The Association for Responsible Aquaculture Reports Allegations of Bid-Rigging in Nova Scotia Aquaculture Expansion

ARGYLE, Nova Scotia, May 13, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Association for Responsible Aquaculture (ARA) reports that the coastal community of Argyle is facing a political storm amid serious allegations of conflict of interest, bid-rigging, and a lack of public consultations related to the expansion of aquaculture facilities along the region's coastline.
Documents obtained through Freedom of Information requests suggest that municipal staff and local oyster operators worked behind the scenes to fix the locations of Aquaculture Development Areas (ADAs) -placing them adjacent to residential properties without engaging affected residents or conducting meaningful consultation.
The controversial site selection has prompted accusations of favouritism and secrecy, with constituents questioning why certain locations were chosen and who benefited. Despite repeated calls for transparency and accountability, the municipality has ignored these concerns.
'People feel betrayed,' said Susan Savriga, an Argyle resident. 'This wasn't a transparent process. It feels like the decisions were made behind closed doors to benefit a few, while the broader community was left in the dark.'
Further compounding the issue, The Nova Scotia Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture (DFA) is reported to have approved the contested ADA locations based on the municipality's recommendations-recommendations now mired in claims of improper influence.
During a June 2024 council meeting, the Municipality of Argyle confirmed that no meaningful public consultation had been conducted on the site selections-further fuelling community frustration.
Top Right to Left: Nolan Deon, and Colton Deon from Deon's Oysters sit behind Deputy Warden Ted Saulnier, Warden Nicole Albright, and CAO Alain Muise during the March 20 session for the municipality of Argyle NS.
Evidence and Escalating Concerns
Residents allege that municipal councillors and staff enabled specific oyster farmers to secure preferential treatment under the ADA program. In response, the municipality has hired an independent third-party investigator. Simultaneously, the Nova Scotia Ombudsman has launched a separate investigation into the municipality's failure to conduct proper consultation.
Despite these developments, the Municipality and DFA have refused to address or resolve the reported conflicts and continue to resist public calls for a reset of the ADA process to perform fair and open public consultations.
Rising Barriers to Transparency
In what residents describe as an attempt to stifle public oversight, the municipality has begun imposing excessive fees for FOIPOP requests. Additionally, it is invoking Bill 1, recently passed by the provincial government, to label certain information requests as 'trivial, frivolous, or vexatious,' potentially blocking further disclosures.
Community Voices Call for Accountability
'Seeing local councillors refuse to represent and listen to their constituents is extremely alarming,' said Lorelei Murphy, Former Liberal Candidate for MLA Argyle. 'Given the volume of concerns and perceived evidence presented by the residents throughout the area, I think it is council's obligation to hold an open and unbiased review of their decisions to this point and act accordingly moving forward.'
'It's clear now that the farmers cheated,' said Chris Thibedeau, a member of the Argyle Residents Association (ARA). 'The email evidence shows individuals inside the municipality helped them. These are no longer perceived conflicts-they are real, and they must be investigated.'
'I've been respectful in all of my communications,' said ARA member Corey Clamp. 'Yet weeks go by with no reply from my councillor. People are watching. If you can't respond to your constituents, you should step down.'
As public pressure builds, residents are calling for a full halt to aquaculture approvals until an independent review is completed. The integrity of the municipal governance, they say is on the line.
About the ARA
The Association for Responsible Aquaculture (ARA) in Argyle is a community stakeholder group of over 400 residents concerned with the lack of transparency and fairness offered by the Aquaculture Development Area (ADA) Pilot led by the Municipality of Argyle and the NS Dept. of Fisheries and Aquaculture. While the ADA is a government led effort, the ARA represents the public and residents of Lobster Bay who seek fairness and a balance of realizing aquaculture expansion in non residential areas in a manner that promotes Tourism and the local harvesting of seafood. ARA is not anti-aquaculture. The goal is to make sure the ADA achieves balance and offers a win for all stakeholders including industry and the public.
https://www.facebook.com/associationforresponsibleaquaculture
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at:
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/0aec507f-92f3-47a0-a90b-c1b18e470dbe
Videos accompanying this announcement are available at:
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/e6490fec-de8b-4fd1-aa13-beacce677198
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/e3d15935-5989-48d9-b652-f5fb99aebdf0
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/fcdd9d7c-5efc-4a8b-a05b-f0d141e46709

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Upturn

2 hours ago

• Business Upturn

ACI, Council of State refers decision on commissioner appointment back to TAR for full review

By GlobeNewswire Published on June 23, 2025, 19:34 IST Appeal by former president Sticchi Damiani upheld on procedural grounds MILAN, June 23, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — With ordinance no. 2254/2025, published on 20 June, the Third Chamber of the Italian Council of State ruled on the precautionary appeal filed by engineer Angelo Sticchi Damiani, challenging the decision issued on 21 February 2025 by the Prime Minister's Office. That decision, pursuant to Article 65, paragraph 1, final sentence, of the Statute of the Automobile Club d'Italia (ACI), had declared the end of his term as president of the organisation and simultaneously appointed General Tullio Del Sette as acting commissioner. Unlike the Lazio Regional Administrative Court (TAR), which in its contested ruling had found the former ACI president's claim to be prima facie unfounded, the Council of State refrained from ruling on the lawfulness of the measure. Instead, it decided not to suspend the contested decision appointing the commissioner. The appellate court recognised Sticchi Damiani's interest in serving as president until the end of his term. However, in balancing the competing interests, it deemed the institutional interest of ACI in continuing under the leadership of the already-installed commissioner to outweigh the individual interest. This, it stated, was necessary to ensure administrative continuity and to preserve the organisational structure established with the appointment of the commissioner. All issues relating to the merits of the case — particularly the lawfulness of the commissioner's appointment — remain open. 'In the substantive phase of the proceedings,' reads a press release, 'it will need to be determined whether the removal of a president elected in October 2024 by the Assembly with over 90% of the vote was lawful. This occurred in a legal context in which a 1978 rule prohibiting a third term in office for public entities had been considered inapplicable to ACI due to the elective nature of the position and a subsequent 1999 law, which allows a fourth term for sports federations such as ACI, provided a reinforced majority is met — a threshold that was comfortably reached by Sticchi Damiani.' The statement goes on to recall that, in the late 1980s and early 1990s, another ACI president had served five terms. In Sticchi Damiani's case, however, the Prime Minister's Office for the first time applied the restriction laid out in the 1978 law. 'Precisely because of these contradictory interpretations,' the Council of State decided to leave the substantive questions entirely open for the Lazio TAR to assess in the coming months. For more information: Press Office LaPresse – [email protected] A photo accompanying this announcement is available at Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash GlobeNewswire provides press release distribution services globally, with substantial operations in North America and Europe.

Yahoo

21 hours ago

• Yahoo

US Supreme Court curbs discrimination claims over lost retiree benefits

By Daniel Wiessner (Reuters) -Retirees cannot sue their former employers for disability discrimination after leaving their jobs, the U.S. Supreme Court decided on Friday in a ruling against a disabled former Florida firefighter that could make it harder to bring lawsuits seeking to restore lost retiree benefits. The ruling upheld a lower court's decision to dismiss a lawsuit by Karyn Stanley, who had worked as a firefighter in Sanford, that accused the city of discriminating against her by ending a health insurance subsidy for retirees. Conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch, who authored the ruling, wrote that only job applicants and current employees are "qualified individuals" covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, a landmark federal law that prohibits discrimination based on disability. "In other words, the statute protects people, not benefits, from discrimination. And the statute also tells us who those people are: qualified individuals, those who hold or seek a job at the time of the defendant's alleged discrimination," Gorsuch wrote. Gorsuch was joined by the court's five other conservative justices and liberal Justice Elena Kagan. Liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson penned separate dissenting opinions. While Stanley worked for Sanford, located in the suburbs of Orlando, the city changed its policy to limit health insurance coverage for disabled retirees to 24 months after they stopped working. Stanley retired from her job after two decades because her Parkinson's disease had made it impossible for her to work, according to court filings. She sued the city in 2020, claiming it discriminated against workers who retired early because of a disability by giving them a smaller healthcare subsidy than employees who retired after 25 years of service. The city in court filings has said its policy was lawful and necessary to contain costs related to employee benefits. Sanford covers insurance costs for workers who retire after 25 years of service until they turn 65, and had previously done so for employees who retired due to a disability regardless of how long they worked for the city. While Stanley worked for the city, it changed its policy to limit coverage for disabled retirees to 24 months after they stopped working. Stanley was 47 when she retired. Friday's decision will help reduce the legal risks that employers face when they change or terminate retirement benefits, according to Caroline Pieper, a Chicago-based lawyer with the firm Seyfarth Shaw, which represents employers. "While there are certainly other considerations ... this case should give employers more comfort under the ADA when they modify or reduce post-employment offerings," Pieper said, referring to the Americans with Disabilities Act. Friday's ruling affirmed decisions by a judge in Florida and the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which had dismissed Stanley's lawsuit.

Business Upturn

2 days ago

• Business Upturn

OCUFA Challenges Ontario Government's Narrative on Postsecondary Funding Crisis, Welcomes Review with Call for Meaningful Faculty Consultation

TORONTO, ON, June 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Ontario Confederation of University Faculty Associations (OCUFA) today responded to the announcement by Minister of Colleges, Universities, Research Excellence and Security (MCURES) Nolan Quinn of $55.8 million to expand teaching training seats across Ontario. While OCUFA welcomes any new investment in the postsecondary sector, the organization asserts that the Ontario government is not taking meaningful action to address the deep-seated financial crisis facing Ontario's world-class public universities. Minister Quinn highlighted that the investment would train up to 2,600 new teachers by 2027, prioritizing accelerated programs, French and technological education, and seats in northern, rural, Indigenous, and remote regions. However, when asked on the broader financial challenges confronting the sector, Minister Quinn attributed these issues to 'unilateral decisions' by the federal government regarding international student study permits. 'The financial struggles plaguing Ontario's postsecondary education sector are not a sudden development, nor are they solely a result of federal changes to international student permit caps', stated OCUFA President Nigmendra Narain. 'For decades, Ontario's universities have endured chronic underfunding, consistently ranking dead last in Canada in per-student funding. We are disappointed to see the Ontario Government downplay its own responsibility in supporting this vital sector.' OCUFA is deeply concerned that Ontario's universities are currently grappling with program closures, enrollment pauses, increasing precarity among faculty, and significant challenges in funding the province's most promising talent. The undergraduate programs that produce the students who enter teacher's college are not only underfunded, but are now facing cuts, limiting the academic preparation of teachers. While the $55.8 million for teaching pathways is a positive step, OCUFA emphasizes that these recent commitments only scratch the surface of the sector's needs. To simply reach Canada's national per-student funding average, Ontario requires an immediate investment of at least $2.78 billion, possibly more depending on the impact of declining international student enrolment. Without substantial and ongoing funding commitments, Ontario's position as a world leader in postsecondary education, research, and scholarship will continue to be at jeopardy. OCUFA welcomes the Minister's announcement that his ministry will be reviewing how funding is delivered across the postsecondary sector. 'We sincerely hope for meaningful consultation during this process and that the Ontario Government will ensure the voices of university faculty and academic librarians across the province are not only heard but respected,' said OCUFA Executive Director Jenny Ahn, echoing recommendations made at OCUFA's Funding Our Future: Keeping Universities Public conference in 2023. Founded in 1964, OCUFA represents more than 18,000 professors and academic librarians in 30 faculty associations across Ontario. It is committed to enhancing the quality of higher education in Ontario and recognizing the outstanding contributions of its members towards creating a world-class university system. For more information, please visit the OCUFA website at Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash