Child Q: Officer who strip searched girl thought she was ‘doing the right thing'

The girl, known as Child Q, was strip searched by officers in Hackney, east London, on December 3 2020 after her school wrongly suspected her of carrying cannabis.
This involved the removal of the 15-year-old's clothing including underwear, her bending over and having to expose intimate parts of her body while she was menstruating, the panel heard.
Trainee detective constable (TDC) Kristina Linge, Pc Victoria Wray and Pc Rafal Szmydynski, who were all Pcs at the time, all deny gross misconduct over their treatment of the girl.
Giving evidence to a misconduct panel on Monday, Pc Wray, who undertook the search alongside TDC Linge, admitted a series of failings in her handling of the incident.
Three Met officers deny gross misconduct (Jordan Pettitt/PA)
Robert Morris, representing her, asked: 'Do you think you were performing an overly intrusive search?'
'I thought the skipper had authorised it, I thought the officers at the scene had covered all bases,' she replied.
'I thought I was doing the right thing,' she added.
Asked whether she was 'aware' of certain stereotypes relating to black people, Pc Wray replied: 'If I am aware of the stereotypes, I don't use them stereotypes to make any decisions.
'Those decisions are purely based on facts, on my surroundings, on the intel, I prefer to make very objective decisions.'
The panel heard records showed the majority of the individuals stopped and searched by Pc Wray were black or Asian.
Mr Morris continued: 'Do you think your actions have been unconsciously biased by race?'
'No, not at all,' she replied.
Asked if she thought the search should have taken place at all, Pc Wray responded 'No.
'There was so many things that should've been done, we should've spoken to the teachers more, we should've phoned mum, we should've spoken to the sergeant more.'
Mr Morris went on to ask why she did not stop to do those things and reassess the situation, to which Pc Wray replied: 'I was just following the lead of other officers.'
'It was just such a quick interaction, I am sorry and I should've stopped and I should've thought and I should've checked, I am really sorry,' she added.
The officer, who was 25 at the time of the incident, said of the search: 'I never intended it to be humiliating and degrading.
'It happened in the way we were trained, we tried to make it age-appropriate.'
Speaking through tears, whilst dabbing her eyes with tissues, Pc Wray added: 'I am really sorry to Child Q and her family.
'I should've checked so many things but I didn't and I'm sorry.
'I'm sorry for any distress, it was never my intention, I was just trying to help out.'
Pc Wray said prior to the incident she had never strip searched anyone who was not in custody and had never attended a school for policing purposes.
The panel previously heard the child informed the officers who searched her that she was menstruating but the search continued during which her sanitary pad was exposed.
When no drugs were found, Child Q's hair was also scoured.
According to the allegations, Pcs Linge and Szmydynski performed a search that exposed the girl's intimate parts when this was 'disproportionate in all the circumstances'.
Pcs Linge and Wray are also accused of performing or allowing the search in a manner which was 'unjustified, inappropriate, disproportionate, humiliating and degrading'.
It is alleged that all of this happened without authorisation, in the absence of an appropriate adult, and with no adequate concern being given to Child Q's age, sex, or the need to treat her as a child, and that the child's race was an effective cause of this.
Pcs Szmydynski and Linge are further accused of giving a 'misleading record' of the search afterwards.
The girl will not be giving evidence at the tribunal 'because of the psychological effects' the search has had on her, the panel has heard.
Outrage over Child Q's treatment led to protests outside Stoke Newington Police Station.
Scotland Yard has previously apologised over the incident.
The hearing continues.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mirror

14 hours ago

• Daily Mirror

Grooming beast must stay in prison for raping schoolgirl, Justice Sec orders

Shahmeel Khan's victim - a teenager at the time she was raped - welcomes the decision to keep him locked up, 14 years after he was jailed in a huge Telford grooming gang investigation A rape victim has told of her relief after hearing her sex gang attacker must stay locked up despite finishing his sentence. Shahmeel Khan, 37, has been inside for 14 years for repeatedly raping an A-level student and armed robbery. The teenager was one of over 1,000 girls exploited by mainly Asian paedophiles in Telford, Shropshire, in a scandal exposed by the Sunday Mirror. Last night she said a decision to block Khan's move to an open prison was a 'huge weight off my shoulders'. Justice Secretary and Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood vetoed a Parole Board recommendation because of public safety fears and his drug abuse. After reading the Parole Board report on Khan, victim Kate Elysia said: 'I couldn't see anything that showed he understood his sexual offences. I was also really unimpressed that two witnesses had suggested he wasn't safe to be released but that he should be in open conditions so that he could be 'tested'. 'So they are literally ready to gamble with his risk of sex offending. I thought that was disgraceful, dangerous risk-taking on their part. I've always remained aware of how dangerous that man was, those risks don't go away.' Khan was convicted under West Mercia Police 's Operation Chalice which led to a handful of convictions of Telford sex gang members before being wound up to save money. In 2018 we exposed his father Shahzad 'Keith' Khan as a paedophile who abused girls in the town over four decades. The Parole Board recommended Khan junior's transfer to open conditions in April after hearing from two witnesses who suggested the move despite concerns about his drug intake because he was 'unlikely to abscond'. April's review was the third by the Parole Board since 2015, meaning he has spent another 10 years inside for public protection since he was first eligible for release. At the time of his offending, Khan was said to be violent, controlling and 'unable to manage strong emotions'. Khan had been moved to an open prison in June 2021 but 'was returned to the closed estate after one month due to concerns about comments to a member of staff'. Kate – not her real name – helped police jail him and other abusers and has written a book called The Patchwork Girl which is due out in January. But she revealed that she no longer has the right to be told about Khan's future release because he has now served the 10 years he received for raping her. The Probation Service told her: 'Unfortunately, once the sentence relating to you has ended, we do not have a legal basis under which the Probation Service's Victim Contact Scheme can continue to provide you with information for SK. I therefore regret to inform you that this means our contact, regarding SK, will end on 18 June.' Kate said: 'No rights really angered me. No right to stable mental health. No right to a normal life without having to look over my shoulder. No right to feeling safe in my home or community. It's not just about right it's about risk. Risk to me. Risk to my family. Risk to my children. Risk to the public. If they control what information I am allowed to know legally then the law has put him, the dangerous offender, the one in control.' The Ministry of Justice said: 'Public protection is our number one priority which is why the Lord Chancellor has blocked Shahmeel Khan's transfer to an open prison.' A government review last week found that child victims of rape gangs in towns like Telford were let down by the system for decades. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced a national inquiry which is due to take around three years. More than 1,000 dropped child sex abuse cases are expected to be re-investigated by police.

Daily Record

a day ago

• Daily Record

Lawyer had to ask for trans killer's criminal record FOUR times after name change

Solicitor Paul Lynch demands probe after revealing that he only received notorious killer Alex Stewart's genuine rap sheet after he sent law chiefs a link to a news story detailing grisly crime A lawyer at the centre of a trans row was forced to ask FOUR times for the correct criminal record of a murderer – whose offences 'disappeared' when they changed their name. Paul Lynch has called for an urgent probe into procedures that led to Police Scotland and the Crown Office falsely disclosing killer Alex Stewart had no previous convictions. Alan Baker – now known as Alex Stewart – is serving life for stabbing a man he met online before transitioning. ‌ Respected solicitor Lynch said he was flatly told by the Crown Office that Stewart had no previous convictions (PCs) – even after informing them he used to be called Alan Baker. It was only after he sent a link to an online news story about Baker's murder conviction that the error was rectified. ‌ Police Scotland insists it was a one-off clerical error and no records were wiped. But Lynch claims a full investigation is needed to make sure criminal records disclosed to the courts are accurate after changes of name or gender. He said: 'I don't accept this can be dismissed as an isolated case involving human error. It shows a systematic failure on the part of Police Scotland to have proper procedures in place, with up-to-date ­information enabling them to reference a person's criminal record after they have assumed a new name and gender. ­Otherwise, a murderer's convictions can simply disappear.' The PC disclosures sought by Lynch came in the case of killer Jayney Sutherley, who was eventually cleared of subjecting Stewart and prison lover Nyomi Fee of transphobic and ­homophobic abuse, including 'misgendering' Stewart. Fee's disclosed record duly showed she killed Liam Fee, four, son of her then partner Rachel Fee, also convicted of Liam's murder in 2014. But Stewart's adoption of a new name while in HMP Greenock appeared to have effectively given them a clean slate with no PCs showing. Lynch was astonished he had to ask four times for the correct PCs. He said: 'The third time, I gave them his former name but the reply still came – 'no PCs'. ‌ 'Next time I told them the witness was in custody serving a life sentence. I sent a link to a news story, suggesting it might assist. They took that information to police and the correct PCs finally arrived.' He said the situation was ludicrous given that a cop interviewed witnesses inside a high security jail about a complaint. ‌ He said: 'The witness has been identified as a murderer yet police systems somehow do not have on record Alex Stewart and Alan Baker are one and the same. It is seriously alarming. It stands to reason it could happen in any case where a trans prisoner has changed their name. 'It's not as if Alex Stewart has been under the radar. Anyone reading the Daily Record or following the media would have had more information than Police Scotland about the previous convictions of Alan Baker or Alex Stewart.' Lynch said criminals who escape their past through an administrative bungle could pose a threat. ‌ He said: 'Think of all those cases where men who have served their sentences, then changed their names and are self-identifying as women. This has to be thoroughly investigated. If this could happen in Jayney Sutherley's case, it could happen in any case.' Police Scotland last night insisted the error in disclosing previous convictions of Alex Stewart had been rectified. A spokesperson said: 'We are aware of an issue relating to the previous convictions of a victim, which were omitted from a report submitted ahead of a case heard at Greenock Sheriff Court. The issue has been rectified. Work is ongoing to prevent something similar taking place. ‌ 'Officers are liaising with the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. The criminal records referred to in this case have not been wiped, they remain in place. It is inaccurate to suggest otherwise.' At Holyrood this week, Justice Secretary Angela Constance told MSPs: 'I have received assurances this was an isolated incident but I have asked Police Scotland to review their procedures.' A COPFS spokesperson said: 'The conviction record for this witness was shared quickly once the error was identified. 'We are supporting Police Scotland's review of their systems.' Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!

ITV News

2 days ago

• ITV News

Police name man wanted over death of teenager in Sheffield hit-and-run

Police have named a man wanted on suspicion of murdering a teenager in a hit-and-run crash who they say is "actively evading" capture. Detectives want to speak to Zain Ahmed, 22, following the death of 16-year-old Abdullah Yaser Abdullah Al Yazidi on 4 June. Abdullah was walking along Staniforth Road, in Darnall, Sheffield, when he was hit by a car which left the scene. He died in hospital. A South Yorkshire Police spokesperson said: "Extensive work to locate Ahmed has been carried out, including enquiries with his family members and associates, visits to more than a dozen addresses, and numerous other tactics. "We are now wanting to hear from one anyone who has seen or spoken to him recently, or knows where may be staying. "We believe Ahmed knows he is wanted and is actively evading our officers." Three men have already been charged with Abdullah's murder and three counts of attempted murder in relation to claims the car was driven at three e-bike riders before it collided with Abdullah. One of the riders, an 18-year-old man, suffered serious injuries after being hit. Ahmed, from Sheffield, is Asian, thin, with dark medium length hair and a short beard. He has links to Sheffield, Worksop and Birmingham.