LA cops forced to delete ‘offensive' post about US strikes on Iran and admit it was ‘unacceptable' in lengthy apology
LOS Angeles police have been forced to delete a social media post about the Iran conflict that they called "offensive and inappropriate."
Cops issued a lengthy apology for speaking out on the issue and falsely suggesting people were killed after the US launched airstrikes on three nuclear facilities in Iran.
5
5
The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department shared condolences for the "tragic" bombing in a since-deleted post on X on Sunday.
An original version of the post read, "Our hearts go out to the victims and families impacted by the recent bombings in Iran.
"While this tragic event occurred overseas, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department is closely monitoring the situation alongside our local, state, and federal partners."
No deaths have been confirmed in the US airstrikes on Iran.
A few moments after the post was shared, it was edited to remove mentions of Iranian victims and families.
The statement was also edited to say police were "closely monitoring the situation overseas."
Then, the post was deleted entirely after backlash from social media users, some of whom called the message "embarrassing" and "pathetic."
LASD then shared an apology for the post.
"We are issuing this statement to formally apologize for an offensive and inappropriate social media post recently posted on our Department social media platforms regarding the ongoing conflict in Iran," police said.
"This post was unacceptable, made in error, and does not reflect the views of Sheriff Robert G. Luna or the Department.
Inside Operation Midnight Hammer: How Trump carried out unprecedented Iran attack using decoys in 37-hour covert mission
'"As a law enforcement agency, we do not comment on foreign policy or military matters.
"Our mission remains solely focused on protecting public safety and serving our diverse communities."
The department said it launched an internal review to figure out how the post was created and published.
Police also said they're working to strengthen their social media policies and "ensure that any future communications align with our Department's standards of professionalism, respect, and accountability," the apology added.
LA County Sheriff's Department's statement
The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department issued the following apology after sharing a post about the US airstrikes on Iran:
We are issuing this statement to formally apologize for an offensive and inappropriate social media post recently posted on our Department social media platforms regarding the ongoing conflict in Iran. This post was unacceptable, made in error, and does not reflect the views of Sheriff Robert G. Luna or the Department. As a law enforcement agency, we do not comment on foreign policy or military matters. Our mission remains solely focused on protecting public safety and serving our diverse communities.
We fully recognize that the words and messages we share carry weight. As law enforcement professionals, we are entrusted with a position of public responsibility, and that trust demands that we communicate accurately. In this instance, we fell short of that expectation, and we are taking quick corrective action. We are committed to learning from this failure and to prevent such incidents from occurring again.
We have updated our social media post and have launched an internal review to determine how it was created and published. Steps are being taken to strengthen our social media oversight protocols and ensure that any future communications align with our Department's standards of professionalism, respect, and accountability.
We appreciate the continued trust of our community and will work diligently to reaffirm that trust every day.
Source: LASD
The LASD hasn't returned The U.S. Sun's request for comment.
It comes after Los Angeles law enforcement officials are already facing backlash for how they handled anti-ICE protests in the city, which saw violence and looting break out earlier this month.
The demonstrations were peaceful at first, but escalated after President Donald Trump sent in the National Guard as some rioters lit self-driving vehicles on fire.
Cops and local politicians were slammed for failing to keep the peace during the rallies.
5
5
CONFLICT IN IRAN
The LASD's original post about Iran was shared just hours after Trump entered the conflict between Israel and Iran on Saturday night.
He sent American warplanes to target Iranian nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.
It's unclear if there have been any casualties in the attack, but Trump said the sites were "obliterated."
He wrote on Truth Social after the strikes, "We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan.
"All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home.
"Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!"
Iran has warned that there will be consequences for the strikes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
12 minutes ago
- The Sun
Explosions heard in Qatar as Iranian missiles shot towards US airbase after Tehran vowed revenge for Trump nuke strikes
IRAN launched a salvo of ballistic missiles at Qatar targeting the biggest US military base in the Middle East. Loud explosions were heard in central Doha as air defence systems worked to intercept the missiles launched at Al Udeid air base - home to some 10,000 US army personnel. 3 3 All the Iranian missiles were shot down, it is understood. Footage shared by OSINT accounts appeared to show interceptions by air defence systems. It comes after the US said it expects that Iran could carry out retaliatory attacks targeting American forces in the next 24 to 48 hours. The Qataris have now closed their airspace. They said they reserve the right to respond directly and in accordance with international law. It has also been said that there are no casualties at the US Al Udeid military base in Doha, following Iran's attack on the facility. Tehran repeatedly threatened to strike US military bases in the Middle East following Donald Trump's bombing of its nuclear sites. Qatar is home to the largest US military base in the Middle East – Al Udeid Air Base. The base in the desert outside of Doha serves as the forward HQ for US Central Command. It houses about 10,000 troops and hosts some 40 military aircraft. In total, the US has about 50,000 troops stationed in the Middle East. British military personnel also serve there on rotation. Earlier today, The Sun reported that US and UK embassies in Qatar warned American and British citizens to 'shelter in place until further notice'. Meanwhile, the Israelis carried out their most intense bombing raids in Iran - pounding the Islamic Republic's intelligence HQ, a prison full of dissidents and the Fordow nuke plant for the second time. The IDF blew the gates off the notorious Evin Prison - a pit of torture and executions - hoping to bust out the regime's fierce critics languishing behind the walls. Also targeted were the Basij Headquarters of the Revolutionary Guard, Iran's "Destruction of Israel" countdown clock and various other security hubs, the IDF said. The Fordow mountain-fortress nuclear site was bombed - barely a day after the Americans pulverised it - with IDF rockets going after the "access routes". Significant damage has likely been caused to the plant and the sensitive machinery it houses by the US's bombing, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said. Stay up to date with the latest on Israel vs Iran with The Sun's live blog below...
The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
header
Fifa is facing new questions over the increasingly fraught World Cup next year, with the issue of how to treat Iran while the country is involved in a conflict with the co-host the US. There are no provisions within Fifa's regulations to prevent Iran from playing their group matches in the US, despite the country being subject to military action by the Trump administration and Iranian citizens being under a travel ban that prevents them from entering the country. The ban contains an exemption that could apply to players, staff or associated families with teams at the 2026 Fifa World Cup. Iran, who faced USA in the group stage of the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, qualified in March for their fourth consecutive World Cup. Although 2026 is also being hosted by Canada and Mexico, only by being given a specific slot in group A could Iran avoid playing in the US, with their matches then taking place in Mexico. If Iran won that group they would stay in Mexico for their last-32 game and any last-16 match. Should they go further – and they have never reached a World Cup knockout game – they would then play in the US. Fifa did not respond on Monday to a request for comment from the Guardian and will likely be considering its options before the World Cup draw, which is due to take place in December. The decision will be a difficult one for its president, Gianni Infantino, who has associated himself closely with President Donald Trump, who authorised the use of US bombs on Iranian nuclear sites last weekend. Infantino and the Fifa Council will have the final say on inclusion in the competition and the makeup of the draw, but the organising committee for Fifa competitions will be expected to have input. The committee has members from Canada, Mexico and Iran, and its chair is Uefa's president, Aleksander Ceferin. In 2022, his organisation announced that Ukraine and Belarus would be kept apart in Uefa competition draws, after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and his action may provide an example for Fifa to follow. Before the World Cup draw in Qatar, the agreed draw constraints included limitations on where teams could be selected but this related only to a 'general principle' that no more than one team from each confederation (excluding Europe) should appear in a given group.
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Iran's closure of strait of Hormuz would be monumental act of self-harm, says Lammy
Any Iranian move to close the strait of Hormuz waterway would be an act of monumental self-harm, David Lammy, the UK's foreign secretary, said, as he continued to refuse to endorse the Israeli and American strikes on Iran, or lay out the UK view of their lawfulness. Lammy said there was no need for the British government to say if the strikes were legal since the UK was not involved in the action and had not been asked by the US to take part, or to allow the US to use the UK's Diego Garcia base in the Indian Ocean to target Iran. The US used B-2 stealth bombers and a salvo of submarine-launched missiles to hit Iran's nuclear facilities on Saturday night. Lammy denied that the US was involved in regime change, saying the attacks were very targeted. No assessment had yet been completed on the effectiveness of the US attacks, he admitted, raising questions over whether Iran has moved its enriched uranium to a new site. Lammy, in an hour-long statement to the Commons, also disclosed the first RAF plane had evacuated 63 British nationals and their dependents to Cyprus from Israel. He said negotiations were under way to help the 4,000 British nationals in Israel that had registered with the Foreign Office. Referring to the Iranian parliament's decision to vote for the closure of the strait of Hormuz, he said contingency plans were in place. He told MPs: 'Be in no doubt we are prepared to defend our personnel, our assets and those of our allies and partners. We are closely monitoring how energy markets are responding to the conflict. We have been extremely clear to the Iranians. Any action to blockade their Straits of Hormuz would be a monumental act of self-harm, making a diplomatic solution even harder.' Lammy also repeated his plea for Iran to return to the negotiating table. He said: 'My message for Tehran was clear, take the off-ramp, dial this thing down, and negotiate with the United States seriously and immediately. 'The alternative is an even more destructive and far-reaching conflict, which could have unpredictable consequences.' For the first time since the crisis broke party political splits started to emerge with Liberal Democrats, Scottish Nationalists and Labour backbenchers, including the chair of the foreign affairs select committee, Emily Thornberry, challenging the trustworthiness of the US and the legality of its action. Lammy was also repeatedly asked if the UK's reputation as an upholder of rule-based order was not damaged if it could not admit the acts of its allies were unlawful. By contrast the Conservative frontbench and Reform MPs congratulated the US's actions, with some MPs backing regime change. Lammy said: 'It's not our belief that it is for us to change the regime of any country – that is for the people of that country.' He added 'I am confident that this is not about regime change and the Israelis have been clear they are not attacking the civilian population.' Asked about the Israeli bombing of the gates of Evin prison in Tehran, he said he had been reassured in phone call by the Israeli foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar that 'nuclear targets remained their objective and focus at this time'. The UK has long taken the view that any public criticism of the US only reduces the UK's private influence, but it has been rare for the government to be so circumspect in setting out its views on such a major crisis. Lammy did implicitly question the wisdom of a US strategy based heavily on air power, pointing out that 'strikes cannot destroy the knowledge Iran has acquired over several decades nor any regime ambition to deploy that knowledge to build a nuclear weapon'. Thornberry expressed her concern over whether diplomatic negotiations favoured by Lammy would occur since that required a modicum of trust. She said given that Trump tore up the previous nuclear deal in 2018, Israel had ended the previous US-Israel talks by striking Iran and an emboldened Benjamin Netanyahu was talking about regime change, it is difficult to see how negotiations based on trust can take place. Lammy also broke new ground by saying for the first time that the UK's focus in any future diplomatic negotiations would be a requirement for Iran to accept zero enrichment of uranium, saying we have 'moved on' from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal that allowed Iran to enrich to 3.75%. Lammy insisted that Iran was in breach of its obligations by enriching uranium at levels of purity as high as 60% and said the country was engaging in deception and obfuscation. Speaking to the BBC, he also refused to say if he agreed with the latest US intelligence assessment that Iran was close to securing a nuclear weapon, saying instead that he relied on the report from the International Atomic Energy Agency , the UN's nuclear inspectorate, which said in its latest report it had no evidence that Iran was seeking to make a nuclear bomb.
