The Bayoh inquiry is at a crossroads – the Crown Office must decide

On May 3, 2015 in Kirkcaldy, Sheku Bayoh was restrained on the ground by six police officers. He died. In November 2019, Humza Yousaf announced a full judicial inquiry into the circumstances of Bayoh's death, including an investigation into what role, if any, race played in these events and their aftermath.
Lord Bracadale was appointed to lead the inquiry by the Scottish Government, with Angela Grahame KC as its main ­lawyer. Core participants were identified, ­including the Bayoh family, Police ­Scotland, the Crown Office, and the individual police ­officers involved in the incident giving rise to Bayoh's death. Remarkably, the Equality and Human Rights Commission declined to get involved in the most significant ­official investigation into race and policing in ­Scotland in decades.
To date, the inquiry has heard almost 125 days of evidence and legal argument over the better part of six years. Until Lord ­Bracadale recalled the participants to the oral hearing at Capital House this month, we thought the evidential parts of the ­Bayoh inquiry were basically over and awaited Bracadale's formal conclusions.
READ MORE: Presiding Officer to step down at Holyrood election
Now, his investigation may be fatally compromised before a single conclusion has been published. Last week, lawyers for the Scottish Police Federation lodged a formal recusal application, arguing that the inquiry was tainted by apparent bias and that officers under investigation by it had 'lost confidence' in the independence of the chair.
It isn't unheard of for public inquiries to shed their chair before reaching ­conclusions and if this happens early enough in their progress, it need not fatally compromise their work. Because inquiry chairs tend to have grey hairs, human frailty being what it is can also have an impact, as age and illness catch up with very long-running ­inquiry processes.
Lady Poole did a bunk from the ­Scottish Covid inquiry for reasons still ­unexplained, leaving Lord Brailsford to step in. Child abuse inquiries across the UK have burned through a number of chairs during their long and painfully slow progress. But if Bracadale steps down in response to this pressure, it is ­difficult to see how the inquiry could meaningfully recover.
The Bayoh family's solicitor Aamer Anwar has described the move as an '11th hour,' 'desperate and pathetic attempt to sabotage the inquiry' by 'the Federation and those hanging on to their coat tails'.
But the legal arguments involved are serious and if Bracadale decides not to recuse himself, we can expect further litigation in judicial review at the Court of Session.
One of the tricky things here is the ­nature of public inquiries. Public ­inquiries aren't courts – though given the ­plantations of lawyers who have sat through the Bayoh inquiry hearings, you could be forgiven for mistaking them for one.
Unlike courts, core participants aren't free to choose what evidence they'd like to lead. The lawyers in the room can ­apply to the chair to ask questions of ­witnesses, but they don't have the ­absolute right to cross-examine as they or their clients might like. The process is inquisitorial, and counsel for the inquiry takes the lead. But like all public decision-makers, there's an overriding requirement for public inquiries to adopt a fair procedure.
What fairness requires depends on the circumstances, but one aspect of fairness deals with bias – actual or apparent.
Some biases are easy to identify. If one of the core participants is best friends with the inquiry chair, we have a ­problem. If the judge in charge is on the board of trustees of one of the organisations ­involved in the scrutiny, the fair-minded observer might have their doubts about their independence. Legally, the question is 'whether the fair-minded and informed observer, having considered the facts, would conclude that there was a real ­possibility that the tribunal was biased' in the circumstances.
The case for Bracadale's recusal is based on a range of critical observations about how Bracadale and his lawyers have handled the investigation, but focus primarily on five private meetings they held with the Bayoh family and their legal representatives without any of the other core participants being present, aware of the meetings or given comprehensive ­information about what precisely was ­discussed.
'Mindful of how long the inquiry has lasted and the attendant effort and time that has been invested,' ­Scotland's ­prosecuting authorities have also ­concluded 'with great regret' that the ­inquiry appears biased in favour of ­Bayoh's surviving relatives.
While repeatedly stressing 'there is no basis for assuming anything other than good intentions on the part of the Chair,' the Crown Office and Procurator ­Fiscal Service (COPFS) told the judge they share the ­Police Federation's disquiet and have submitted supporting arguments, ­arguing that the inquiry has been actually ­biased in its language and approach to the ­evidence.
Explaining these meetings, the inquiry has stressed 'the engagement of the ­families with the inquiry is crucial to the effectiveness of the inquiry in ­fulfilling its terms of reference. If the inquiry failed to obtain and retain the confidence of the families its effectiveness would be ­prejudiced'.
READ MORE: Labour blasted as 'deeply authoritarian' over plans to proscribe Palestine Action
'Over the years from 2015, the families lost confidence in the various state institutions with which they had dealings – Police Scotland, the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner, and the Crown Office. There was a real prospect that they would not engage at all with the inquiry process or at some point would cease to engage with it,' they said.
For these aspirations, Bracadale is also criticised by the Crown Office, who maintains 'the fair-minded observer would question whether that was consistent with a stated intention to proceed in a way that was entirely impartial and independent of any person'. But their argument stretches a long way beyond this.
They suggest, for example, that the inquiry's approach to witnesses has tended to focus on evidence that met aspects of counsel's 'case theory' which 'usually appeared to align with the position of the family.' Cherry-picking, essentially, with a mind made up, determined to extract answers from witnesses that fit the theory rather than reflect a perhaps more muddled and messy reality. This ­suggestion stretches a good way beyond suggestions of apparent bias.
Reflecting on how some witnesses were examined, COPFS also complained that this 'case theory was at times pursued with notable vigour, creating the impression that the purpose was to validate rather than test the theory'.
The prosecuting authorities – ­themselves the subject of criticism in evidence before the inquiry, remember – don't set out what precisely they understand the inquiry's 'case theory' to be – so the ­innuendo reading of these complaints is all we're left with.
At least the Police Federation are more uncompromisingly direct about the legal consequences of their recusal application. They insist that comments from Bracadale – including suggestions he was 'profoundly moved' by Bayoh's sister's description of the impact of her brother's death on their family – 'suggest or create the appearance' that the inquiry has ­'pre-judged, or evinced a closed mind to, material issues' at stake, including the ­relative blameworthiness of the dead man.
Objection was also taken to a human impact video which opened the inquiry, with Roddy Dunlop KC suggesting that 'arranging and paying for a video tribute to the life of one core participant when it was known that other core participants did not accept the description of Mr ­Bayoh as the 'victim' is again problematic – all the more so when the chair had indicated in advance (privately) that this would 'be a very strong start to the hearings''.
Although the Crown Office stresses they aren't questioning the motives or ­intentions of the chair, their submission argues the ­inquiry's approach to the ­questioning of witnesses was actually biased and biased in favour of Bayoh's family – a remarkable allegation meriting much more critical comment than it has received.
If the Solicitor General is right, then as a matter of law, Bracadale must resign. If they are confident in their legal ­analysis, the Crown Office should say so. At the ­hearing last week, Scotland's ­prosecutors limply argued it was a 'matter for the ­inquiry' how to respond to their full-frontal ­attack on how the inquiry has discharged its ­duties investing this death in custody. Given the startling breadth of the Crown Office's attack on its work, this isn't legal politesse but pure cowardice.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Edinburgh Reporter

an hour ago

• Edinburgh Reporter

By-election June 2025 – Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart

A by-election will be held this week to fill the vacant council seat in Edinburgh following the sudden death of Labour councillor, Val Walker in April. Polling stations will be open from 7am to 10pm on Thursday 26 June 22025 and will be positioned at: Kingsknowe Golf Club Edinburgh Corn Exchange St Michaels Church Hall Fountainbridge Library Boroughmuir Rugby & Community Sports Club Craiglockhart Parish Church Hall Tollcross Community Centre The electronic election count will take place on Thursday 26 June starting at the close of poll at 10pm. The candidates standing for election are as follows: Bonnie Prince Bob, Independent Derrick Emms, Independent Lukasz Furmaniak, Scottish Libertarian Party Mark Hooley, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Richard Crewe Lucas, Scottish Family Party Q Manivannan, Scottish Greens Kevin Joseph McKay, Scottish Liberal Democrats Catriona Munro, Scottish Labour Party Gary Neill, Reform UK Mark Rowbotham, Independent Murray Visentin, Scottish National Party (SNP) Steve Christopher West, Independent Marc Wilkinson, Independent Council Ward 9 Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart The ward stretches from Haymarket west to Colinton Dell. It is as diverse as most others in the city and includes part of the Union Canal, Easter Craiglockhart Hill Local Nature Reserve and the main campus for Edinburgh Napier University. In 2022 at the Local Government election the electorate was 18,284 and there was a 49.8% turnout. Three councillors were elected – Cllr David Key (SNP), Cllr Christopher Cowdy (Conservative) and Cllr Val Walker (Labour). We have interviewed some of the candidates either online or face to face – but here is a breakdown of what we know about all 13 in alphabetical order: Bonnie Prince Bob, Independent Bob is a serial candidate in Edinburgh. He stood in the last two by-elections in Colinton/Fairmilehead. In the last by-election he gathered support from 30 voters in the ward which has an electorate of 19,669. He also stood in the 2021 Scottish Parliamentary election where he lost to Angus Robertson MSP who won the Edinburgh Central seat with 16,276 votes. Bob won 363 votes on that occasion which was 0.9% of the poll. He describes himself as a 'professional political commentator /producer & presenter of #What the X Scotland's most dynamic livestream' and encourages voters to 'Stop electing party political parasites'. Click here to see his social media presence on X. You can watch the unboxing of his campaign leaflets here: Bonnie Prince Bob an Independent candidate in Edinburgh Central with Lady A and Lady B ©2021 The Edinburgh Reporter Derrick Emms, Independent Derrick Emms is an independent candidate who is standing in a loose coalition with two of the other 13 candidates, Marc Wilkinson and Mark Rowbotham (see below). He encourages voters not to elect politicians but rather to elect a team. So if you vote for Mr Emms then the three would work together. He said in a statement to voters: 'Let's set aside party-political differences and come together.' While Wilkinson is declared to be the front-runner, Derrick Emms said he would hold twice weekly surgeries open to all – on Fridays and Saturdays in Fountainbridge Library. He would have the help of the other two independent candidates as 'case workers'. His statement continues: 'Our plan is to come 4th in the twelve wards that elect four Councillors and 3rd in the five wards that elect three. Seventeen Councillors would make us the largest party in the City Chambers as we would have taken these seats from the current five parties. At our surgeries we will represent constituents from all of Edinburgh's Wards. We will help constituents coordinate with each other to lobby their respective Councillors as a team making them more effective. We will make the petition feature on our website which is designed for petitioning elected representatives available. This will transform representative democracy.' Lukasz Furmaniak, Scottish Libertarian Party Lukasz Furmaniak is Polish and has been in the UK for 14 years. He used to work in hospitality but is now a private hire car driver. He wants politics to 'come back to common sense'. He is most exercised by planters which impede progress for drivers on the city's streets. He said: 'We believe that people should decide for themselves if they want to use the cars or not. If they want to use the bus, we are very happy they use the buses. If they want to walk or cycle, we're very happy when they do that. But at the end of the day, it should be their own choice, not imposed by the overlords.' He continued: 'What I believe is that it's time for us to review all the rules and make them simplified, easier to follow 'We all can see there's road works everywhere all year around. Charlotte Square was like that five times last year – closed for a stretch of 200 yards. 'Corstorphine Road – four times in 15 months it was closed again. And there's all the potholes and everything. Why are all the jobs not done in one go? I don't really understand that.' But he would do nothing to affect public libraries or schools saying 'I believe in all this spending – libraries are probably the best choice we can have'. But most of all it is about common sense. He said: 'The biggest thing I'm campaigning on is just come back to common sense – as simple as that. Stop doubling down on the ideas that don't really work and don't help anyone, but they are just, I guess, a vanity project of the councillors. Just to come back to actually sorting the problems rather than creating a new one.' Libertarians have little time for rules. Instead the party is in favour of individual liberty, a free and sound economy, foreign neutrality and political independence. The Scottish Libertarian Party holds a social event every second Sunday. Mark Hooley, Scottish Conservative and Unionist For Mark Hooley a local who has lived in the area for the past ten years, it is all about 'the basics'. He said: 'The theme of the campaign is back to basics. You probably hear going around really popular is fixing the roads, the potholes, you know, the bin collections, but these sort of basics, the weeding, it's just really the theme is kind of the council sometimes forgetting to do the basics for the residents that live here. you know, if some people, they maybe don't understand why. He said: 'There's money to do trams and everything, but the day-to-day basics are getting missed. It is no wonder that people have a bit of disillusionment when they see that. There is usually a bit less of a turnout during by-elections, but I would say there has been a little bit of apathy in vernal about politics.' He explained that he has always loved politics – his father was an SNP supporter. He grew up in the Parkgrove area of the city, studied politics in Dundee and then lived in the US and in Holland. Currently he is studying for a MSc in Journalism at Edinburgh Napier University, and he ran as a Conservative candidate in the Sighthill/Gorgie ward in the 2022 council elections when he attracted 986 first preference votes. He said that he is not a career politician, just 'a regular guy who wants to get involved and is passionate about it'. Reflecting on the lower number of Conservative councillors at the City Chambers after the 2022 election he said that a win here would help to 'chip away' to get back to where the council group was before. He was complimentary to Conservative councillor, Christopher Cowdy who represents the Fountainbruidge/Craiglockhart ward along with SNP councillor, David Key, saying: 'Chris Cowdy is one of the councillors for the ward currently. He's very visible, very vocal, he's very well liked and trusted in the area and known as someone who can get things done and is very responsive. So I would be looking to work together with him and to really reflect residents concerns and the day-to-day stuff.' @edinreporter Mark Hooley is the Scottish Conservative candidate in the June 2025 council by-election in Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart Here he explains a bit of his personal background to the Editor of The Edinburgh Reporter. #edinburghnews #edinburghlocalnews #hyperlocalnews #councilbyelection ♬ original sound – EdinReporter Mark Hooley centre with his Conservative supporters out campaigning PHOTO courtesy of Miles Briggs Richard Crewe Lucas, Scottish Family Party Richard Lucas is the Scottish Family Party candidate who has stood at a range of elections in the past few years. He stood in the Colinton/Fairmilehead ward in the 2022 council elections when he achieved 65 votes – and got the same number of votes in January 2025. Mr Lucas hs lived in Colinton for over 25 years, teaching at Merchiston Castle School for most of that time. The party values are: 'Families are the building blocks of a healthy society. The government's job is to support and encourage stable family life, for the sake of children, adults and the wider society.' The party promotes marriage as the best way to lay the foundation for society – but only heterosexual marriage. 'The commitment of marriage helps ensure that a child benefits from the distinct and complementary parenting of their mother and father, a male and female role model in the family home, and the sense of identity that naturally flows from relatedness.' They do not believe in same sex marriage as it does not embody these ideals. Richard Lucas Scottish Family Party candidate Q Manivannan, Scottish Greens Q Manivannan is from the Tamil community and was born in India in 1997, making their home in Scotland since 2021. Q has worked in the United Nations, in trade unions, voluntary organisations, and as an award-winning scholar in universities. Q has won the Kavya Prize for Scottish writers of colour in 2023 and co-convenes the Palestine Solidarity Group for the Scottish Greens. Q said that as an academic at St Andrews University and as a policy expert they have experience of community organising. Projects which they have supported include road safety, pedestrian crossings and tenants rights. Q plans to focus on stricter speed limits and improved infrastructure for disability access if elected. Attracted to the Green Party by its focus on individual expression and environmental conservation, other matters of importance to them include voter transparency and inclusion. Q said: 'My main principles have been around building more inclusive governance structures, particularly ones where residents and voters are more involved with democratic processes from the get go and through different stages of policies and motions. But at the same time, focusing on the very local issues I know we've had in our area, like resident safety alongside along alongside the canal path, for instance, or traffic and road safety along Ashley Terrace where the pedestrian crosssing has been overdue there for 20 years, Harrison Road and Yeamen Place. Lastly of course preserving our green and blue spaces because it feels like a fair few spaces around the city as well as in our ward are under threat.' In relation to some matters these could be solved more easily with a collaborative approach. Q said: 'I think it's also important that issues like road safety as well as tenants rights are across parties. I feel like they're more logistical concerns regardless of where you stand on the political spectrum. I think Cllr Val Walker was excellent in that sense almost removing the more dramatic politics out of it and focussing on the local issues and communities.' Q is involved with fundraising for Palestine running a music and culture event each month in Marchmont. Through that organisation they have been able to help local businesses having troubles with the council about tables and chairs placed outside. Q said: 'It was good to work with them to find solutions to that.' Q has also been part of the activism around pensions and pay cuts for tutors and paid staff members in St Andrews and Edinburgh. At the end of the interview Q said : 'I would begin with bette infrastructural changes and audits for disability as well as mobility. There's been a lot of concerns raised around roads as well as on the Canal Path and other parts of Fountainbridge /Craiglockhrt not being accessible, whether it's for the elderly or it's for pram pushers. I think, is a significant concern that leads to other safety issues, and that would be right on top of my to do list to begin with.' Q Manivannan Kevin Joseph McKay, Scottish Liberal Democrats The Scottish Liberal Democrats announced Mr McKay as their candidate in May like this: 'An environmental campaigner, Kevin spent a career tackling pollution issues in the water industry. If elected, he would join a City Chambers Lib Dem team fighting for road safety, investment in schools, and fixing our pavements and roads!' Catriona Munro, Scottish Labour Party Catriona Munro Labour candidate Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart Catriona Munro has been a lawyer for the last 30 years, most recently a competition lawyer. Now that retirement is fast approaching she is looking to be an elected member of the council. Ms Munro explained that her parents were lifelong activists for the Labour Party, and she was born on an election day when her father was a Westminster candidate. He didn't ever get elected but she said: 'I feel as though I'm an election baby. I've always loved elections and I relish campaigning. It's great fun.' Brought up in Brussels, Ms Munro said she doesn't have a strong Scottish accent, but she lives in the city. Asked what she is campaigning on she replied: 'People are concerned about the very basic things, that the potholes are very annoying, that there are lots of issues around parking. People raise questions over access to new developments. I had someone who who is concerned about their their road becoming busy because it was going to be used to access a new development. 'Now, of course, we need new housing, but we also need to respect people's views and then other people concerned about the introduction of controlled parking zones. So it's welcome to some people, but not to others, and it's a question of making sure that those voices are all heard and that the most appropriate way of introducing those controlled parking zones is used.' She cited the positive contribution and local impact of two Labour councillors elected in 2022 – Cllr Scott Arthur and Cllr Val Walker. The usual topics of ootholes, parking issues and underfunding all came up during our interview when she explained the difference Cllr Walker made in securing funding for DanceBase. Ms Munro agreed that Cllr Walker will be a hard act to follow, but she thinks she could fill her shoes. She said that many local people had met Cllr Walker during her short time as a councillor – and some people in the area had met Val several times – often in their homes – about their issues. Catriona said: 'It is good to know that work on the ground really makes a difference, that people notice it. You're right these are big shoes to fill but I think it means the groundwork of having a well-liked councillor has been done.' Gary Neill, Reform UK Gary Neill Reform UK candidate Gary Neill is the Reform UK candidate standing in this by-election. The grandfather from Northern Ireland said he is standing for the sake of his grandchildren. He explained: 'I've been a member of Reform for about three years. I've been a Tory voter all my life, but the last lot of years, it's got very disenchanting. 'The biggest thing we need to take control of is the amount of money that we spend and the amount of tax that we raise. This country has been borrowing month on month, year on year. And we are rolling up the most enormous debt for our grandchildren to deal with. So that's what drives me.' Asked what he would seek to influence in the council he said it was simple: 'We need to start looking at the way The City of Edinburgh Council is run. Even in my short term, and exposure to the statistics and there is in your face waste.' He suggests selling off any council-owned buildings and land which are not required or used, and is vocal in his campaign leaflet about the 'state of Edinburgh roads'. He said: 'I'm in and out of Edinburgh Airport quite a bit and honest to goodness taking people back into the centre of town your back is put out with the state of the roads.' He said that he has had a career in sales, has travelled the world and is now retired. He feels that his experience can now be put to use. He said: 'My entire time has been in the commercial sector, in the private sector, where it is very competitive, very tough. But, I think I can use that in the public sector. And I'm fortunate that I have the time to pursue this – and I feel quite driven to do so.' Finally he is incensed that the council should only be concerned about local matters. He said that in a previous set of council papers from March there were motions about Palestine and Gaza – 'not one of them anything to do with Edinburgh'. He said: 'I think our elected representatives, of which I hope to be one, should actually concentrate and focus on running the city without getting involved in stuff they have no knowledge of. It might even be said that it's virtue signalling to look good in front of their people. I don't know, I don't care. It's nothing to do with running Edinburgh.' He is new to politics and says he has quickly learned that the electorate is very fickle. He said: 'They'll tell you one thing and they'll do something else. We learned that just last month at Hamilton where a lot of volunteers for Reform were helping the excellent candidate that we have, Ross Lambie. The media didn't say it, but they knew it was a two horse race, the SNP and Reform. We knew it was a two horse race. Yeah. Yeah. And then bang out of nowhere comes Labour and it flummoxed all of us.' Mr Neill has been out twice daily in the ward with his supporters visiting as many people as possible in the ward. He said: 'As much as Reform is enjoying a fairly high profile nationally, we've got to try and make that a local message, I feel pretty good about it. It;s a good challenge and I'm enjoying it.' Gary Neill is the @ candidate for the council by-election in Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart. Here he outlines just one way he thinks the council could do better — The Edinburgh Reporter (@ 2025-06-22T12:52:45.692Z Mark Rowbotham, Independent Mr Rowbotham is standing as an independent candidate in collaboration with Marc Wilkinson and Derrick Emms. HIs stance is the same as the other two candidates : Don't elect politicians Elect People Elect a Team #1 Marc Wilkinson #2 Mark Rowbotham #3 Derrick Emms… Edinburgh Council By-election, Thursday 26th June 2025, 7am-10pm Everyone in the Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart ward has a reason to vote now Let's set aside party-political differences and come together.' Murray Visentin, Scottish National Party (SNP) Murray Visentin SNP candidate Murray Visentin is manager in Asda Chesser and although a relative newcomer to politics he knows the price of shopping – and said that it is the basics which matter. He explained that the price of milk depends on some variables – whether or not it is branded and according to size. The Visentin household buys the four litre size as it includes Murray, his wife, their four children and two cats. He said his candidacy has been 'a long time coming' but when this possibility came up he jumped at the chance. His support of independence is key and he has been an activist since he was a teenager. He joined the SNP in 2014. He feels he could make a difference in the council and said: 'I'm confident to take people's views on board and talk about them, regardless whether they fall in line with SNP values or anybody else's values. 'Local politics is different from national politics. It's about the people more than the actual polici. Of course, I'm going to vote with the group. I'm going to be an SNP councillor and would huave to do that, but it doesn't mean I can't have a voice for my neighbors and the family members and my friends in the ward as well.' He said that politics for local residents is about more than just the price of shopping. It is also about educaiton and local travel as well as green space. He lives in Hutchison and holds the Hutchison Community Garden up as a model project which along with organised litter picking 'makes a difference in local communities in a big way'. He said: 'I think that it's a svery family orientated ward. You've got a mixed batch of different sort of political affiliations. You've got different sorts of demographics as well that we need to be appealing to and helping. So if you go up to Craiglockhart way you've got more affluent people. It's the day to day things. It's the cost of living for some people. It's education for their kids. It's having a voice for somebody that knows the neighborhood, knows the ward, to be able to go to the council and be in the chambers and say, Look, these are my people. These are the people that need help.' Steve Christopher West, Independent Steve West is a trade union activist in the PCS civil service workers' union. He describes himself as an independent socialist and told The Socialist Worker that he is campaigning against the £2.2 million cuts proposed by the Edinburgh Integration Joint Board. He said: 'There has to be someone in this election who is against cuts and racism.' He believes that this cut in funding would result in '200 compulsory redundancies and cuts to valuable services'. He said he will stand 'against austerity', against attacks on benefits and against attacks on trans+ rights. He is using TikTok as a way of getting his election message out to voters. His latest video has a simple message – 'No to cuts, end austerity, tax the rich, fund public services migrants are not to blame,, no to racism welfare not warfare, end the genocide, Free Palestine – for a real left alternative vote for me, Steve West.' Marc Wilkinson, Independent Marc is also someone who has stood in the last two council by-elections as well as three others. He has created his own 'party' called Edinburgh and East Lothian People although he is standing as an Independent candidate. He wants everyone in the ward to have a reason to vote, and believes that he can fix party politics by stopping the party whip and allowing elected politicians to have a free vote. He explains that he grew his vote share in the January 2025 by-election when 494 people supported him. He said this was a +79% increase in vote share compared to the November by-election. He is leader of Edinburgh and East Lothian People as well as seven other new parties in other areas of Scotland. and claims that this could mean that the party would return one MSP in each region if the party attracts just 6% of the vote. He would work alongside Derrick Emms and Mark Rowbotham to represent the constituency. Like this: Like Related

Reuters

an hour ago

• Reuters

El Al says to start rescue flights out of Israel starting on Monday, after getting 25,000 applications

SAN FRANCISCO, June 22 (Reuters) - Israeli airline El Al said it would resume flights out of Tel Aviv airport on Monday, as the government began to allow limited "rescue" flights in the midst of the Middle East conflict and U.S. bombing of Iran. El Al said it had received 25,000 applications for flights out of Israel since it opened a web site for requests on Saturday, although government rules will limit flights to 50 passengers each, it added in a Sunday statement.

Telegraph

2 hours ago

• Telegraph

Assisted dying, abortion, grooming gangs...Britain is morally deformed

I've a friend in a nursing home with very bad cancer. Physically, he feels OK, but there are hints of mental confusion. One afternoon we watched a quiz show on a blank television that wasn't turned on. It was proof, he said, that his mind couldn't be going because he got all the answers right. With the passage of Kim Leadbeater's Bill – save a stay of execution in the Lords – he suddenly looks like a candidate for assisted dying, and yet his suffering strengthens the case against. My friend, at this stage, is miserable less because of the tumour than because he's poor – can't afford a home care – and anxious because he wakes up in a strange place and imagines he's been kidnapped. He tells me he is at the centre of a plot by the state to kill the old by driving them mad. Though I assure him that no government is competent enough to pull such a thing off, I'm beginning to wonder if he has a point. Last week, the Commons voted to decriminalise abortion and legalise state-assisted suicide, the latest twist on 'cradle to grave'. Supporters spoke of humanising the law, of continuing the 'progressive' effort begun in the 1960s when abortion was first permitted. But there's a big contextual difference. Social liberalism in a time of economic growth was about increasing choice; today, in a period of austerity, it suggests narrowing options. Can't afford a baby? Terminate it. Worry you might burden the grandkids? Take a seat in the suicide pod. Of course this isn't what MPs meant by voting this way – but when you cut benefits for the elderly and cap them for children, and then make it easier to destroy yourself or your baby, it's hard not to infer a link. People keep saying to me, with a dash of British humour, that the state intends to kill us all to save money. Let's assume this is wrong. Let's call the speculation tasteless. Nevertheless, we have to account for why so many people feel this way, for the historic loss of trust. This is not some opioid-induced fantasy; human beings respond to cues. The third story in the grimmest week of Starmer's premiership was the publication of the Casey report, which confirmed that Asian men raped girls, and that officials declined to act because it might appear racist. This is mind-blowing stuff and shows how morally deformed our establishment now is. It has no coherent understanding of good and evil – in the difference between innocence and guilt – and in its yearning to look good by its own bizarre standard, it permits evil to flourish. In 2025, a person who prays outside an abortion clinic faces arrest. Meanwhile, a foreign-born, convicted rapist might avoid deportation by invoking their human rights. Religion, in fact, barely featured in the assisted dying debate, except to suggest that opponents might be acting under orders from the Pope. This fantasy pays a backhanded compliment to a faith that has been losing its influence for a very long time. As far back as 1937, Cosmo Gordon Lang, the archbishop of Canterbury, abstained in a Lords vote on divorce because he judged it 'no longer possible to impose the full Christian standard by law on a largely non-Christian population'. Christianity defined the West for so many centuries that its loss is experienced as the death of a fixed order, but we mustn't forget that Jesus was a revolutionary who overturned an even older system of ethics. Pagans, who largely felt life was meant to be enjoyed, thought the martyrdom-chasing Christians were nuts. One can see why. They taught that death is not the end, life is a test, and suffering is an opportunity to imitate the crucifixion. For example: the 7th century saint Cuthbert had a best friend, Herbert, and the two men dreamt of spending eternity together. But Cuthbert was a famously holy man, so would pass through purgatory to Heaven fast, whereas Herbert was just a very good man, so, they feared, might take longer – delaying their reunion. How did God fix the problem? He generously gave Herbert a long, painful illness, so that when he died on the same day as Cuthbert, his soul was so cleansed by suffering that they entered paradise at the same time. Weird, isn't it? Yes, but it also seeded into the West the idea that our life belongs to God, that He made us in his image, and this is a foundation for the principle that you can't take away another's life at will. This gradually flowered into rights for women or slaves, the peace movement and abolition of the death penalty. The problem with a commandment, of course, is that it's inflexible: it extends to unwanted foetuses and relatives in pain. Around the 19th century, we detached God from ethics, getting around the 'Thou Shalt Nots' and opening morality up to negotiation. Add individualism, toss in consumerism, and moral action today is contingent upon personality, economics, circumstance. Back when I was a socialist, before religion came into it, I wasn't comfortable with the idea that one unborn baby gets to live because its parents happen to be married and rich, whereas another is aborted because its mother is single and poor. Humanistic morality seemed surprisingly naive about the reality of the human condition, its appetites and deprivations. Looking at my friend in the nursing home, to what possible extent can one say he has 'agency'? I'm not sure he understands his diagnosis. The notion that he might have a chat with Kim Leadbeater, she with a smile and a clipboard in her hand, and make a rational choice to die next Wednesday afternoon is preposterous. The opportunity for error or manipulation is self-evident, yet many cannot, or will not, see it. For anyone who does choose assisted dying, I hope Christians respond with mercy. We are not in charge of Britain, haven't been for a long time, and I'm not sure I'd want to be. The best options left are to witness and accompany, to do the sometimes depressing, occasionally rewarding work of being with people when they go. I enjoy holding my friend's hand. I'd never have done that when he was healthy.