Could US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites cause radiation leak?

The US has struck Iran's nuclear facilities, including Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, on Sunday. Could this pose a danger? Experts say that there has been limited contamination so far; there is no radiological risk. Here's why read more
Military personnel stand guard at a nuclear facility in the Zardanjan area of Isfahan, Iran in this screengrab taken from video. Isfahan was among the key nuclear sites hit by the US on Sunday. File photo/Reuters
The US has inserted itself into the Israel-Iran conflict. On Sunday (June 22), US President Donald Trump said Iran's main nuclear sites – Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan – had been 'obliterated' in military strikes overnight.
Fordow is 'gone' , Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social, after the deeply buried facility was bombed. However, Iran has downplayed the attack, with one lawmaker saying that there was no serious damage and the strikes were superficial.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
There is, of course, fear that the destruction of the nuclear sites could pose dangers – possible radiation leaks. While the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) , the United Nations nuclear watchdog, has said that no increased off-site radiation levels had been reported following the US attacks, it has called for an emergency meeting on Monday (June 22).
Which nuclear sites in Iran have been targeted by the US and Israel?
The US military on Sunday struck sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Donald Trump said Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities had been 'completely and totally obliterated'.
Calling the US attack on Iran 'historic' and 'brave', Israeli President Isaac Herzog told the BBC '… It's quite clear to me that the Iranian nuclear programme has been hit substantially.'
However, Iran's nuclear regulatory authority has said that there is no danger to residents living near these facilities. The nuclear sites struck by the US did not contain materials that cause radiation, an official at the Iranian Broadcasting Corporation said.
A satellite image shows trucks positioned near the entrance of the Fordow fuel enrichment facility, near Qom, Iran, June 19. Fordow is one of Iran's key nuclear sites and was hit by the US on Sunday, June 22. Maxar Technologies/Handout via Reuters
'No signs of contamination have been recorded,' Iranian state media quoted the country's National Nuclear Safety System Centre as saying. 'There is no danger to the residents living around the aforementioned sites.'
Sunday's strikes come after previously announced Israeli attacks on nuclear sites in Natanz , Isfahan, Arak and Tehran. Israel says it aims to stop Iran from building a nuclear bomb, and the US maintains that Tehran would not be allowed to get such weapons. Iran denies ever seeking nuclear arms.
The international nuclear watchdog IAEA has previously reported damage to the uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, the nuclear complex at Isfahan that includes the Uranium Conversion Facility, and to centrifuge production facilities in Karaj and Tehran.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Israel has also attacked Arak, also known as Khondab . The IAEA said Israeli military strikes hit the Khondab Heavy Water Research Reactor, which was under construction and had not begun operating and damaged the nearby plant that makes heavy water, reports Reuters.
The IAEA said it was not operational and contained no nuclear material, so there were no radiological effects. Heavy-water reactors can be used to produce plutonium, which, like enriched uranium , could be utilised to produce an atom bomb.
Speaking to Reuters before the US attack, experts said Israel's strikes had posed limited contamination risks so far. Darya Dolzikova, a senior research fellow at London think-tank RUSI, said attacks on facilities at the front end of the nuclear fuel cycle – the stages where uranium is prepared for use in a reactor – pose primarily chemical, not radiological risks.
At enrichment facilities, UF6, or uranium hexafluoride, is the concern. 'When UF6 interacts with water vapour in the air, it produces harmful chemicals,' she told the news agency. 'In low winds, much of the material can be expected to settle in the vicinity of the facility; in high winds, the material will travel farther, but is also likely to disperse more widely. The risk of harmful chemicals being dispersed is lower for underground facilities.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A view of a damaged building at Iran's Natanz Nuclear Facility, in Isfahan. Both the US and Israel have attacked this facility. File photo/Reuters
Simon Bennett, who leads the civil safety and security unit at the University of Leicester in Britain, said risks to the environment were minimal when subterranean facilities are hit because you are 'burying nuclear material in possibly thousands of tonnes of concrete, earth and rock'.
James Acton, co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said that before uranium goes into a nuclear reactor it is barely radioactive. 'The chemical form uranium hexafluoride is toxic … but it actually doesn't tend to travel large distances and it's barely radioactive.'
Attacks on enrichment facilities were 'unlikely to cause significant off-site consequences', he said, while stating his opposition to Israel's campaign.
What if nuclear reactors are hit?
The big concern would be a strike on Iran's nuclear reactor at Bushehr on the Gulf coast. Fears of catastrophe rippled through the Gulf on June 19 when the Israeli military said it had struck a site in Bushehr, only to say later that the announcement was a mistake.
Israel says it wants to avoid any nuclear disaster.
Richard Wakeford, honorary professor of epidemiology at the University of Manchester, told Reuters that while contamination from attacks on enrichment facilities would be 'mainly a chemical problem' for the surrounding areas, extensive damage to large power reactors 'is a different story'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Radioactive elements would be released either through a plume of volatile materials or into the sea, he added.
Acton of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace said an attack on Bushehr 'could cause an absolute radiological catastrophe'.
Satellite image shows the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, in Bushehr Province, Iran. File photo/Reuters
Who would be worst affected if Bushehr is hit?
For Gulf states, the impact of any strike on Bushehr would be worsened by the potential contamination of Gulf waters, jeopardising a critical source of desalinated potable water.
The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is on high alert to monitor for any possible environmental contamination after the attacks, said a source with knowledge of the matter. There have been no signs of radiological contamination so far, the source said, adding that the GCC had emergency plans in place in case of a threat to water and food security in the Gulf, reports Reuters.
In the United Arab Emirates, desalinated water accounts for more than 80 per cent of drinking water, while Bahrain became fully reliant on desalinated water in 2016, with 100 per cent of groundwater reserved for contingency plans, authorities say.
Qatar is also 100 per cent dependent on desalinated water.
In Saudi Arabia, a much larger nation with a greater reserve of natural groundwater, about 50 per cent of the water supply came from desalinated water as of 2023, according to the General Authority for Statistics.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
While some Gulf states, such as Saudi Arabia, Oman and the UAE, have access to more than one sea to draw water from, Qatar, Bahrain and Kuwait are crowded along the shoreline of the Gulf with no other coastline. 'If a natural disaster, oil spill, or even a targeted attack were to disrupt a desalination plant, hundreds of thousands could lose access to freshwater almost instantly,' said Nidal Hilal, professor of engineering and director of New York University Abu Dhabi's Water Research Center.
'Coastal desalination plants are especially vulnerable to regional hazards like oil spills and potential nuclear contamination,' he said.
With inputs from Reuters

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

20 minutes ago

• Time of India

Hormuz blockade will hurt global energy supply: Experts

NEW DELHI: Any blocking or disruption of traffic through the Strait of Hormuz - a narrow passage connecting the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea - will have significant global and regional impact including for India's energy security, strategic affairs experts said on Sunday. Following the US bombing of three major Iranian nuclear sites this morning, Tehran has indicated that closing the Strait of Hormuz for shipping is one of the options on the table to pressure its adversaries. Nearly 30% of global oil and a third of the world's LNG (liquefied natural gas) passes through the Strait daily and its closure would immediately reduce global supplies triggering a spike in prices, they said. The shutting down of the narrow passage would have significant global repercussions across energy markets and it will impact India's energy security as well, said Dr Laxman Kumar Behera, Associate Professor at Special Centre for National Security Studies at the Jawaharlal Nehru University. Behera said any disruption in the critical shipping lane, which is a geopolitical flashpoint, will majorly impact India's crude oil import from Iraq and to an extent from Saudi Arabia. Live Events Captain D K Sharma (retd), a former Indian Navy spokesperson who closely follows developments in the Gulf region, too said Iran's threat to block the Strait of Hormuz could lead to significant disruptions in global oil trade. Any disruption in shipping traffic could impact insurance premiums, causing costlier rerouting of oil shipments, he said. "Oil prices are expected to surge due to increased tensions in the region, with some analysts predicting prices to reach $80-$90 per barrel or even $100 per barrel if Iran responds with retaliatory measures," he noted. US Urges China to Dissuade Iran from Closing Strait of Hormuz US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday called on China to encourage Iran to not shut down the Strait of Hormuz after Washington carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. "I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil," said Rubio, who also serves as national security adviser. Rubio said a move to close the strait would be a massive escalation that would merit a response from the US and others. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )

Hindustan Times

24 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

US warns Iran against closing Strait of Hormuz: 'It's economic suicide'

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday reacted to reports claiming that the Iranian parliament has approved a measure to close the Strait of Hormuz, saying that it would be an 'economic suicide'. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the State Department in Washington, DC on June 20, 2025. (AFP) Speaking at Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo" show, Rubia called on China to encourage Iran not to shut down the Strait of Hormuz after Washington carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Follow LIVE updates here. The Strait of Hormuz is situated between Iran and its Arabian Gulf neighbours. According to Bloomberg, this route enables the daily transportation of roughly one-fifth of global oil supplies. "I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil," Rubio was quoted as saying on the show by Reuters. Also Read | How US military's decoy B-2 Bomber mission helped it achieve stealth before Iran strikes "If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake. It's economic suicide for them if they do it. And we retain options to deal with that, but other countries should be looking at that as well. It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours." The secretary of state additionally cautioned that closing the strait would represent a significant escalation, warranting a response from the US and others. Iran's closure of Strait of Hormuz After the US airstrikes on its nuclear installations, Iran is considering closing the Strait of Hormuz, EuroNews reported on Sunday. Also Read | 'Large volume of our supplies don't come through Hormuz': Hardeep Puri assures fuel stability amid Middle East tensions In an interview with local media, Revolutionary Guard commander Sardar Esmail Kowsari stated that closing the Strait of Hormuz "is under consideration, and Iran will make the best decision with determination," according to EuroNews. "Our hands are wide open when it comes to punishing the enemy, and the military response was only part of our overall response," added Kowsari, who is a member of the Iranian parliament in addition to his military position.

News18

29 minutes ago

• News18

US Increases West Asia Evacuations, Travel Alerts After Trump Orders Strikes On Iran

In internal and public notices, the US State Department over the weekend significantly ramped up its cautionary advice to Americans in the Middle East. The US State Department has increased emergency evacuation flights for American citizens seeking to leave Israel, directed nonessential staff to depart the US Embassy in Lebanon, and heightened travel advisories across the Middle East due to fears of potential Iranian retaliation against US interests in the region. In internal and public notices, the department over the weekend significantly ramped up its cautionary advice to Americans in the Middle East. In a notice on Sunday, after American strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities, the department said it had ordered nonessential personnel and the families of staff at the US Embassy in Beirut to leave Lebanon 'due to the volatile and unpredictable security situation in the region." The notice made no mention of any potential evacuation flights or other assistance for private Americans wanting to leave Lebanon but said those who want to should try to use existing commercial services to depart. At the same time, the department issued warnings to US citizens in Saudi Arabia and Turkey to take extra security precautions given the uncertainty. 'Given reports of regional hostilities, the US Mission to Saudi Arabia has advised its personnel to exercise increased caution and limit non-essential travel to any military installations in the region," the department said in its notice for Saudi Arabia. In Turkey, the department said US personnel 'have been cautioned to maintain a low profile and instructed to avoid personal travel to the US Consulate Adana consular district," which includes the NATO airbase at Incirlik. 'Negative sentiment toward US foreign policy may prompt actions against US or Western interests in Turkey," the statement said. Late Saturday, the department said it was stepping up evacuation flights for American citizens from Israel to Europe and continuing to draw down its staff at diplomatic missions in Iraq. But even before the US airstrikes on Iran were made public by President Donald Trump on Saturday evening in Washington, the US Embassy in Jerusalem had announced the start of evacuation flights for private Americans from Israel. After the US strikes in Iran, security officers at all US embassies and consulates have been instructed to conduct reviews of their posts' security posture and report back to the State Department by late Sunday. First Published: June 22, 2025, 23:36 IST