Tasmanian Labor consulting on 'right process' for Macquarie Point stadium approval

Tasmanian Labor says it is trying to understand what the "right approval process" is for the Macquarie Point stadium, suggesting it may walk back its support for the fast-track process currently in place.
The $945 million proposed waterfront stadium is being assessed by the Tasmanian Planning Commission as a Project of State Significance (POSS).
But the government and others involved in the project fear the project will be unable to meet the strict timelines set out by the AFL.
In June, knowing it had the support of Labor, the Liberal government introduced special legislation that would have allowed the project to bypass the planning system.
It was due to be debated later this month. Instead, following a no-confidence motion in Premier Jeremy Rockliff, Tasmania is facing its fourth election in seven years.
Now, Labor appears to be reconsidering its support for the legislation.
When asked at a press conference if Labor would be pursuing the enabling legislation, leader Dean Winter said the party was "consulting" with stakeholders about the right process.
"We need to make sure that we can get this thing built," said Mr Winter.
"We've looked at the legislation and also understood from Legislative councillors that there are some real challenges there, so we'll be making announcements around that following consultation."
The Legislative Council is ruled by independents and minor parties at a nine-to-six split, meaning even with both major parties on board, nothing is guaranteed.
Regardless of which process it goes through — legislation or POSS — the project has to be approved by both houses of parliament.
"We need to make sure whatever goes to the Legislative Council can actually get approval," Mr Winter said.
"That's going to require a lot of hard work and a parliamentary process that makes sense."
He would not be drawn on whether he thought the legislation would pass the upper house in its current form.
"We have to get it approved and finding the right approval process to maximise the chances of actually getting it built is the most important priority here," Mr Winter said.
Regardless of whether Labor wins government on July 19, its support is likely to be essential.
Greens candidate Helen Burnet said while she would like Labor to walk away from the stadium altogether, she hoped the party would at least drop its support for the legislation.
"They've been very unclear in the past. They've flip-flopped. It's really important with such a massive issue that they're making it very clear for Tasmanians before they vote.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

News.com.au

an hour ago

• News.com.au

‘Should not be punished': Queensland decries GST carve up

Cash-strapped state governments are looking west with envy as Western Australia pulls in its large slice of the GST carve up despite the healthiest books in the country. Resource-rich WA posted a $2.5bn operating surplus on Thursday – it's seventh budget surplus in a row. From Friday it is set to receive its share of the GST pool of 75 cents in the dollar, despite its strong revenue stream from its resources sector. State premiers and treasurers have been agitating for changes to the GST distribution, since the final figures were announced in March, and ahead of the funds formally being dished out on Friday. WA is still enjoying the windfalls of a 2018 GST deal struck under previous Coalition government by then-treasurer Scott Morrison and backed in by the Albanese government, where WA is guaranteed 75 cents of every dollar paid in GST. Without this benchmark, WA would have received as little as 18 cents back. The WA Premier and Treasurer credited their economic management for this week's operating surplus and healthy debt forecasts. Iron ore prices are hovering at $US95 while the state government has done its forecasting with an expectation of $US72 a tonne. But every state and territory except WA has been posting deficits since the 75 cent distribution reforms in 2018. The Queensland Treasurer feels short-changed, as strong coal royalties pad the state coffers. Victoria and NSW's slices of the GST pie are set to expand while Queensland's portion gets a trim. 'This money belongs to Queenslanders and we should not be punished because of our support for industries that underpin our national wealth,' state Treasurer David Janetzki said. The impending Queensland state budget, to be delivered on Tuesday, will show the effects of a dip in coal prices after an $8.8bn royalties windfall during the past four years. Despite the Sunshine State's royalty take coming down, Queensland's GST payout this year falls by $1.1bn to $16.5bn. In a speech to the National Press Club on Wednesday, federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers, who has historically opposed raising the GST rate, left the door slightly open to raising it from 10 per cent – the amount the excise has remained for the past 25 years. 'I've, for a decade or more, had a view about the GST,' he told The Conversation. 'I repeated that view at the Press Club because I thought that was the honest thing to do, but what I'm going to genuinely try and do, whether it's in this policy area or in other policy areas, is to not limit what people might bring to the table.' This year, Queensland is the only state or territory getting less than previous years, while every other jurisdiction is getting more. Victoria is set to become a net-recipient of the GST pool for the first time as well. 'It used to be the case that our friends in Victoria would help us shoulder the burden in supporting all the other states,' NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey said last month. 'Victoria is now a recipient state, to quite a large degree, $1.07 (per dollar taxed) is what they're getting. 'I'm going to continue to speak out, particularly about the fact that NSW is now carrying the federation when it comes to GST distribution.' The Northern Territory receives $5.15 for every dollar it contributes, far and away the largest return. Despite having the second largest population, Victoria receives the largest portion of the total pool, getting 27.5 per cent; with a $3.6bn year-on-year increase this time around.

SBS Australia

an hour ago

• SBS Australia

Australia's social media ban is approaching, but questions remain over whether it will work

April Willis says young people need a seat at the table for figuring out how to implement the teen social media ban. Source: SBS News / Ash Minchin Like many, April Willis has been using social media since her early teens. As she grew up on the platforms, she says she didn't immediately understand the impact it was having on her. She says that in hindsight, though, she can see that a lot of her "behaviours" and "the content and interactions" she had on social media platforms were "definitely not great" for her mental health. But the now 22-year-old ReachOut youth advocate says she doesn't think a ban would have stopped her. "I think the hard truth is that a lot of us are thinking, 'I would've found a way around it', as I'm sure many young people will." Whether she actually would have is one of the many questions experts are wondering six months out from the implementation of Australia's social media ban for those under the age of 16. And as of 11 December this year, social media companies will be required to take "reasonable steps" to prevent Australian children and teenagers under 16 from using their platforms. A government-commissioned trial into the potential technologies used to assess the ages of users presented their preliminary findings on Friday. Their key finding was that "age assurance can be done in Australia and can be private, robust and effective". "The preliminary findings indicate that there are no significant technological barriers preventing the deployment of effective age assurance systems in Australia," project director Tony Allen said in a statement. "These solutions are technically feasible, can be integrated flexibly into existing services, and can support the safety and rights of children online." With details about the accuracy of the technologies tested left for later release, experts are wary of the trial's initial claim. Daniel Angus is a professor of digital communication at the Queensland University of Technology and the director of its Digital Media Research Centre. "One of the key concerns that we have is how the industry often will inflate their accuracy and the utility of these approaches when we know that there are still significant issues when it comes to both gender and also racial biases, but also the general lack of efficacy of these approaches," he said. According to the Department of Communications, a government-commissioned report from the Social Research Centre found nearly nine in 10 adults were supportive of age assurance measures. Only two of those 10 had heard of at least one potential method to check a person's age online. 'This research shows Australians widely support our world-leading age restrictions on social media for under 16s and have strong expectations of platforms when it comes to data protection and security," Communications Minister Anika Wells said in a statement. Angus says the general public has not been adequately informed about the likely impacts of these technologies. "I think Australians are in for a very rude shock when this actually perhaps, gets implemented, and they all of a sudden are being forced to hand over [their] data to access services that they've freely been able to access up to this point," he said. "It's absolutely everything you would expect to find in the midst of a moral panic where people have been sucked along with this idea that, 'Yeah, this thing is really, really bad and we need to prevent it,' but have not stopped to think critically about this, and then not been properly informed about the fullness of that risk." John Pane, chair of digital rights organisation Electronic Frontiers Australia (EFA), is a member of the stakeholder advisory board for the trial. He says the EFA has "concerns about the rollout of this technology because it's not simply about restricting access to social media platforms for children 15 and under". "It requires all adults who participate in the online environment, who wish to access social media platforms to either have their age authenticated or establish their identity as a means of, or part of that age authentication. "So from our perspective, it's the Trojan horse for getting people to get used to providing more and more credentials online." Amid these concerns, some remain supportive of the ban, including Kirra Pendergast, another member of the stakeholder advisory board. "Initially, I was only against the ban purely because of the technical workarounds that are possible for some kids who are more technical than others," she said. "But after having lots of conversations with parents in particular, it became abundantly clear that the ban was making parents have a conversation that we've needed to have for a very, very long time." Pendergast is the founder of Safe on Social, an online safety advisory group for schools and businesses, and chief digital safety strategist at the global Ctrl+Shft Coalition. "I get contacted almost every single day by parents that are struggling with this," the cybersecurity expert said. "They don't know how to say no." Pendergast said parents and educators would have "a lot more time to get it right". "It's like all aspects of technical security, cybersecurity, and cyber safety. It's never ever going to be 100 per cent. This is never going to be the silver bullet. "It's a really, really good start because, again, it sparked all of the conversations that we needed to have at every level of society." Professor Tama Leaver, an internet studies academic at Curtin University and the chief investigator in the ARC Centre of Excellence for the Digital Child, says the ban responds to a "very real fear that parents have that social media is an unknown space". "If this is world-leading, we need to be quite clear on what the legislation is actually doing." He warned that the implementation of the policy may not address all the issues that have been discussed. "Some harms, for example, such as cyberbullying, were very much touted as one of the big problems to be solved," he said. "There is nothing in this legislation that addresses cyberbullying meaningfully at all. "This at best addresses algorithmic amplification … of young people's experiences of social media, but … we expect from what's been said already that most messaging apps are exempt from this legislation. "So, the spaces where we imagine cyberbullying is most likely to happen are not being touched by this legislation at all." Leaver was a signatory on an open letter from more than 140 academics and civil society organisations against the ban. "If the rest of the world is watching Australia and hoping that this might be a blueprint, we're going to have an awful lot of work to do in the next few months to actually have a blueprint to practically do this rather than simply aspire to giving parents some reassurance," he said.

ABC News

2 hours ago

• ABC News

Workforce shortages the key roadblock to state government's 'Made in WA' future

Economic experts have endorsed the WA government's future-focused budget, but warned a tight labour market could be its biggest roadblock. Thursday's state budget represented a shift in the government's focus, from transport projects and cost-of-living relief to infrastructure spending to kick-start diversification of the state's economy. About 40 per cent of government infrastructure investment over the next four years is earmarked for so-called enabling infrastructure, like electricity transmission and ports. "There's global economic turmoil," Treasurer Rita Saffioti said of the shift in focus. "We need to make sure we protect Western Australia and help Western Australia grow into the future. "We don't want WA to be collateral damage in global economic chaos." Raymond Da Silva Rosa studies what drives corporate investment at the University of Western Australia and backed the government's plans to try and increase productivity across the state. "We have a budget that's in surplus, we have an economy that's booming, we have a state government that has pretty much total control of the political agenda," he said. "So all the pieces are in place for the government to take some considerable risks that other governments can't afford to." One missing piece though, he said, is likely to be workforce — largely because the mining industry remaining successful leaves few workers for other industries. Chief economist for the Committee for the Economic Development of Australia, Cassanda Winzar, agreed. "There's a real argument to be had there for spreading some of the spend out and looking at what the biggest priorities are," she said. "So looking at some of that infrastructure around the energy transition, but also really looking at our housing situation. "If people can't get houses here there's not really going to be much investment and much desire for new industries to grow and develop here in WA." That backing from the private sector will be critical to making the government's vision a reality — because without businesses changing where and how they spend money, the shape of the economy won't change. Saffioti used an address to a business breakfast yesterday to encourage them to back the government's plans. "We're here, ready to work with industry, making sure we can deliver on our commitments," she said. Asked later in the day what would happen if businesses didn't change their spending, the treasurer said the combination of providing initial infrastructure and capital with long-term government purchase agreements was attractive to industry. "I think there's a lot of excitement, and just speaking to a few people today, I think that there's a real willingness," she said. Despite the broad support, Ms Winzar and Professor da Silva Rossa questioned the government's focus on manufacturing as a priority area, beyond a few niche industries. "We're a very high-cost state, labour-wise, in a high-cost country," Ms Winzar said. "Manufacturing across Australia is always going to be challenging. "It's particularly challenging in WA when we've got competing demands for labour from industries such as mining." Professor da Silva Rosa said there were strengths the government should try to leverage, which could be enhanced by boosting the quality of primary and secondary education. "The services sector is the one that dominates, so it's more about high-end services, like medical services, computers and the like, engineering services," he said. For its part, the opposition continues to argue payroll tax is an unnecessary roadblock to economic growth. Payroll tax is paid to the state government by all businesses whose wage bill exceeds $1 million each year, and is expected to bring in $6.2 billion next financial year. "WA businesses face a disincentive when they hire people," Shadow Treasurer Sandra Brewer said. "Our payroll tax, particularly for small businesses, are the highest in the country." She made the case alongside Jay Sidhu, who owns a land surveying business and said the tax had influenced his thinking as demand for his services grew. "Me and my business partners have to consider it before we even think of growing," he said. Ms Brewer said those costs were often passed directly on to customers. "So what we're saying is, the government could help housing affordability by looking at all of the taxes on business, and seeing where they can reform," she said. Asked at the business breakfast if a Labor government was ever likely to consider changes to payroll tax, Ms Saffioti said: "Every budget we consider everything." "But also it's about the approvals process," she said. "So we're working across the breadth of the economy to [see] what we can do in relation to supporting industry and business." Ms Winzar said that was another area which needed to be looked at closely to attract investment to the state. "What often happens in WA is we have really good small businesses and they're looking to expand, and they feel like they can't do it in WA because they don't have access to the right resources, to get the right labour," she said. "The tax and regulation settings don't encourage them to grow here, so they leave either for interstate or overseas. "We really want to encourage all those businesses to stay, to grow here, and other businesses to come setup here."