, Democrats said the Senate parliamentarian ruled the provision aligns with the special budgetary process Republicans are using to consider the tax package. That process allows the GOP to avoid making concessions to Democrats, who otherwise could filibuster legislation.