Pope's death, US aid cuts complicate Vatican's debt relief push
LONDON, May 1 (Reuters) - The death of Pope Francis and global aid cuts led by the United States could complicate the work of a group of experts assembled by the Vatican to bring debt relief and a fairer financing system to the world's poor.
Developing countries are already grappling with shrinking concessional financing and difficulty accessing bond markets due to the selloff triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump 's sweeping tariffs.
The challenges were highlighted when the Vatican-assembled group, known as the "Jubilee Commission", presented its draft plan for debt relief and affordable finance at the IMF and World Bank spring meetings last week in Washington.
Less than a year ago, liquidity concerns for the developing world were a priority at such meetings. But in D.C., concrete, high-level talks to increase the amount of development and finance cash for emerging economies took a backseat.
"For any finance minister, central bank governor of a developing country, it is a depressing takeaway from the meetings," said Reza Baqir, head of sovereign debt advisory at Alvarez & Marsal, and a former Pakistan central bank governor.
Notably, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told the gathering that the world's richest nation had not yet decided whether it would meet a $4 billion commitment to a lending arm for the world's poorest countries.
Experts say the shifts could sow the seeds for slow growth and the next cascade of debt defaults.
"More countries will be forced to choose between honouring their debt and ensuring their future," Paolo Gentiloni, co-chair of the U.N. Expert Group on Debt, said at a panel discussion on the sidelines of the meeting.
Investment bank JPMorgan, in a note summarising the meetings, said that "a new default wave cannot be ruled out by next year" if risks continue rising.
'HAND GRENADE'
The group drafting the Jubilee report has postponed its plans to present the initial proposals to the Vatican on May 16 due to Pope Francis's death and the conclave to select his successor scheduled to start on May 7.
Those involved said the work - which will include proposals to help defaulted countries restructure more quickly and to expand access to affordable lending - will continue. They are playing a long game, not focusing on quick wins, Commission Chair Joseph Stiglitz said.
"It is clear that we haven't solved the problem in any way," Nobel laureate Stiglitz told Reuters about the developing world's debt problems, adding that tariff wars amount to a "hand grenade" whose explosion would hit developing nations the most.
The Commission's work this year sharply contrasts with the last "Jubilee" year in 2000, which yielded billions in historic debt forgiveness to dozens of countries, enabling them to access lending to help their economies grow.
China also lent billions to developing economies in that time, leaving a more complex slate of creditors.
Now, emerging economies that had been limping out of a default wave sparked by external shocks such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the fallout from Russia's invasion of Ukraine are facing a global economic growth slowdown.
A spike in U.S. Treasury yields has shut many out of global bond markets, and made it expensive for the others.
The World Bank lists 59 countries worldwide as in or at risk of debt distress, and that does not include some that have run into issues more recently, including countries such as Senegal, Colombia and Indonesia.
David McNair, executive director of non-profit advocacy group ONE Campaign, said some of them were putting in place "very stringent austerity measures" to avoid default.
South African Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana told Reuters that the developing world's liquidity problems were high on the agenda for the G20 top economies, which South Africa is chairing, citing an increase in the number of countries requesting IMF balance of payments assistance.
But countries with cash - like the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and France - are cutting aid to boost defence spending. According to the OECD, official development assistance fell 7.1% in real terms last year, and is estimated to drop between 9% and 17% this year.
The ONE Campaign estimates it could shrink by 23% by 2027.
China's lending is also in flux, after the developing world's default wave and as Trump's tariffs threaten its economic recovery.
World Bank President Ajay Banga warned that if the U.S. withholds its pledged funds for the International Development Association (IDA), and Europe also cuts, the $100 billion funding round for the lending arm for the poorest countries could drop to $80-$85 billion.
Vera Songwe, chair of the Liquidity and Sustainability Facility who is working with the Jubilee Commission, said the environment for concessional finance and debt forgiveness was undeniably tougher.
But some work, such as getting global south development banks to step up funding and pressuring the IMF to include climate in debt sustainability calculations was progressing, though she added the progress was not fast enough and at scale.
S&P Global Ratings has warned countries are likely to default more frequently in the coming decade due to higher debt and rising borrowing costs. Rising costs to service debt could cut spending on education, infrastructure and health, which help economies grow.
"Sixty percent of growth is happening in the developing world, middle economies," Songwe said. "If there is slowing down, the world slows down with them."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
The future of Iran
Follow on Apple or Spotify. Listen on the Reuters app. For decades, Iran was able to project power across the Middle East using its network of proxies. That meant any strikes against it could threaten to trigger a formidable response. But Israel's recent attacks have exposed just how vulnerable Tehran is. In this special episode of Reuters World News, we look at how Iran went from monarchy to Islamic Republic - and what its future could look like. Sign up for the Reuters Econ World newsletter here. Listen to the Reuters Econ World podcast here. Visit the Thomson Reuters Privacy Statement for information on our privacy and data protection practices. You may also visit to opt out of targeted advertising. Further Reading Iran's divided opposition senses its moment but activists remain wary of protests, opens new tab Iran strikes Israeli hospital; Trump to decide on US role in conflict within 'two weeks', opens new tab Israeli scientists scramble to save work after Iranian missile hits labs, opens new tab
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Pakistan to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
ISLAMABAD, June 21 (Reuters) - Pakistan said on Saturday it would recommend U.S. President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, an accolade that he has said he craves, for his work in helping to resolve the recent conflict between India and Pakistan. Some analysts in Pakistan said the move might persuade Trump to think again about potentially joining Israel in striking Iran's nuclear facilities. Pakistan has condemned Israel's action as a violation of international law and a threat to regional stability. In May, a surprise announcement by Trump of a ceasefire brought an abrupt end to a four-day conflict between nuclear-armed foes India and Pakistan. Trump has since repeatedly said that he averted a nuclear war, saved millions of lives, and grumbled that he got no credit for it. Pakistan agrees that U.S. diplomatic intervention ended the fighting, but India says it was a bilateral agreement between the two militaries. "President Trump demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi, which de-escalated a rapidly deteriorating situation," Pakistan said. "This intervention stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker." Governments can nominate people for the Nobel Peace Prize. There was no immediate response from Washington. A spokesperson for the Indian government did not respond to a request for comment. Trump has repeatedly said that he's willing to mediate between India and Pakistan over the disputed Kashmir region, their main source of enmity. Islamabad, which has long called for international attention to Kashmir, is delighted. But his stance has upended U.S. policy in South Asia, which had favored India as a counterweight to China, and put in question previously close relations between Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. In a social media post, opens new tab on Friday, Trump gave a long list of conflicts he said he had resolved, including India and Pakistan and the Abraham accords in his first term between Israel and some Muslim-majority countries. He added: "I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do." Pakistan's move to nominate Trump came in the same week its army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, met the U.S. leader for lunch. It was the first time that a Pakistani military leader had been invited to the White House when a civilian government was in place in Islamabad. Trump's planned meeting with Modi at the G7 summit in Canada last week did not take place after the U.S. president left early, but the two later spoke by phone, in which Modi said "India does not and will never accept mediation" in its dispute with Pakistan, according to the Indian government. Mushahid Hussain, a former chair of the Senate Defence Committee in Pakistan's parliament, suggested nominating Trump for the peace prize was justified. "Trump is good for Pakistan," he said. "If this panders to Trump's ego, so be it. All the European leaders have been sucking up to him big time." But the move was not universally applauded in Pakistan, where Trump's support for Israel's war in Gaza has inflamed passions. "Israel's sugar daddy in Gaza and cheerleader of its attacks on Iran isn't a candidate for any prize," said Talat Hussain, a prominent Pakistani television political talk show host, in a post on X. 'And what if he starts to kiss Modi on both cheeks again after a few months?"
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Whitehall launches hunt for mole who leaked Hermer's Iran advice
The Government has launched an official hunt for the Whitehall mole who leaked Lord Hermer's legal advice on Iran. The Cabinet Office's Propriety and Ethics Team (PET) has been instructed to carry out an official leak inquiry after it was reported that the Attorney General did not believe the UK should join Israeli strikes on Iran. On Wednesday The Spectator said Lord Hermer had told Downing Street that he had ' concerns about the UK playing any role in this except for defending our allies'. The Telegraph understands the advice was given after Israel's first attack on Iranian nuclear facilities last Thursday, although it was not reported for another six days. Lord Hermer was concerned that the UK might breach international law if it joined Israel in striking Iran directly. The United Nations Charter says that countries can only launch an attack in self-defence, to defend an ally, or if the UN Security Council passes a resolution authorising military action. The leak has placed Lord Hermer in a difficult position because he is not allowed to discuss the content of his advice and Downing Street is keen to avoid any public discussion of its plans in the Middle East. The disclosure came as Donald Trump was considering sending an American 'bunker buster' bomb into Iran to destroy a nuclear fuel enrichment facility in northwestern Iran. In response, No 10 urged world leaders to keep 'cool heads' and said that it maintained a policy of 'de-escalation'. The UK has not participated in any offensive action against Iran, nor defended Israel, since the latest round of the conflict began. While it is commonplace for the Attorney General, the government's chief law officer, to give an opinion on defence policy as ministers draw up their response to a crisis, the advice must be kept a secret. The Ministerial Code, the official handbook for serving in government says that 'the fact that the Law Officers have advised or have not advised, and the content of their advice, must not be disclosed outside government without their authority'. The Cabinet Office's team will now attempt to find the leaker, who may be one of the officials or ministers who attended official meetings about the Middle East conflict on Thursday or Friday last week. Lord Hermer's legal advice has previously attracted criticism after sources said he was acting as a 'freeze on government' by trying to block various government policies on legal grounds. He has also been criticised for controversial clients he represented while working as a barrister, including the alleged terrorist Abu Zubaydah and Gerry Adams. The Labour peer is a former human rights lawyer and long-time friend of Sir Keir Starmer. His position on the Israel-Iran conflict has since been backed by Left-wing Labour MPs, including Dame Emily Thornberry, the former shadow attorney general and chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee. She said on Thursday that 'any of those justifications' for war in the UN Charter do not apply because the UK is 'not under threat ourselves,' an air strike would not be defensive and there is no Security Council resolution. Downing Street, the Cabinet Office and the Attorney General's Office declined to comment.
