KSEB's hydel push stirs fresh concerns
Tourism sells. But should it be used to sell the idea of a contentious hydroelectric project that has, for decades, aroused deep misgivings and resentment is the question now doing the rounds in Kerala.
A little over a week ago, State-run power utility Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) sprang a surprise when it announced plans to examine whether the Athirappilly hydroelectric project can be developed as an 'Integrated tourism-cum-power generation project.'
Proposed on the west-flowing Chalakudy river in Kerala's Thrissur district, the 163-megawatt (MW) hydel project, first mooted in 1979, has come to symbolise the perpetual war against mindless development and destruction of nature in the southern State. After a long gap, what has abruptly turned the spotlight on it is an April 24 order stating that a meeting of the full-time directors of the KSEB has given its approval 'for remodelling the Athirappilly HEP as a tourism-friendly project.'
Despite winning environmental sanction in 1998 from the Ministry of Environment and Forests, the Athirappilly hydel project has failed to get off the ground on account of environmental concerns. Greens have long opposed it, citing the irreversible consequences it entails for an exceptionally biodiversity-rich region located within the Western Ghats. Since it involves the construction of a dam, concerns have been raised over the potential destruction of large tracts of riparian forest land, an abundant wealth of flora and fauna, and the displacement of Kadars, a Scheduled Tribe that calls the region home. Furthermore, greens argue that the project would alter the very character of the Chalakudy river and sound the death knell for the scenic Athirappilly and Vazhachal waterfalls.
The protests have prompted successive State governments to declare that the project would only be implemented with consensus. As a result, it has lain in such a state of dormancy that it was expected to die a natural death. This impression had gained currency especially in recent years, even though all were aware that the KSEB, which handles power generation, transmission, and distribution in power-deficit Kerala, had not fully given up on its pet project.
On April 28, the KSEB followed up its order with a press statement explaining its intention to see whether the hydel project can be developed in tandem with tourist amenities and present the concept for public debate. The announcement was quickly met with the criticism that the KSEB was merely trying to repackage the project in the glossy wrappings of tourism. State government sources responded to the renewed outrage among environmentalists and local communities by denying that the plan has the backing of a political decision.
Nevertheless, it is interesting to note that the Athirappilly hydel project is back in the news at a time when Kerala's power sector is witnessing dramatic changes.
Hydropower has traditionally dominated the power-deficit State's internal electricity generation. Yet, internal production has served to meet only about 30% of the requirement, leaving the State heavily dependent on allocations from central generating stations and power purchases from outside.
But of late, Kerala has been witnessing a surge in the use of other forms of renewable energy, especially solar power. It aspires to become a 100% renewable energy-based State by 2040 and net carbon neutral by 2050. In the immediate future, the State hopes to add 3,000 MW through solar and wind energy projects and 1,500 MW through hydro projects. (The plans for hydropower, it must be noted, do not include the Athirappilly.)
Besides these, pumped storage projects, battery energy storage systems, and green hydrogen initiatives are also being actively pursued.
The question arises whether the Athirappilly hydel project, conceived decades ago in a different context, holds relevance anymore in this rapidly changing landscape that offers accessible, less-expensive options.
Furthermore, one cannot dismiss the fact that Kerala has witnessed a string of natural disasters in recent years. Such a sombre backdrop demands that development projects, especially ones in fragile locations, undergo hard and prudent scrutiny through the lens of environmental sustainability, safety, and long-term public good.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
5 days ago
- The Hindu
Corporation to ask CSML to address issues with LED lights
Mayor M. Anilkumar has promised to address issues with LED lights by bringing complaints raised by the councillors to the notice of Cochin Smart Mission Limited (CSML). He was responding to complaints at the Kochi Corporation Council meeting on Tuesday. Admitting to problems with LED lights, Mr. Anilkumar said lights developing snags during the monsoon was common. The councillors complained that CSML had not taken any steps for maintenance, though the relocated LED lights had been facing problems from day one. LED lights have been installed along the national highway and the North overbridge. The Mayor said a meeting was once convened with CSML chief executive officer and the deputy chief engineer to discuss the issue. He said he would write to CSML asking to address the problem. CSML had given a contract to a company for ₹40 crore to relocate the lights. The councillors accused CSML of not completing the relocation of the lights yet. When the lights turn dysfunctional, the KSEB blames it on CSML, which in turn puts the onus on the KSEB. Besides, the Corporation has given separate contract for the maintenance of the lights. However, the contractor claims that the maintenance of the lights within the guarantee period is not his responsibility, they said. The councillors rued how they were being forced to approach various agencies to get lights in their wards repaired. Street lights remain the responsibility of the Corporation though they are now forced to run from pillar to post to offer that service, the councillors said. Property tax Mr. Anilkumar said that, except for a few, almost all had paid property tax, thanks to K-Smart. Those receiving notice for the first time need to pay the dues for three years alone. However, those who have failed to pay tax despite being repeatedly served notices should clear the full dues with penal interest, he added. The Mayor was responding to allegations by the Opposition councillors of discrimination in property tax collection. The opposition councillors cited how 146 persons had secured a verdict limiting the collection of tax dues to three years since the increase in tax in 2016, while that benefit was being denied to those who could not afford to approach the court.
Time of India
14-06-2025
- Time of India
Long-term power sale pact: KSERC rejects KSEB's plea
Thiruvananthapuram: The Kerala state electricity regulatory commission (KSERC) rejected KSEB's plea to direct power-generating agencies to comply with the commission's order to honour the long-term power sale agreements, to which the regulator initially denied permission but revised its decision later following state govt intervention. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now KSEB was the first power utility in the country to tap into the 25-year-long power purchase scheme introduced by the Union power ministry in 2013. A year after KSEB signed the pacts, the commission pointed out some deviations in the conditions set by the central govt for the power purchase agreement. It said KSEB should have obtained prior permission from the commission and wanted KSEB to obtain clearance from the Centre. The Centre, however, recommended appropriate steps as deemed fit by the Kerala govt, regulatory commission, and KSEB. Since the agreements were already signed, there was no point in the Centre suggesting how to proceed, it said. The LDF govt also developed some scepticism about the deviations pointed out by the regulatory commission for the 465 MW power purchase agreements signed when the UDF was in power. Subsequently, the commission in March 2023 rejected KSEB's approval for the power purchase. However, following the acute power crisis and mounting criticism against the commission for annulling the power purchase agreements on technical grounds, the state govt was forced to exercise section 109 (2) of the Electricity Act and ask the commission to let KSEB draw power from the agreements cancelled by the commission. Though the commission complied and gave KSEB permission to draw power, most of the companies refused to reinstate the agreements which the commission earlier annulled. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Eventually, all companies stopped supplying power to KSEB as the cost of power increased significantly by then. It was in this context that KSEB approached the commission, seeking directives to two power generators who refused to honour the agreement, which the commission once cancelled and later gave conditional approval following govt intervention. KSEB said in its petition that it was in talks with one of the generating companies and hence the directive should be passed against the other two. However, the commission, in its order on June 12, said the petition filed by KSEB was defective in pleading and not legally sustainable.
Time of India
11-06-2025
- Time of India
Centre rejects state's request to kill wildlife
Kochi: Ministry of environment and forests (MOEF) rejected the state govt's demand to grant permission to kill wild animals that cause damage to crops and property and pose a threat to human life. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The ministry issued the official intimation in this regard to the state govt on Wednesday. The LDF govt approached the ministry with this demand following the death of a Kalikavu native in a tiger attack in the Nilambur assembly constituency, which is going to a byelection on June 19. The notice stated that the Wildlife Protection Act 1972 provides for the conservation, protection and management of wildlife to ensure the ecological and environmental security of the country. "Wild animals are listed in Schedule I considering their ecological and cultural status. Such species are often threatened or endangered and therefore, listing them in Schedule I accords them the highest degree of protection against hunting," reads the letter to state forest department. The official intimation also specified the prohibition on killing wild animals in Schedule I and II except in certain exceptional circumstances. Regarding the demand for declaring wild boars as vermin, the letter states, "Site-specific management of the population of such animals is necessary to maintain a healthy ecosystem instead of having generic provisions of declaring species vermin."
