Why defunding research on misinformation and disinformation isn't what Americans want

Research on misinformation and disinformation has become the latest casualty of the Trump administration's restructuring of federal research priorities.
Following President Donald Trump's executive order on ' ending federal censorship,' the National Science Foundation canceled hundreds of grants that supported research on misinformation and disinformation.
Misinformation refers to misleading narratives shared by people unaware that content is false. Disinformation is deliberately generated and shared misleading content, when the sharer knows the narrative is suspect.
The overwhelming majority of Americans —95%—believe misinformation's misleading narratives are a problem.
Americans also believe that consumers, the government and social media companies need to do something about it. Defunding research on misinformation and disinformation is, thus, the opposite of what Americans want. Without research, the ability to combat misleading narratives will be impaired.
The attack on misleading narrative research
Trump's executive order claims that the Biden administration used research on misleading narratives to limit social media companies' free speech.
The Supreme Court had already rejected this claim in a 2024 case.
Still, Trump and GOP politicians continue to demand disinformation researchers defend themselves, including in the March 2025 ' censorship industrial complex' hearings, which explored alleged government censorship under the Biden administration.
The U.S. State Department, additionally, is soliciting all communications between government offices and disinformation researchers for evidence of censorship.
Trump's executive order to 'restore free speech,' the hearings and the State Department decision all imply that those conducting misleading narrative research are enemies of the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech.
These actions have already led to significant problems— death threats and harassment included—for disinformation researchers, particularly women.
So let's tackle what research on misinformation and disinformation is and isn't.
Misleading content
Misinformation and disinformation researchers examine the sources of misleading content. They also study the spread of that content. And they investigate ways to reduce its harmful impacts.
For instance, as a social psychologist who studies disinformation and misinformation, I examine the nature of misleading content. I study and then share information about the manipulation tactics used by people who spread disinformation to influence others. My aim is to better inform the public about how to protect themselves from deception.
Sharing this information is free speech, not barring free speech.
Yet, some think this research leads to censorship when platforms choose to use the knowledge to label or remove suspect content or ban its primary spreaders. That's what U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan argued in launching investigations in 2023 into disinformation research.
It is important to note, however, that the constitutional definition of censorship establishes that only the government—not citizens or businesses—can be censors.
So private companies have the right to make their own decisions about the content they put on their platforms.
Trump's own platform, Truth Social, bans certain material such as 'sexual content and explicit language,' but also anything moderators deem as trying to ' trick, defraud, or mislead us and other users.' Yet, 75% of the conspiracy theories shared on the platform come from Trump's account.
Further, both Trump and Elon Musk, self-proclaimed free-speech advocates, have been accused of squelching content on their platforms that is critical of them.
Musk claimed the suppression of accounts on X was a result of the site's algorithm reducing 'the reach of a user if they're frequently blocked or muted by other, credible users.' Truth Social representatives claim accounts were banned due to 'bot mitigation' procedures, and authentic accounts may be reinstated if their classification as inauthentic was invalid.
Is it censorship?
The ' censorship industrial complex ' hearings held by the House Foreign Affairs South and Central Asia Subcommittee were based on the premise that not only was misleading narrative research part of the alleged 'censorship industrial complex,' but that it was focused on conservative voices.
But there isn't evidence to support this assertion.
When research does show that conservative authors have posts labeled or removed, or that their accounts are suspended at higher rates than liberal content, it also reveals that it is because conservative posts are significantly more likely to share misinformation than liberal posts.
This was found in a recent study of X users. Researchers tracked whose posts got tagged as false or misleading more in 'community notes'—X's alternative and Meta's proposed alternative to fact checking —and it was conservative posts, because they were more likely to include false content than liberal posts.
Furthermore, an April 2025 study shows conservatives are more susceptible to misleading content and more likely to be targeted by it than liberals.
Misleading America
Those accusing misleading narrative researchers of censorship misrepresent the nature and intent of the research and researchers. And they are using disinformation tactics to do so.
Here's how.
The misleading information about censorship and bias has been repeated so much through the media and from political leaders, as evident in Trump's executive order, that many Republicans believe it's true. This repetition produces what psychologists call the illusory truth effect, where as few as three repetitions convince the human mind something is true.
Researchers have also identified a tactic known as ' accusation in a mirror.' That's when someone falsely accuses one's perceived opponents of conducting, plotting or desiring to commit the same transgressions that one plans to commit or is already committing.
So censorship accusations from an administration that is removing books from libraries, erasing history from monuments and websites, and deleting data archives constitute 'accusations in a mirror.'
Other tactics include ' accusation by anecdote.' When strong evidence is in short supply, people who spread disinformation point repeatedly to individual stories (sometimes completely fabricated) that are exceptions to, and not representative of, the larger reality.
Facts on fact-checking
Similar anecdotal attacks are used to try to dismiss fact-checkers, whose conclusions can identify and discredit disinformation, leading to its tagging or removal from social media. This is done by highlighting an incident where fact-checkers 'got it wrong.'
These attacks on fact-checking come despite the fact that many of those most controversial decisions were made by platforms, not fact-checkers.
fact-checkers are rated the most effective.
When Republicans do report distrust of fact-checkers, it's because they perceive the fact-checkers are biased. Yet research shows little bias in choice of who is fact-checked, just that prominent and prolific speakers get checked more.
When shown fact-checking results of specific posts, even conservatives often agree the right decision was made.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Hill

31 minutes ago

• The Hill

FHFA chief takes aim at Fed

The Big Story The overseer of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is waging an online battle to force out Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, shattering norms along the way. © The Associated Press Over the span of 24 hours, Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director Bill Pulte has written or shared more than a dozen posts on social media calling for Powell's resignation and sharing the rationale for doing so. Along the way, he's throwing his politically independent agency into a partisan battle. 'I am calling for Federal Reserve Chairman, Jay Powell, to resign,' Pulte wrote in a Thursday post on social platform X, which he pinned to the top of his profile. In another post in response to The Hill's reporting, Pulte said he was doing so '[b]ecause he is hurting Americans and hurting the mortgage market, which I am responsible for regulating.' The campaign against Powell began shortly before the Fed announced Wednesday, as was widely expected, it would keep interest rates unchanged for another month. President Trump has raged against Powell and the Fed for not cutting interest rates by levels only seen during economic crises, even though the unemployment rate remains close to historic lows. I've got more here. Welcome to The Hill's Business & Economy newsletter, I'm Sylvan Lane — covering the intersection of Wall Street and Pennsylvania Avenue. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads Key business and economic news with implications this week and beyond: Sports betting company DraftKings launching PAC DraftKings, a sports betting company, said Wednesday it filed with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to create a corporate political action committee (PAC). US Steel, Nippon Steel finalize 'historic partnership' U.S. Steel said Wednesday it finalized its merger with Japan's largest steelmaker, Nippon. Trump signs order extending TikTok ban deadline President Trump signed an executive order Thursday extending the deadline for TikTok's parent company to divest the popular video sharing app by 90 days. The Ticker Upcoming news themes and events we're watching: In Other News Branch out with more stories from the day: Trump extends TikTok ban deadline for a third time, without clear legal basis WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order to keep TikTok running … Good to Know Business and economic news we've flagged from other outlets: What Others are Reading Top stories on The Hill right now: Michelle Obama on being 'glad' she didn't have a son: 'He would've been a Barack Obama' Michelle Obama says she's 'so glad' she never had a son — because he would've been a kiddie clone of her husband. Read more Senate GOP leader faces pushback after members blindsided by Trump bill Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) is facing strong pushback from members of the GOP conference over the Finance Committee's piece of President Trump's tax and spending bill, which largely ignores GOP senators' concerns about Medicaid cuts and the quick phaseout of clean-energy … Read more What People Think Opinions related to business and economic issues submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here

CBS News

32 minutes ago

• CBS News

Memphis mayor targeted in stalking and attempted kidnapping incident, police say

A man has been charged with stalking, attempted kidnapping and aggravated criminal trespass after allegedly scaling a wall and knocking on the door of Memphis Mayor Paul Young's residence in Tennessee, police say. The Memphis Police Department said Wednesday that it recovered "a taser, gloves, rope and duct tape" from the vehicle of 25-year-old Trenton Abston as he was arrested. The suspect allegedly approached the home on Sunday "with gloves on, a full pocket, and a nervous demeanor," Young wrote Wednesday on Facebook. Abston was listed as an inmate in the Shelby County Sheriff's Office database, which showed a hearing for him scheduled for Friday. It was not immediately clear if he has an attorney who could speak on his behalf. CBS News has reached out to the Shelby County Sheriff's Office. The incident comes on the heels of what officials called politically motivated shootings last week in which Minnesota state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband were killed in their home and state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife were wounded. The suspect, who has been taken into custody, impersonated police officers as he approached their homes and shot his victims, according to investigators. Young wrote on Facebook that political violence "simply cannot become our norm." "In today's climate, especially after the tragic events in Minnesota and the threats my wife and I often receive online, none of us can be too careful," Young said. "The link between angry online rhetoric and real-life violence is becoming undeniable." "What starts as reckless words online can all too quickly become something much more dangerous," the mayor continued. "The angry rhetoric, the hateful speech, and the heated threats create a culture where violence feels like a next step instead of a red line." Young was elected mayor in 2023 and was sworn in on Jan. 1, 2024. He was previously the director of Memphis' Division of Housing and Community Development. State and local officeholders reported increasing levels of threats in recent years, according to a January 2024 report from the Brennan Center, a nonpartisan law and policy institute. The threats range from insults to physical attacks, according to the report, with 18% of local officeholders experiencing threats. The same day of the Minnesota shootings, June 14, the Texas Department of Public Safety Capitol Region said it was notified of a threat made against Texas lawmakers. A suspect was taken into custody for further questioning and the investigation is ongoing, the agency wrote on X.

CBS News

35 minutes ago

• CBS News

Rev. Al Sharpton, filmmaker Spike Lee speak out on Juneteenth

Juneteenth commemorates the day enslaved people in Texas finally learned they were free. It happened more than two years after the emancipation proclamation. In Brooklyn Thursday, Rev. Al Sharpton and filmmaker Spike Lee marked the holiday by speaking out about racial injustice, immigration reforms, and the continued fight for freedom. The two Brooklyn natives reflected on Juneteenth's meaning at a breakfast in their home borough. "We learned from our history," Lee said. "Juneteenth started because Texas never informed those who were enslaved that they were free," Sharpton said. Although the emancipation proclamation took effect in 1863, slavery continued in Texas for more than two years until Union troops arrived in Galveston on June 19, 1865 with a document called General Order No. 3, which declared "all slaves are free." Sharpton and Lee say the fight for freedom now means showing up at the ballot box, including for next Tuesday's mayoral primary. "People died for us to have the chance to vote," Lee said. "That's why it is important that people register and vote. Vote in the mayor's election, whoever you're voting for. Vote in every election. Because they're trying to erase Black history," Sharpton said. The pair protested the Trump administration's immigration policies, blasting the latest travel ban which restricts entry from 12 countries. "I think the travel ban, the fact that Haiti and several other countries, all Black and Brown countries, are on the travel ban, shows outright bigotry," Sharpton said. Local leaders say Juneteenth is a reminder that the fight for freedom isn't over "Racism is still alive and well in America," Brooklyn resident Darryl E. Jones said. It's to never forget what the struggle is about." "July 4th is independence from kings — but Juneteenth is independence for me and my people. That's when we were freed from the people of this country," Brooklyn resident Teegee Wilson said. Juneteenth is a day to reflect on the past and the future. "Onward and upward. Let's move forward," Lee said.