Satchwell guilty of murder: Here's what the jury didn't hear

TRIAL MOVED TO DUBLIN
Richard Satchwell's trial was initially scheduled to sit in his home county of Cork but, due to the "intense publicity" surrounding the case, his lawyers applied late last year to move the trial to the capital.
The move was resisted by the State, who pointed out that much of the publicity was generated by Satchwell himself.
In November last year Brendan Grehan SC, for Satchwell, said that as the media attention was concentrated in Cork, it would be "impossible to retain an impartial jury" there who had not heard of the case and formed "adverse views of Mr Satchwell".
Mr Grehan said that most trials can be held in local venues but some generate media attention that can be "macabre" and lead to "greater hostility than it is possible to imagine in an ordinary case."
Satchwell's preference, Mr Grehan said, was for the trial to be held in Limerick so it would be closer to the prison where he was being held. "He has a position of responsibility there, which enables him to be a productive prisoner," counsel told the court.
Gerardine Small SC, for the Director of Public Prosecutions, opposed the change of venue, arguing that publicity around the case was national, not local. File picture: Collins Courts
Gerardine Small SC, for the Director of Public Prosecutions, opposed the change of venue, arguing that publicity around the case was national, not local. Also, she said, much of that publicity was generated by Satchwell who "sought the attention of the media" by appearing on radio and television shows.
Ms Small pointed to Satchwell's appearances on RTÉ's Prime Time, TV3's Ireland AM, the Ray D'Arcy Show and the numerous interviews he gave to journalists.
She added: "It is an unusual factor that it [the media attention] can be attributed to the accused man while he was aware the body of his wife was buried where it was."
Mr Justice Paul McDermott agreed to change the venue to Dublin, due to the significant risk of an unfair trial. He said: "The high degree of local coverage and engagement with the case takes it out of the ordinary."
'SOMEWHAT OF A SIDE SHOW: TWEETS AND CHARGINGS'
During the trial and in the absence of the jury, Mr Grehan applied to exclude Satchwell's "cryptic" reply of "Guilty or not guilty, guilty" when he was formally charged with the murder of Tina on October 13, 2023.
Counsel said a second part of the application - which was "somewhat of a side show" - was connected to the fact that a member of the press - Paul Byrne, formerly of Virgin Media News - tweeted that Satchwell was going to be charged before gardaí had actually done so.
He said Superintendent Anne Marie Twomey had received directions from a legal officer at 7.28pm to charge Satchwell with the murder of his wife and he was formally charged at 8:07pm on October 13.
Mr Grehan said Mr Byrne had tweeted at 8.03pm that "a man in his 50's had been charged with the murder of Tina Satchwell" - four minutes before his client was formally charged. Counsel said Michael O'Toole, of The Irish Daily Mirror and Irish Daily Star, had "retweeted" at 8.09pm from the handle @mickthehack that "Richard Satchwell had been charged with the murder of his wife".
A number of gardaí who were called to give evidence in the voir dire denied that they had contacted anyone in the media but accepted that Mr Byrne had tweeted about it several minutes in advance and that Mr O'Toole had named Satchwell as being charged two minutes after it occurred.
Mr Grehan said it was "implicit" that contact was made with a number of people in the media "to enable them to do their job".
Counsel also submitted that Satchwell should have been informed that he could consult with his solicitor before the charging process took place and was entitled to legal advice "at this critical juncture". "It vitiated the process and the court should not permit the fruits of the charging to be now available to the prosecution," he added.
Richard Satchwell's Senior council Brendan Grehan (left) and solicitor Eddie Burke. During the trial and in the absence of the jury, Mr Grehan applied to exclude Satchwell's 'cryptic' reply of 'Guilty or not guilty, guilty' when he was formally charged with the murder of Tina on October 13, 2023. Photo: Niall Carson/PA
He said the defendant's solicitor Eddie Burke had left the garda station at 7.07pm that evening and didn't arrive back until 8.10pm - three minutes after the charging took place.
The lawyer said his client's reply after caution was more prejudicial than probative and would create difficulties in terms of how the jury could be properly directed.
In reply, Ms Small said Satchwell, who was interviewed by gardaí on 10 separate occasions, had a "full appreciation of his entitlement not to say anything" in reply to the caution and was acutely aware of this.
The defence, she said, was claiming there is an entitlement to have a solicitor present on charging and she wasn't aware of any such entitlement. She said the entitlement was to legal advice, which Satchwell had received "in abundance".
She called the media tweets "completely irrelevant".
In his ruling, Mr Justice McDermott said the defendant's reply was fully voluntary and found that the absence of a solicitor in the garda station had not impaired the fairness of the process. He refused to exclude the reply to charge.
DIRECTION TO REMOVE MURDER CHARGE FROM INDICTMENT
When the prosecution's case was at an end, Mr Grehan applied to the judge to withdraw the charge of murder against his client, submitting there was no evidence of an intention to kill or cause serious injury, which he said was "a huge lacuna" in the State's case.
"It is one of the elements of the offence of murder which the prosecution have to adduce evidence of, which they have singularly failed to do," he argued.
He said Assistant State Pathologist Dr Margaret Bolster couldn't give a cause of death due to a very long post mortem period and had confirmed there were no broken bones in Tina's body. He said she wasn't able to conclude anything about the state of the organs due to the lapse of time.
Mr Grehan said there was an explanation available to the jury as to how death was caused in the case without the evidence of the pathologist or anthropologist and that explanation was given by his client, where Satchwell said the belt of Tina's bathrobe had been held up against her neck until she collapsed.
Counsel said this was the only account available as to what happened to Tina and was of "immense importance" as there was no evidence of violence discovered in the post mortem.
Counsel said it was significant that Tina's hyoid bone was unfractured. He said there was also no medical evidence to say that his client's account of holding Tina off with a restraint against her neck before she collapsed suddenly was not possible.
In a ruling, Mr Justice McDermott said Richard Satchwell's (pictured) immediate response was to create a false impression that Tina was alive and he had taken every conceivable step to protect himself. File photo: Brian Lawless/PA
In reply, Ms Small submitted that there was "a wealth of evidence" from the surrounding circumstances in the case from which intent could be inferred.
Counsel said the deception began on March 20, 2017, very shortly after Satchwell killed Tina and the plethora of lies were an acknowledgement of guilt.
Ms Small said a limited post mortem examination was conducted because the defendant had buried his wife in a manner to ensure the cause of death wasn't available.
She added: "There is also motive on his own account, Satchwell says she is threatening to leave him. She has wasted 28 years of her life, that is all part of the evidence for the jury to accept or not."
Mr Grehan said the lies told were not sufficient to show intent for murder. Referring to motive, he said there was also clearly a basis for which Tina might have wanted nothing further to do with her husband and attacked him in that manner.
In his ruling, Mr Justice McDermott said Satchwell's immediate response was to create a false impression that Tina was alive and he had taken every conceivable step to protect himself.
He said Satchwell told lie after lie "to any journalist who'd indulge him" and portrayed a scenario that his wife had deserted him suddenly without any explanation.
Mr Justice McDermott said Satchwell had shown a degree of malevolence towards his wife and the defendant was totally focused on protecting himself from discovery. There had been, he said, a period of six prolonged years before Tina's body, of which Satchwell had disposed of, was found and this was relevant to the issue of intention.
He said it was a matter for the jury as to whether Satchwell had formed the requisite intent and whether he was guilty of his wife's murder. He rejected the application to withdraw the murder charge.
APPLICATION TO DISCHARGE THE JURY
At the very end of the trial, when Mr Justice McDermott had finished charging the jurors, Mr Grehan said on foot of instructions from his client he "regrettably" had to seek the discharge of the jury.
Counsel voiced his opposition to the tone of the charge, which he said was intended to "nudge" the jurors towards a guilty verdict.
Counsel said he became increasingly concerned as the charge proceeded that it was not resembling a charge but a "second prosecution speech" in terms of the emphasis the court was placing on the State's case to the detriment of the defence.
Mr Grehan told the judge he had not put the defence case in full at all to the jury.
He said the two separate tasks of directions on the law and a summary of the evidence had become "intermingled" and submitted there was no balance in what had been said to the panel. "The whole emphasis of what was said to the court seemed to be to reiterate the prosecution case," he argued.
Richard Satchwell's Senior council Brendan Grehan (left) and solicitor Eddie Burke. Mr Grehan had sought the discharge of the jury on foot of instructions from his client. Photo: Niall Carson/PA
Mr Grehan said the facts of the case "shouted and screamed for themselves" in terms of what Satchwell did and didn't do. "They are not facts that need to be nudged or pushed for the jury in any particular way".
Counsel said it was beyond remedy at this stage and the court should discharge the jury.
Ms Small called Mr Grehan's application "wholly inappropriate", describing the charge as balanced, fair and extremely comprehensible. "The criticism is unfounded, a court will rarely outline all the evidence, that is a matter for the jury".
In his ruling, the judge said this was a difficult case in which to sum up the evidence for the jury and he didn't accept that his charge was "so wildly unbalanced". He disagreed that the absence of references to certain parts of the evidence in any sense justified the jury being discharged.
Mr Justice McDermott refused the application but did give the jury further directions in relation to two matters of which complaints were made, one relating to the detailed evidence of Lorraine Howard concerning her half sister Tina, the other to evidence that Satchwell loved or was "besotted" with his wife.
Read More
How a concrete patch under the stairs in Youghal revealed Tina Satchwell's tragic fate

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Sunday World

8 hours ago

• Sunday World

Dad twice caught driving at over four times legal limit dodges prison

'VERY LUCKY' | Defence barrister Sarah Brennan said the 'very traumatic' murder of his sister in the US had provided the catalyst for the onset of an 'extensive drink problem'. Peter McKenna Judge Raymond Finnegan warned Peter McKenna (56) of the potential consequences that awaited him following both episodes which occurred in Castleblayney, Co Monaghan in April and December last year. McKenna, with addresses at Castle Lodge Guesthouse, Market Square, Monaghan and Cois Locha, Doohamlet, Castleblayney, Monaghan pleaded guilty to two counts of drink driving, alongside those of no insurance and dangerous driving in the south Monaghan town on April 21 and December 16, 2024. Sgt Lisa McEntee relayed the State's evidence in connection to the first incident which took place shortly after 1am. She explained how gardaí, who had been on patrol in the area, came across McKenna behind the wheel of a red Vauxhall van which had been travelling along a stretch of the old Monaghan road and in the direction of Castleblayney town. Sgt McEntee said the vehicle was spotted 'swerving over and back and from side to side', resulting in gardaí turning around their patrol car and going off in pursuit of the offending vehicle. Having carried out that manoeuvre on the town's York Street area, Sgt McEntee said pursuing gardaí proceeded to activate the patrol car's blue lights as the vehicle in question continued onwards with its full beam headlights on while also 'swerving over and back and from side to side'. When McKenna pulled in and was tested for drink driving, Sgt McEntee said his reading returned a result of 223mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood. That reading put McKenna at almost four and a half times over the legal limit to drive owing to the fact the State's present day legal limit stands at 50mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood. Less than eight months later, the court was told how McKenna was caught for a second time with an almost identical blood alcohol level, this time as he drove a silver coloured Renault Kangoo van through the town. Sgt McEntee said McKenna was identified by gardaí as they observed him driving at speed along the town's Main Street shortly after midnight on December 16 last year. Like the earlier incident, gardaí took off in pursuit of McKenna before noticing the accused make a left hand turn at a roundabout while proceeding out of town and along the Monaghan Road. Moments later, the van was sighted turning onto the Ballybay Road where McKenna signalled to turn right before turning off his indicator to instead indicate left. Judge Finnegan was told how once McKenna pulled in, gardaí once again took a sample from the accused in a move which returned a reading of 224mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood. The court heard McKenna had one previous conviction for drink driving to his name, which dated back to 2004. Defence barrister Sarah Brennan, BL, said there was no denying the 'very high' nature of both readings, as she told of McKenna had been cooperative throughout both incidents by providing samples and ultimately tendering guilty pleas before the court. She said McKenna was a separated man who had been labouring under poor health for some time, challenges which had been brought to bear by a diagnosis of Chron's disease some 10 years earlier. Ms Brennan said McKenna had undergone extensive surgery as a result and was now on anti-depressants and reliant on a €240 weekly income from disability allowance. She said the upshot from that diagnosis and the 'very traumatic' murder of his sister in the US had, by his own admission, provided the catalyst for the onset of an 'extensive drink problem'. Peter McKenna News in 90 Seconds - June 22nd In appealing for leniency, Ms Brennan also implored the court to consider the antiquity which was linked to her client's sole previous conviction over two decades earlier. Judge Finnegan disqualified McKenna for two and three years respectively for dangerous and drink driving for the April 21 incident, fining him €250 in the process. A five month jail term, suspended for two years, was similarly imposed for the drink driving summons despite Judge Finnegan's own concession of how he had been 'very tempted' not to suspend any of its duration. A further €500 fine was handed down for no insurance in the latter incident with a six year ban and five month consecutive suspended prison sentence being recorded for what Judge Finnegan said was an 'extraordinary' alcohol intake reading. In handing down those penalties and advising McKenna of his good fortune in avoiding a custodial spell, Judge Finnegan told him: 'You are getting a chance Mr McKenna. It's up to you whether you take it, if you don't you will serve the full sentence.'

Sunday World

a day ago

• Sunday World

Getaway driver in Lisa Thompson's murder slammed for painting herself as ‘the victim'

Deirdre Arnold acted as the get-away driver for "violent and abusive thug" Brian McHugh A HSE addiction counsellor, who acted as the get-away driver for "violent and abusive thug" Brian McHugh after he murdered Lisa Thompson, has been told by the victim's daughter that while the defendant tried to paint herself as "the victim" in the trial, she was "guilty and always would be". The teenager, who was 12 years old when her mother was strangled with a blind cord and stabbed to death in her own home by her former lover, also told Deirdre Arnold: "I hope every time you close your eyes you see what we live with. I hope in the silence of the night it reminds you of how you silenced my mam's voice forever". On March 10 this year, Brian McHugh (40), with a former address at Cairn Court, Poppintree, Ballymun in Dublin 11 was sentenced to the mandatory term of life imprisonment for murdering 52-year-old Ms Thompson after a jury found he had inflicted 11 stab wounds to her chest and wrapped the cord around her neck. Six of the wounds had penetrated her heart and two went through and through. In a separate trial last April, a jury found Deirdre Arnold was not an "innocent abroad" and had "decided at every turn" to assist her then-partner McHugh, whom she knew to have murdered mother-of-two Ms Thompson. Arnold's defence counsel, Mr Patrick Gageby SC, told her sentence hearing yesteday that "in one of those terrible twists of fate", soon after becoming acquainted with McHugh, the addiction worker herself became addicted to heroin and crack cocaine. He said she has since resigned from her State job. Arnold, whom the court previously heard is the sole financial support for her three children, remains on bail pending her sentence next month. Evidence was heard at McHugh's trial that Ms Thompson was dealing prescription drugs from her home, with gardai who searched the house finding thousands of tablets worth nearly €50,000 hidden in the attic. The trial was told that Ms Thompson and McHugh had a "bit of a fling" in the year before she died. At Arnold's trial, the jury heard that she had made domestic abuse complaints and got an interim barring order against McHugh. She also told gardai that McHugh had broken her arm by holding it on the bottom of a stairway and stamping on it. Mr Gageby argued that his client was in fear of McHugh and reminded the jury that, even if they were satisfied she assisted the murderer, for a conviction they had to find it was without reasonable excuse. The jury unanimously accepted the State's case that Arnold impeded McHugh's prosecution by driving him to Ms Thompson's home at Sandyhill Gardens in Ballymun on May 9 2022, where she waited outside for "well over an hour" before driving him away from the scene. Vicious killer Brian McHugh Arnold later checked McHugh into the Clayton Hotel near Dublin Airport in an effort to help him evade prosecution. It was also the prosecution's case that the defendant allowed her silver Hyundai Tucson to be used to dispose of evidence taken from Ms Thompson's home. Deirdre Arnold, with an address at Briarfield Grove, Kilbarrack, Dublin 5 was charged that on a date between May 9 2022 and May 10 2022, both dates inclusive, at a location within the State, did without reasonable excuse an act with intent to impede the apprehension or prosecution of Brian McHugh, a person who had committed an arrestable offence, namely murder, whilst knowing or believing Brian McHugh to be guilty of the offence or of some other arrestable offence. Arnold was also charged that on a date between May 9 2022 and May 10 2022, both dates inclusive, at a location within the State, acted or embarked upon a course of conduct which had a tendency to and was intended to pervert the course of public justice. She had pleaded not guilty to the two counts. Murder victim and mother-of-two Lisa Thompson Detective Garda Fergus Burke, of Ballymun Garda Station, told the court that Arnold has three children and one previous conviction from 2022 for attempting to drive under the influence of drugs. She she received a fine and was disqualified from driving for 18 months for this offence. In his submissions today, Mr Gageby said Arnold accepted the verdict and the matter would rest there. He said a letter had been handed up to the court which was not a plea for forgiveness but an indication of "true sorrow for her part" and that she would never forget the consequences of that day. Counsel added: "She also indicates that she recognises her actions no matter how unintentional had become part of something that caused the family great harm and is truly sorry". Mr Gageby said his client became a heroin user in early 2020, having formed a relationship with McHugh in the preceding year. In mitigation, Mr Gageby said there was demonstrably a pattern of abuse in the case and there was a text message deployed by the prosecution in the trial where Arnold had nominated McHugh as a danger to women. He said there were some unfortunate aspects to Arnold's upbringing and to date she has had three relationships with partners; "none of which had ended well and there seemed to be a pattern". Mr Gageby said his client had worked from the age of 16, had done a number of courses and had provided counselling. He added: "In one of those terrible twists of fate, soon after becoming acquainted with Brian McHugh she became herself subject to the addiction of heroin and crack cocaine; a pathetic aspect to this". The lawyer asked the court to consider if Arnold had not been in a relationship with McHugh at the time, would she ever have offended or come to the attention of authorities or ended up in the Central Criminal Court. Deirdre Arnold He said the defendant's conviction is incompatible with State employment and she has resigned. He said Arnold had worked incredibly hard from the age of 16 to provide a stable home but unfortunately established a relationship with someone who brought her down to his level and she was responsible for that. He submitted that there is no facility for an open prison for female prisoners and asked the court to take that into consideration. Mr Justice Patrick McGrath remanded Arnold on continuing bail until July 4, when she will be sentenced. Victim Impact statements: Ms Thompson's sister Ashley Duckett said in her victim impact statement that the reality between their family and the two defendants families was that "they can still pick up the phone to hear their voice or they can call or visit the prison and one day they can return to their lives". Ms Duckett said her family will never hear Lisa's voice again or her "contagious laughter". "Her children would love to be sharing their news on the Junior Cert results and many more things that have happened in the last three years since their mother was taken from them". Deirdre Arnold News in 90 Seconds - June 21st She said her sister had been "brutally murdered" in her own home and her children would never see her "redeem herself from the depression which had been taking over her life in her final weeks". Ms Duckett said she asked Lisa's daughter if she wanted to add to the victim impact statement so she could have a voice in the court and what she had to say "provided a glimpse into the hurt and pain caused by the murder of my sister by Brian McHugh and the actions of Deirdre Arnold". In her statement, Ms Thompson's daughter said she had been out playing with her friends "completely unaware that my world was about to be shattered". When her dad told her "your mam is dead", the teenager said "it felt like my heart was being stabbed over and over again and each word twisting the knife in deeper, ripping the life out of me bit by bit". "But you wouldn't understand that kind of pain Deirdre... you brought him to what was once a home filled with laughter, memories and love in every inch of that house". Ms Thompson's daughter continued: "In court you tried to paint yourself as the victim. Brian may have abused you and threatened you. Maybe you were scared of him but fear doesn't make you had a choice that night and you chose to be a part of something unforgivable". "I was 12 when my mam died. I was still a little girl. I was left alone to carry this grief that was too heavy for a child so I was forced to grow up overnight". "You have no idea of the trauma and scars you left me and my family with. Imagine a child crying uncontrollably in their friend's arm for hours, begging for a reason, begging for someone to make sense of it. Begging for their friend to tell them it was a nightmare and you would wake up to everything to be okay. "It's been three years and I'm still waiting to wake up from this nightmare. All of the sleepless nights I've spent staring at the ceiling with so many questions". "She should be here making a million more memories with our family and friends but instead we visit a cold silent grave".

Irish Daily Mirror

2 days ago

• Irish Daily Mirror

Ian Bailey's ashes scattered in west Cork

A sister of Ian Bailey said innocent victim Sophie Toscan du Plantier's family is 'misguided' for believing that he killed her. Kay Reynolds was speaking on Friday when she scattered her brother's ashes near the 1996 death site in west Cork, as he requested. Bailey, who died 16 months ago, was found guilty of French filmmaker Sophie's murder in a trial in France in 2019 without his attendance. Ms Reynolds spoke of how Bailey cherished the area, which he was tied to for legal reasons, and claimed the murder probe impacted his health. She said her sibling 'had nothing to hide' and she expressed sympathy for the family of Sophie. She told Cork's 96fm Opinion Line with PJ Coogan: 'He absolutely loved West Cork with a passion. 'I know there was the warrant that meant he couldn't leave the country and he used to say, 'I wouldn't want to be anywhere else'.' When producer Paul Byrne asked Kay if 'pressure' from the 'murder investigation' contributed to 'his already ill health?', she said: 'Without question.' She added: 'I think if he'd have kept quiet, it would have been better. But that wasn't Ian's style. He felt he didn't need to hide. 'He had nothing to hide. And so he confronted his challenges face on. 'I think it came out very close to the time that there were things, I think, that the gardai felt only someone involved in the crime would have known. I don't think that helped. But as a family, we never thought that he'd done these things because that was his style of journalism. 'When he lived in Gloucester, we were near GCHQ, and he found out all sorts of things that other journalists didn't. 'He thought outside the box and he came up with things that no one else had thought about. And I think that's really what had to happen there and in the end became his downfall, really. He came up with all sorts of ideas around what had happened and that's how he became a suspect.' Kay stated she never questioned her brother's innocence and vowed: 'Never for a second.' She added: 'We never doubted him that he'd been involved in this.' She also expressed sympathy with Sophie's relatives and said: 'A very young mother was brutally murdered. 'I feel so sorry for the family because I think because of their misguided belief that Ian committed the murder, they've just had so many years of torture. 'And I just wish them peace around this. And hopefully the cold case will [help]. It's just not only losing her, but to have no peace and thinking that Ian was the perpetrator and that he's got away with it. 'I can't imagine what that must be like for them. And I just feel so sorry for them.' Taoiseach Micheal Martin claimed last year, when he was Tanaiste, the State let Bailey away with Sophie's murder. After he died in 2024 f rom a suspected heart attack, gardai conducted a search under warrant of his home and seized items, including a laptop computer, memory sticks, notebooks, and materials with DNA.