Weaponised storytelling: How AI is helping researchers sniff out disinformation campaigns

It is not often that cold, hard facts determine what people care most about and what they believe. Instead, it is the power and familiarity of a well-told story that reigns supreme. Whether it's a heartfelt anecdote, a personal testimony or a meme echoing familiar cultural narratives, stories tend to stick with us, move us and shape our beliefs.
This characteristic of
storytelling
is precisely what can make it so dangerous when wielded by the wrong hands. For decades, foreign adversaries have used narrative tactics in efforts to manipulate public opinion in the United States.
Social media
platforms have brought new complexity and amplification to these campaigns. The phenomenon garnered ample public scrutiny after evidence emerged of Russian entities exerting influence over election-related material on Facebook in the lead-up to the 2016 election.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Save Big on Makeovers
Kitchen Magic
Get Quote
Undo
While artificial intelligence is exacerbating the problem, it is at the same time becoming one of the most powerful defences against such manipulations. Researchers have been using machine learning techniques to analyze disinformation content.
At the Cognition, Narrative and Culture Lab at
Florida International University
, we are building
AI
tools to help detect disinformation campaigns that employ tools of narrative persuasion. We are training AI to go beyond surface-level language analysis to understand narrative structures, trace personas and timelines and decode cultural references.
Live Events
Disinformation vs
misinformation
Discover the stories of your interest
Blockchain
5 Stories
Cyber-safety
7 Stories
Fintech
9 Stories
E-comm
9 Stories
ML
8 Stories
Edtech
6 Stories
In July 2024, the Department of Justice disrupted a Kremlin-backed operation that used nearly a thousand fake social media accounts to spread false narratives. These weren't isolated incidents. They were part of an organized campaign, powered in part by AI.
Disinformation differs crucially from misinformation. While misinformation is simply false or inaccurate information - getting facts wrong - disinformation is intentionally fabricated and shared specifically to mislead and manipulate.
A recent illustration of this came in October 2024, when a video purporting to show a Pennsylvania election worker tearing up mail-in ballots marked for Donald Trump swept platforms such as X and Facebook.
Within days, the FBI traced the clip to a Russian influence outfit, but not before it racked up millions of views. This example vividly demonstrates how foreign influence campaigns artificially manufacture and amplify fabricated stories to manipulate US politics and stoke divisions among Americans.
Humans are wired to process the world through stories. From childhood, we grow up hearing stories, telling them and using them to make sense of complex information. Narratives don't just help people remember - they help us feel. They foster emotional connections and shape our interpretations of social and political events.
This makes them especially powerful tools for persuasion - and, consequently, for spreading disinformation. A compelling narrative can override scepticism and sway opinion more effectively than a flood of statistics.
For example, a story about rescuing a sea turtle with a plastic straw in its nose often does more to raise concern about plastic pollution than volumes of environmental data.
Usernames, cultural context and narrative time
Using AI tools to piece together a picture of the narrator of a story, the timeline for how they tell it and cultural details specific to where the story takes place can help identify when a story doesn't add up.
Narratives are not confined to the content users share - they also extend to the personas users construct to tell them. Even a social media handle can carry persuasive signals. We have developed a system that analyzes usernames to infer demographic and identity traits such as name, gender, location, sentiment and even personality, when such cues are embedded in the handle.
This work, presented in 2024 at the International Conference on Web and Social Media, highlights how even a brief string of characters can signal how users want to be perceived by their audience.
For example, a user attempting to appear as a credible journalist might choose a handle like @JamesBurnsNYT rather than something more casual like @JimB_NYC. Both may suggest a male user from New York, but one carries the weight of institutional credibility. Disinformation campaigns often exploit these perceptions by crafting handles that mimic authentic voices or affiliations.
Although a handle alone cannot confirm whether an account is genuine, it plays an important role in assessing overall authenticity. By interpreting usernames as part of the broader narrative an account presents, AI systems can better evaluate whether an identity is manufactured to gain trust, blend into a target community or amplify persuasive content.
This kind of semantic interpretation contributes to a more holistic approach to disinformation detection - one that considers not just what is said but who appears to be saying it and why.
Also, stories don't always unfold chronologically. A social media thread might open with a shocking event, flash back to earlier moments and skip over key details in between.
Humans handle this effortlessly - we're used to fragmented storytelling. But for AI, determining a sequence of events based on a narrative account remains a major challenge.
Our lab is also developing methods for timeline extraction, teaching AI to identify events, understand their sequence and map how they relate to one another, even when a story is told in nonlinear fashion.
Objects and symbols often carry different meanings in different cultures, and without cultural awareness, AI systems risk misinterpreting the narratives they analyze. Foreign adversaries can exploit cultural nuances to craft messages that resonate more deeply with specific audiences, enhancing the persuasive power of disinformation.
Consider the following sentence: "The woman in the white dress was filled with joy." In a Western context, the phrase evokes a happy image. But in parts of Asia, where white symbolizes mourning or death, it could feel unsettling or even offensive.
In order to use AI to detect disinformation that weaponises symbols, sentiments and storytelling within targeted communities, it's critical to give AI this sort of cultural literacy. In our research, we've found that training AI on diverse cultural narratives improves its sensitivity to such distinctions.
Who benefits from narrative-aware AI?
Narrative-aware AI tools can help intelligence analysts quickly identify orchestrated influence campaigns or emotionally charged storylines that are spreading unusually fast.
They might use AI tools to process large volumes of social media posts in order to map persuasive narrative arcs, identify near-identical storylines and flag coordinated timing of social media activity. Intelligence services could then use countermeasures in real time.
In addition, crisis-response agencies could swiftly identify harmful narratives, such as false emergency claims during natural disasters. Social media platforms could use these tools to efficiently route high-risk content for human review without unnecessary censorship.
Researchers and educators could also benefit by tracking how a story evolves across communities, making narrative analysis more rigorous and shareable.
Ordinary users can also benefit from these technologies. The AI tools could flag social media posts in real time as possible disinformation, allowing readers to be sceptical of suspect stories, thus counteracting falsehoods before they take root.
As AI takes on a greater role in monitoring and interpreting online content, its ability to understand storytelling beyond just traditional semantic analysis has become essential.
To this end, we are building systems to uncover hidden patterns, decode cultural signals and trace narrative timelines to reveal how disinformation takes hold.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

20 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Did he casually use 'N' word? Trump slams Medvedev over Iran nuke comments

US President Donald Trump has hit out at former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev for suggesting that some countries may be ready to supply nuclear warheads to Iran in response to recent American airstrikes. In a strongly worded post on Truth Social, Trump said: "Did I hear Former President Medvedev, from Russia, casually throwing around the 'N word' (Nuclear!), and saying that he and other Countries would supply Nuclear Warheads to Iran? Did he really say that or, is it just a figment of my imagination? If he did say that, and, if confirmed, please let me know, IMMEDIATELY," he wrote. "I guess that's why Putin's 'THE BOSS,' he added. Trump also highlighted the technological edge of the United States in nuclear weaponry. He said US nuclear submarines are '20 years advanced over the pack' and expressed gratitude to the submarine crews involved in the recent strikes on Iranian nuclear targets. 'Russia has no intention of supplying nuclear weapons to Iran' Responding to Trump's concern, Medmedev, in a post on X, said, "Regarding President Trump's concerns: I condemn the US strike on Iran – it failed to achieve its objectives. However, Russia has no intention of supplying nuclear weapons to Iran because, unlike Israel, we are parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty." — Dmitry Medvedev (@MedvedevRussiaE) June 23, 2025 He added, "I know quite well what this would entail, having overseen our nuclear forces as president. But other countries might – and that's what was said. And we definitely shouldn't be arguing over who has more nukes. All the more so because the New START treaty, which I once signed with a US president, is still in force — for now. The question is: what comes next?" Strikes failed to damage Iran's nuclear programme: Medvedev The Trump-Medvedev comes after a series of posts by Dmitry Medvedev on X (formerly Twitter), where he claimed that the US-led strikes failed to cause serious harm to Iran's nuclear infrastructure. He argued that the attacks might have strengthened Iran's position and escalated tensions in the Middle East. 'Critical infrastructure of the nuclear fuel cycle appears to have been unaffected or sustained only minor damage. The enrichment of nuclear material — and, now we can say it outright, the future production of nuclear weapons — will continue. A number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads,' Medvedev wrote. 'US now entangled in new conflict' Medvedev painted a grim picture of the situation in the region: 'Israel is under attack, explosions are rocking the country, and people are panicking. The US is now entangled in a new conflict, with prospects of a ground operation looming on the horizon.' In his posts, Medvedev blamed Trump for pushing the US into yet another war and mocked any chances the American president might have had of receiving international recognition for peace efforts. 'Iran's political regime has survived — and in all likelihood, has come out even stronger. The people are rallying around the country's spiritual leadership, including those who were previously indifferent or opposed to it. Donald Trump, once hailed as 'president of peace,' has now pushed the US into another war,' he stated. 'The vast majority of countries around the world oppose the actions of Israel and the United States. At this rate, Trump can forget about the Nobel Peace Prize — not even with how rigged it has become. What a way to kick things off, Mr. President. Congratulations!' Medvedev added.

Time of India

29 minutes ago

• Time of India

Bishnoi gang claims responsibility for 2nd killing in a month in Canada

New Delhi: The Lawrence Bishnoi gang has claimed responsibility for the killing of a businessman reported from Canada's Brampton last week. Sources said Goldy Brar supervised the killing of the gang's rival, who apparently refused to pay protection money. This would be the second killing carried out by the gang in Canada over a month's time, the previous one being of Harjeet Dhadda, who the Bishnoi group claimed was financing the Arsh Dala syndicate. Investigators said Bishnoi and Brar accused Dhadda of sheltering the killers of their associate Mahal Singh at his farmhouse in Uttarakhand. The latest victim who was shot on Friday has been identified as MP Dhanoa, who was in his thirties. He was gunned down in a drive-by shooting at an automotive complex shop located on Rutherford Road South and Selby Road in Brampton. Peel Regional Police told the local media that its officers responded to the shooting around 5.45pm. Upon arrival at the complex, police discovered a man with multiple gunshot wounds. Paramedics rushed him to a trauma centre in critical condition, where he succumbed to his injuries. The local administration blamed an "India-based crime network" for the "targeted killing". A Facebook post by Bishnoi's man Friday Rohit Godara read, "We are responsible for the killing. I called him a week ago for protection money because he made money through a lot of wrong things and he came out on bail from jail some time ago. When I called him, he misbehaved with me. We told him that we will definitely take him out.. . lightly. This is a warning for those whose name is included in our hit list, we will definitely kill them." The group has of late stopped tagging their kingpin Bishnoi in their posts to shield him and give the impression that they are operating separately. However, investigators dismissed these claims as frivolous attempts to mislead the law enforcement agencies. In May, 51-year-old Dhadda of Brampton was shot multiple times after being approached by unknown suspects in a parking lot near Tranmere Drive and Telford Way in Mississauga. Investigators said they found common patterns in the killings of Dhanoa and Dhadda—Brar being a key link and conspirator. Two of Brar's henchmen, Aman and Digvijay, were held in June for Dhadda's murder. According to social media posts from his children, Dhadda, a Canadian resident since 1997, received threats in recent years, which were reported to police, but no action was taken.

India Gazette

31 minutes ago

• India Gazette

India-US trade deal to increase US' exports to India: Crisil

New Delhi [India], June 23 (ANI): Given that India has much higher tariffs than those imposed by the US, the impending bilateral trade agreement (BTA) -- that would reduce tariffs-- is set to increase the US's exports to India more than vice versa, according to an analysis by Crisil. India would be able to import more energy products, certain agricultural products, and defence equipment, among others, from the US, Crisil said in a 'Quickonomics' report. India, according to Crisil, should be prepared to see more imports from the US under the bilateral trade agreement (BTA). A lowering of tariffs under the BTA would make US goods more competitive in India, it argued. 'This is because India's tariffs are much higher than those of the US, and bringing these down would be advantageous to exporters in the US,' Crisil said. India's exports, however, are unlikely to see a major spike because the focus of the President Donald Trump administration is to reduce its trade deficit with India, and most of India's top exports to the US are already duty-free (before the application of baseline 10 per cent, which is applicable since April 10). Besides, the export potential would also depend eventually on the amount of tariff India faces when compared with other competing nations, Crisil noted. The US has categorically said that it wants to reduce its trade deficit with India (among other nations) and has complained that India's high tariffs and non-tariff barriers have been a hindrance for American companies looking to increase their exports. Even as India had shown its discomfort in allowing US agriculture products to be exported to India, imports of certain agriculture products such as walnuts, pistachios and cranberries could get a fillip as India's share in US exports of these items was relatively low -- at 19.4 per cent, 5.0 per cent and 3.1 per cent, respectively -- in 2024. This contrasts with almonds, where India's share was a hefty 70.5 per cent in 2024 -- one of the US's top agricultural export items to India. Further, with India's aviation sector growing, there is scope to increase imports of civilian aircraft, engines, and parts. According to Crisil, there also seems to be good complementarity in the energy space as the US is a large exporter and India is a large importer of energy commodities. Even though India has a huge opportunity to import crude oil from the US, Crisil said the prospects of increasing crude oil imports from the US would have to be viewed against challenging factors -- such as higher cost of transportation, including the longer transit time. 'The US is a large exporter and India a large importer of LNG, providing a mutually beneficial ground. Here, the synergy seems to be much better than that in crude petroleum as the US is already among the top three suppliers of LNG to India,' Crisil said. 'With favourable factors such as US natural gas prices being more stable than those in the Middle East (India's largest LNG import partner) and long-term contracts being signed between Indian entities and US suppliers, there has been an increase in the import of this commodity from the US,' it added. Defence imports into India could see a rise under the bilateral trade agreement. 'Even as India is trying to increase its defence production and export capabilities, it remains one of the largest arms importers. At the same time, the US is the world's largest arms exporter. While Russia has been India's largest arms supplier traditionally, its share in India's arms imports has come down in recent years. This has created space for western suppliers, led by the US, to step up their sales,' the report said. In fact, in 2023, the US and India launched a bilateral Defence Acceleration Ecosystem (called INDUS-X) to facilitate defence collaboration between the countries. Combining all these opportunities, India's trade surplus with the US is expected to come down -- a major ask of the US, as it has implemented reciprocal tariffs on countries in proportion to the trade surplus. On the contrary, India may see some gains in exports of smartphones, certain pharmaceuticals and labour-intensive sectors such as textiles and gems and jewellery. The US announced reciprocal tariffs on India and a host of other nations on April 2, and then paused the increase for 90 days from April 10 to negotiate trade deals with these countries (for India, the reciprocal tariff was 26 per cent, lower than the tariff on many other Asian peers). During the pause period, a 10 per cent base tariff remains applicable (over and above the existing tariffs) on all countries, including India. India is negotiating a trade deal with the US, called the bilateral trade agreement (BTA) -- the first tranche of which is targeted to be completed by the fall of 2025. (ANI)