Indian reserve tigress kills forest ranger in second attack on humans in as many months
A tigress killed a forest ranger inside a national reserve in the Indian state of Rajasthan on Sunday, authorities confirmed.
He was the second human victim of the tigress named Kankati. A seven-year-old child was killed by the same predator in Ranthambore Tiger Reserve in Sawai Madhopur last month.
The ranger, Devendra Chaudhary, 40, was killed Sunday afternoon after the animal grabbed him by the neck and dragged him into the forest, according to eyewitnesses.
Chaudhary was taken to a local hospital but declared dead on arrival, a forest official told The Times of India. Chaudhary is survived by his wife and one-and-a-half-year-old son.
'Tourism has been suspended in parts of the reserve where the tigress was last seen,' Ranthambhore's field director, KR Anoop, told The Independent.
He said the state's forest department formed a committee on Tuesday to decide whether to relocate Kankati.
They had also halted pilgrimage to the Trinetra Ganesh temple inside the reserve until further notice, he said.
Forest officials said there had been increased sightings of tigers along the pilgrim route to the temple and at an old fort inside the reserve.
Kankati fatally attacked a seven-year-old boy walking back from the temple with his grandmother on April 16. The tiger reportedly emerged from the forest and dragged the child away.
Kankati is the daughter of an ageing tigress named Arrowhead. Kankati is a Hindi word that roughly translates to someone with a torn ear. Kankati is identifiable to rangers and safari guides by her torn ear.
Mr Anoop told The Independent the forest department had resorted to using firecrackers to deter tigers from crowded areas inside the reserve for now.
He said the department started 'bursting crackers to keep tigers away after the last incident of last month' in which the seven-year-old was killed.
Reserve workers started feeding Kankati's mother in 2023 after a hip injury left her unable to hunt, The Indian Express reported.
Her cubs – Kankati and two other tigresses – too started feeding on the bait and came to roam crowded areas near Jogi Mahal, an iconic hunting lodge used by erstwhile rulers of the region.
There are 13-14 tigers currently active in the vicinity of the temple, the fort and Jogi Mahal.
The newspaper reported that officials dismissed calls to shift Kankati after last month's fatality and instead opted to use firecrackers to deter tigers.
Like the Trinetra Ganesh temple in Ranthambore, there are religious sites inside several other tiger reserves in India where pilgrims routinely make offerings.
The National Tiger Conservation Authority has mandated that every reserve develop plans to manage religious tourism, but a 2019 study found that efforts to implement conservation measures had been hampered by the challenge of balancing ecological protection with community visitation rights.
One example is Kerala's Periyar Tiger Reserve, where the Sabarimala temple, a renowned Hindu shrine, draws five to six million pilgrims each year. Activists say it causes disturbance to the wildlife and significant environmental damage to the reserve's fragile forest ecosystem.
Kankati is not the first maneater in Ranthambore. A tiger named Ustad was linked to the deaths of four people in the reserve between 2010 and 2015. The animal killed a local villager in July 2010 and another in March 2012. In October 2012, it reportedly killed a forest guard and in May 2015 fatally mauled Rampal Saini, a veteran forest ranger, near the Trinetra Ganesh temple.
The May 2015 attack sparked outrage among local villagers who demanded that Ustad be relocated. The maneater was removed to the Sajjangarh Biological Park in Udaipur in 2016.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
10 hours ago
- The Sun
Shock moment passenger threatens to CRASH Air India plane mid-flight in furious row just days after Ahmedabad disaster
THIS is the shocking moment a woman allegedly threatened to crash a plane in India during a row with cabin staff. The incident comes just days after the tragic Ahmedabad disaster, in which at least 270 people sadly died. 5 5 5 In a now viral clip, a woman can be seen yelling at passengers and crew on board the flight. The row is reported to have taken place on an Air India Express flight from Bengaluru to Surat. A woman, identified as Dr Vyas Hiral Mohanbhai, 36, was taken off the flight and detained by police following the incident on Tuesday, the Indian Express has reported. She reportedly left her bag in the front row of the plane before making her way to her seat 20 F. The plane had been due to take off at around 2.30 pm. But when cabin crew objected to where she had placed her bag and asked her to stow it in her overhead locker, she refused, according to NDTV. She is said to have instead insisted that cabin crew move her bag to her seat for her. But despite requests from the crew and an intervention from the captain, she still declined to comply - leading to the chaotic row. She also shouted at passengers who attempted to reason with her. The situation then escalated further when she allegedly yelled threats about crashing the plane, local media has reported. New video of doomed Air India flight 'shows Boeing 787 did lose power' just before crash This prompted the crew to alert security, who removed her from the flight. She was subsequently booked by Bengaluru International Airport Limited police. A dramatic video of the alleged incident has circulated online, which shows a woman shouting at crew and fellow passengers - despite their best efforts to pacify her. The cabin crew can be seen trying in vain to calm her down, while some passengers also attempt to intervene. At one point, the woman can even be seen appearing to strike another passenger. It took place on a flight operated by Air India Express, which is a subsidiary of Air India. The incident comes days after the horrifying crash of Air India flight 171 in Ahmedabad last week. All passengers and crew - except for one miracle survivor - died in the crash, which killed at least 270 people. The Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner had been en route to London Gatwick, but crashed less than a minute after take-off. India's Ministry of Civil Aviation said the tragic incident remains under investigation and that more information will be provided in due course. 5
Daily Mail
11 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Amazon issues warning to Prime users over cyber scams
Amazon is alerting its 200 million Prime members to a sharp rise in cyber scams just weeks before its biggest-ever Prime Day event, set to begin July 8. The online retail giant says fraudsters are ramping up efforts to steal customer accounts and payment details. Amazon found that impersonation scams spiked by 80 percent during Prime Day in 2024, and similar schemes are already underway this year. The most common tactics involve fake emails and text messages designed to look like official Amazon communications, often containing malicious links or requests for personal information. Cybercriminals are seizing on the hype and urgency surrounding the four-day sales event to lure unsuspecting shoppers. With global sales expected to break records, shoppers are urged to be cautious, avoid clicking suspicious links, and report any suspicious messages to Amazon. 'Independent sellers sold more than 200 million items during Prime Day,' Amazon said in a statement. 'Prime members in the US chose to consolidate their deliveries on millions of orders, saving an estimated 10 million trips.' This year's Prime Day event will run in 26 countries, including the US, UK, India, and Canada. Ireland and Colombia are joining the list for the first time. To counter these attacks, Amazon said it removed more than 55,000 phishing websites and 12,000 fraudulent phone numbers last year. Scammers rely on urgency and fear, often warning users their account will be locked or charged unless they act immediately. Victims are frequently asked to verify account details or resolve fake issues by providing gift card numbers, passwords, or one-time passcodes, methods Amazon states it never uses. In November, the company found that 94 percent of global impersonation scams came through email, text messages, or phone calls. Two-thirds of those scams focused on fake account issues. To verify if a text message is truly from Amazon, go to the Message Center under 'Your Account.' Only legitimate communications from Amazon will appear there. Moreover, before clicking on email attachments, review the sender's address. Legitimate Amazon emails will come from an '@ address. Check the 'From' name in your email to see the full sender address and check for misspellings or suspicious characters. In March, the company tweeted on X that impersonation scams on social media have jumped 33 percent since December 2024. 'Scammers monitor customer complaints on comments, then respond using fake accounts,' Amazon said. The company emphasizes it never asks customers to click external links or move conversations to private messages. While earlier fraud attempts focused on account access, by May 2025, payment fraud had become the most reported scam, accounting for 38 percent of cases. Amazon reminds users: 'We will never call or email you requesting sensitive information like passwords.' The company has issued clear safety steps: Always access your account through the official app or website, never respond to suspicious messages, and report scam attempts through Amazon's help center or self-reporting tool. Additionally, Amazon encourages customers to enable two-factor authentication, avoid reusing passwords across websites, and turn on app notifications to confirm legitimate account activity. 'Count to ten before you act,' Amazon advises, stressing that any message pushing urgent action is a red flag. In March, Amazon also warned about 'Membership Renewal Scams,' messages prompting users to renew services by entering payment details on fake websites. To avoid delivery scams, Amazon recommends buying directly from the company instead of third-party sellers whenever possible. Items shipped and sold by Amazon are more likely to qualify for fast Prime shipping, arrive as advertised, and offer easier returns. Some customers report receiving refunds for defective items without needing to return them, due to Amazon's streamlined internal process.
Telegraph
11 hours ago
- Telegraph
Cycling charity misled public with ‘save the dormouse' campaign
Britain's biggest cycling charity misled the public by running an inaccurate fundraising campaign which claimed donations would save endangered wildlife, a regulator has found. Sustrans, which manages the vast National Cycle Network (NCN), launched a series of hugely successful Facebook adverts in 2022 pleading for money to help protect rare birds, bats, dormice and hedgehogs. The following year, the Fundraising Regulator received two complaints that the charity, which has received more than £100 million of taxpayers' cash to promote cycling and low traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs), was wrongly 'portraying' itself as a 'wildlife charity'. The watchdog launched an investigation and was sent examples of social media adverts in which Sustrans asked potential donors: 'Will you help save the dormouse?' Other adverts asked people to give money to tackle the 'environmental emergency' by preventing animals' homes from being 'razed to the ground' and paying for a nest box for a 'beautiful barn owl'. The Facebook adverts featured 'cute, fluffy' creatures, including a toad crossing a road, a Willow Tit and a young hedgehog snaffling for food. Now the regulator has ruled that Sustrans, twice breached the code of fundraising practice by giving the impression it was 'solely focused on wildlife protection activities'. The nature enthusiast who lodged the official complaint said Sustrans had to be 'dragged kicking and screaming' to the charity regulator before it eventually 'stopped misleading the public' and withdrew the adverts. The regulator's full ruling, seen by The Telegraph, will prove hugely embarrassing for the cycling charity, which after the pandemic benefited massively from controversial 'active travel' projects. 'The complainant is concerned that potential donors would not be aware their donations could fund work that has a potentially negative impact on wildlife,' the ruling says. 'We find that Sustrans positioning itself within this fundraising campaign as solely focused on wildlife protection activities on the NCN is likely to mislead potential donors.' It concludes that the 'fundraising campaign' was 'inaccurate' because 'a potential donor... could assume their donation will be used for wildlife protection' but could fund a 'different purpose'. Sustrans' 'wildlife protection work is predominantly a direct result of... increasing active travel and by expanding and developing the NCN', the ruling said. It added some sample ads were 'not clear about the charity's broad strategic aim', leaving some likely to 'conclude the charity's activities are mostly the promotion and protection of wildlife.' The complainant initially used the charity's internal complaints procedure, prompting Sustrans to pause and review the campaign, before making the adverts 'clearer'. But, the complainant, who is not named by the regulator and has maintained his right to anonymity, then contacted the regulator. The regulator found the charity 'acknowledges' its work expanding cycle networks 'could negatively impact protected wildlife species' and has a 'statutory obligation towards ecology work and biodiversity in relation to its charitable aim of expanding and improving the NCN' by installing bird, bat and dormouse boxes and managing hedgerows. Sustrans was found not to have breached the code that requires it to prove any 'direct or indirect claim' in its campaign. The dossier at the centre of the Fundraising Regulator's investigation, seen by the Telegraph, shows Sustrans' £140,000 a year chief executive, Xavier Brice, twice rejected the complainant's concerns saying: 'I have full confidence that our fundraising adverts are not misleading to the public in portraying us as a wildlife charity, only that we do spend time and money to support ecology and wildlife on the NCN.' The complainant said he was 'shocked' by the response after he raised concerns about 92 Facebook ads which he claimed attracted 'three million hits'. He said: 'It's brazenly unethical as they confirmed to me a lot of ecological work they do is to mitigate the negative effects of implementing cycling infrastructure. 'Sustrans' website only showed they sowed seeds and put up boxes for birds, bats and dormice. That's like a primary school eco-project. 'Sustrans had to be dragged kicking and screaming to stop misleading the public after two years. 'I believe it's unprecedented for the regulator to censure a charity this large which is mostly funded by the taxpayer.' The campaign was so successful that in its 2022/23 accounts, Sustrans boasted that tests of 'new digital engagement' fundraising campaigns found 'the best performing adverts' included 'cash gifts to support ecology work on the National Cycle Network'. A Sustrans spokesman said: 'All the work mentioned in our fundraising campaign appropriately reflects the work our in-house team of ecology experts and volunteers have done to improve biodiversity on the National Cycle Network. The regulator agreed we were able to show evidence that we had completed this work. 'Our ecology campaign was an unrestricted appeal, helping us to raise donations for our charitable objectives and we had a statement to that effect on every landing page. We accept the regulator's recommendation that we should have included more about our core mission, to make it easier for people to walk, wheel and cycle, throughout the adverts to ensure it was clear to potential supporters that our mission is not solely ecology on the National Cycle Network. 'The last thing we would want to do is mislead our supporters, who are vital to our mission. We have been grateful to collaborate closely with the regulator and we are implementing their recommendations.'
