Flute teacher to appeal WRC ruling he was not a whistleblower

A flute teacher who claimed he was penalised for blowing the whistle on an alleged misuse of public funds at a State-backed music school intends to appeal a tribunal ruling that complaints he raised did not amount to a protected disclosure.
The Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) has rejected a claim under the Protected Disclosures Act 2014 by Hugh Rance, a long-serving music teacher at the Cork Education and Training Board School of Music.
The tribunal has dismissed Mr Rance's case with a ruling that his claims alleging "waste and misuse of public funds" by the management of the school in late 2023, due to the level of vacant teaching hours, did not amount to a protected act.
Mr Rance, who appeared before the WRC last year as a lay litigant, said today that he was taking legal advice and intended to appeal the ruling to the Labour Court.
At a hearing last August at the WRC's offices on Eglinton Street in Cork, Mr Rance claimed that he and some of his colleagues had been paid for an "enormous number" of teaching hours with student vacancies over the preceding five years.
He said the problem had been building up since 2011, when responsibility for recruiting new students passed from the music teachers themselves to staff at Cork ETB School of Music's main office.
He told the Commission he calculated that his own teaching hours were 63% vacant, costing the State in the region of €50,000 a year - calling it a "waste and misuse of public funds" and "gross mismanagement".
Mr Rance said that having discussed the matter with his colleagues, he discovered that 18 music teachers at the school had "excess vacant hours for a number of years" - their rates of unutilised teaching hours ranging from 35% to 70% in one case.
In a September 2023 email, Mr Rance wrote to a manager referring to "serious implications of fiscal irresponsibility" and an "ineffective recruitment strategy".
He said this had resulted in a situation where "a teacher ends up, as is now the case, with 11 students instead of between 30 and 40 students".
"This has resulted in only having enough students to teach for nine hours a week, instead of the contracted 22 hours for which they are paid," Mr Rance's email added.
He said "all the flute teachers" had student vacancies in October 2024 and he was aware that 18 music teachers had "excess vacant hours for a number of years".
The email "bounced back" as that manager "no longer worked" at the organisation, the tribunal heard. Mr Rance then emailed Denis Leamy, the chief executive of the Cork ETB, on 2 October, with a copy of the September 30 letter.
The complainant asked the CEO to: "personally review the email and letter and let me know what your intentions are in resolving the issues referred to".
He denied a suggestion that he bears a "personal vendetta" against the school principal Carol Daly - and insists he just wanted to see the school "back on track".
The chief executive, Mr Leamy, said of the October 2 email: "It was not new news. We knew about vacancies."
He said Mr Rance had caused "a good deal of upset to staff" with "a continuum of threats… on Freedom of Information, Protected Disclosure and data access deadlines", which had taken "thousands of hours" for administrators to address.
He said CETB had determined that the 2 October 2023 email from Mr Rance was "not found to constitute a protected disclosure", and denied any penalisation.
Giving evidence, Ms Daly told the WRC she knew nothing of Mr Rance's original email until June 2024, after his WRC complaint was filed, and "denied gross mismanagement", the WRC noted.
Flute lessons were "not popular" following the Covid-19 pandemic, she told the commission, referring to the sharing of instruments.
Ms Daly said she was "flabbergasted" by his allegations, denied the School of Music was "stagnant" and said it was "re-energising through promotional videos and external public relations".
Enda McWeeney, CETB's finance director, carried out a review of Mr Rance's correspondence, but ultimately concluded that the material put in front of him was "a bare allegation, and not a protected disclosure".
He said there had been five teachers "underutilised" at the School of Music, according to attendance records, but that he did not think a financial audit was necessary.
In her decision, adjudication officer Patsy Doyle wrote: "What occurred in this case amounted to a matter of interpersonal grievance exclusively affecting the complainant and his line manager".
"The complainant had a different opinion in how the school was progressing and somehow could not find a platform to express these views through individual or collect[ive] grievances," the adjudication officer said.
"I find I cannot elevate these grievances to what the law requires in a protected disclosure," Ms Doyle added, dismissing the penalisation complaint.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Irish Times

28 minutes ago

• Irish Times

Salesman 'deceived by false promises' over unpaid wages wins €27,000 at WRC

A tech firm has been ordered to pay over €27,000 in wages illegally withheld from a salesman who told a tribunal he was 'consistently deceived by false promises' to pay him. In a decision published on Monday the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) decided to redact the identity of the video company to 'encourage' it to 'bring the matter to a close without adverse publicity'. It follows a statutory complaint under the Payment of Wages Act 1991 by the salesman, who resigned last year with the company owing him some five months' salary and commission. The salesman joined the company in April 2023 on a contract which paid a base salary of €75,000 and commission of up to €55,000 annually. READ MORE The tribunal heard difficulties first arose when his wages were not paid in November 2023, but that this was rectified the following month. There was further non-payment in January and February 2024, the salesman told a hearing earlier this month, and in March, that he had 'less than half' his normal salary payment. His salary did come in April that year, but went unpaid in May and June 2024, he told the WRC. Bobby Healy on why Manna drone delivery could be the 'biggest technology company in the world for its space' Listen | 67:08 In July 2024, the salesman handed in notice of resignation effective 30 August, 2024. When he left on that date, he was owed €19,450 in salary and €7,979 in commission, net of tax and statutory deductions, the tribunal heard. The salesman presented the WRC with emails and WhatsApp messages he exchanged with senior executives in the company, all of whom had confirmed to him that he was owed the money, he said. The company had been able to pay him two months' wages prior to his resignation after applying for a loan in August 2024, the tribunal noted. Around 10 weeks after the claimant left, he had an email from the CEO confirming that half of the outstanding sum would be 'available by the end of the week' and that the rest would be 'available in December [2024]'. WRC adjudicator Catherine Byrne noted that when the case was first called on in April 2025, the salesman 'agreed to an adjournment when his former employer indicated that they would shortly be in funds'. When the salesman's case was heard earlier this month, he showed Ms Byrne correspondence from May 2025 in which an executive at the firm stated that the company was about to draw down funds which would allow it to pay him. 'However, no money was transferred to the complainant,' she said. The salesman told the WRC in a submission that he had suffered 'stress and inconvenience' because of the failure to pay the wages he was owed. He had spent an 'inordinate amount of time writing to various managers' and had been 'consistently deceived by false promises', he added. Adjudication officer Catherine Byrne decided to anonymise her decision on the case 'to encourage the [company] to bring the matter to a close without adverse publicity'. Ms Byrne wrote in her decision: 'It is extremely regrettable that the complainant had to spend so much time and energy trying to exert his basic entitlement to be paid his wages, an issue about which there is no dispute.' The company had made an 'illegal deduction' from the claimant's wages by failing to pay him the €27,429 owed to him when he resigned on 30 August last year, she found. Upholding the complaint, Ms Byrne directed the company to pay the salesman the sum as compensation under the Payment of Wages Act 1991.

Irish Independent

10 hours ago

• Irish Independent

Norma Foley begins talks with Attorney General on forcing religious orders to pay redress schemes

Ms Foley said her officials have now liaised with the Office of the Attorney General 'and will be engaging on the identification and legal analysis of potential mechanisms which may be available to the State'. The minister said the issue of forced financial contributions was 'complex work' and would take some time to complete. The broader impacts and implications of any 'potential mechanisms' identified would also have to be considered. The move raises at least the possibility of the sequestration of assets or the seizing or freezing of bank accounts. A recent RTÉ Investigates programme revealed how the Christian Brothers in Ireland had been rerouting their financial and asset holdings offshore – with the work carried out, in some cases, by persons against whom serious allegations have been made. The news comes days after the first excavation work was begun at the Tuam mother and baby home site, where it is claimed up to 796 babies' remains were buried. In April, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said the Government would consider options it can take against religious orders that are 'within the law'. He was answering the Social Democrats party, which said the orders had been operating as 'criminal networks'. Only one religious order made a serious offer of restitution to government negotiator Sheila Nunan, who was asked to extract a cash commitment after the State paid compensation to victims in the first instance. Another made a tiny offer. Why are these orders not being raided by the gardaí? 'When is the State finally going to flex some legal muscle when it comes to these religious orders?' Social Democrats stand-in leader Cian O'Callaghan asked in the Dáil. 'Why are these orders not being raided by the gardaí? Why are their assets not being seized?' ADVERTISEMENT He said it was unbelievable that the approach of successive governments to these orders, 'which operated as criminal networks', was to 'roll over'. Religious orders made millions on the backs of 'enslaving' women and children and were now 'walking away without paying a penny', he said. This was because 'the Government is allowing them to run rings around you'. After receipt and publication of the report from Ms Nunan, Ms Foley made contact with each of the relevant religious organisations. Of eight organisations mentioned in the report, only two made offers of a voluntary contribution 'Of eight organisations mentioned in the report, only two made offers of a voluntary contribution to the Mother and Baby Homes Payment Scheme,' she said. 'My officials have initiated contact with representatives of those organisations to ensure that this matter moves forward without delay. 'With regard to the offer of a voluntary financial contribution, I can confirm that my officials have been in contact with representatives of this organisation and that this matter is progressing. 'Similarly, with regard to the offer from an organisation to transfer legal ownership of a property to the State, officials have commenced contact with relevant parties. 'With regard to those organisations who have not chosen to make a contribution to the payment scheme, I can confirm that I have written to them to express my disappointment at their approach and to express my belief that more could and should be done by them in terms of offering contributions. 'The purpose of my contact was also to invite each of them to reflect on the content of the Nunan Report and take that opportunity to make a meaningful contribution. 'My departmental officials have been, and remain, at all times available to engage with these organisations in the event that they are willing to take up this invitation and make a meaningful contribution.' In the meantime, the minister has consulted the Attorney General to examine ways in which the cash can be obtained without their consent, she indicated. Mr Martin in April said current law meant that 'we simply can't just go in and raid people'. There had to be legality for whatever Government does, he added. Former children's minister Roderic O'Gorman first wrote to the orders early in the last government 'saying they may wish to consider making a financial contribution to redress costs'. In May 2023, the government appointed former trade union official Ms Nunan to negotiate with the orders. She was told to come back with their best and final offers within six months. Nearly two years later, Ms Nunan filed her final report stating just one order had made a serious offer of cash to pay redress. These are religious orders that own assets worth hundreds of millions Mr O'Callaghan said: 'We know these orders would much prefer to pay their armies of lawyers than the women and children that they tortured and abused. These are religious orders that own assets worth hundreds of millions.'

Sunday World

a day ago

• Sunday World

Dad twice caught driving at over four times legal limit dodges prison

'VERY LUCKY' | Defence barrister Sarah Brennan said the 'very traumatic' murder of his sister in the US had provided the catalyst for the onset of an 'extensive drink problem'. Peter McKenna Judge Raymond Finnegan warned Peter McKenna (56) of the potential consequences that awaited him following both episodes which occurred in Castleblayney, Co Monaghan in April and December last year. McKenna, with addresses at Castle Lodge Guesthouse, Market Square, Monaghan and Cois Locha, Doohamlet, Castleblayney, Monaghan pleaded guilty to two counts of drink driving, alongside those of no insurance and dangerous driving in the south Monaghan town on April 21 and December 16, 2024. Sgt Lisa McEntee relayed the State's evidence in connection to the first incident which took place shortly after 1am. She explained how gardaí, who had been on patrol in the area, came across McKenna behind the wheel of a red Vauxhall van which had been travelling along a stretch of the old Monaghan road and in the direction of Castleblayney town. Sgt McEntee said the vehicle was spotted 'swerving over and back and from side to side', resulting in gardaí turning around their patrol car and going off in pursuit of the offending vehicle. Having carried out that manoeuvre on the town's York Street area, Sgt McEntee said pursuing gardaí proceeded to activate the patrol car's blue lights as the vehicle in question continued onwards with its full beam headlights on while also 'swerving over and back and from side to side'. When McKenna pulled in and was tested for drink driving, Sgt McEntee said his reading returned a result of 223mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood. That reading put McKenna at almost four and a half times over the legal limit to drive owing to the fact the State's present day legal limit stands at 50mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood. Less than eight months later, the court was told how McKenna was caught for a second time with an almost identical blood alcohol level, this time as he drove a silver coloured Renault Kangoo van through the town. Sgt McEntee said McKenna was identified by gardaí as they observed him driving at speed along the town's Main Street shortly after midnight on December 16 last year. Like the earlier incident, gardaí took off in pursuit of McKenna before noticing the accused make a left hand turn at a roundabout while proceeding out of town and along the Monaghan Road. Moments later, the van was sighted turning onto the Ballybay Road where McKenna signalled to turn right before turning off his indicator to instead indicate left. Judge Finnegan was told how once McKenna pulled in, gardaí once again took a sample from the accused in a move which returned a reading of 224mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood. The court heard McKenna had one previous conviction for drink driving to his name, which dated back to 2004. Defence barrister Sarah Brennan, BL, said there was no denying the 'very high' nature of both readings, as she told of McKenna had been cooperative throughout both incidents by providing samples and ultimately tendering guilty pleas before the court. She said McKenna was a separated man who had been labouring under poor health for some time, challenges which had been brought to bear by a diagnosis of Chron's disease some 10 years earlier. Ms Brennan said McKenna had undergone extensive surgery as a result and was now on anti-depressants and reliant on a €240 weekly income from disability allowance. She said the upshot from that diagnosis and the 'very traumatic' murder of his sister in the US had, by his own admission, provided the catalyst for the onset of an 'extensive drink problem'. Peter McKenna News in 90 Seconds - June 22nd In appealing for leniency, Ms Brennan also implored the court to consider the antiquity which was linked to her client's sole previous conviction over two decades earlier. Judge Finnegan disqualified McKenna for two and three years respectively for dangerous and drink driving for the April 21 incident, fining him €250 in the process. A five month jail term, suspended for two years, was similarly imposed for the drink driving summons despite Judge Finnegan's own concession of how he had been 'very tempted' not to suspend any of its duration. A further €500 fine was handed down for no insurance in the latter incident with a six year ban and five month consecutive suspended prison sentence being recorded for what Judge Finnegan said was an 'extraordinary' alcohol intake reading. In handing down those penalties and advising McKenna of his good fortune in avoiding a custodial spell, Judge Finnegan told him: 'You are getting a chance Mr McKenna. It's up to you whether you take it, if you don't you will serve the full sentence.'