Baloch separatist group BLA claims it's killed six Pakistan Army personnel in IED attack

The escalation in violence comes a day after Pakistan's ex-Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi sounded the alarm over a deteriorating security situation in Balochistan. In an interview, Abbasi warned that the state was 'rapidly losing control', particularly during night hours. 'In Quetta, even senior government officials cannot move without heavy security. After dark, the state's presence on the ground virtually disappears', he said.
The IED attack, which left five soldiers injured too, targeted a military vehicle moving between the Amir Post and the Ali Khan base Tuesday in the Geshtri area of Bolan, The Balochistan Post reported. Security forces have cordoned off the area, and five helicopters are conducting a search operation now.
New Delhi: Six Pakistan Army personnel, including a major-rank officer, have died in an attack with an improvised explosive device (IED) in Balochistan's Bolan district, said a statement by the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), which has claimed credit for the killings.
Shahid Khaqan Abbasi attributed the worsening crisis to the increasing assertiveness of the Baloch armed groups, who now routinely patrol highways, set up checkpoints, and occupy urban areas for extended periods. 'This is not just a breakdown in law and order—it signals a loss of state authority,' he said, pushing back on recent comments from the Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir, who claimed the unrest had only 1,500 backers. 'This is a dangerous misreading. The problem is far deeper,' Shahid Khaqan Abbasi added.
The Baloch Liberation Army or BLA, one of the most active separatist outfits in Balochistan, has claimed responsibility for two other attacks this week.
Its fighters Sunday killed Amjad Ababaki, an operative in the Pakistan counter terrorism department, in the Jungle Bagh area of Quetta. The Baloch Liberation Army accused Ababaki of enforced disappearances and torture, including the abuse of minors and elders under the cover of state agencies.
The BLA Friday hit a compound, which, allegedly, was inhabited by a state-backed militia group, known locally as a 'death squad'. The attack, using a grenade launcher, killed a guard on the compound in the Khudabadan area of the Panjgur district.
The BLA has called both attacks part of its broader campaign against what it described as systemic state violence in Balochistan.
(Edited by Madhurita Goswami)
Also Read: Nishikant to Himanta, BJP leaders back 'free Balochistan, split Pakistan' after Pahalgam attack

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

India Gazette

10 hours ago

• India Gazette

Pakistan recommends Trump for Nobel Peace Prize

Islamabad has cited the US presidents role in ending the latest Pakistan-India escalation The Pakistani government has formally recommended US President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, citing his mediation efforts in ending the recent military conflict between Islamabad and New Delhi. India, however, insists Trump played no role in de-escalating the tensions. Relations between the two nuclear-armed neighbors escalated in late April after a deadly terrorist attack in Pahalgam in Indianadministered Kashmir, which New Delhi blamed on Pakistanbacked militants. In a statement on Friday, the Pakistani government announced it "decided to formally recommend" Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize "in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis." According to Islamabad, the American leader helped de-escalate a "rapidly deteriorating situation" that could have triggered "catastrophic consequences for millions in the region and beyond." It also expressed gratitude to Trump for offering to help resolve the longstanding Kashmir dispute between Pakistan and India. The US president has repeatedly claimed credit for the ceasefire on May 10 that halted the hostilities between the two neighboring states. However, the Indian government has denied that the US president played a decisive role. Speaking at a press briefing on Wednesday, Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri revealed that during a phone conversation with Trump the previous day, Prime Minister Narendra Modi stressed that "India has never accepted mediation [to resolve its dispute with Islamabad over Jammu and Kashmir], does not accept and will never accept it." Also on Wednesday, the US president invited Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir to a private lunch meeting, after the field marshal similarly called for Trump's Nobel nomination, Reuters reported, citing White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly. On Saturday, in a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump stated that he and Secretary of State Marco Rubio had arranged a "wonderful treaty between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Republic of Rwanda in their war." "I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for this, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between India and Pakistan, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between Serbia and Kosovo, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for keeping Peace between Egypt and Ethiopia... and I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for doing the Abraham Accords in the Middle East," Trump lamented. Speaking to reporters the previous day, the Republican made similar claims about his role in resolving those conflicts. "I should have gotten [the Nobel Peace Prize] four or five times," he insisted, claiming that this will not happen "because they only give it to liberals." (

Business Standard

14 hours ago

• Business Standard

Trump, Nobel Peace Prize, and US presidents he wants to stand among

It's a story of treaties, tenacity, and a trophy that US President Donald Trump just can't seem to get his hands on. The Nobel Peace Prize — one of the world's most prestigious honours — has become something of a personal mission for Trump. And now, Pakistan has stepped in with a formal nomination, making the case that the president deserves the Nobel for his 'decisive diplomatic intervention' in South Asia. In a statement issued recently, Pakistan announced it had nominated Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, citing his role in de-escalating tensions during the India-Pakistan standoff. The move comes soon after Trump hosted Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir for lunch at the White House — a meeting that hinted at a warming of ties and a shared diplomatic narrative. Despite this endorsement, Trump appears convinced that recognition will continue to elude him. 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do,' he wrote on Truth Social, his social media platform. And this isn't the first time he's said it. In his post, Trump listed out his achievements like a checklist: peace between Rwanda and Congo, Serbia and Kosovo, Egypt and Ethiopia, and the much-publicised Abraham Accords — normalising ties between Israel and multiple Arab nations. Even 'stopping the war between India and Pakistan' was on his list. 'They should give me the Nobel Prize for Rwanda, Congo, Serbia…the big one is India-Pakistan,' he wrote. 'I should have gotten it 4-5 times. Abraham Accords would have been a good one. They won't give me. They only give it to liberals.' He added, 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do, including Russia/Ukraine, and Israel/Iran... but the people know, and that's all that matters to me!' India pushes back, Pakistan backs Trump While Trump may see himself as a global peacemaker, not everyone agrees with his version of events. India has strongly rejected his claim about preventing a war with Pakistan. According to New Delhi, the ceasefire was a result of direct military-level talks between the two nations' Directors General of Military Operations — not foreign intervention. Pakistan, however, sees it differently. Islamabad praised Trump's 'strategic foresight' in helping avert a broader conflict, and pointed to his past role in bringing regional tensions down. Hence, their formal nomination for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. US presidents who have won the Nobel Peace Prize If Trump were to win, he'd join an exclusive club of American presidents who have received the honour: - Theodore Roosevelt (1906): Honoured for mediating an end to the Russo-Japanese War and advancing international arbitration. - Woodrow Wilson (1919): Recognised for founding the League of Nations. - Barack Obama (2009): Awarded just months into his presidency for efforts to strengthen diplomacy and cooperation. At the time, Obama said, 'I am at the beginning, and not the end, of my labours on the world stage.' Trump has repeatedly brought up Obama's win, which he sees as undeserved. 'They gave one to Obama immediately upon his ascent to the presidency, and he had no idea why he got it... That was the only thing I agreed with him on,' Trump said in 2019. So how does one win the Nobel Peace Prize? The Nobel Peace Prize is awarded annually by the Norwegian Nobel Committee, a five-member panel appointed by the Norwegian Parliament. The prize is meant for individuals or organisations that have significantly advanced peace. Eligible nominators include: - Members of national parliaments or governments - University professors in relevant fields - Previous Nobel Laureates - Directors of peace research institutes - Judges of international courts Nominations must be submitted by January 31 each year. The committee then compiles a shortlist and evaluates nominees based on their actual impact on peace — not just diplomatic theatre. After detailed analysis and deliberation, a majority vote is taken. If no candidate is deemed worthy, no award is given. Winners are announced in October in Oslo, Norway. Trump's many nominations, but no prize Trump has been nominated six times since 2018. Norwegian politician Christian Tybring-Gjedde and Swedish MP Magnus Jacobsson nominated him for the Abraham Accords. Congresswoman Claudia Tenney followed up with another nomination. Most recently, Israeli-American academic Anat Alon-Beck nominated him in 2024, writing, 'By securing the release of hostages, standing firm against antisemitism, and fostering historic agreements that bring stability to the world's most volatile regions, [Trump] has once again demonstrated why he is a deserving recipient.' Cheers from allies, silence from Oslo Inside Trump's circle, the belief is clear- he deserves the prize. White House communications director Steven Cheung said, 'The Nobel Peace Prize is illegitimate if President Trump — the ultimate peace president — is denied his rightful recognition.' Support has also come from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, and Rep Elise Stefanik — all saying that Trump's diplomacy is Nobel-worthy. But outside the echo chamber, critics remain skeptical. Critics question the substance Former National Security Adviser John Bolton, once a close Trump ally, had this to say: 'The centre of his public life is the greater glory of Donald Trump, and the Nobel Peace Prize would be a nice thing to hang on the wall.' Analysts also argue that while Trump helped facilitate certain deals, many lacked lasting impact. His administration's foreign policy was often transactional. His domestic and international human rights record — including family separations at the US border and controversial travel bans — also weighed against the Nobel's emphasis on dignity and humanitarian values. And unlike previous laureates known for bridging divides, Trump's deeply polarising rhetoric and political style made global consensus difficult. A prize that remains out of Trump's reach In the end, Trump's quest for the Nobel Peace Prize is more than a political talking point — it's a running theme in his global image campaign. Whether it's the Abraham Accords or his self-declared peacemaking in South Asia, the goal is always the same- to be counted among the greats. Whether the Nobel Committee agrees is still up in the air, but for now, his bottom line remains unchanged- 'I deserve it, but they would never give me.' Only time — and Oslo — will tell. (With agency inputs)

The Print

14 hours ago

• The Print

Pakistan formally recommends ‘genuine peacemaker' Trump for Nobel Peace Prize

Munir, according to a Reuters report that quoted White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly, received the invite after he advocated for Trump to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for preventing a 'nuclear war' between India and Pakistan. The announcement, made on X, comes two days after Trump hosted Pakistan Army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir for lunch at the White House. New Delhi: Pakistan's government Saturday 'decided to formally recommend' US President Donald Trump's name for the Nobel Peace Prize for his 'decisive diplomatic intervention' and 'pivotal leadership' during the India-Pakistan conflict last month. 'This intervention stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker and his commitment to conflict resolution through dialogue,' read the post on X by the Pakistani government Saturday. Following the announcement by Pakistan, Trump in a post on Truth Social also projected himself as a global peacemaker and said that his government 'arranged a wonderful treaty' between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda. He went on to claim credit for what he described as a landmark agreement in one of Africa's most protracted and violent regional conflicts. 'This is a Great Day for Africa and, quite frankly, a Great Day for the World,' Trump wrote, and proceeded to lament that he would not get a Nobel prize 'no matter what I do'. 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for this, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between India and Pakistan, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between Serbia and Kosovo, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for keeping Peace between Egypt and Ethiopia (A massive Ethiopian built dam, stupidly financed by the United States of America, substantially reduces the water flowing into The Nile River), and I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for doing the Abraham Accords in the Middle East which, if all goes well, will be loaded to the brim with additional Countries signing on, and will unify the Middle East for the first time in 'The Ages!' he wrote on Truth Social. Trump has long voiced frustration over not receiving the Nobel Peace Prize for his role in the Abraham Accords—which led to normalisation of ties between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, and Israel and Bahrain—and for what he claims were his efforts to maintain stability across flashpoints like North Korea, Ukraine and the Middle East. 'No, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do, including Russia/Ukraine, and Israel/Iran, whatever those outcomes may be, but the people know, and that's all that matters to me!' he stated. While Pakistan credits Trump for ending the India-Pakistan crisis, India flatly denies any external mediation, asserting that the end to armed hostilities was achieved bilaterally. Indian officials have maintained that Trump played no mediatory role in end of military operations between India and Pakistan post Operation Sindoor. In a statement, Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said the ceasefire was arranged through established bilateral military channels and 'on the insistence of Pakistan'. He reiterated that India 'has not accepted mediation in the past and will never do'. Pakistan, in its post on X, however, claimed that 'at a moment of heightened regional turbulence, President Trump demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi which de-escalated a rapidly deteriorating situation, ultimately securing a ceasefire and averting a broader conflict between the two nuclear states that would have had catastrophic consequences for millions of people in the region and beyond'. It added: 'The Government of Pakistan also acknowledges and greatly admires President Trump's sincere offers to help resolve the longstanding dispute of Jammu and Kashmir between India and Pakistan—an issue that lies at the heart of regional instability. Durable peace in South Asia would remain elusive until the implementation of United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning Jammu and Kashmir.' India has consistently maintained that the Kashmir dispute is a bilateral issue and should not be subject to external involvement—a position that has long shaped India's strategic posture. According to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, nominations must be submitted by 31 January of the award year. Qualified nominators include heads of state, national lawmakers, university professors in certain disciplines, and members of international institutions. While the committee does not reveal its list of nominees until 50 years later, governments are free to publicise their submissions. Nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize for 2026 will only begin in October this year. (Edited by Nida Fatima Siddiqui) Also Read: Asim Munir features on Times Square billboard. Pakistanis ask, 'Who paid for it?'