MP Gebran Bassil says municipal elections exposed the myth of NGOs

Free Patriotic Movement (FPM) leader and MP Gebran Bassil said the party's choices in the recent municipal elections in Beirut were driven by a political agreement to preserve the city's sectarian power-sharing balance, which he described as vital for coexistence.
"Beirut has proven it cherishes unity, and its people have demonstrated greater awareness than any political leader in their commitment to parity," Bassil said in a press conference.
He criticized a breach of that balance by the electoral list led by MP Nabil Badr, warning that political fragmentation can occur despite public awareness.
"This incident shows the need to reinforce the spirit of parity with legal safeguards," he added.
Bassil also addressed the participation of the Lebanese Forces in a joint municipal list with Hezbollah in Beirut, saying it was justified by both parties as necessary to maintain the delicate balance. "This challenged the narrative against our previous political understandings with Hezbollah," he noted.
Bassil stressed that the FPM's approach to the elections was rooted in supporting family-based representation rather than partisan dominance. He also aimed at civil society groups, accusing them of hypocrisy and weakness in areas with a developmental or political electoral identity.
"The elections exposed the myth of the NGOs and their demonization of political parties," Bassil said, adding that many of these organizations had failed to impact municipal contests, particularly in Beirut.
In the Bekaa and Baalbek-Hermel regions, Bassil said the FPM maintained a significant presence across several districts.
"From Hermel to Zahle and Rachaya, we are still strong among Christian voters. In West Bekaa, we helped broker electoral understandings, and in Zahle, we remain a major force."
While acknowledging setbacks in the town of Qaa due to internal divisions, he said the FPM had scored wins in nearby Ras Baalbek and Jdeidet Fakeha, which carry weight in the local political landscape. "Even in Hermel, where our presence is limited, we succeeded in electing several mukhtars," Bassil added.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

LBCI

3 hours ago

• LBCI

Israel police say arrested two for working for Iran intelligence

Israeli authorities have arrested two citizens suspected of working for Iran's intelligence services, police and the country's internal security agency said in a joint statement Sunday. "In the midst of a war with Iran... operatives have arrested two Jewish Israeli citizens on suspicion of having carried out missions for the Iranians in recent days," the statement said, adding that the case was one of 22 involving thwarted Iranian efforts recorded since the outbreak of the war in Gaza in October 2023. AFP

LBCI

7 hours ago

• LBCI

Israeli strikes in central Iran kill nine Revolutionary Guards

At least nine members of the Revolutionary Guards were killed Sunday in Israeli attacks on central Iran, local media reported, as fighting between the two foes continued. "Following the aggression of the barbaric Zionist regime and its mercenaries against two military centers in Yazd city, seven Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps personnel and two conscripts were martyred," the Tasnim news agency reported, quoting an IRGC statement. Others were injured in the attack, it added. The Fars news agency had earlier said Israeli strikes targeted two military sites in Yazd. AFP

LBCI

7 hours ago

• LBCI

Strike and standstill: Iran weighs its next move following US attack

Report by Petra Abou Haidar, English adaptation by Yasmine Jaroudi The world awoke to the echoes of U.S. missiles targeting strategic Iranian sites, signaling a direct American entry into the escalating confrontation. With this shift, what are the political options facing Tehran? One scenario suggests that Washington's strike may have been a calibrated "message to Iran" aimed at pressuring Tehran back to the negotiating table without triggering a full-scale war. This was implied by U.S. President Donald Trump, who, after the attack, stated that Iran should make a deal "before everything is lost," urging the country to save what he referred to as the remnants of the "former Iranian empire." However, such a path hinges entirely on Tehran's response. Iran has repeatedly insisted it will not negotiate under fire. That stance was reaffirmed by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who accused Washington and Tel Aviv of "blowing up diplomacy." In a post on X, Araghchi wrote: "Last week, we were in negotiations with the U.S. when Israel decided to sabotage diplomacy. This week, we were in talks with the E3 and the EU, and the U.S. decided to blow up diplomacy. What conclusion would you draw?" The European Union and the United Kingdom continue to press Iran to "return" to negotiations, though Tehran maintains it never left the table. Speaking at a press conference, Araghchi said the door to diplomacy should remain open but stressed that it is not the immediate solution. Among the more drastic options reportedly under consideration in Tehran are withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), expulsion of international inspectors, and potentially activating regional allies to join the confrontation. However, analysts warn that such moves could provoke broader military responses and plunge the country into prolonged instability or even threaten the survival of the Iranian regime itself. According to The New York Times, Iran risks years of internal and regional turbulence if escalation continues unchecked. Meanwhile, The Wall Street Journal cited a U.S. official as saying the Trump administration has communicated to Tehran that the airstrikes were a one-time action, not the beginning of a campaign to topple the government. As the dust settles, the coming days will reveal whether the region edges further toward widespread conflict or both sides return to the negotiating table.