Irish leaders call for ‘immediate de-escalation' between Iran and Israel
Ireland's premier and deputy premier have called for an 'immediate de-escalation' between Israel and Iran and for diplomatic talks to restart.
Irish premier Micheal Martin said Iran should make clear it will not pursue further enrichment of uranium.
Irish deputy premier Simon Harris, who is also the minister for foreign affairs, said work was ongoing at EU level to engage with citizens in Israel and Iran who may wish to leave.
Iran and Israel have been striking each other's territory for a week, deepening the crisis in the Middle East.
Israel said it launched an attack to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.
Iran has insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful, but it is the only non-nuclear-armed state to enrich uranium up to 60%, far in excess of the levels required for power stations and a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%.
After a missile attack on a hospital in southern Israel, defence minister Israel Katz said Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei 'absolutely should not continue to exist'.
US President Donald Trump has also reportedly been considering involving the US by targeting a uranium enrichment facility in Iran.
Asked what role Ireland can play in the crisis, Mr Martin said Ireland and the EU can urge 'restraint and de-escalation'.
'The world needs stability and it needs peace – and dialogue is the way to resolve the nuclear issue in terms of Iran,' the Taoiseach told RTE Radio.
'Iran has been a malign actor in the Middle East for quite a long time in terms of supporting Hezbollah, Hamas the Houthis – it's a theocratic autocratic state.
'But there was dialogue on the way between Iran and the United States on that issue, I think that should restart.
'I think Iran should make it very clear that it will not pursue further enrichment of uranium, or indeed progress to developing nuclear bomb capacity.'
Meanwhile, Mr Harris said there was a 'massive effort' at EU level to support citizens and diplomats in Iran and Israel.
He said the EU was engaging with Germany, France and the UK to persuade the Iranians back into talks.
'It is almost impossible to overstate the potential danger of this, if there ends up being involvement of other countries, or indeed spill-over into other countries,' he said on Thursday.
'Ireland, whilst far away in one way, does obviously have a number of citizens in both countries, have a significant number of troops in Lebanon, is very concerned about the situation in Palestine, so there's quite a lot of moving parts in this.'
He told RTE Radio: 'Nobody wants to see Iran with nuclear capabilities.
'Everybody is aware of the dangers that Iran poses, but at the same time, the way you resolve these issues is through the talks that were scheduled to take place and which were obviously ultimately postponed as a result of Israeli (incursion).'
He said Irish embassies had contacted citizens in Iran and Israel on Wednesday who would like to leave when the opportunity arises.
There are around 29 Irish citizens and 12 dependants in Iran, and 200 Irish citizens in Israel.
'There's the massive effort at a European level to make sure we try to provide support to our own citizens and our own diplomats in what is becoming a really dangerous environment and a really difficult environment in which to operate from and function from as well,' he told RTE Radio.
He said that as the airspace is closed in Iran, evacuation would mean going over the land border, and for those in Israel it means travelling to Jordan or Egypt.
'There are a number of options available to us. We're working very closely with a number of member states, and we're also having to now, in a very serious way, also look at how we best support our diplomats, because the situation is deteriorating quite significantly in terms of being able to effectively operate in the country, and also obviously safety and security issues,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
Europeans try to coax Iran back to diplomacy, as Trump considers strikes
GENEVA, June 20 (Reuters) - European foreign ministers are set to meet their Iranian counterpart on Friday aiming to create a pathway back to diplomacy over its contested nuclear programme despite the U.S. actively considering joining Israeli strikes against Iran. Ministers from Britain, France and Germany, known as the E3, as well as the European Union's foreign policy chief spoke to Abbas Araqchi earlier this week and have been coordinating with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. In a rare call they pressed upon Araqchi the need to return to the negotiating table and avoid further escalation. At Iran's suggestion the two sides agreed to meet face-to-face. The talks will be held in Geneva, where an initial accord between Iran and world powers to curb its nuclear programme in return for sanctions lifting was struck in 2013 before a comprehensive deal in 2015. They come after negotiations between Iran and the United States collapsed when Israel launched what it called Operation Rising Lion against Iran's nuclear facilities and ballistic capabilities on June 12. "The Iranians can't sit down with the Americans whereas we can," said a European diplomat. "We will tell them to come back to the table to discuss the nuclear issue before the worst case scenario, while raising our concerns over its ballistic missiles, support to Russia and detention of our citizens." The European powers, who were not part of Iran's nuclear negotiations with the United States, had grown increasingly frustrated by the U.S. negotiating strategy in the talks. They deemed some of the demands unrealistic, while fearing the possibility of a weak initial political framework that would lead to open-ended negotiations. Two diplomats said there were no great expectations for a breakthrough in Geneva, where the European Union's foreign policy chief will also attend. But they said it was vital to engage with Iran because once the war stopped, Iran's nuclear programme would still remain unresolved given that it would be impossible to eradicate the know-how acquired, leaving it potentially able to clandestinely rebuild its programme. An Iranian official said Tehran has always welcomed diplomacy, but urged the E3 to use all available means to pressure Israel to halt its attacks on Iran. "Iran remains committed to diplomacy as the only path to resolving disputes — but diplomacy is under attack," the official said. Prior to Israel's strikes the E3 and U.S. put forward a resolution that was approved by the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency, a U.N. watchdog, which declared Iran in breach of its nuclear non-proliferation obligations. As part of last week's IAEA resolution, European officials had said they could refer Iran to the United Nations Security Council later in the summer to add pressure on Iran if there was no progress in the nuclear talks. That would be separate to them reimposing UN sanctions, known as the snapback mechanism, before October 18 when the 2015 accord expires. The Europeans are the only ones who can launch the snapback mechanism, with diplomats saying the three countries had looked to set a final deadline at the end of August to launch it. "Iran has repeatedly stated that triggering snapback will have serious consequences," the Iranian official said.
Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
MAGA tears itself apart over Iran as Steve Bannon unloads on Bibi for dragging America into war: 'Who the hell are you?'
Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon pivoted his criticism away from President Donald Trump and aimed it toward Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu as the president weighs further military action against Iran. Bannon lambasted the Israeli government for pushing Trump to get involved in the goal of 'regime change' in Iran and trying to manipulate the American people into support of further military strikes in Iran. 'Who in the hell are you to lecture the American people? Who are you to lecture the American people?' Bannon said angrily on his War Room podcast. He demanded that Netanyahu do more to 'finish the job' to destroy Iran's nuclear capacities. 'The American people are not going to tolerate it. Not going to put up with it. Who are you to jam us into this situation which you knew you couldn't finish the job, or if you can, go finish it!' he announced. In recent days, Netanyahu has pressed Trump and his MAGA allies for more support, speaking to the media about the importance of getting the United States further involved with the war against the 'evil' in Iran. 'Today, it's Tel Aviv. Tomorrow, it's New York. Look, I understand "America First" I don't understand "America Dead,"' he said on ABC News on Sunday. Bannon said that it was the Israeli's responsibly to conclude the war, and expressed frustration that they had no problem starting the conflict. 'Go finish it! Quit coming to us to finish it. President Trump may come to that conclusion, but it's not something he would just say… 'Oh yeah, let's go bomb 'em and take care of it,"' he said. 'He's going to do it because he's got to weigh the options now that you've gotten us into it. That's reality. That's the truth. That's exactly where we are and people should be truthful with each other, particularly in these tough decisions,' he said. 'That's what allies do. Allies don't manipulate and don't inextricably draw people into situations of which the other party has to get them out of,' he continued. On his show, Bannon questioned the timing of the military strikes on Iran, asking the Israelis why it had to be now. He demanded Netanyahu show their intelligence that proved the Iranians were on the cusp of obtaining a nuclear weapon. 'Why did you start something that you couldn't finish?' he asked. Bannon told his viewers that Trump was facing enormous pressure to get involved in the war. 'The pressure on President Trump is coming from the outside and it's coming from people who are not straight with him,' he said. He conceded that Trump could conclude that military action was necessary but that it was important to detail the reasons why they had to do it. 'We have enough faith in President Trump and his judgement that he will come to the right conclusion, but we have to get all the cards on the table,' he concluded.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - China may win more than EU from auto tariff truce
LONDON/HONG KONG, June 19 (Reuters Breakingviews) - A détente in the electric vehicle tariff war may suit China more than Europe. Brussels and Beijing are haggling over a way for Chinese manufacturers to sell battery rides tariff-free, but at a minimum price. Embracing such a system would be a risky move. Europe's electric-vehicle tariffs are barely a year old. Brussels added extra levies of up to 35% to offset the competitive advantages that made-in-China vehicles get from government subsidies or cheap labour. Now, the People's Republic is pushing an alternative: rather than duties levied on imports, carmakers would commit to not sell below a certain price, a model used before with solar panels. Such a system could have benefits. Chinese manufacturers would not have to absorb the burden of levies through discounted prices. Europe, meanwhile, would be able to mollify Beijing and so avoid tit-for-tat tariffs on cognac and other exports, but still stop it dumping cars on the cheap. The latter is a potential mortal threat to Renault ( opens new tab or Volkswagen ( opens new tab. Last year, the Middle Kingdom exported, opens new tab some 1.25 million electric vehicles, more than half of the total production in Europe, as per International Energy Agency data. Look beneath the hood, however, and there are issues. Europe would probably want to find a level that reflects the extent of subsidies enjoyed by each carmaker, as it did with tariffs. A single tariff, likely China's preferred option, would be less precise. Either way, establishing a minimum floor for a complex vehicle with many moving parts would be challenging. It could also quickly become obsolete. Renault and Volkswagen are launching cheaper EV models to compete with China, and changes in battery technology will lower costs. A floor could reduce the incentive to innovate. Enforcement looks a bigger headache. Tariffs have the virtue of simplicity. Yet car prices are fluid: dealers offer discounts, and incentives such as cheap loans. And China's carmakers are already masters at bundling products to make their wares more attractive at home. BYD ( opens new tab, ( opens new tab includes its 'God's Eye' assisted driving software for all vehicles priced above 100,000 yuan (less than $10,000). Carmakers at April's Shanghai auto show touted perks such as multiple screens and built-in kitchenettes. Nio ( opens new tab owners have access to the brand's clubhouses. As such, European carmakers may still be undercut by Chinese rivals, incentivising production in China. True, Europe could impose minimum import quotas, as it did with Japan in the 1980s. Or it could set the price floor high but still impose tariffs below that level. But overall, minimum pricing may be the cost Europe must bear to maintain relations with Beijing and secure access to rare earths – meaning China would most likely be the winner. Follow @Unmack1, opens new tab on X and Katrina Hamlin on Bluesky, opens new tab and Linkedin, opens new tab
