World Bank sanctions USD 108 mn for Pakistan's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
The World Bank has sanctioned additional funding of USD 108 million for improving the lives of women and girls by enhancing their access to essential services and economic opportunities in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province in northwest Pakistan.
The Pakhtunkhwa Integrated Tourism Development (KITE) and the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Rural Accessibility Project (KPRAP) projects have an estimated value of USD 30 million and USD 78 million respectively.
According to a release from the World Bank, the funding has been granted to help both projects accomplish their goals of increasing access to markets, jobs, and health and education services in a way that increases the province's resilience to natural catastrophes.
The USD 78 million in additional financing for the KPRAP will focus on providing safe and climate resilient road infrastructure, by upgrading and rehabilitating rural roads, thereby improving access to services including schools, health facilities, and markets.
'The project is crucial for improving the lives of people in the province, particularly women and girls, by enhancing their access to essential services and economic opportunities,' said Muhammad Bilal Paracha, Task Team Leader for the project.
The USD 30 million in additional financing for the KITE will help enhance the province's tourism sector by completing the rehabilitation of two roads that will improve access to the province's pristine tourist spots in the vicinity.
'This additional financing underscores the World Bank's commitment to supporting Pakistan's and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province's development goals,' Paracha said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
4 hours ago
- Mint
Indian stock market trend shows ‘cautious undertone' amid escalating Israel-Iran conflict, says Geojit' Vinod Nair
In a span of one and a half months, the Indian market recouped more than 75% of the broad market's total loss of 21% made during the consolidation period between September 2024 and April 2025. However, the recent trend shows a cautious undertone, with the Nifty50 oscillating in a tight range of 750 points — between 24,500 and 25,250 — indicating indecision and a mild downward bias. The muted market trend reflects the fact that much of the optimism surrounding a recovery in domestic earnings and easing global risks, such as tariff-related concerns, has already been factored in. After a consequent fall in corporate earnings in Q2 and Q3 FY25 results, Q4 has provided a glimpse of an upgrade in earnings. In anticipation of recovery in domestic capex and moderation in inflation, the market expects that FY26 will be much better than FY25. However, after the recent market rebound, the market is waiting to guess further about the details, i.e., Q4 has shown about a 10-12% rebound in earnings, which may not be good enough to sustain India's current premium valuation. The need is that it should sustain higher growth in the long term, like towards an average of 15% growth, to keep alive the one-year forward P/E of India at 20-21x. Diverging views have emerged amid signs of a global economic slowdown and escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. The World Bank has lowered its global GDP growth forecast for CY25 by 50 basis points to 2.3%, with only a marginal improvement expected in CY26 to 2.5–2.6%. The downgrade is largely driven by increasing trade frictions, policy uncertainty, and subdued investment activity, resulting in growth forecast cuts for nearly 70% of economies. Against this backdrop, the Indian market is projecting a modest earnings growth of around 10%, which may not be enough to sustain the prevailing positive sentiment. Therefore, the upcoming Q1FY26 earnings— due in the next 2–3 weeks — will be crucial in determining the market's near-term trajectory. Secondly, the temporary pause in reciprocal tariffs, which is currently on a 90-day grace period, is set to expire in July. So far, the markets have shown little concern about it, buoyed by expectations of a constructive, long-term bilateral trade agreement (BTA) with the U.S. Such an agreement is anticipated to mitigate long-term risks associated with tariff volatility and deglobalisation trends. However, investors remain watchful for concrete developments, as any delay or setback could reignite concerns, particularly with the rising cost of operations in an increasingly protectionist global environment. Additionally, escalating tensions in the Middle East have introduced a note of caution in both global and domestic markets. India, which was basking under the cut of crude prices, is taking a setback from the rise in risk. In the aftermath of the Gaza conflict, Israel has escalated its response to Iran's advancing nuclear ambitions, increasing fears of a broader regional crisis. The potential involvement of the U.S. in this complex situation has further unsettled investor sentiment. Despite this, markets witnessed a relief rally on Friday, driven by hopes of a possible diplomatic breakthrough between the U.S. and Iran. Domestic players are exploring the pattern to book profits under the rise of geopolitical tension and lack of a new trigger. In the future a domestic trigger could be the continuity of the earnings outlook in Q1FY26, whereas globally it could be the smooth completion of BTA and moderation in Middle East tension regarding which a better clarity is expected in July. This means that the market may continue to trade in a volatile pattern within the narrow range of 24,500 to 25,250 for the Nifty50 index, as noticed in the last 4-5 weeks. Large-cap stocks are anticipated to outperform during this period, with a selective approach recommended for mid and small caps. Should tensions escalate, 24,000 is expected to act as a strong support level. To cross beyond 25,500, steady upside in domestic Q1 earnings growth, concrete BTA and drop in global tensions are required. The author, Vinod Nair is Head of Research at Geojit Financial Services. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making investment decisions.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Kerala Startup Mission signs agreement to support agri tech startups and farmers
Thiruvananthapuram: Kerala Startup Mission (KSUM) has inked a performance-based condition (PBC) agreement with agriculture department's KERA project to provide innovative solutions tailored to the needs of local farmers and agri-food enterprises. Under this PBC agreement, KSUM will select 150 agri-tech startups across the state to address specific challenges. This is intended to benefit at least 40,000 farmers. KERA is a World Bank-funded project under investment project financing for the agriculture sector of the state. The PBC framework represents an innovative, results-driven approach to funding allocation. In this model, funds or payments to the implementing agency are disbursed only after achieving predefined results. KSUM CEO Anoop Ambika said that this performance-oriented strategy not only encourages optimal performance but also allows the implementing agency considerable autonomy in how to utilise funds to meet set targets. It promotes greater accountability by directing resources to frontline operations, enabling decision-making and strategic resource allocation based on real-time performance indicators. Selected startups will receive a grant of Rs 25 lakh each. An initial grant of Rs 20 lakh will be allocated for product development (PBC1), which covers idea development (innovation/seed fund), research and development, product testing, technology commercialisation, production, scaling up existing facilities, working capital for business operations and other related activities. The subsequent grant of Rs 5 lakh will support product adoption by end users (PBC2), addressing product demonstration, market testing, pilot product launch, sales and marketing and other related activities.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
World Bank and IMF climate snub 'worrying', says COP29 presidency
The hosts of the most recent UN climate talks are worried international lenders are retreating from their commitments to help boost funding for developing countries' response to global warming. Major development banks have agreed to boost climate spending and are seen as crucial in the effort to dramatically increase finance to help poorer countries build resilience to impacts and invest in renewable energy. But anxiety has grown as the Trump administration has slashed foreign aid and discouraged US-based development lenders such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund from focussing on climate finance. Developing nations, excluding China, will need an estimated $1.3 trillion a year by 2035 in financial assistance to transition to renewable energy and climate-proof their economies from increasing weather extremes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Laxmi Ji Idol For Wealth, Peace & Happiness Luxeartisanship Shop Now Undo Nowhere near this amount has been committed. At last year's UN COP29 summit in Azerbaijan, rich nations agreed to increase climate finance to $300 billion a year by 2035, an amount decried as woefully inadequate. Azerbaijan and Brazil, which is hosting this year's COP30 conference, have launched an initiative to reduce the shortfall, with the expectation of "significant" contributions from international lenders. But so far only two -- the African Development Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank -- have responded to a call to engage the initiative with ideas, said COP29 president Mukhtar Babayev. "We call on their shareholders to urgently help us to address these concerns," he told climate negotiators at a high-level summit in the German city of Bonn this week. "We fear that a complex and volatile global environment is distracting" many of those expected to play a big role in bridging the climate finance gap , he added. - A 'worrisome trend' - His team travelled to Washington in April for the IMF and World Bank's spring meetings hoping to find the same enthusiasm for climate lending they had encountered a year earlier. But instead they found institutions "very much reluctant now to talk about climate at all", said Azerbaijan's top climate negotiator Yalchin Rafiyev. This was a "worrisome trend", he said, given expectations these lenders would extend the finance needed in the absence of other sources. "They're very much needed," he said. The World Bank is directing 45 percent of its total lending to climate, as part of an action plan in place until June 2026, with the public portion of that spilt 50/50 between emissions reductions and building resilience. The United States, the World Bank's biggest shareholder, has pushed in a different direction. On the sidelines of the April spring meetings, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged the bank to focus on "dependable technologies" rather than "distortionary climate finance targets." This could mean investing in gas and other fossil fuel-based energy production, he said. Under the Paris Agreement, wealthy developed countries -- those most responsible for global warming to date -- are obliged to pay climate finance to poorer nations. Other countries, most notably China, make voluntary contributions. - Money matters - Finance is a source of long-running tensions at UN climate negotiations. Donors have consistently failed to deliver on past finance pledges, and have committed well below what experts agree developing nations need to cope with the climate crisis. The issue flared up again this week in Bonn, with nations at odds over whether to debate financial commitments from rich countries during the formal meetings. European nations have also pared back their foreign aid spending in recent months, raising fears that budgets for climate finance could also face a haircut. At COP29, multilateral development banks (MDBs) led by the World Bank Group estimated they could provide $120 billion annually in climate financing to low and middle income countries, and mobilise another $65 billion from the private sector by 2030. Their estimate for high income countries was $50 billion, with another $65 billion mobilised from the private sector. Rob Moore, of policy think tank E3G, said these lenders are the largest providers of international public finance to developing countries. "Whilst they are facing difficult political headwinds in some quarters, they would be doing both themselves and their clients a disservice by disengaging on climate change," he said. The World Bank in particular has done "a huge amount of work" to align its lending with global climate goals. "If they choose to step back this would be at their own detriment, and other banks like the regionally based MDBs would likely play a bigger role in shaping the economy of the future," he said. The World Bank declined to comment on the record.
