Thousands of Ukrainian civilians are still held by Russia with uncertain hope of release
When she heard her front door open almost two years ago, Kostiantyn Zinovkin's mother thought her son had returned home because he forgot something. Instead, men in balaclavas burst into the apartment in Melitopol, a southern Ukrainian city occupied by Russian forces .
They said Zinovkin was detained for a minor infraction and would be released soon. They used his key to enter, said his wife, Liusiena, and searched the flat so thoroughly that they tore it apart 'into molecules.'
But Zinovkin wasn't released. Weeks after his May 2023 arrest, the Russians told his mother he was plotting a terrorist attack. He's now standing trial on charges his family calls absurd.
Zinovkin is one of thousands of civilians in Russian captivity. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy insists their release, along with prisoners of war, will be an important step toward ending the 3-year-old war.
So far, it hasn't appeared high on the agenda in U.S. talks with Moscow and Kyiv.
'While politicians discuss natural resources, possible territorial concessions, geopolitical interests and even Zelenskyy's suit in the Oval Office, they're not talking about people,' said Oleksandra Matviichuk , head of the Center for Civil Liberties, which won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2022.
In January, the center and other Ukrainian and Russian rights groups launched 'People First,' a campaign that says any peace settlement must prioritize the release of everyone they say are captives, including Russians jailed for protesting the war, as well as Ukrainian children who were illegally deported .
'You can't achieve sustainable peace without taking into account the human dimension,' Matviichuk told The Associated Press.
It's unknown how many Ukrainian civilians are in custody, both in occupied regions and in Russia. Ukraine's human rights ombudsman Dmytro Lubinets has estimated over 20,000.
Matviichuk says her group received over 4,000 requests to help civilian detainees. She notes it's against international law to detain noncombatants in war.
Oleg Orlov , co-founder of the Russian rights group Memorial , says advocates know at least 1,672 Ukrainian civilians are in Moscow's custody.
'There's a larger number of them that we don't know about,' added Orlov, whose organization won the Nobel alongside Matviichuk's group and is involved in People First.
Many are detained for months without charges and don't know why they're being held, Orlov said.
Russian soldiers detained Mykyta Shkriabin, then 19, in Ukraine's Kharkiv region in March 2022. He left the basement where his family was sheltering from fighting to get supplies and never returned.
Shkriabin was detained even though he wasn't charged with a crime, said his lawyer, Leonid Solovyov. In 2023, the authorities began referring to him as a POW, a status Solovyov seeks to contest since the student wasn't a combatant.
Shkriabin's mother, Tetiana, told AP last month she still doesn't know where her son is held. In three years, she's received two letters from him saying he's doing well and that she shouldn't worry.
She's hoping for 'a prisoner exchange, a repatriation, or something,' Shkriabina said. Without hope, 'how does one hang in there?'
Others face charges that their relatives say are fabricated.
After being seized in Melitopol, Zinovkin was jailed for over two years and charged with seven offenses, including plotting a terrorist attack, assembling weapons and high treason, his wife Liusiena Zinovkina told AP, describing the charges as 'absurd.'
While vocally pro-Ukrainian and against Russia's occupation, her husband couldn't plot to bomb anyone and had no weapons skills, she said.
Especially nonsensical is the treason charge, she said, because Russian law stipulates that only its citizens can be charged with that crime, and Zinovkin has never held Russian citizenship, unless it was forced upon him in jail. A conviction could bring life in prison.
Ukrainian civilian Serhii Tsyhipa, 63, was convicted of espionage and sentenced to 13 years in a maximum-security prison after he disappeared in March 2022 while walking his dog in Nova Kakhovka, in the partially occupied Kherson region, said his wife, Olena. The dog also vanished.
Tsyhipa, a journalist, was wearing a jacket with a large red cross sewn on it. Both he and his wife, Olena, had those jackets, she told AP, because they volunteered to distribute food and other essentials when Russian troops invaded.
Serhii Tsyhipa protested the occupation, and Olena believes that led to his arrest.
He was held for months in Crimea and finally charged with espionage in December 2022. Almost a year later, in October 2023, Tsyhipa was convicted and sentenced in a trial that lasted only three hearings.
He appealed, but his sentence was upheld. 'But the Russian authorities must understand that we are fighting — that we are doing everything possible to bring him home,' she said.
Mykhailo Savva of the Expert Council of the Center for Civil Liberties said rights advocates know of 307 Ukrainian civilians convicted in Russia on criminal charges — usually espionage or treason, if the person held a Russian passport, but also terrorism and extremism.
He said that in Ukraine's occupied territories, Russians see activists, community leaders and journalists as 'the greatest threat.'
Winning release for those already serving sentences would be an uphill battle, advocates say.
Relatives must piece together scraps of information about prison conditions.
Zinovkina said she has received letters from her husband who told her of problems with his sight, teeth and back. Former prisoners also told her of cramped, cold basement cells in a jail in Rostov, where he's being held.
She believes her husband was pressured to sign a confession. A man who met him in jail told her Kostiantyn 'confessed to everything they wanted him to, so the worst is over' for him.
Orlov said Ukrainian POWs and civilians are known to be held in harsh conditions, where allegations of abuse and torture are common.
The Kremlin tested those methods during the two wars it waged in Chechnya in the 1990s and 2000s, well before invading Ukraine, said Orlov, who recently went to Ukraine to document Russia's human rights violations and saw the pattern repeated from the North Caucasus conflicts.
'Essentially, a misanthropic system has been created, and everyone who falls into it ends up in hell,' added Matviichuk, the Ukrainian human rights worker.
A recent report by the U.N. Human Rights Council said Russia 'committed enforced disappearances and torture as crimes against humanity,' part of a 'systematic attack against the civilian population and pursuant to a coordinated state policy.'
It said Russia 'detained large numbers of civilians,' jailed them in occupied Ukraine or deported them to Russia, and 'systematically used torture against certain categories of detainees to extract information, coerce, and intimidate.'
Russia's Defense Ministry, the Federal Penitentiary Service and the Federal Security Service did not respond to requests for comment.
As the U.S. talks about a ceasefire, relatives continue to press for the captives' release.
Liusiena Zinovkina says she hasn't abandoned hope as her husband, now 35, stands trial but is tempering her expectations.
'I see that it's not as simple as the American president thought. It's not that easy to come to an agreement with Russia,' she said, reminding herself 'to be patient. It will happen, but not tomorrow.'
Olena Tsyhipa said every minute counts for her husband, whose health has deteriorated.
'My belief in his return is unwavering,' she said. 'We just have to wait.'
___
Litvinova reported from Tallinn, Estonia. Arhirova reported from Kyiv, Ukraine. Yuras Karmanau in Tallinn contributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Russia Responds To US Strikes, Will Hold Direct Talks With Iran
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Russian government on Sunday "strongly condemned" the United States' strikes the day before against three key Iranian nuclear facilities and is preparing to hold direct talks with Iranian officials to address the fallout. Why It Matters Trump on Saturday evening announced what he described as a "very successful attack" against three Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. U.S. officials said the attacks caused severe damage, but questions remain about the full extent of the damage and how much of a setback it is for Iran's nuclear program. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised the Trump administration for taking an offensive position in the conflict, which Israeli officials have strongly advocated for since Israel first ignited the war on June 13. The Israelis said the U.S. should strike Iran's nuclear facilities because Tehran was getting close to developing a nuclear weapon. Iran denies the charge, saying its nuclear program is for civilian purposes. Iran vowed to retaliate after Saturday's strikes, accusing the U.S. of crossing "a very big red line" with its decision to pummel the three nuclear sites with 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs. What To Know "It is already clear that a dangerous escalation has begun, fraught with further undermining of regional and global security," the Russian foreign ministry said in a statement addressing the U.S.'s strikes. "The risk of the conflict spreading in the Middle East, which is already gripped by multiple crises, has increased significantly." Russia also called the strikes "irresponsible" and a "gross violation of international law." Iran and Russia will hold talks in the aftermath of the U.S. strikes and Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said hours after the attacks that he will travel to Moscow while emphasizing Iran's "strategic partnership" with Russia. A top Russian official and close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin also skewered Trump on social media after he announced the U.S.'s strikes, which hit Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. "The US is now entangled in a new conflict, with prospects of a ground operation looming on the horizon," Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, wrote in a thread on X (formerly Twitter). Medvedev went on to praise Iran's "political regime," saying it "survived" the strikes and "in all likelihood, has come out even stronger." "Donald Trump, once hailed as 'president of peace,' has now pushed the US into another war," Medvedev wrote, taunting Trump. The vast majority of countries around the world oppose the actions of Israel and the United States." "At this rate, Trump can forget about the Nobel Peace Prize — not even with how rigged it has become," he added. "What a way to kick things off, Mr. President. Congratulations!" Trump, for his part, said on social media after that if Iran retaliated against the U.S., it would "BE MET WITH FORCE FAR GREATER THAN WHAT WAS WITNESSED TONIGHT." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Ukraine showers Trump with praise for strikes on Iran while ex-Russian prez floats giving Tehran nukes
Ukraine's Foreign Ministry cheered the US strikes against Iran, and backed President Trump's assertion that Tehran cannot be permitted to obtain nuclear weapons. Meanwhile, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev blasted the move and starkly warned that 'countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads,' while chiding that Trump can kiss his dreams of a Nobel Peace Prize goodbye. 'As early as this spring, the United States warned Iran of the consequences in the absence of constructive steps,' Ukraine's Foreign Ministry said in a statement. 'Iran is complicit in the crime of aggression against Ukraine. The Iranian regime is providing military assistance to Russia, including the supply of UAVs [unmanned aerial vehicles] and technologies that Russia consistently uses to kill people and destroy critical infrastructure.' Throughout the war, Russia has turned to Iran and North Korea for resources to assist in its bloody invasion of neighboring Ukraine. Iran has supplied the Russians with critical drone technology. 3 President Trump ordered strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran. AP 3 President Trump has had a rocky relationship with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. UKRAINIAN FOREIGN MINISTRY/AFP via Getty Images Ukraine had once been in possession of the world's third-largest stockpile of nuclear weapons during the collapse of the Soviet Union. It relinquished those nukes as part of the 1994 Budapest Memorandum in exchange for security guarantees from the US, Russia and the United Kingdom. 'We are convinced that the measures taken by the United States and Israel against Iranian nuclear facilities have sent a clear message to the Iranian regime — a message that the continuation of policies aimed at destabilizing regional security is unacceptable,' Kyiv added in a statement. 'As for Iran's future, we firmly believe that the Iranian people — with their proud, millennia-old history –deserve a dignified, free, and happy life in peace and mutual understanding with Israel and all other nations of the world.' Russia roundly condemned the strikes, with Medvedev being among the most forceful. 3 Dmitry Medvedev delivered a stern rebuke of President Trump over the strikes on Iran. 'A number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads,' Medvedev put in an ominous X post. 'At this rate, Trump can forget about the Nobel Peace Prize — not even with how rigged it has become. What a way to kick things off, Mr. President.' There are at least eight countries believed to have nukes: China, India, France, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the United Kingdom and the US. Israel has been coy about whether it posses them. Vice President JD Vance rebuked Medvedev's apparent threat. 'First of all, I think it's a bizarre response, but I also don't know that that guy speaks for President Putin or for the Russian government,' Vance shot back. '[Russia has] been very consistent that they don't want Iran to get a nuclear weapon.' 'I'll let President [Vladimir] Putin speak to what the official Russian position on this is.' Medvedev served as Russia's president from 2008 to 2012 and is generally seen as a close ally of Russian tyrant Vladimir Putin. Currently, he serves as the deputy chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation.
Los Angeles Times
5 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
With 40,000 troops in the region, U.S. braces for response as Iran weighs its options
WASHINGTON — Fallout from President Trump's historic gamble to strike Iran's nuclear facilities reverberated across the Middle East Sunday, as Washington braced for an unpredictable response from a cornered but determined Islamic Republic. While the Iranian government downplayed the impact of the U.S. attack, noting the depths of its nuclear know-how built over decades of study, U.S. military officials said its precision strikes against Iran's three main nuclear facilities caused 'extremely severe damage and destruction.' A senior Israeli official told The Times that Jerusalem was so satisfied with the operation that it was prepared to suspend hostilities if Iran ends its missile salvos against Israeli territory. 'We are ready to be done,' the Israeli official said, granted anonymity to speak candidly. As the dust settled, the sun rose and satellite imagery emerged of the wreckage, the main question among Trump administration officials became how Tehran would respond — both militarily, against U.S. interests in the Persian Gulf and around the world, as well as with the remnants of its nuclear program, with so much of it destroyed. Tehran's nuclear-armed allies, in Russia and North Korea, have been critical of the military campaign, with former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev raising the prospect of Moscow giving Iran a nuclear warhead in response to the attacks. The Israeli official dismissed that idea, alluding to direct talks with Moscow over the Iranian program. 'We are not concerned,' the official said. Trump's military action, dubbed 'Operation Midnight Hammer,' was a contingency years in the making, prepared and much feared by Trump's predecessors over two decades as a desperate last resort to a nuclear Iran. Ever since Tehran resumed its fissile enrichment program in 2005, Republican and Democratic presidents alike have warned that the Islamic Republic could never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. But a constellation of diplomatic talks and complex agreements have failed to dissuade Tehran from a fundamental principle of a 'right to enrich' uranium — near to weapons grade — on its own soil. Despite the dramatic nature of the U.S. air raid, few in Washington expressed an appetite for a prolonged U.S. war with Iran and echoed Israel's interest in a truce after assessing its initial operations a success. Vice President JD Vance denied that the United States was 'at war' with Iran on Sunday, telling CBS that the nation is, instead, 'at war with Iran's nuclear program.' But the prospect of another full-scale U.S. war in the Middle East, made palpable by the weekend strikes, shook Capitol Hill on Sunday, compelling Democrats who have long advocated a tough approach to Iran to push for a vote to restrict Trump under the War Powers Act. More than 60 members of Congress, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, both of New York, called on the Trump administration to seek congressional authorization for any further action. At least one Republican, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, joined in the call. The Pentagon said that seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers deployed a total of 14 Massive Ordnance Penetrators — 30,000-pound bombs known as 'bunker busters,' for their ability to destroy facilities buried deep underground — against Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. The U.S. operation followed an Israeli campaign that began last week with strikes against Iranian air defenses and nuclear facilities, scientists and research facilities, as well as against military generals, ballistic missile launch pads and storage depots. While the United States and Israel believe that Saturday's strikes were a strategic victory, some concern remains that Iran may have removed critical equipment and materiel from its site in Fordow — an enrichment facility that had been burrowed into the side of a mountain — to an undisclosed location before the U.S. operation began, the Israeli official said. 'That remains a question mark,' the official added, while expressing confidence that Israeli intelligence would be aware of any other significant nuclear facilities. Addressing the nation on the attacks on Saturday night, Trump warned Iran that U.S. attacks could continue if it refuses to give up on its nuclear program. 'There will be either peace, or there will be tragedy for Iran, far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days,' Trump said, flanked by his vice president, national security advisor and secretary of defense. 'Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight's was the most difficult of them all, by far, and perhaps the most lethal. But if peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill. Most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes.' Across the region Sunday, the question paramount on observers' minds was what shape Iran's response would take. Iranian officials downplayed the strikes' impact, acknowledging damage to nuclear facilities but that the know-how remained intact. 'They [the United States and Israel] should know this industry has roots in our country, and the roots of this national industry cannot be destroyed,' said Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesman of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, according to a Sunday interview with the semi-official Tasnim News Agency. 'Of course, we have suffered some losses, but this is not the first time that the industry has suffered damage. … Naturally, this industry must continue and its growth will not stop.' Hassan Abedini, the deputy political director of Iran's state broadcaster IRIB, said the three targeted nuclear sites had already been emptied some time before the attacks and that they 'didn't suffer a major blow because the materials had already been taken out.' Other officials, including leaders in the targeted areas in Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow, reassured residents there was no nuclear contamination as a result of the strikes and that they could 'go on with their lives,' according to a statement Sunday from government spokesperson Fatemah Mohajerani. The U.S. attacks drew swift pleas for restraint from Saudi Arabia and Qatar, both of which issued statements calling on all parties to de-escalate. Iraq, meanwhile, said the U.S. escalation 'constitutes a grave threat to peace and security in the Middle East,' according to an interview with its government spokesman on Qatari broadcaster Al-Jazeera. Oman, a key mediator in the negotiations between Tehran and Washington, was more scathing, expressing what it said was its 'denunciation and condemnation' of the U.S.'s attacks. In Europe, as well, governments urged caution and affirmed support for Israel. 'We have consistently been clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon and can no longer pose a threat to regional security,' France, Germany, and Italy, known as the E3, said in a statement. 'Our aim continues to be to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.' The last significant face-off between Iran and the United States happened during Trump's first term, when he ordered the assassination of top Iranian commander Gen. Qassem Suleimani in 2020. That attack spurred predictions of a furious retaliation, with fears of Tehran deploying its missile arsenal or activating its network of regional militias to attack U.S. forces and interests across Washington's footprint in the region. Instead, Tehran reacted with little more than an openly telegraphed ballistic missile barrage on a U.S. base in Iraq. Iran's options are even more limited this time. Much of that network — known as the 'Axis of Resistance' and which included militias and pro-Tehran governments in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Gaza, Afghanistan and Yemen — lies incapacitated after more than 20 months of Israeli attacks. Allies such as Russia and China, though issuing condemnations of the U.S. attack, appear to have little appetite for involvement beyond statements and offers of mediation. And how much remains of Tehran's missile capacity is unclear, with the Israeli official estimating roughly 1,000 ballistic missiles – half of their capacity before the most recent conflict started – remaining available to them. Nevertheless, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps warned that the United States should expect 'regrettable responses.' 'Instead of learning from repeated failures, Washington effectively placed itself on the front lines of aggression by directly attacking peaceful installations,' said a statement from the Guard Corps on Sunday. It hinted that its targets would include U.S. military presence in the region. 'The number, dispersion, and size of U.S. military bases in the region are not a strength, but have doubled their vulnerability,' the statement said. The United States has more than 40,000 stationed in the region, according to Pentagon figures, and has bases in at least 10 countries in the region, not to mention a significant presence at sea. Yet experts say the likeliest scenario would involve disruptions to shipping lanes, with Iran leveraging its control of the Strait of Hormuz, an oil transit chokepoint handling a fifth of the world's energy flows, that is 30 miles wide at its narrowest point; or calling on Yemen's Houthis to intensify their harassment campaign of merchant vessels on the Red Sea. It a situation in which Iran has experience: During its conflict with Iraq in the eighties, Tehran engaged in the the so-called 'Tanker War,' attacked hundreds of Iraqi ships near Hormuz and entering into direct confrontations with the U.S. Navy. Shippers are already girding themselves for disruptions. But Danish shipping giant Maersk said it was continuing to use the Strait of Hormuz for the time being. 'We will continuously monitor the security risk to our specific vessels in the region and are ready to take operational actions as needed,' Maersk said in a statement. Wilner reported from Washington, Bulos from Beirut.
