Why was Malta's ‘golden passports' scheme scrapped?
The story so far: In late April, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) struck down Malta's 'golden passports' scheme — a 2020 scheme which authorises the naturalisation of foreigners in the country, and consequently the European Union, in return for hefty financial investments in the country. Brussels had launched infringement proceedings against Malta, as it persisted with its own scheme, blocking access only to Russians and Belarusians consequent to Russia's war against Ukraine.
What are CBIs and RBIs?
Citizenship by investment (CBI), known as golden passports, and residency by investment (RBI), or golden visas, enable third country nationals to live and work in host countries in exchange for financial investments. The European Parliament and the Commission have called for both forms of mobility to be abolished in view of the inherent risks to security, such as money laundering, organised crime, tax evasion and corruption. Between 2013 and 2019, about 1,32,000 persons had obtained entry into the EU through CBI and RBI schemes, generating financial inflows of over €20 billion, as per a 2022 European Parliament Research Service report. The risks from CBI and RBI have been highlighted by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and the Financial Action Task Force. Principal among the beneficiaries of such migration are nationals from China, Russia and West Asia.
Why is the EU against the scheme?
Within the 27-member bloc, the acquisition or loss of nationality falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of each country. That said, the historic 1992 Maastricht Treaty inaugurated common EU citizenship. That is to say, nationals of an EU state are simultaneously common EU citizens. Therefore, the matter of the grant or rejection of nationality must accord with EU law.
The European Commission contended that the attractiveness of Malta's CBI scheme did not lie in the acquisition of Maltese nationality per se, but instead in the rights that accrue from the complementary EU citizenship. The implicit assumption here being the unique appeal of the absence of internal frontiers, the right to free movement and work across the bloc, the right to vote and to be elected in local as well as European parliament elections. The Commission President Ursula von der Leyen made a pointed reference to golden passports in the 2020 State of the Union address, declaring that 'European values are not for sale.' Brussels further argued that the grant of nationality in return for investments — a commodification of citizenship — was incompatible with the principles of membership of the bloc. These are sincere cooperation, fairness and non-discrimination — codified in Article 4(3) of the 1992 Maastricht Treaty and under Article 20 of the 2009 Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.
What did the ECJ verdict state?
Upholding the Commission's claims, the court reasoned that the pillars of European citizenship are dependent on mutual trust among member states and mutual respect for national decisions. The bond of nationality of a given state is underpinned by a 'relationship of solidarity, good faith and the reciprocity of rights and duties between the state and citizens,' the court added. These principles are infringed upon once citizenship is sought to be granted as a commercial transaction in exchange for an investment. The 2020 Maltese scheme is tantamount to the commercialisation of the grant of nationality of a particular state, and by extension, of the entire bloc. This is incompatible with EU treaties.
What next?
In theory, Malta could exercise its authority to confer nationality to those who availed the CBI scheme, minus union citizenship. This would risk diminishing its appeal as a destination state.
The writer is Director, Strategic Initiatives, AgnoShin Technologies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Iran Israel war updates: Indians evacuated from Iran to land in Delhi today
Heavily damaged building of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) after it was hit a few days earlier in an Israeli strike, in Tehran. Iran and Israel exchanged a new wave of air strikes on Friday, marking the eighth consecutive day of hostilities between the neighbours. The conflict intensified even as European diplomats convened in Geneva in a fresh bid to revive nuclear negotiations and stem further escalation. Israeli fighter jets targeted missile infrastructure in western Iran, the military said, while Tehran launched salvos of missiles at Haifa and Beersheba. At least 19 Israelis were reported wounded, and Iran's Human Rights Activists News Agency estimated 657 deaths and over 2,000 injuries in Iran since the conflict began. ...Read More In Geneva, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi held talks with EU foreign policy chief and ministers from the UK, France, and Germany. Araghchi said Iran would not engage with the US until Israel halts its attacks, but signaled willingness to continue talks with Europe. US President Donald Trump cast doubt on European mediation efforts, asserting that 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us.' Trump had on Friday warned Tehran that it has only two weeks to de-escalate or face potential American intervention. Latest developments in the Iran Israel war: Israel vows a 'prolonged campaign' to cripple Iran's nuclear capacity. Iran's foreign minister holds talks in Geneva, but rules out US dialogue for now. Israel says it struck missile and nuclear-related sites in Tehran and western Iran. Trump gives Iran two weeks to de-escalate or face possible US strikes. Iran reports 657 killed, including civilians, in Israeli airstrikes since the conflict began. Iran accuses Israel of bombing five hospitals in recent attacks. Haifa and Beersheba hit by Iranian missiles; 19 injured in Israel. Arab ministers warn of regional energy disruption, call for US pressure. Follow all the updates here: June 21, 2025 6:09 AM IST Iran Israel war live: Hundreds of American citizens have departed Iran using land routes over the past week since an aerial war between the Islamic Republic and Israel broke out, according to an internal State Department cable seen by Reuters on Friday. While many left without problem, "numerous" citizens had faced "delays and harassment" while trying to exit, the cable said. It said, without giving further details, that one unidentified family had reported that two US citizens attempting to leave Iran had been detained. June 21, 2025 6:05 AM IST Iran Israel war live: The Israeli military launched a new wave of attacks targeting missile storage and launch infrastructure within Iran. Following the recent Iranian air strikes, Israeli authorities have now instructed residents that it is safe to leave protected areas, indicating that the immediate threat has passed.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
CBI books JNPT officials, Tata firm for 804cr fraud
Mumbai: CBI has registered a case against Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (JNPT) officials and Tata Consulting Engineers (TCE), a project management consultant, for allegedly causing Rs 804 crore loss to govt in a contract to increase the depth of the channel for large cargo ships. CBI was carrying out searches at several premises at the time of going to the press, report Vijay V Singh & Reeba Zachariah. The FIR mentions "preparation of inflated estimates, restriction of competition to favour international bidders, extension of undue favour to contractor and suppression of reports of independent experts/organisations". CBI conducted searches at Tata Consulting Engineers' (TCE) Mumbai and Navi Mumbai offices and took "some materials from the locations", sources said. CBI has registered a case against JNPT officials and TCE for allegedly causing Rs 804 crore loss to govt in awarding a dredging contract. The sources clarified that TCE acted as a project management consultant for the JNPT dredging projects and earned just Rs 12 crore from them. Late on Friday, CBI issued a press release stating, "Searches were conducted at the residential premises of officials of JNPT and consulting company, and offices of accused private companies at 5 places in Mumbai and Chennai, which led to recovery of documents relating to the Capital Dredging Project, digital devices, and documents showing investments made by public servants." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo The FIR was registered against former JNPT chief manager Sunil Kumar Madabhavi, TCE and its project director Devdutt Bose, BoskalisSmit India LLP, Jan De Nul Dredging India Pvt Ltd, and unidentified individuals. It says the loss was spread over the dredging project's two phases – 2003-14 and 2013-19. To accommodate large cargo ships, in 2003, JNPT appointed TCE to prepare the phase 1 project report for the cost estimates and time duration. TCE was also awarded the work of project management consultant, including preparation of tender documents and supervision of work. The FIR stated, "Shadow bidding arrangements to support the cartel made by BoskalisSmit India LLP and Jan De Nul Dredging India Pvt Ltd were permitted by Madabhavi in connivance with Bose… and other unidentified individuals, thereby enabling the cartel to participate in the bidding process." During the probe, it was found that the pre-dredge survey was manipulated by using the less accurate software 'Qinsy' instead of the globally accepted 'HYPACK' for measuring dredging quantity, the FIR said. CBI claimed that the two phases were planned back-to-back, and their implementation overlapped, though on record, it was mentioned that they would be taken up separately. JNPT had assigned the project report on Phase 2 to TCE in collaboration with E&Y and Howe Project. "Several stringent project qualifications criteria and tailor-made specifications were inserted in the Phase 2 tender documents to eliminate Indian bidders . ..and to the advantage of the international bidders. Such changes were made to allow bidders forming JVs or consortiums to compete for complementary bidding against the Competition Commission of India guidelines," the FIR said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘50-bps Cut a Clear Growth Signal'
India's monetary policymakers used a benign inflation outlook to frontload rate cuts and send a 'clear signal' to productive sectors to boost growth, showed the minutes of the June 6 meeting that slashed benchmark rates by an outsized half a percentage point. A bigger reduction would also quicken transmission, argued those in favour. 'Given the sharp reduction in inflation over the past few months and the projected reduction in annual average inflation… it is expected that the front-loaded rate action along with certainty on the liquidity front would send a clear signal to the economic agents, thereby supporting consumption and investment through lower cost of borrowing,' RBI governor Sanjay Malhotra was cited as saying in the minutes of the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) published Friday. On June 6, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) lowered the benchmark repo rate by an unexpected 50 basis points to 5.5% and changed the policy stance to 'neutral' from 'accommodative', going by the majority vote of the MPC. One basis point is a hundredth of a percentage point. Rajiv Ranjan, an internal member on the rate-setting panel, was of the opinion that since monetary policy worked with a lag, under the current circumstances, a 50-bps cut was preferable to two 25-bps cuts for faster transmission. 'Similar to the frontloaded rate hikes during the tightening cycle, frontloading rate cuts could help in hastening transmission by providing decisive signals and confidence to the stakeholders' Ranjan said. Deputy governor Poonam Gupta agreed there was merit in frontloading rate cuts. 'I vote for a policy rate cut by 50 bps in this meeting. This should help in fostering policy certainty and faster transmission than a staggered rate cut, and in more effectively countering the challenges emanating from the global economy,' she said in her first MPC vote. The inflation outlook is 3.7% for FY26, lower than the 4% mandated target. The GDP is forecast at 6.5% for the year. In May, the headline consumer price gauge was 2.82%. Saugata Bhattacharya, who had split ranks with panel members on the quantum of the reduction, voted for a 25-bps rate cut, arguing that boosting durable liquidity would be more impactful on transmission than a steeper reduction in policy rates. 'The RBI's liquidity infusion and other measures have played a key role in this process, partly via lower money market and short-term interest rates, reducing the overall banks' cost of funds,' Bhattacharya, an external member, was cited as saying. 'The RBI data suggests that Rs 9.5 lakh crore of durable liquidity was injected into the banking system since January. In this context, I believe the RBI's assurance of continuing large durable liquidity support is likely to have a more dominant effect on further transmission compared to a deep cut in the repo rate.' The RBI's cumulative 100-bps cuts since February come amid private investment, especially in manufacturing, and urban consumption, remaining subdued. Additionally, the uncertain external environment has complicated the economic growth outlook for 2025-26, especially due to political tensions and trade war which has impacted job creation. 'A heavier-than-expected cut in policy rate (along with the possible fiscal policy support) would send a clear message that India is serious about supporting economic growth momentum and would spare no effort in terms of policy interventions,' said external member Nagesh Kumar, director and chief executive, Institute for Studies in Industrial Development. 'A double dose of rate cut is likely to bring down lending rates significantly, helping to spur the investment and consumption of durable goods.' Expectations of further rate cuts have likely delayed the materialisation of demand and investment decisions. 'In such an environment, given the market expectation of a 50-bps rate cut in this cycle, a staggered rate cut can further delay the materialisation of demand and investment decisions,' said external member Ram Singh, Director, Delhi School of Economics. 'By contrast, a front-loaded 50-bps cut in the policy rate is likely to help achieve the twin objectives of supporting demand and growth by reducing the cost of funds for borrowers'. One of the concerns raised was the interest rate differential between India policy rates and the US Fed rates, which could lead to capital flight and can put pressure on the rupee. 'However, given the robust fundamentals of the Indian economy, including a comfortable current account situation, any pressure on INR is likely to be confined to the short run,' said Singh.
