Vivy Yusof, husband to face 15-day trial over RM8 million criminal breach of trust charge involving Khazanah and PNB funds
KUALA LUMPUR, June 23 — The Sessions Court today set 15 days of trial next year beginning April 13, for the case involving FashionValet Sdn Bhd founders Datin Vivy Sofinas, known as Vivy and her husband Datuk Fadzarudin Shah Anuar, who are facing charges of criminal breach of trust (CBT) involving RM8 million in investment funds from Khazanah Nasional Berhad (Khazanah) and Permodalan Nasional Berhad (PNB).
Judge Rosli Ahmad set the trial dates for April 13 to 17, May 18 to 22, and June 8 to 12, 2026.
'The trial will run for 15 days, and the court has set the next case mention for October 27,' said Rosli.
Earlier, Deputy Public Prosecutor Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin requested the court fix the trial dates agreed upon by both the prosecution and defence. Lawyer M. Athimulan is representing the couple.
Wan Shaharuddin told the court that the prosecution will call 26 witnesses to testify.
The accused, both 37, were not present in court today as their attendance had been exempted.
On December 5 last year, Vivy and Fadzarudin pleaded not guilty to a charge of committing CBT in their capacity as directors of FashionValet Sdn Bhd. They were accused of misappropriating investment funds entrusted to them by Khazanah and PNB by transferring RM8 million from FashionValet Sdn Bhd's company account to 30 Maple Sdn Bhd without the approval of FashionValet's board of directors.
The offence was allegedly committed at Public Bank Berhad, Bukit Damansara Branch, 36-40 Medan Setia 2, Plaza Damansara, Bukit Damansara, here, on August 21, 2018.
The charge, framed under Section 409 of the Penal Code, read together with Section 34 of the same Code, provides for a minimum sentence of two years and a maximum of 20 years in jail, whipping, and a fine upon conviction.
They also pleaded not guilty to an alternative charge of jointly and dishonestly misusing company property, namely, RM8 million in investment funds from Khazanah and PNB belonging to FashionValet Sdn Bhd under Section 403 of the Penal Code, read together with Section 34 of the same Code, which provides for an imprisonment of between six months and five years, along with caning and a fine upon conviction. — Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Merdeka Center poll: 73pc of Malaysians say economy is top issue, Anwar gets 55pc approval rating
KUALA LUMPUR, June 26 — A total of 73 per cent of Malaysian voters identified economic issues as the biggest problem facing the country, according to a new mid-term survey by Merdeka Center on the performance of the Madani administration. According to the center's 'National Survey Highlights May 2025' report, when respondents were asked to name their top concerns, they pointed to inflation (33 per cent), economic growth (13 per cent), corruption (seven per cent), Also cited were job opportunities (seven per cent), and issues related to Malay rights and fair treatment of all races (seven per cent). Concerns over racial issues and public safety were comparatively low, at just three per cent each. 'Concerns over instability have evaporated, but there is a slight rise in [concerns regarding] identity politics (protection of Malay rights),' said the center. Leadership and governance ratings Despite these concerns, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's approval rating stood at 55 per cent, up from 53 per cent in December 2024. A further 36 per cent expressed dissatisfaction, while nine per cent were neutral. According to the centre, Anwar's ability to maintain a two-thirds majority in Parliament and provide political stability was credited for easing public anxiety over governance. Satisfaction with the overall performance of the government was evenly split, with 50 per cent expressing satisfaction and 48 per cent dissatisfaction. 'Public sentiments on the direction of the country shows 50 per cent of the voters surveyed think the country is headed in the wrong direction (compared to 61 per cent one year ago), while the number of voters that think the country is heading in the right direction improved to 43 per cent compared to 29 per cent in June 2024. 'The major reasons for the wrong direction remain focused on the trajectory of the national economy and the performance of the current administration,' the survey said. Demographic breakdown of public sentiment Among those who believed the country was heading in the wrong direction, 68 per cent were Indian respondents, followed by 55 per cent Malay and 43 per cent Chinese. According to Merdeka Center, by age group, those aged 51 to 60 made up the highest percentage of respondents who believed the government was on the wrong track, at 59 per cent. Meanwhile, younger respondents aged 21 to 30 were more optimistic, with 54 per cent saying the country was heading in the right direction. Macroeconomic trends 'In terms of the economy, government data indicates that inflation has cooled to just 1.4 per cent in March 2025 — a three-year low — and economic growth hit 4.4 per cent in the first quarter. The government's minimum wage hike to RM1,700, combined with festive cash aid for civil servants and ongoing fuel subsidies, has helped ease some public frustration over the cost of living. 'While the survey continues to show that the public's top concerns remain the economy, the absence of price shocks despite the withdrawal of diesel fuel subsidies in 2024, has helped ease sentiments,' said the center. The survey was carried out by the Merdeka Center between May 12 and 23, 2025, to gauge voters' perceptions of current developments. A total of 1,208 registered voters were surveyed, comprising 52 per cent Malay, 29 per cent Chinese, seven per cent Indian, six per cent Muslim Bumiputera, and six per cent non-Muslim Bumiputera (from Sabah and Sarawak). Respondents were interviewed via fixed line and mobile telephones, selected through random stratified sampling across age group, ethnicity, gender, and state constituency.
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Whistleblower protection only applies if procedures are followed, says MACC
MACC senior director (legal and prosecution) Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin said informants must follow proper procedures and cannot go public. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission has reminded the public that whistleblower protection is only granted if reports are made directly to enforcement agencies and through proper legal channels. MACC senior director (legal and prosecution) Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin said there is a growing misconception that anyone who exposes misconduct is automatically protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010. He said some believe they can post information on social media or speak to the press first and still claim protection. 'The law is clear. Once information is made public before a report is submitted through proper legal channels, the protection no longer applies,' Bernama quoted him as saying. Wan Shaharuddin said the law requires the whistleblower to act in good faith, without motives such as revenge, personal gain, or defamation. He said whistleblowers cannot be involved in the offence they report, citing the revocation of protection if they are found complicit under Section 11(1) of the Act. 'This is to ensure that whistleblower status is not used as a shield to escape responsibility. Integrity and intent matter,' he said. While the Act protects informants from legal repercussions, he said, many still face stigma, fear of reprisals, and a lack of public understanding about how whistleblower protection actually works. To encourage more reports, especially from civil servants, the government has introduced cash rewards and official recognition for those who report corruption through official channels. Wan Shaharuddin said as of last year, 514 civil servants had received rewards totalling more than RM1 million, with the highest individual reward amounting to RM100,000. He also noted that the Whistleblower Protection (Amendment) Bill 2025 was tabled in Parliament on March 6 to expand protections further, including immunity from civil or criminal action and safeguards against harmful retaliation. With this amendment it is hoped more individuals will come forward to report misconduct without fear, he said.
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Court rules company director not entitled to get favourable statements
Sim Choo Thiam is facing four charges of soliciting and accepting bribes of RM15 million to secure projects from a home ministry agency. (Bernama pic) PUTRAJAYA : The Court of Appeal has ruled that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission is not obliged by law to furnish a written statement containing facts favourable to a company director charged with receiving RM15 million in bribes to secure projects linked to the home ministry. A three-member bench led by Justice Hashim Hamzah said the High Court erred in ruling that Section 51A (1)(c) of the Criminal Procedure Code stands on the same legal footing as Section 51 of the same law. 'The High Court was wrong in compelling MACC to give two paragraphs of a written statement in favour of the accused to the defence,' he said, referring to Sim Choo Thiam, in the unanimous ruling which restored a sessions court ruling. Section 51 deals with summonses to produce documents or other things, while Section 51A(1)(c) states that the prosecution shall, before trial, deliver to the accused a written statement of facts favourable to the defence. Also on the panel hearing the appeal were Justices Azizul Azmi Adnan and Faizah Jamaludin. A case management will be held in the sessions court on June 30 to fix trial dates. Earlier today, deputy public prosecutor Farah Ezlin Yusop Khan submitted that the High Court ruling had usurped the role of the prosecution in determining whether there were statements in favour of Sim under Section 51A (1)(c) of the CPC. She said the prosecution would be prejudiced if the statements were provided before the trial. 'It amounts to conceding the case, and the defence will only have to tender the statements in court and would not need to cross-examine the investigating officer,' she said. Lawyer Hisyam Teh Poh Teik said the law obliged the prosecution to provide an accused person with exculpatory statements for the benefit of their defence. 'There must be an honest pre-trial disclosure,' he said. Last year, the High Court in Kuala Lumpur allowed Sim's revision application to compel MACC to furnish a fresh written statement of facts favouring his defence. Sim, 55, is facing four charges of soliciting and accepting bribes of RM15 million to secure projects from a home ministry agency. According to him,, the fact in favour of the defence is that he was charged in court before MACC recorded a statement from former home minister Hamzah Zainudin, whose name was mentioned in Sim's charges. Sim also claimed that his cautioned statements, recorded by MACC on Feb 16 and 28, 2023, did not support the alleged corruption charges against him. In his ruling, Justice K Muniandy directed MACC to furnish the statement, after finding there were favourable facts to be disclosed by the prosecution to the accused before trial to ensure his right to a fair trial. Sim had filed the revision application in the sessions court on July 4, 2023, claiming he was entitled to the statement under Section 51A of the CPC. Judge Rozina Ayob dismissed his application two months later. On May 10, 2023, Sim was charged with soliciting a RM15 million bribe from Hep Kim Hong, the managing director of Asia Coding Centre Sdn Bhd, through Syed Abu Zafran Syed Ahmad, as an inducement for Hamzah to award projects to the company. He was also charged with three counts of accepting RM15 million in bribes from the same individual as an inducement for Hamzah to award other projects on a similar basis. The offences are alleged to have been committed at the Shaas Holdings office and a parking lot at Solaris Dutamas, Jalan Dutamas 1 here between June and July 2021. The charges were framed under Section 16(a)(B) of the MACC Act 2009, punishable under Section 24(1) of the same Act, carrying a maximum imprisonment of 20 years and a fine of at least five times the value of the bribe or RM10,000, whichever is higher, upon conviction. Lawyers Low Wei Loke and Kee Wei Lon also represented Sim, while deputy public prosecutors Asraf Tahir, Qistini Qamarul Abrar and Ifa Sirhu Samsudin assisted Farah.
