Gold in a healthy consolidation period, says Chris Wood

Gold prices have risen by 85% since the start of 2022 while the MSCI AC World Index is up only 19% over the same period, according to the note.
Jefferies' Christopher Wood notes gold's consolidation above $3,000. He maintains high gold allocation in his pension fund. Western gold ETF flows are light despite gold's outperformance since 2022. Total ETF holdings are below 2020 peak. Gold prices have significantly outpaced the MSCI AC World Index since 2022. China's gold imports surged in April.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Mumbai: Jefferies' global equity strategist Christopher Wood said gold has entered a 'healthy consolidation' period with prices holding above US$3,000 an ounce-a level he described as ideal for gold mining companies to enjoy rising profit margins. In his newsletter, Greed & Fear, Wood said he maintains a 40% allocation to physical gold and 20% to gold mining stocks in his asset allocation for a US dollar-denominated pension fund."Normally, when a certain category of stocks outperform, there are strong flows into the related ETFs. But that has not been the case with gold in recent years," he said. "Flows into gold ETFs in the western world have remained relatively light given the dramatic outperformance of gold since the start of 2022."Total known ETF holdings of gold are up 10% from their May 2024 low but remain 20.3% below the October 2020 peak. Gold prices have risen by 85% since the start of 2022 while the MSCI AC World Index is up only 19% over the same period, according to the note.Wood said China has increased its gold purchases with imports rising 73% in April from the previous month to 127.5 tonnes, the highest level in 11 months. This volume is equivalent to nearly half of the average monthly global gold production outside China, he said."Holdings in China-listed gold ETFs have increased by 82 tonnes so far this year, compared to an increase of 53.3 tonnes in all of 2024," the note said.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

an hour ago

• Time of India

Strait of Hormuz closure on the cards: Why India isn't hitting the panic button over oil yet, ET Infra

Advt Why the Strait of Hormuz matters India's exposure—and its evolving strategy In June 2025, Indian refiners imported 2.2 million barrels per day (bpd) of Russian crude—the highest in two years and more than combined imports from the Gulf. Imports from the United States rose to 439,000 bpd, up from 280,000 bpd in May. LNG imports from Australia, Russia, and the US are also on the rise—all bypassing Hormuz entirely. Advt Has Iran ever closed the Strait? Why a full blockade Is unlikely Iran's own oil exports rely on the Strait—primarily via Kharg Island, which handles 96 per cent of its volumes. Its largest buyer, China, imports 5.4 million bpd through Hormuz and is unlikely to support such a move. Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, and Qatar—countries Iran has been trying to mend ties with—would also be severely impacted. The US Navy and allied forces maintain a heavy presence in the region, further reducing the chances of a prolonged closure. Can India manage a disruption? Strategic petroleum reserves covering 9–10 days of imports. Increased sourcing from Russia, the US, Latin America, and West Africa. Flexible refining infrastructure and wider crude handling capacity. Possible use of fuel subsidies to contain inflationary pressure on diesel and LPG.e By , ETInfra Standing at the lectern in the White House briefing room, Karoline Leavitt, President Donald Trump's press secretary, read aloud a message she said came 'directly from the president.'Citing a 'substantial chance of negotiations' with Iran, the statement said Trump would wait two weeks before deciding whether to launch air strikes in the Middle East. Less than 30 hours later, Trump gave the go-ahead for a sweeping aerial assault on Iran's nuclear facilities—joining Israel in the most significant Western military action against Iran since its 1979 global tensions mount, analysts are closely watching how Tehran might respond. One possibility is the closure of the Strait of Hormuz—a strategic maritime corridor through which more than 20 million barrels of oil and a significant volume of liquefied natural gas (LNG) pass Strait of Hormuz, just 33 km wide at its narrowest point, connects the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean. With only two-mile-wide shipping lanes in each direction, it is a chokepoint for tankers moving oil and gas from the Gulf to the to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), an average of 20.3 million barrels of oil and 290 million cubic meters of LNG transited the Strait daily in 2024. Most of it comes from Saudi Arabia, Iraq, UAE, Kuwait, Iran, and disruptions were once a bigger concern for the West, today it's Asia that stands most exposed. More than 80 per cent of the oil passing through the Strait is destined for Asia. India, China, Japan, and South Korea accounted for 67 per cent of these flows in 2022 and early imports 90 per cent of its crude oil, with about 40 per cent sourced from Gulf countries like Iraq, Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Kuwait—all dependent on Hormuz. But India's risk profile is changing oil (Urals, ESPO, Sokol) reaches India via the Cape of Good Hope, the Suez Canal, or the Pacific, giving New Delhi important logistical flexibility. Indian refiners, for their part, have invested in processing flexibility to handle a wider variety of yet. Tehran has made multiple threats over the years—most notably in 2012, 2018, and 2019—but has never followed through. Even during the Tanker War of the 1980s, when Iran and Iraq attacked Gulf shipping, the Strait remained most recent flashpoint came in April 2024, when Iranian forces seized a container ship near Hormuz following Israeli strikes on an Iranian consulate in some Iranian leaders have once again raised the prospect of closure, most analysts remain Secretary of State Marco Rubio publicly urged China to dissuade Iran from escalating.'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them [Iran] about that,' Rubio told Fox News. 'If they [close the Strait]... it will be economic suicide for them.'China is Iran's largest oil customer, importing 1.8 million bpd in May, according to Vortexa. Any closure would also hit India, Japan, and South Korea, which rely on the same the Strait would be economically and diplomatically self-defeating for far, the government appears confident. Oil Minister Hardeep Singh Puri said that India has adequate reserves and access to alternate sources. Over the years, the government has also worked on diversification of its sources of crude oil, significantly reducing the dependence on Strait of present, India enjoys a certain degree of cusion. Key buffers include:State-owned retailers like IOC, BPCL, and HPCL also have built-up margins after holding retail prices steady during periods of low global crude Strait of Hormuz remains a geopolitical flashpoint , but India's energy security posture has changed. With a more diversified crude basket, greater sourcing resilience, and improved infrastructure, a short-term disruption would be manageable—though not if the conflict deepens or becomes protracted, oil prices could spike, and shipping patterns may shift rapidly—testing how robust India's backup plans really are.

Business Standard

2 hours ago

• Business Standard

US asks China to dissuade Iran from closing Strait of Hormuz oil route

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has urged China to intervene and dissuade Iran from shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most critical oil shipping routes. His request followed Iranian state media reports that the country's parliament had approved a proposal to close the Strait, although the final decision rests with Iran's Supreme National Security Council. The move comes days after the United States struck three of Iran's nuclear facilities, escalating tensions in West Asia and raising fears of a broader regional conflict. Rubio: Strait closure would be 'economic suicide' for Iran Speaking to Fox News on Sunday, June 22, Rubio said he had encouraged China to speak directly with Iranian authorities, noting that Beijing's economic interests were deeply tied to uninterrupted shipping through the Strait. 'If Iran closes the Strait, it would be economic suicide for them,' Rubio said, adding that while the US has response options, other nations—particularly energy importers—would suffer more. China, the largest importer of Iranian oil, imported over 1.8 million barrels per day from Iran last month, according to data from ship-tracking firm Vortexa. Strait of Hormuz: Global oil lifeline Roughly 20 per cent of the world's oil supply transits through the Strait of Hormuz. It serves as the main conduit for energy exports from key producers from West Asia, including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Iraq. Any disruption could cause severe market volatility and spike global fuel prices. Besides China, several major Asian economies—such as India, Japan, and South Korea—are heavily dependent on oil shipped through this strategic waterway. Oil prices surge after US-Iran escalation Oil prices spiked in the wake of the US strike on Iran 's nuclear facilities. On Monday morning, Brent crude futures rose by $1.52, or 1.97 per cent, to $78.53 per barrel—the highest level in five months. Market watchers say tensions in the Strait could push prices higher still, especially if Iran carries through on its threat. Indian exporters brace for freight shock Exporters and logistics firms in India are preparing for renewed shipping disruptions through the Gulf. Dushyant Mulani, chairman of the Federation of Freight Forwarders' Associations in India, said that freight rates had begun to rise and the situation remained volatile. He noted that with the United States targeting key Iranian nuclear facilities, retaliation was anticipated and tensions were likely to remain elevated. According to him, this would impact oil prices and shipping costs, with war risk premiums already being applied to shipments.

First Post

2 hours ago

• First Post

Bilateral trade talks stall as US demands low duties on GM crops threaten India's farmers

As the Donald Trump administration of the United States has stuck to its maximalist demands, the India-US trade talks have stalled. The disagreement primarily lies over agricultural products and dairy products. read more The India-US trade talks have stalled as negotiators have made extractive demands but have not offered anything substantial in return. The main areas of dispute are agriculture, dairy, pharmaceuticals, and digital services. Officials have described the US position as that of take-it-or-leave-it. The news of trade talks hitting a hurdle has come at a time when US President Donald Trump's actions have soured the India-US relationship. Since last month, he has sought to intervene in the Kashmir conflict and consistently taken Pakistan's side in the India-Pakistan conflict and undermined India's position. He open embrace of jihadists and jihad sympathisers from West Asia to Central Asia has also compromised India's security interests. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD If a deal is not reached by July 8, India would be slapped with 26 per cent tariffs as the pause announced in 'reciprocal tariffs' would come to an end. India-US trade talks stall over US demands The Trump administration has demanded India to allow lower-duty imports of US agricultural products like maize and soybean and India is resisting the demand, according to The Times of India. The government is concerned about the effect of such imports on farmers. There are also concerns about potential effects of genetically modified food on health. Sources told the newspaper that India-US trade talks have hit a hurdle. India had also expected to secure zero duty access to US markets for Indian textiles, leather goods, pharmaceuticals, and some engineering goods and automobile parts, but US negotiators have said that going down to zero tariffs immediately is not possible. Separately, Bloomberg has reported that the Trump administration wants India to remove tariffs and ease price controls on medical devices. It has also demanded India to relax its data localisation requirements for digital services. US following take-it-or-leave-it approach As the Trump administration has persisted with maximalist demands, an Indian officials told Mint that its dealings came off as a 'take-it-or-leave-it offer'. The newspaper further reported that India has made it clear to the Trump administration that unless it changes its animal feeding practices, such as the usage of non-vegetarian feed to cattle, US dairy products will not be allowed into India. 'The negotiations are not progressing as expected. The talks were meant to be two-way, as agreed. However, the US team's insistence on opening certain critical sectors comes across as a take-it-or-leave-it offer," a person familiar with the matter told the newspaper. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD