In Critique of Draft Rohith Vemula Bill, UN Experts Urge Stronger Safeguards for SC, ST Students

New Delhi: Two United Nations special rapporteurs have issued a detailed statement raising concerns and offering recommendations on the draft Rohith Vemula (Prevention of Exclusion or Injustice) (Right to Education and Dignity) Bill proposed by the Karnataka government and urged the government to consider them.
Ashwini K.P., special rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, and Nicolas Levrat, special rapporteur on minority issues, noted that while the Bill aims to combat caste-based discrimination in higher education, it lacks key human rights protections and clarity in legal definitions.
The draft legislation of the law, named after Rohith Vemula, seeks to criminalise discrimination against students from Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and religious minorities in educational institutions.
The special rapporteurs come under the purview of the 'special procedures' of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC); they are 'independent human rights experts' who are mandated by the UN to report and advise on 'human rights from a thematic or country-specific perspective'.
Under their special mandate from the UNHRC, they have highlighted 'several human rights considerations that should be considered during the ongoing development of the legislation'.
UN concerns on the draft Bill
The special rapporteurs stated that the draft Bill does not mention 'specific protection for Dalits and Adivasis against disproportionate discrimination in various areas' and urged the drafting committee to 'explicitly' include provisions for their protection.
Ashwini K.P., replying to an email questionnaire by The Wire, said: 'The current draft clubs OBCs, SC, ST and minority communities together. All of them face marginalisation, but it's crucial to understand and recognise the heterogeneous nature of their experiences. The persistent and systematic forms of discrimination that Dalit and Adivasi students face require explicit acknowledgement.'
They also claimed that there is a lack of definition for 'direct or indirect discrimination', which could result in the law failing to provide 'comprehensive protection' to those affected. It could also lead to misuse of the law and oppression of activities unrelated to the law, including those in the 'defence of human rights'.
The draft includes provisions to imprison a person convicted of discriminating against SC, ST, OBC and minority students for up to one year or impose a fine of Rs 10,000.
Heads of higher education institutions will also be held liable, and the institutions may lose government aid or grants in case of such convictions.
The punitive nature of the draft law was also criticised. They warned that it may 'undermine the promotion of understanding, tolerance and friendship among racial or ethnic groups'.
Focusing on addressing the social roots of caste-based discrimination, the rapporteurs recommended placing greater emphasis on effective 'preventive measures' such as orientation programmes and educational awareness campaigns.
To ensure effective implementation, they also recommended setting up a grievance redressal mechanism, ensuring 'protection for whistleblowers' and introducing 'accountability measures' for educational institutions that fail to comply.
The special rapporteurs also claimed that the Bill's drafting process has not been sufficiently deliberative and has not included the 'voices of those who may experience caste-based discrimination and harassment, including Dalit and Adivasi students, scholars and activists'.
They called upon the committee to introduce provisions that make the process more transparent, consultative and participatory.
Finally, the rapporteurs noted the need for diversity and proportional representation in the drafting committee itself and urged that there be 'proportionate caste, gender and geographical representation from the state of Karnataka in the committee'.
The political equation
The move to draft this law comes after leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, wrote a letter to the three Congress-led state governments in April urging them to enact the law that was promised in the party's 2024 Lok Sabha election manifesto.
Following this, Karnataka chief minister Siddaramaiah instructed his legal adviser to prepare a draft of the Bill.
'The Union government brushed the incident under the carpet although it was clear that Rohith Vemula was targeted because of his [Dalit] caste,' said minister Priyank Kharge confirming that he provided inputs for drafting the Bill.
However, Ashwini claimed that the Indian government 'has not approached the UNHRC or any other international bodies for recommendations'.
Meanwhile, the BJP's leader of opposition in the Karnataka legislative council, Chalavadi Narayanaswamy, agreed that caste-based discrimination should be banned but questioned whether such discrimination can be addressed solely through legislation.
This is not the first time that such a demand has been raised. In 2019, Radhika Vemula and Abeda Tadvi – the mothers of Rohith Vemula and Payal Tadvi – filed a petition in the Supreme Court demanding that the government enforce the 2012 University Grants Commission (UGC) regulations that aim to protect vulnerable students from discrimination in educational institutions.
The UGC guidelines also have a specific definition of 'discrimination' and various kinds of discriminatory behaviour, but in January 2025, after the case was heard only for the second time, the UGC released new draft regulations intended to replace the 2012 ones.
N. Sukumar, a professor at Delhi University, noted in an interview to Scroll that in the new draft, 'these terms are loosely defined'. When the various aspects of the problem are not properly defined, 'there is hardly any scope to address the issues of caste on the campus.'
Rohith Vemula and a legacy of institutional violence
Vemula, a PhD scholar belonging to Dalit community at the University of Hyderabad, was among five students suspended in September 2015 following a complaint filed by the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), the student wing of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the BJP's ideological fountainhead.
His monthly research fellowship of Rs 25,000 was also discontinued, reportedly due to his activities in the Ambedkar Students' Association.
The ABVP's complaint was forwarded by then-Union minister Bandaru Dattatreya to then-human resource development minister Smriti Irani, who subsequently asked the university to take appropriate action.
Following their suspension and removal from university housing, the students began a relay hunger strike and stayed in a temporary tent on campus.
On January 17, 2016, Vemula died by suicide, leaving behind a note in which he expressed a deep sense of disillusionment and described his birth as a 'fatal accident'.
His death was one amongst numerous such incidents in the past two decades where a Dalit student was allegedly pushed over the edge and died by suicide. Activists consider these to be 'institutional murders', since every part of the education institution – including the student body, the faculty and the administration – are said to work in tandem to make sure that caste hierarchies are upheld and no voices can be raised against it. This leaves the student completely cornered.
Some say that caste-based discrimination, humiliating abuse and alienation by peers have pushed students like Payal Tadvi, Darshan Solanki, Ayush Ashna and Varad Sanjay Nerkar over the edge. They were allegedly targeted for belonging to a certain caste and viewed as not fit to be in such institutions.
There are no avenues for redressal of complaints as well, since the administration too engages in suppressing their voices, activists say.
While a few of these cases received media attention, many others were recorded through an independent study by the Delhi-based Insight Foundation, led by educationist Anoop Kumar.
Path ahead
Ashwini claims that 'currently there is no specific legislation in India which addresses caste-based discrimination in higher education for Dalit and Adivasi students. While some mechanisms such as grievance redressal cells exist in colleges and universities, there is no exclusive framework to protect students from marginalised backgrounds in academic spaces.'
Therefore, although some critics believe that the draft Rohith Vemula (Prevention of Exclusion or Injustice) (Right to Education and Dignity) Bill is a politically motivated move by the Congress, Ashwini believes that 'the intention behind the Rohith Vemula Act is to fill this gap and ensure a safe space for students coming from marginalised backgrounds'.
Such a law becomes crucial in an education system where, according to her, 'student suicides among marginalised communities highlight the disproportionate discrimination faced by them'. She claims that there is a pattern of structural exclusion and systematic discrimination against Dalit and Adivasi students, and that this legislation is important to create a 'safer academic environment' for them.
But critics also raise questions of political motivation and appropriation of the long-fought struggles of activists like Radhika Vemula and Abeda Tadvi in creating an equitable and safe educational space by Rahul Gandhi and the Congress.
According to the UNHRC special rapporteurs, the draft law has the potential to make effective changes – but this can only be realised if such expert criticism and recommendations are taken into account and the drafting process becomes more publicly participatory.
Tamoghna Chakraborty is an intern at The Wire.
If you know someone – a friend or a family member – at risk of suicide, please reach out to them. The Suicide Prevention India Foundation maintains a list of telephone numbers they can call to speak in confidence. The TeleManas helpline, a government helpline, functions 24×7, its numbers are 1-800 891-4416 or 14416. You could also take them to the nearest hospital.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Hindustan Times

18 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

SC grants relief to man who filed complaint against YouTube influencer

New Delhi, The Supreme Court on Monday granted interim protection from coercive action till July 14 to the man who filed a complaint against social media influencer Sharmistha Panoli for allegedly making communal remarks in a video. SC grants relief to man who filed complaint against YouTube influencer A bench of Justices K V Viswanathan and N Kotiswar Singh passed the order while hearing a plea by Wazahat Khan, booked in FIRs across states, including West Bengal. The bench said Khan was already arrested by West Bengal Police and was in custody. His counsel said the FIRs and complaints against Khan were registered in several states for his old tweets, which were alleged to have hurt religious sentiments. After the bench agreed to hear his plea, his counsel sought no further coercive action against his client till the next date of hearing. "Having considered the prayer, we are inclined to grant the same," the bench said. As an interim measure, the top court said, till the next date of hearing on July 14, no coercive action should be taken against the petitioner pursuant to the FIRs or complaints referred to in the petition or the FIRs or complaints which may be lodged against him in connection with similar allegations. "There is a famous Tamil saying. It must be there in Telugu also. A wound inflicted by a fire may heal but not a wound inflicted by the tongue," the bench observed. Khan was arrested by Kolkata Police on June 9. He moved the apex court alleging that FIRs and complaints have been lodged against him in several states, including Assam, West Bengal, Maharashtra and Haryana, for certain old tweets made by him. The FIRs were in retaliation to a complaint filed by him against Panoli, who was arrested and later released on bail, he argued. "I have deleted all of them and apologised," his counsel said, submitting Khan was perhaps "reaping what he has sown". His counsel argued that the first FIR, according to the petitioner, was dated June 2. He referred to a number of previous judgements and orders of the apex court in which orders to consolidate the FIRs either in one state or multiple FIRs filed in a state to the state concerned were passed. The bench agreed to hear the plea and issued notice to the Centre and states of West Bengal, Assam, Maharashtra, Delhi and Haryana. The matter would be heard on July 14. Khan, arrested by the Kolkata Police in June earlier, was booked in the case for offences under the BNS, including for promoting enmity between different groups based on religion, race, and insults or attempts to insult religion. An FIR was registered against him at the Golf Green Police Station in south Kolkata for allegedly promoting hate speech and hurting religious sentiments through his social media posts. The other charges slapped against him included provoking breach of peace and statements conducing to public mischief. Panoli, a 22-year-old law student, was arrested by Kolkata Police from Gurugram in Haryana on May 30 after a video she uploaded on social media drew widespread outrage. She was booked by Garden Reach Police Station in Kolkata on May 15. The Calcutta High Court granted her interim bail on June 5. Khan, the prime complainant against Panoli, got a complaint registered against the influencer for offences, including malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings, leading the police to lodge a case against her. In the video, Panoli allegedly hurled abuses and made communal remarks while being critical of a section of Bollywood celebrities for their silence on Operation Sindoor. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

India Today

24 minutes ago

• India Today

Israeli intelligence superb; no one's better: Benjamin Netanyahu on terrorism

(NOTE: This article was originally published in the India Today issue dated January 29, 2018)Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's extensive visit to India gave a major boost to relations between the two countries. In an exclusive interview with India Today Group Editorial Director Raj Chengappa, he talks of the changing dynamic in Indo-Israeli ties. Excerpts:Raj Chengappa: Shalom, and welcome to Netanyahu: Thank you, namaste. This is a dream come true. Q. You met Prime Minister Narendra Modi as soon as you landed. He gave you a warm hug. You too had hugged him when he came to Tel Aviv. What is the special relationship you have?A. First of all, there is a special relationship between our countries, a special relationship between our people and a special relationship between leaders. I respect Prime Minister Modi as a great leader. I see in him a kindred spirit, because he is impatient to bring the future to his people and change the world. In many ways, I think our partnership can do a lot of things. I said to the [Indian] foreign minister that the partnership between Israel and India is a marriage made in heaven but consecrated on In Tel Aviv, you had said the sky is not the limit for the two countries. Some dark clouds have emerged, particularly after India voted against the US resolution to recognise Jerusalem [as the capital of Israel]. How has that impacted relations? Are you disappointed?A. Well, look, I don't think one vote affects the general trend. Yes, naturally, we are disappointed, but I think this visit is a testimony to the fact that our relationship is moving forward on so many fronts, not only in the political sense but in a technological sense, in security matters, tourism, and the level of the individual citizen. The fact that you can grow your crops better, that you can have better, cleaner water, better energy, cleaner air... these are things that make a difference in the lives of people. And I think our cooperation answers that. And ultimately, you'll see that reflected in all the UN votes.Q. What are the big things that you hope to achieve during this visit?A. Strengthening cooperation in various technological areas, especially agriculture, but also in all the other areas that are changing the world, in satellites and drones. Like drones for agriculture, can you imagine that? This is what Israel can do for the Indian farm-put a drone in the sky, pick data, photograph the field and then direct the water to the level of the individual plant. You can produce more crops for less-less water, less energy. This is life-changing. This is one area I intend to concentrate on, but there are many others. It is using technology to change not only the future but to change lives today to make people healthier, safer, better nourished, to live longer, better One area that India and Israel have great congruence in is counter-terrorism. You are bringing young Moshe Holtzberg, it is going to be an emotional moment for him when he lands in Mumbai. But his parents' killers still roam free, including Hafiz Saeed. How can Israel help India and the world book the culprits?A. In this and in many other cases of terrorism, the key is intelligence. You can't be everywhere all the time. The key is intelligence and Israel has, on the whole, superb intelligence. No one is better, I would say, than our intelligence services and we share with you our intelligence. We have stopped, over the last few years, some 30 major terrorist attacks. Not vis-a-vis India alone but dozens of countries. We shared intelligence with them. Ultimately, we'll catch up with the [26/11] killers, but the important thing is to prevent future attacks. Israel protects the lives of so many people. When you board a plane, you want to know it will not be blown up mid-air, that it will take off and land safely. When that happens, usually Israel has something to do with it, not on every flight but on many You and Prime Minister Modi had talked of strong measures. Would that include surgical strikes? Do you approve of what India did?A. Well, I'd let India make its own choices. But I think the doctrine of fighting terrorism is-one, have intelligence so you can prevent it; and second, take action against the killers, not against innocent people. It's something that's not always easy to do. These are the two principles-you fight terrorism by fighting terror.Q. And you approve, of course, of what India did in the surgical strikes.A. I am trying to be the foreign minister; I'm trying to be a diplomat. Because I hold two portfolios: I am prime minister and foreign minister at the same There is another area we are concerned about. Israel shares a very good rapport with China, and China has been blocking an Indian resolution with the UN to blacklist Jaish-e-Mohammad chief Masood Azhar. Will Israel use its good offices to persuade China to lift the blockade so that the resolution goes through?A. I think these things are not best discussed in such interviews, especially if you want to make progress.Q. Just before you came, India cancelled a major defence deal on the Spike anti-tank missile. Has that impacted the defence relationship?A. I hope that this visit will help resolve the issue. I think there is a reasonable chance we can reach an equitable resolution but we will have to wait till the end of this visit. Our defence relationship is quite significant and it encompasses many things. The key word is defence, we want to defend ourselves. We are not aggressive nations but we are very committed to making sure that no one can commit aggression against either one of us.Q. You have a large business delegation accompanying you, one of the largest we have seen from Israel. How can we move India and Israel's relations beyond diamonds and defence?advertisementA. By having a free trade agreement, I would say, or moving in that direction. Israel is changing so rapidly. We are creating industries out of thin air. You have a very well-known car industry here, with some exceptional people leading it. But imagine, we have created a car industry in just the last five years, with companies that have been sold to Google for 15 billion dollars. I don't know if you use Waze satellites and guidance direction systems in your cars, that's an Israeli company too. We have 500 start-ups that just deal with automotive technology, autonomous is changing so rapidly because future cars are going to be, like, 85 per cent software and 15 per cent hardware; it will basically be a computer on wheels. And Israel has a car industry that receives billions of dollars of investments every year. Why shouldn't we have this same partnership between us and Indian car manufacturers? This happens everywhere-digital, health, water, agriculture, energy, transportation... every single area... IT. And that's before you discuss just a whole world that is erupting, exploding. And we are seizing the future; the future belongs to those who innovate. Israel is an innovation nation. India has great innovation. In Silicon Valley, they say, oh, there are two dialects you hear-you hear Hindi dialects and you hear Hebrew. Sometimes, you hear a little English too. I think this visit will help secure this partnership which is so natural, which is so promising.Q. You had used a phrase in Tel Aviv, I2 T2 [Indian talent times Israeli technology for tomorrow]. India and Israel have signed technological agreements. What do you need to spur this on, what is the progress on this?A. It is slicing through the bureaucracy. We are all suffering from this malaise, this disease of bureaucracy. I chair a ministerial committee that meets every few weeks and I take a machete and hack through the wild vines of bureaucracy. I have started doing this in the last two years. And we have moved up in the competitive index, from No. 27 in the world to No. 16. So, I hope that on this visit, I don't want to tackle all of Indian bureaucracy. I want to hack a path in the bureaucratic jungle that afflicts us... to allow Israeli entrepreneurs to come to India, do business with India for the benefit of the people of India.Q. On this visit, you may have tasted a lot of Indian food. Anything in particular that you really liked?A. Chicken tikka masala, that's it. I love Indian food.Q. Given that Prime Minister Modi has championed yoga, there is even an international day and the UN observes it, do you do yoga?A. I don't do yoga but when I wake up in the morning and look to the right, the first democracy I see is India. And when Mr Modi wakes up and does yoga and looks left, the first democracy he sees is Israel. This is a grand partnership. Prime Minister Modi was very kind to come and receive me and my wife at the airport. Then we drove into town and named the square, a commemoration for fallen Indian soldiers, for Haifa. Haifa is one of the cities that was liberated by Indian soldiers. It was very moving. It was such an expression of gratitude, almost the closing of a circle, a 100 years later. What a grand meeting of two great peoples and our two great civilisations, two of the oldest civilisations on to India Today Magazine- EndMust Watch

New Indian Express

an hour ago

• New Indian Express

Israel says struck Iran's Fordo to 'obstruct access routes'

The Israeli military said it had launched air raids Monday to block access to Iran's enriched uranium facility in Fordo which was bombed by the United States at the weekend. A military statement said Israeli forces had "struck in order to obstruct access routes to the Fordo enrichment site" which US President Donald Trump said had been "totally obliterated" by the US strikes. There has been speculation that Iran might have moved out some of its known 400-kilogramme stockpile of highly enriched uranium before the US bombing of its storage sites in the early hours of Sunday. The International Atomic Energy Agency, which has been monitoring Iran's nuclear programme, called earlier Monday for access to the Islamic republic's nuclear sites to "account for" the uranium. "There needs to be a cessation of hostilities for the necessary safety and security conditions to prevail so that Iran can let IAEA teams into the sites to assess the situation," the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, said.