Lawyers asking for Tufts student detained by ICE to be released in hearing today

A federal judge in Vermont is holding a hearing Monday regarding jurisdictional issues involving a
Tufts University Ph. D student
who is being
detained by the Trump administration
.
Rumeysa Ozturk, a doctoral student at the Massachusetts university from Turkey, was
detained last month
on her way back from a Ramadan Iftar dinner on March 25 after her student visa was revoked. Ozturk is
one of hundreds of students
studying at American universities whose visas have been revoked or stopped from reentering the United States after they were accused of publicly expressing support for Palestinians.
Ozturk's attorneys argue that her detention is unconstitutional. She is currently detained at a federal detention center in Basile, Louisiana, where the government argues her case should be heard.
Mahsa Khanbabai, one of Ozturk's attorneys, told CBS Boston
on Sunday that it's "pretty clear, based on the lack of evidence that the government has submitted, that she's done anything that's violated our immigration laws."
"It's essentially just trying to silence and show everyone from speaking out and creating basically this, you know, Soviet-style era of watch your neighbor and report on what your neighbor is doing to us," Khanbabi said.
After taking Ozturk into custody, immigration officials took her from Somerville to Methuen, Massachusetts, and then to Lebanon, New Hampshire, according to court filings. From there, she was brought to an ICE field office in St. Albans, Vermont, and was held there overnight. The following morning, on March 26, Ozturk was taken to the airport in Burlington, Vermont, and flown to Louisiana, where her custody was transferred to the immigration detention facility in Basile.
Earlier this month, a federal judge rejected an effort by the Justice Department to throw out the challenge to Ozturk's detention after she was first taken into custody, and also denied an effort by the department to move her case to Louisiana. The same judge blocked Ozturk's removal from the United States until court proceedings play out.
Ozturk's attorneys have argued in court proceedings that her detention is unconstitutional, violating her right to free speech and due process.
Monday's arguments will be heard by Vermont District Court judge William K Sessions III, who was nominated to the federal bench by President Bill Clinton.
In a court filing last week, Ozturk, 30, detailed how she was detained by ICE.
Surveillance footage showed
six plainclothes ICE agents who appeared to be wearing masks stopping Ozturk on the street and taking her into custody.
"I felt very scared and concerned as the men surrounded me and grabbed my phone from me," Ozturk said in the statement, writing that the officers told her they were police, and one quickly showed what might have been a gold badge. "But I didn't think they were the police because I had never seen police approach and take someone away like this," she said.
She added that the officers did not tell her why they were arresting her, and that they repeatedly denied her requests to speak to an attorney.
While a letter dated March 25 did not state the basis for revocation of her visa, Ozturk had co-authored an editorial published in March 2024 in the school newspaper that criticized Tufts for dismissing several resolutions adopted by the undergraduate student Senate in an effort to "hold Israel accountable for clear violations of international law." The op-ed piece did not mention Hamas.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

New York Times

27 minutes ago

• New York Times

World Central Kitchen Resumes Gaza Operations After Nearly 7-Week Pause

World Central Kitchen, the charity founded by the celebrity chef José Andrés, has resumed operations in Gaza almost seven weeks after pausing cooking and distributing meals because of Israel's blockade of the enclave. The charity said in a statement that it cooked nearly 10,000 meals on Saturday, its first day of operations after it was able to deliver aid to its teams in Gaza for the first time in more than 12 weeks. World Central Kitchen suspended its work in Gaza on May 7, saying that it had run out of supplies to cook meals or make bread after Israel imposed a near total shutdown of aid deliveries, starting in March, that lasted almost three months. Israeli officials defended the blockade, saying it was intended to prevent Hamas from smuggling weapons or diverting aid supplies. But the United Nations and other international aid agencies criticized some of the measures as a form of collective punishment and warned of a growing hunger crisis because of the restrictions. They also said that Israel had not provided evidence that Hamas had systematically diverted aid. 'This pause marked a devastating moment in our response, cutting off a vital source of daily nourishment for families already facing extreme hardship,' World Central Kitchen said in its statement, adding that it had prepared and served more than 133 million meals in Gaza since October 2023. Last year, the group halted operations for nearly a month after Israel hit a convoy and killed seven of its workers, a strike that prompted widespread international condemnation. The Israeli military said that a number of failures, including a breakdown in communications and violations of the military's rules of engagement, had led to the attacks, and it dismissed two officers. Many families in Gaza have relied heavily on charities such as World Central Kitchen for meals as staple foods have become scarce and fuel for cooking has become nearly impossible to obtain. But much of the wider aid infrastructure in Gaza remains nonoperational since Israel began to allow some supplies to be delivered in mid-May, mostly under a new distribution system run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. The beginning of the Israeli and U.S.-backed system has been chaotic, with scores of Palestinians killed as they tried to get food packages. 'Far too many people have died while trying to access the trickle of food aid coming in,' the U.N. World Food Program said in a statement this past week. 'Only a massive scale-up in food distributions can stabilize the situation, calm anxieties, and rebuild the trust within communities that more food is coming.' Abdel Nasser al-Ajrami, head of Gaza's bakers' union, said that the U.N.-supported kitchens across the territory remained out of service. We are unable to operate the bakeries because people are too desperate, making it nearly impossible to manage the constant chaos,' he said.

USA Today

28 minutes ago

• USA Today

US bombs Iran: Trump's gamble: Nuclear threat ended? Or the start of 'endless war'?

It's Donald Trump's war now. The decision to bomb Iran revealed the conflict between some of the president's fundamental impulses. The highest hope of President Donald Trump's bombing of Iran: A rogue nuclear program that had defied a half-dozen of his predecessors has finally been destroyed. The deepest fear: Just four years after the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan ended America's longest war, the United States is now enmeshed in another war in a volatile region, with perilous and uncertain consequences. "Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's No. 1 state sponsor of terror," Trump said in a late-night announcement in the East Room on June 21, interrupting Americans' Saturday night plans with news that B-2 bombers had dropped the world's most powerful conventional bombs on three sites considered crucial to Tehran's nuclear program. "Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace." Watch Trump's address to the nation after US bombed Iranian nuke sites More: US on 'high alert' for Iran retaliation, says nuke program 'obliterated' That's the calculation behind "Operation Midnight Hammer," anyway − that despite its initial bluster, Tehran will be forced to abandon its nuclear program. But Trump acknowledged there were other possibilities. "Remember, there are many targets left," he said, surrounded by a solemn-looking trio of advisers − Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. "If peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speech and skill." A war between Trump's fundamental impulses The White House debate over whether to launch the bombers put at odds some of Trump's most fundamental impulses. One is his fervent opposition in all three of his presidential campaigns against "forever wars," including the costly and controversial conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. His "America First" agenda reflects a determination to focus less on places like Ukraine and more on challenges close to home. Though most Republican congressional leaders praised the president for the decision, some people prominent in the MAGA movement did not. "This is not our fight," Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene complained on social media. "Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war." On the other hand, Trump is also famously impatient with problems that have frustrated standard solutions. Witness, for instance, his willingness to press the limits of the law in identifying and deporting millions of undocumented immigrants. The lengthy efforts at negotiation with Iran, like much of diplomacy, seemed unlikely to reach the sort of dramatic and decisive conclusion he favors. The bombing of Iran also reflects his alliance with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who argues that Iran's nuclear program poses an existential threat to his country. For the prime minister, achieving his decades-old dream of destroying that program is the stuff of legacy. It's the stuff of Trump's legacy, too − a powerful message for a president who cannot run for the Oval Office again. Netanyahu struck that chord. "Congratulations, President Trump," he said in Tel Aviv. "His leadership today has created a pivot in history that can help lead the Middle East and beyond to a future of prosperity and peace." Congressional leaders notified as planes headed home For better or worse, this will be Trump's war. For one thing, he didn't seek the approval of Congress, which under the Constitution has the right to declare war, though the president has broad authority to order the use of military force. The War Powers Act, passed after President Richard Nixon's secret bombing of Cambodia during the Vietnam War, requires presidents to notify Congress and limits the length of deployments. After the U.S. bombers had left Iranian airspace, the administration immediately notified congressional leaders, Hegseth told reporters at a Pentagon briefing early June 22. Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, said Trump had risked dragging the United States into a long war "without consulting Congress, without a clear strategy, without regard to the consistent conclusions of the intelligence community, and without explaining to the American people what's at stake." Those will be the elements of the debate ahead, in echoes of the Iraq War. How serious was the Iranian nuclear threat? And how will voters weigh the stakes and the cost? In Istanbul, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi accused Trump of having "deceived his own voters" by launching a strike despite his campaign promises. The U.S. administration holds "sole and full responsibility for the consequences of its actions," he said. But he didn't specify whether Iran would retaliate against U.S. forces in the region. Hours after the bunker-buster bombs were dropped, Iran launched a new round of missiles toward Israel. On June 23, the foreign minister plans to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin, an ally but one who has his own war to fight.

The Hill

31 minutes ago

• The Hill

Trump in wake of Iran attack: ‘Everyone, keep oil prices down'

In the wake of the U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, President Trump on Monday urged 'everyone' to keep oil prices down. 'EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I'M WATCHING! YOU'RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON'T DO IT!' Trump said on Truth Social. Oil is traded on a global market, and the energy produced in not only the U.S. but in players around the world including Iran, Russia and Saudi Arabia contribute to the prices that Americans pay at the pump. Prices have spiked in recent days amid escalations between the U.S. and Iran — and gasoline prices were up an average of 8 cents compared to a week ago, according to the American Automobile Association. The $3.22 cent average price was still well below highs in 2022 when the national average was as high as $5 per gallon. Iranian state media reported Sunday that Tehran is considering a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which much of the world's oil supply flows, threatening further price increases. Trump also wrote on social media calling on the Department of Energy to drill quickly. 'To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!' he added on Truth Social. The Energy Department is primarily a research and funding agency — and is also tasked with maintaining the nation's nuclear weapons stockpile. Unlike many countries, the U.S. does not have a state-run oil company, so the government cannot make the unilateral decision to try to drill. It is up to private companies whether they want to produce oil in the U.S., though some government agencies such as the Interior Department can try to make it more attractive to drill on public lands. Presidents have relatively little influence on oil and gasoline prices generally. —Alex Gangitano contributed.