Opinion: As Trump Basks In Fordow Afterglow, Kremlin Has A Counterpoint

Last Updated:
Russians believe Trump will scramble for peace in a hurry to hog credit for stopping Israel-Iran war. But Iran will invest all its energies to get past nuclear line in minimum time
When bombs drop on the nuclear kitchens of the Ayatollah Khameini regime in Iran, billions rejoice. Some openly, some (especially the fast-transforming Sunni Arab powers) privately. Iran is a ruthlessly violent regime which has killed and targeted thousands of its own women for merely refusing to wear the hijab; runs terror proxies like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis; and is widely seen as the biggest destabilising force in the Middle East. It has richly earned its comeuppance.
But then the man who ordered the early morning bombings on Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan nuclear facilities is one who believes that jumping into every global conflict and claiming credit for solving those has earned him about five undelivered Nobel Peace Prizes so far.
It is true that American B-2 stealth bombers have dropped six GBU-57, the deepest bunker-busting bomb in the world. Developed in the early 2000s, the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) weighs 13,600 kg, is 6 meters long, has a diameter of about 80 cm, and contains nearly 2,500 kg of explosives. It can target structures up to 60 metres under the ground.
The B-2 bombers flew non-stop for around 37 hours from its base in Missouri, US, refuelling several times mid-air. The Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran (AEOI) acknowledged the strikes. But it has downplayed these as superficial. No nuclear contamination detected after US strikes, it said.
No changes in background radiation were detected in Saudi Arabia or other Gulf Arab states, the Saudi Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Commission (NRRC) confirmed.
Russia, Iran's steadfast ally, remains unimpressed by the airstrikes. Russian news agencies mocked Trump through its X handle.
'Force far greater than what was witnessed tonight," boasted Trump — the man who thinks he deserves FIVE Nobel Peace Prizes," Sputnik posted.
But sources close to the Kremlin break down the US airstrikes more technically. Since Russia is Iran's biggest backer and has helped set up its nuclear infrastructure, there could be bias in its analysis. But it is nevertheless worth considering because beyond Trump's narcissistic boasts and the democratic world's confirmation bias to believe Iran's Ayatollah regime's nuke toys are finished, there could be a reality check.
Six GBU-57 bombs (some now say 12) pounded Iran's Fordow nuclear plant. They rely on mass, not firepower. Imagine 30,000 pounds of tungsten, delayed fuses, inertial guidance, and geological stress sequencing.
But Fordow was built for this, the Russians say.
It is designed to counter the MOP. Hence the curved tunnels, offset caverns, anti-penetration strata, and layered redundancy across ventilation. Fordow apparently has C2 and IR-6 centrifuge chambers. A single hit does not affect much, but two strikes can open up a tunnel mouth.
To truly destroy the core, you would need tight sequencing, vector convergence, telemetry confirmation, and real-time damage layering, says the source close to the Kremlin. That apparently didn't happen. At most, the American bombs sealed an entrance, he argues. Iran has so far reported no core disruption, no enrichment halt, and no internal collapse.
Russians estimate that to drop six GBU-57 bombs, three B-2 stealth bombers together or two conducting multiple flyovers deep in contested airspace flew in without strike escort in one of the most monitored radar corridors on earth. If Fordow was gone, you would see craters, electromagnetic rupture, emergency airlifts, seismographs lighting up, and infrared flares beneath the mountain, they say.
Tomahawk missiles on Natanz and Esfahan add nothing, they claim. Cruise missiles are subsonic, non-penetrative, and designed for surface-level disruption. 'You don't decapitate nuclear infrastructure with Tomahawk Block IV missiles. You flick switches. You scorch perimeters," the source says. 'A thousand-pound warhead does not cut into fuel halls or disrupt cascade chambers beneath 20 meters of hardened casing."
This was bravado by Trump aimed at placating pro-Israel pressure groups, Russians believe. Apparently Jewish groups in the US have been long pressing Washington to join the war.
'As of now, there is no synthetic aperture radar (SAR) confirmation. No crater clustering. No multispectral flash analysis. No underground fire signature. No battle damage assessment (BDA) loop," says the Russian source.
The Russians believe Trump will now scramble for peace in a hurry to hog credit for stopping the Israel-Iran war. But Iran will invest all its energies to get past the nuclear line in the minimum time now. And Russia is likely to help it.
The last quip is particularly acerbic: 'If the centrifuge of Fordow still spins tomorrow, Washington just pulled off the most expensive influence op in bunker-busting history, only to watch Tehran climb the escalation ladder unscathed."
top videos
View all
Although Benjamin Netanyahu thanked Trump and America, he would not be pleased if the airstrikes serve only as Trump's headline and photo-op and makes Iran even more determined to procure the Bomb.
Abhijit Majumder is a senior journalist. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
First Published:

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

NDTV

20 minutes ago

• NDTV

United Behind Iran War Effort, Israelis Express Relief At US Bombing

Israelis expressed relief and optimism Sunday after US President Donald Trump ordered air strikes on Iran, 10 days into a war that has widespread public support. Despite daily nerve-shredding trips to bomb shelters and growing damage around the country, Israelis appeared united behind Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's move to attack Iran on June 13. Trump's decision to authorise overnight bombing raids on Iran's nuclear facilities has provided further reassurance after more than a week of sorties by the Israeli air force. "The war with Iran was inevitable. You knew it would happen sooner or later," Claudio Hazan, a 62-year-old software engineer, told AFP in central Jerusalem on Sunday. "I hope that it will shorten the war, because otherwise Israel by itself would not stop until they get that Fordo place bombed," he explained, referring to the deeply buried Iranian nuclear site targeted by heavy US bombers overnight. Israelis have hunkered down for the last 10 days, with businesses closed, schools shuttered and people urged to stay home. Few have slept a full uninterrupted night since the conflict erupted due to the screeching missile warnings that flash up on mobile phones at all times of day. "We woke up to a Sunday morning of alarms and then we saw that the US attacked," David, a 43-year-old Jerusalem resident, told AFP. "We're all happy that the US is lending a hand, it has always been lending a hand." Israeli President Isaac Herzog told the BBC on Sunday that "now is an opportunity to come to a dialogue of peace, also a dialogue of peace between all nations in the region, including Israelis and Palestinians". ' God Is With Us' Israel's sophisticated air defences have kept Israeli towns and cities relatively safe, shooting down hundreds of Iranian missiles and drones that would otherwise have caused widespread devastation. Dozens have slipped through, however, with three more impacts reported on Sunday morning in the northern port of Haifa and around the coastal hub of Tel Aviv. At least 50 strikes have been acknowledged nationwide and 25 people have died, according to official figures. When a missile blasted her modern apartment block on Thursday in Ramat Gan, near Tel Aviv, resident Renana lamented to AFP that "it will take a long time until this building recovers." But she showed no rancour towards Netanyahu who has deployed Israeli forces in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and now Iran since the attack on Israel by Palestinian group Hamas in October 2023. "The truth is that God is with us and the government should go on with whatever they're doing, which is exactly what should have been done a long time ago," Renana, who did not give her surname, told AFP. 'Sharp Contrast' Israel's usually divided political scene has also lined up behind the attack on Iran, a country generations of Israelis have grown up fearing as a threat to their existence. "Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is my political rival, but his decision to strike Iran at this moment in time is the right one," opposition leader Yair Lapid wrote in a Jerusalem Post op-ed last week. A survey carried out by the Israel Democracy Institute in the days immediately after Israel's first strikes on June 13 found that 70 percent of Israelis supported the war, although the results revealed a major divide. Among Jewish Israelis, there was 82 percent support, while only 35 percent of respondents from Israel's Arab minority, who mostly identify as Palestinian, were in favour. Dahlia Scheindlin, an Israeli pollster and political analyst, told AFP that Israelis were much more united behind the Iran campaign than the grinding conflict in Gaza which many saw as a "dirty war". Netanyahu has been criticised for failing to secure the return of Israeli hostages being held by Hamas and accused of prolonging the war for domestic political purposes. He is also subject to an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court for alleged war crimes in Gaza where nearly 56,000 people have been killed, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory. "There's a very sharp contrast between how Israelis view the war in Gaza and how they view this war with Iran," Scheindlin said. She cautioned, however, that sentiment could change if it turns into a long conflict.

Mint

21 minutes ago

• Mint

"Severe damage and extreme destruction" of three nuclear sites in Iran: US defence secy Hegseth

US defence secretary Pete Hegseth and chairman of the joint chiefs of staff air force general Dan Caine on Sunday said the three Iranian nuclear sites in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan had been severely damaged and facing extreme destruction citing initial battle damage assessment reports and that the final battle damage assessment was in progress. "We devastated the Iranian nuclear programme," said Hegseth. 'It is worth noting the operation did not target Iranian troops or Iranian people.' Hegseth maintained that the operation, named 'Midnight Hammer', was not for regime change in Iran and was focused on destroying the west Asian nation's nuclear capabilities. "This mission was not, has not been for regime change. The president authorized a precision operation to neutralize the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear programme," Hegseth said. He also said public and private messages were being delivered to Iranians after the attack seeking negotiations for peace. Hegseth reiterated President Trump's statement that the objective of this operation was to prevent Iran from developing nuclear arms in order to promote peace. Hegseth said US President Donald Trump had repeatedly asked Iran to halt its nuclear programme for peace, but all such attempts were stonewalled. In response to a question about whether the US is prepared for a full-protracted war, Hegseth clarified that the scope of this operation was intentionally limited and that anything is possible in a conflict. Asked about whether Israeli forces had contributed to the operation, Hegseth said the mission was partly to defend Israel, but Tel Aviv was not a part of the operation and that it was a solely US-led operation. On a query about Iran garnering support from China and North Korea, Hegseth said the previous administration's policies had driven these nations together, which could be a challenge, but maintained that the operation was to promote peace by stopping Iran's nuclear programme. Asked about previous reports stating that Iran's nuclear facilities were not a threat, he said Trump used credible information to take the call that the Iranian nuclear programme was a threat. Operation Midnight Hammer involved eight B-2 stealth bomber aircraft taking off from Missouri in the US, according to Caine. One of these jets flew west for misdirection, while the others flew east for 18 hours towards Iranian airspace, Caine said. This was the biggest B-2 bomber attack carried out by the US and the longest B-2 bomber flight after operations in the wake of 9/11, Hegseth said. Caine said the operation used B-2 stealth bombers, several fourth- and fifth-generation fighter aircraft and one armed submarine to attack the three nuclear facilities. For the first time, the US used Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOP), designated as GBU-57. As many as 14 of these 30,000-pound bombs were used to target nuclear facilities at Fordow and Natanz, Caine said. Over two dozen tomahawk missiles were also fired from a submarine at the facility as Isfahan, Caine said, adding that the attack took place at approximately 2-2:10 am Iranian time. Caine said Iranian jets did not scramble and that Iranian surface-to-air missiles did not retaliate. The US attacked Iran's nuclear facilities after Israel launched an offensive against Iran on 13 June, also targeting Iran's nuclear facilities. Iran responded with military action, attacking an Israeli hospital shortly after head-of-state Benjamin Netanyahu visited it. Iran's foreign ministry condemned the US attack in a post on X, calling it "a grave and unprecedented violation of the fundamental principles of the Charter of the United Nations and the international law". Alleging that the US violated the UN Charter with its attack, Iran's foreign ministry stressed its right to defend Iran's territory and protect its people using "all force and means". Iran also urged the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) to convene an emergency session to condemn the US for its attack. "We call on the IAEA Board of Governors to immediately convene and carry out its legal responsibility in response to this dangerous US attack on Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities, all of which have been under the Agency's full safeguards and monitoring," the Iranian foreign ministry's statement added. On the night of 21-22 June, the US attacked three nuclear facilities in Iran. US President Donald Trump late on 21 June (US time) addressed the nation and said, "Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror. Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated." Trump also thanked and congratulated Israeli prime minister Netanyahu in his address. "We worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before and we've gone a long way to erasing this horrible threat to Israel," he said. Netanyahu, in a video address on Sunday, congratulated Trump on the operation. "Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history," said Netanyahu in his address after the operation. Indian prime minister Narendra Modi spoke with the president of Iran, Masoud Pezeshkian, to discuss the current situation. "Expressed deep concern at the recent escalations. Reiterated our call for immediate de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy as the way forward and for early restoration of regional peace, security and stability," said Modi in a post on X. India has undertaken Operation Sindhu to evacuate Indian students from conflict-ridden places in West Asia. As many as 311 Indian nations arrived in New Delhi from Masshad in Iran on 22 June, external affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal announced in a post on X.

New Indian Express

22 minutes ago

• New Indian Express

US strikes on Iran mark a dangerous turning point for the region and the world: Here's why

NEW DELHI: The American airstrikes targeting Natanz, Isfahan, and the fortified Fordow facility in Iran represent a dramatic escalation in the region's tensions. This could reshape the geopolitical landscape of West Asia, with wide-ranging consequences for diplomacy, regional stability, global oil markets, and India's energy security. What Are Iran's Options Now? Iran has several possible responses, each fraught with risk: Diplomatic De-escalation Iran could return to negotiations, potentially under the framework of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which the Trump administration previously abandoned. However, this route faces resistance from Iran's hardliners, who view the U.S. strikes as a humiliation and a betrayal of diplomacy. Tehran could also withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Closure of the Strait of Hormuz Iran's most potent non-military leverage is the Strait of Hormuz—a narrow maritime chokepoint through which over 20 million barrels of oil and a large volume of liquefied natural gas (LNG) pass daily. Iranian parliament has backed the proposal to close the strait while the final decision is yet to be made by Iran's top security body. The closure of Hormuz could trigger an oil price surge and widespread economic ripple effects. But this move would also harm Iran. Its own oil exports pass through Hormuz, and a closure would likely provoke military responses from Gulf Arab states and lead to further Western sanctions. Still, the threat alone could cause panic in energy markets. Military Counterstrike A more dangerous path is retaliation. Iran's military and political leadership have warned of striking U.S. military bases and naval assets in the region. Hossein Shariatmadari, editor of the hardline Kayhan newspaper, stated ominously: 'It is now our turn.' Iran possesses short-range ballistic missiles, drones, and naval assets that could be used in asymmetric attacks. The U.S., anticipating a reaction, has dispersed its forces and bolstered regional air defenses.