Taiwan charges four with national security violations for alleged spying for China

The four defendants were among five people expelled from Lai's ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) – which advocates for Taiwan's sovereignty – last month for suspected espionage read more
Security guards stand guard in front of the Presidential Office Building in Taipei, Taiwan. File image/ Reuters
Taiwanese prosecutors charged on Tuesday four people, including a former staffer in President Lai Ching-te's office, for violating national security after they allegedly spied for China.
The four defendants were among five people expelled from Lai's ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) – which advocates for Taiwan's sovereignty – last month for suspected espionage.
The fifth person is still under investigation, a prosecutor told AFP.
China claims democratic self-ruled Taiwan is part of its territory and has threatened to use force to annex it. Taipei accuses Beijing of using espionage and infiltration to weaken its defences.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The four people have been charged with violating the Classified National Security Information Protection Act and National Security Act after they allegedly shared state secrets with China, the Taipei District Prosecutors Office said in a statement.
Other alleged offences include money laundering.
The espionage happened over a 'prolonged time', included the sharing of 'important and sensitive diplomatic information' and caused 'significant harm to national security', prosecutors said.
Prosecutors are seeking prison sentences ranging from five to more than 18 years, and the confiscation of more than NT$8.3 million (US$277,000) in illicit gains.
The heftiest sentence is for a defendant surnamed Huang, who allegedly transmitted information to China 'via a specific messaging app'.
Huang previously worked for a New Taipei City councillor, the semi-official Central News Agency (CNA) said.
Among the other defendants is a person surnamed Ho, who CNA said is a former aide to National Security Council chief Joseph Wu when he was foreign minister.
Huang and Ho have denied the allegations against them, prosecutors said.
The other two defendants, including the person who had worked for Lai when he was vice president and then president, have confessed.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Beijing and Taipei have been spying on each other for decades, but experts say the threat to Taiwan is greater given the risk of a Chinese invasion.
Taiwan's National Security Bureau said previously 64 people were prosecuted for Chinese espionage last year, compared with 48 in 2023 and 10 in 2022.
In 2024, they included 15 veterans and 28 active service members, with prison sentences reaching as high as 20 years.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Hindu

26 minutes ago

• The Hindu

97 'anti-nationals' arrested post Pahalgam terror attack in Assam: Himanta

Two people have been arrested for allegedly being "anti-Hindu" from different parts of Assam following the Pahalgam terror attack, taking the total number of arrests to 97 so far, Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said on Monday (June 23, 2025). In a post on X, Mr. Sarma said one person each was apprehended from Tinsukia and Nagaon districts. "Crackdown on anti-Hindu elements continues... 97 anti-national and anti-Hindu culprits behind bars now," he added. Crackdown on Anti-Hindu elements continues 🚨 1️⃣@TinsukiaPolice arrested Md Anisur Rehman for sharing an objectionable content on Hinduism. 2️⃣@nagaonpolice arrested Farijul Islam for a derogatory comment on Lord Ram. 97 anti-national and anti-Hindu culprits behind bars now. — Himanta Biswa Sarma (@himantabiswa) June 23, 2025 The arrested person from Tinsukia had shared objectionable content on Hinduism on social media, while the accused from Nagaon made a derogatory comment on Lord Ram, the CM stated. Earlier, Opposition AIUDF MLA Aminul Islam was arrested on sedition charges for allegedly defending Pakistan and its complicity in the Pahalgam terror attack. After getting bail in the case, Islam was again detained under the National Security Act (NSA). On May 2, Mr. Sarma threatened to break the legs of those who raised the 'Pakistan zindabad' slogan in the aftermath of the Jammu and Kashmir terror attack. Addressing a campaign rally for the panchayat elections, he had appealed to the people to pray and give strength to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Indian Army so that Pakistani terrorists hiding anywhere in the world can be brought for "breaking their legs". Terrorists struck a prime tourist location in Pahalgam in south Kashmir on April 22 killing 26 people, mostly tourists, and injuring several others.

Mint

an hour ago

• Mint

A toy maker sued Trump over tariffs and won. Its operations are still in tatters.

On paper, things are looking up for Rick Woldenberg and his Illinois-based educational-toy business. Tariffs on Chinese imports are down from stratospheric levels. Federal courts have ruled the duties were invalid in the first place. And trade deals could further ease import duties. But on the ground, it is a different story. Crucial equipment has been disassembled, packed and trucked hundreds of miles on mountain roads only to be trucked back on short notice. Staff members are constantly re-evaluating a catalog of more than 2,000 toys and games, deciding which to keep producing and which to put on ice indefinitely. And the business recently had to raise prices. 'We're moving at the speed of light here—flying the plane while fixing it," said Woldenberg, who runs the family business. Founded by his grandfather in 1916, it now comprises two companies, Learning Resources and hand2mind. For weeks, Woldenberg and his roughly 500 employees—most at a suburban Chicago headquarters—have hastened to halt shipments, reroute cargo, raise prices and freeze expansion plans. The companies sued President Trump and other administration officials in federal court, winning a reprieve that is now under appeal and on hold. On Wednesday, the companies asked the Supreme Court to intervene in their favor. Through it all, the most pressing questions are how to move toy production out of China, where to move it—and how to get tons of manufacturing equipment there in time to meet deadlines for end-of-the-year holidays. 'It's almost like an evacuation," Woldenberg said. 'We don't have a place to make important items our reputation is built around." Lining up new factories in another country is just the start. Heavy manufacturing-molds must be transported hundreds or thousands of miles by truck or ship and then reassembled. Quality-control processes and safety inspections must be re-created. On Woldenberg's list: Vietnam, India and Cambodia. One place he isn't considering: the U.S. American injection-molding factories aren't set up—or cost-effective—for the painting, assembly and labor-intensive finishing the toys need, he said. Employees have hurried to halt shipments, reroute cargo, raise prices and freeze expansion plans. Woldenberg's production has been centered on China since the 1990s, when his companies started pairing up with contract manufacturers there. Factories compete vigorously for his companies' relatively small batches, and have plenty of the unskilled but experienced workers needed to manually smooth, paint, assemble and package the products, he said. After the tariffs of Trump's first term, Woldenberg began exploring new manufacturing centers and moved production for about 15% of his products to Vietnam and India over nearly three years. Last year, the companies imported $65 million of products, about 60% from China. When Trump won his second term in November, Woldenberg prepared for a trade war with China and drafted a plan to offset tariffs as high as 40%: Cut costs by 10% in every department. Rein in capital expenditures. Negotiate concessions from factories in China. (He said he got about 5% on average 'after a lot of arguing.") Keep his own price increases under 10%. Then, Trump slapped 145% tariffs on goods from China. Woldenberg threw out his plan. With tariffs at that level, he started planning to move production. That meant relocating the company's 1,500 injection molds installed in Chinese factories, weighing what he estimated to be 1.5 million pounds combined. But where? The answer was clear for one of his top products: GeoSafari Jr. Kidnoculars—bright blue, green and yellow binoculars sold under the Educational Insights brand. Amazon alone has shipped more than 9,000 a month lately, pricing them just under $10 each, and ranking it No. 1 among nature exploration toys. A factory near Hanoi already made some Kidnoculars. Woldenberg's team ordered the 13 molds in China to be sent there. They filled a flatbed truck with bulky blocks of metal stacked on pallets and wrapped in plastic. By May 1, the Kidnocular molds had arrived. Production began soon after. 'That's probably the single easiest product to move," Woldenberg said. Cooper the STEM Robot, a newcomer to the Learning Resources lineup, proved trickier. The cheerful, blue-and-black programmable ball with alligator-clip hands has sensors to detect objects and light, and can wheel along a line drawn by a child. It sells for $79.99 online. Woldenberg's team hasn't found a place to build it, or other electronics, outside China. 'Once the inventory that we have is gone, I don't know how we're going to replenish it," he said. Woldenberg doesn't dodge publicity. Under President Barack Obama, he fought tougher lead-testing rules—and in recent weeks has campaigned on cable television to end Trump's tariffs. His daughter, a company executive, posts TikToks explaining the pain of tariffs. The companies sued in late April, challenging the tariffs on constitutional and other grounds. 'It's not really our corporate personality to wait for the building to fall on our head," Woldenberg said. 'No one's going to save me. We are going to save ourselves." In court, he argued that even the president's emergency powers don't let him impose such tariffs without legislation. The government said that losing the case would hurt trade negotiations and that Trump needed to maintain the tariffs to pursue delicate talks over border crossings, narcotics control and rebuilding U.S. manufacturing. While the case wound through the courts, the tariff policy kept changing. In mid-May, the U.S. and China reached a surprise deal, lowering the new U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports to 30% for 90 days. Production in China for Woldenberg was back on, at least for a few weeks. His team moved quickly, turning around a truck about to cross China's border with Vietnam, weighed down by heavy steel molds needed for making Sight Word Swat, the Sneaky, Snacky Squirrel Game and other games and toys. Aborting the shipment cost the company $13,000. Two more trucks bearing company molds had already crossed the border. Woldenberg would have held off moving them had he known a deal was coming. Costs in Vietnam were running 10% to 30% higher than in China for many products, he said. More good news arrived at the end of May. A federal judge ruled that the government couldn't impose the tariffs on imports by Woldenberg's companies. The government appealed within hours. Meanwhile, the tariffs remained in place. For Woldenberg, the temporary deal with China and his initial court victory are promising but not enough. His team is heading to India and Vietnam in coming weeks to oversee new production lines, which take time to get up to speed. Some molds, including those for the Peeksville Hide & Cheep Chicken Coop, are en route to India by ship. The company just raised prices, averaging 5% to 10%. Trump recently suggested on social media that tariffs on China would be 55%. Tariff rates for Vietnam and India are scheduled to rise sharply in July—to 46% and 26%, respectively. Woldenberg says he can't predict whether those will stick, rise or fall, but says he can't afford to import from China if tariffs are 55%. 'We're like a refugee from a war—if the higher ground we sought isn't safe, we will load everything up in a donkey cart and move again," Woldenberg said. 'It's a really terrible way to run a business." Write to Theo Francis at

The Print

an hour ago

• The Print

China sees Iran attack as a strategic dead-end for US. A no-win situation

Chinese analysts broadly view the US position as a strategic dead-end, and that the Trump administration seeks compromise but is structurally incapable of achieving it. Chinese public opinion coalesces around decisive views: Trump's reckless military intervention has driven the Middle East to a perilous tipping point. The US and Israel emerge as unmistakable aggressors, while Iran is framed as standing on a moral high ground. Commentators lament a spiralling cycle of violence among Iran, Israel, and the US—a conflict with no foreseeable resolution. China's verdict on the American airstrikes on Iran is clear: Beijing leads on peace; Washington on chaos. Its response to the United States' recent attack on Iran's nuclear facilities was outright condemnation. Russia aligned closely, warning that Washington's global credibility has suffered yet another blow. Public sentiment largely echoes this narrative, with social media users portraying the attack as ensnaring US President Donald Trump in a dangerously complex trap. Chen Feng, an Observer (Guancha) columnist, sums up the dilemma: Trump's strike on Iran's nuclear sites has locked him in a lose-lose trap. Thriving on spectacle and drama, Trump's alliance with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was theatrical, flaunting a 'team' dynamic that boosted his bravado. But the show came at a high cost. Iran's swift retaliation, hitting Israeli cities like Haifa with homegrown missiles, exposed cracks in Israel's defences and turned the region's airspace volatile. Attempts at regime change risk uniting Iran's factions instead of breaking them. Chen warns, 'Removing leaders like (Ayatollah Ali) Khamenei won't erase Iran's ideology. What Netanyahu calls 'lasting peace' may spark endless war. With the fuse lit, both he and Trump hold the match.' Adding to this perception of instability, viral content on microblogging site Weibo portrays scenes of Israelis fleeing via Egypt's Taba crossing, invoking historical echoes of Jewish diasporas. Hu Xijin, former editor-in-chief of the Global Times, dismisses Trump as politically untrustworthy; a leader whose promises are tactical manoeuvres and not genuine commitments. He critiques American imperialism as inherently deceitful, a bully to the weak and craven before rivals. For over three years, Hu argues, Russia's nuclear posture has been a check on Western ambitions; and Trump's erratic policies toward Russia, North Korea, and Iran reveal imperialism's frailty under pressure. Liu Zhongmin, a professor at Shanghai Foreign Studies University and vice president of the China Middle East Society, notes a clear downward trajectory for US influence in the Middle East. He argues that the intricate trilateral relationship between the US, Israel, and Iran is becoming increasingly unstable and unpredictable. Also read: Trump tried to belittle India, but his Iran gamble has handed Modi unexpected diplomatic space Rising narrative of defiance On Weibo, the question dominating the discourse is this: how would Iran retaliate? Hashtags like Iran is on fire have drawn nearly a billion views, projecting a rising tide of support for Iran's defiance. The narrative that Iran is 'setting an example for the world' is gaining momentum. While many acknowledge Iran's limitations in striking the US mainland directly, there is consensus that Tehran will retaliate asymmetrically, through unpredictable and potentially destabilising tactics. Wang Jin, director of the Center for Israeli Studies at Northwest University, foresees intensified regional conflict as longstanding red lines crumble. He anticipates that the US will soon claim a diplomatic victory, but warns this could provoke severe backlash within Iran, including escalated attacks on American interests across the Middle East. Despite Iran's increasingly fragile position, facing dwindling foreign support and stretched resources, its resolve appears unyielding. Some commentators advocate for a potential China-Russia-Iran 'grand alliance' to counter US hegemony, a prospect that would further reshape the geopolitical landscape. Also read: Iran has fewer options & more risks than before. Its choices will affect all of Middle East China's calculated role For China, Iran is not just a geopolitical concern but a crucial economic partner. Niu Xinchun, executive director of the China Institute of Arab Studies, highlights the security challenges threatening Chinese investments and business activities in Iran, especially in engineering and technology exports. Zou Zhiqiang, a researcher at Fudan University's Center for Middle East Studies, stresses that China is prioritising efforts to broker a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, alongside pushing for a diplomatic settlement between Iran and the US. A commentator noted China's caution about direct intervention in Iran due to the risks. Yet, Iran's strategic role—as a Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) member, key Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) partner, and an ancient civilisation and resource-rich nation—means China cannot remain passive. It must balance non-intervention with leadership by upholding the moral high ground, condemning aggression, promoting peace, and deepening diplomatic and cultural ties. The consensus: avoid military involvement but engage actively to shape the region's future. As the Middle East conflict escalates, with the US now deeply involved, it opens a new front for China-Russia cooperation and an opportunity for Beijing to assert its narrative of resistance against perceived American unilateralism and hegemony. In this discourse, China positions itself as the peacemaker and promoter of stability, in stark contrast to the US, framed as the escalator of conflict. Sana Hashmi is fellow at the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation. She tweets @sanahashmi1. Views are personal. (Edited by Zoya Bhatti)