Here's how Iran could retaliate after US strikes on its nuclear program - Region
Iran has spent decades building multi-tiered military capabilities at home and across the region that were at least partly aimed at deterring the United States from attacking it. By entering Israel's war, the U.S. may have removed the last rationale for holding them in reserve.
That could mean a wave of attacks on U.S. forces in the Middle East, an attempt to close a key bottleneck for global oil supplies or a dash to develop a nuclear weapon with what remains of Iran's disputed program after American strikes on three key sites.
A decision to retaliate against the U.S. and its regional allies would give Iran a far larger target bank and one that is much closer than Israel, allowing it to potentially use its missiles and drones to greater effect. The U.S. and Israel have far superior capabilities, but those haven't always proven decisive in America's recent history of military interventions in the region.
Ever since Israel started the war with a suprise bombardment of Iran's military and nuclear sites on June 13, Iranian officials from the supreme leader on down have warned the U.S. to stay out, saying it would have dire consequences for the entire region.
It should soon be clear whether those were empty threats or a grim forecast.
Here's a look at what Iran's next move might be.
Targeting the Strait of Hormuz
The Strait of Hormuz is the narrow mouth of the Persian Gulf, through which some 20% of all oil traded globally passes, and at its narrowest point it is just 33 kilometers (21 miles) wide. Any disruption there could send oil prices soaring worldwide and hit American pocketbooks.
Iran boasts a fleet of fast-attack boats and thousands of naval mines that could potentially make the strait impassable, at least for a time. It could also fire missiles from its long Persian Gulf shore, as its allies, Yemen's Houthi rebels, have done in the Red Sea.
The U.S., with its 5th Fleet stationed in nearby Bahrain, has long pledged to uphold freedom of navigation in the strait and would respond with far superior forces. But even a relatively brief firefight could paralyze shipping traffic and spook investors, causing oil prices to spike and generating international pressure for a ceasefire.
Attacking US bases and allies in the region
The U.S. has tens of thousands of troops stationed in the region, including at permanent bases in Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, Arab Gulf countries just across the Persian Gulf from Iran — and much closer than Israel.
Those bases boast the same kinds of sophisticated air defenses as Israel, but would have much less warning time before waves of missiles or swarms of armed drones. And even Israel, which is several hundred kilometers (miles) further away, has been unable to stop all of the incoming fire.
Iran could also choose to attack key oil and gas facilities in those countries with the goal of exacting a higher price for U.S. involvement in the war. A drone attack on two major oil sites in Saudi Arabia in 2019 — claimed by the Houthis but widely blamed on Iran — briefly cut the kingdom's oil production in half.
Activating regional allies
The so-called Axis of Resistance — a network of armed groups across the Middle East, still has some formidable capabilities.
Israel's 20-month war in Gaza has severely diminished the Palestinian Hamas and Islamic Jihad groups, and Israel mauled Lebanon's Hezbollah last fall, killing most of its top leadership and devastating much of southern Lebanon, making its involvement unlikely.
But Iran could still call on the Houthis, who had threatened to resume their attacks in the Red Sea if the U.S. entered the war, and allied militias in Iraq. Both have drone and missile capabilities that would allow them to target the United States and its allies.
Iran could also seek to respond through militant attacks further afield, as it is widely accused of doing in the 1990s with an attack on a Jewish community center in Argentina that was blamed on Iran and Hezbollah.
A sprint toward nuclear arms
It could be days or weeks before the full impact of the U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites is known.
But experts have long warned that even joint U.S. and Israeli strikes would only delay Iran's ability to develop a weapon, not eliminate it. That's because Iran has dispersed its program across the country to several sites, including hardened, underground facilities.
Iran would likely struggle to repair or reconstitute its nuclear program while Israeli and U.S. warplanes are circling overhead. But it could still decide to fully end its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency and abandon the the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.
North Korea announced its withdrawal from the treaty in 2003 and tested a nuclear weapon three years later, but it had the freedom to develop its program without punishing airstrikes.
Iran insists its program is peaceful, though it is the only non-nuclear-armed state to enrich uranium up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. U.S. intelligence agencies and the IAEA assess Iran hasn't had an organized military nuclear program since 2003.
Israel is widely believed to be the only nuclear-armed state in the Middle East but does not acknowledge having such weapons.
Follow us on:
Facebook
Instagram
Whatsapp
Short link:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Egypt Independent
34 minutes ago
- Egypt Independent
Jordanian official explains why there was no radioactive contamination after US attack on Iran
The Commissioner of Nuclear Sciences and Applications at the Jordanian Atomic Energy Commission, Firas Afana, noted the absence of nuclear materials at facilities targeted by the US in Iran. He said that Iranian authorities may have previously removed sensitive materials, reinforcing the belief that no radiation leak occurred. 'This also explains Iran's statements denying any significant damage,' he added. During a telephone interview with al-Qahera News Channel, he noted that Gulf Cooperation Council confirmed that it had not detected any radioactive contamination in its countries. He added that the Gulf states possess advanced monitoring stations operating around the clock, and the absence of any indicators is further reassuring. Afana stressed the importance of conducting periodic inspections of targeted nuclear sites to ensure that there is no risk to the environment or the local population, adding that 'The final assessment must be conducted by joint inspection committees, in accordance with international standards for nuclear emergencies.' 'The current indicators are reassuring, and we hope that matters continue without escalation or environmental damage. The priority now is the safety of people and the stability of the region,' he concluded.
Egypt Independent
34 minutes ago
- Egypt Independent
US asks China to inform Iran not to close the Strait of Hormuz
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged China on Sunday to encourage Iran not to close the Strait of Hormuz, following Washington's strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Reuters reported. Rubio's comments came after the Iranian parliament approved the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which about 20 percent of global oil and gas flows. 'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to approach them (Iran) about this, because they rely heavily on the Strait of Hormuz for their oil,' said the US Secretary of State, who also serves as National Security Advisor. 'If they do that, it would be another grave mistake. It would be economic suicide for them. We still have options to deal with this situation, but other countries should consider it as well. It would hurt other countries' economies far more than ours,' the US Secretary of State said, adding that that 'closing the strait would be a massive escalation that would merit a response from the US and other countries.' A vital waterway The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world's most important waterways. The US Energy Information Administration describes it as 'the world's most important oil transit route.' Located between the Sultanate of Oman and Iran, it connects the Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. It is the primary export route for oil producers such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, and Kuwait. Large amounts of crude oil extracted from the oil fields for states belonging to the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries – such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and Iraq – pass through the Strait of Hormuz to meet global demand.
Al-Ahram Weekly
an hour ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Arab and regional powers voice concern over US strikes on Iran, call for restraint and diplomacy - Region
Arab states have expressed deep concern over the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, urging all parties to exercise restraint, avoid further escalation, and work toward a diplomatic resolution to end the conflict. Arab states and regional powers have voiced deep concern over US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, urging all parties to exercise restraint, avoid further escalation, and pursue a diplomatic resolution to the crisis. Here is a roundup of key regional reactions: Turkey: 'Catastrophic consequences' Turkey warned the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities risked escalating the Iran-Israel conflict to a global level that could have "catastrophic" consequences. "The ongoing developments could cause the regional conflict to escalate globally. We do not want this catastrophic scenario to come to life," the foreign ministry said. Turkey was "deeply concerned about the possible consequences." UAE: 'Avoid serious repercussions' The United Arab Emirates has told all sides to stop escalating the conflict, or there would be a risk of more instability. The Foreign Ministry said countries should 'avoid serious repercussions' in the region. It warned that such actions could lead the region to 'new levels of instability.' In a statement, the ministry said that a spread of the conflict into a wider global war must not be allowed, calling on all parties to act with responsibility and end attacks immediately. It repeated the sentiment from others that only negotiations could resolve the nuclear dispute between Tehran and Washington. Lebanon: 'Threat to regional security' Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun warned that the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites risk expanding regional instability and threatening security 'in more than one country.' He urged restraint and the launch of serious negotiations to restore stability and prevent further bloodshed. Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam agreed to coordinate efforts to shield Lebanon from fallout as Beirut heightened security amid fears of escalation. Egypt: 'Grave concern' Egypt expressed "deep concern" over the recent developments following US strikes on three nuclear facilities in Iran. The Arab nation warned of grave consequences for regional and international security. Cairo condemned the escalation, reaffirmed its rejection of sovereignty violations, and stressed that diplomacy — not military action — is the only path to stability. The foreign ministry called on all parties to show restraint, avoid bloodshed, and resume dialogue. Oman: 'Deep concern' Oman, which has been mediating nuclear talks between Washington and Tehran, strongly condemned the US strikes. The Gulf sultanate expressed its 'deep concern, denunciation, and condemnation of the escalation resulting from the direct air strikes launched by the United States on sites in the Islamic Republic of Iran,' according to the official Oman News Agency. Iraq: 'Grave threat' Iraq warned that the US attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities posed a grave threat to regional peace and security. 'Iraq expresses its deep concern and strong condemnation of the targeting of nuclear facilities in the Islamic Republic of Iran,' said government spokesperson Basim Alawadi. 'This military escalation constitutes a grave threat to peace and security in the Middle East and poses serious risks to regional stability.' Saudi Arabia: 'Great concern' Saudi Arabia expressed 'great concern' following US air strikes on nuclear facilities in neighbouring Iran. In a statement, the kingdom reaffirmed its earlier declaration of 13 June 2025, in which it condemned and strongly rejected the violation of Iran's sovereignty. Riyadh emphasized the urgent need for all parties to exercise maximum restraint, avoid escalation, and prioritize de-escalation efforts. The statement also urged the international community to intensify its efforts under these highly sensitive circumstances to reach a political solution that would end the crisis and open the door to a new era of security and stability in the region. Qatar: 'Catastrophic consequences' Qatar's foreign ministry warned of serious repercussions following the US strikes. 'The current dangerous escalation in the region may lead to catastrophic consequences at both the regional and international levels,' the ministry said in a statement. It called on all parties 'to exercise wisdom, restraint, and to avoid further escalation.' Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
