Skoda Enyaq Price & Specs
Advertisement
Title 0-62 kWh BHP Range (Comb.) Price 210kW 85 Sportline 82kWh 5dr Auto [Maxx] N/A 210kW 85 Sportline 82kWh 5dr Auto N/A 250kW vRS 84kWh 4x4 5dr Auto N/A 210kW 85x Sportline 82kWh 4x4 5dr Auto [Maxx] 6.7s 82 kWh 281.6 332 miles £50,395 210kW 85x Sportline 82kWh 4x4 5dr Auto 6.7s 82 kWh 281.6 332 miles £48,695 210kW 85 Edition 82kWh 5dr Auto [Suite/Advanced] 6.7s 82 kWh 281.6 359 miles £48,445 210kW 85 Edition 82kWh 5dr Auto [Suite] 6.7s 82 kWh 281.6 359 miles £46,195 210kW 85 Edition 82kWh 5dr Auto [Lounge/Maxx] 6.7s 82 kWh 281.6 359 miles £49,495 210kW 85 Edition 82kWh 5dr Auto [Lounge/Advanced] 6.7s 82 kWh 281.6 359 miles £47,795 210kW 85 Edition 82kWh 5dr Auto [Lounge] 6.7s 82 kWh 281.6 359 miles £45,545 210kW 85 Edition 82kWh 5dr Auto [Lodge/Maxx] 6.7s 82 kWh 281.6 359 miles £48,845 210kW 85 Edition 82kWh 5dr Auto [Lodge/Advanced] 6.7s 82 kWh 281.6 359 miles £47,145 210kW 85 Edition 82kWh 5dr Auto [Lodge] 6.7s 82 kWh 281.6 359 miles £44,895 210kW 85 Edition 82kWh 5dr Auto [Maxx] 6.7s 82 kWh 281.6 359 miles £48,195 210kW 85 Edition 82kWh 5dr Auto [Advanced] 6.7s 82 kWh 281.6 359 miles £46,495 210kW 85 Edition 82kWh 5dr Auto 6.7s 82 kWh 281.6 359 miles £44,245 150kW 60 Edition 63kWh 5dr Auto [Suite/Advanced] 8.1s 63 kWh 201.2 268 miles £44,245 150kW 60 Edition 63kWh 5dr Auto [Suite] 8.1s 63 kWh 201.2 268 miles £41,995 150kW 60 Edition 63kWh 5dr Auto [Lounge/Maxx] 8.1s 63 kWh 201.2 268 miles £45,295 150kW 60 Edition 63kWh 5dr Auto [Lounge/Advanced] 8.1s 63 kWh 201.2 268 miles £43,595 150kW 60 Edition 63kWh 5dr Auto [Lounge] 8.1s 63 kWh 201.2 268 miles £41,345 150kW 60 Edition 63kWh 5dr Auto [Lodge/Maxx] 8.1s 63 kWh 201.2 268 miles £44,645 150kW 60 Edition 63kWh 5dr Auto [Lodge/Advanced] 8.1s 63 kWh 201.2 268 miles £42,945 150kW 60 Edition 63kWh 5dr Auto [Lodge] 8.1s 63 kWh 201.2 268 miles £40,695 150kW 60 Edition 63kWh 5dr Auto [Maxx] 8.1s 63 kWh 201.2 268 miles £43,995 150kW 60 Edition 63kWh 5dr Auto [Advanced] 8.1s 63 kWh 201.2 268 miles £42,295 150kW 60 Edition 63kWh 5dr Auto 8.1s 63 kWh 201.2 268 miles £40,045 150kW 60 SE L 63kWh 5dr Auto [Suite] 8.1s 63 kWh 201.2 268 miles £40,895 150kW 60 SE L 63kWh 5dr Auto [Lounge] 8.1s 63 kWh 201.2 268 miles £40,245 150kW 60 SE L 63kWh 5dr Auto [Lodge] 8.1s 63 kWh 201.2 268 miles £39,595 150kW 60 SE L 63kWh 5dr Auto 8.1s 63 kWh 201.2 268 miles £38,945 You might like
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Markets' Gulf composure fits a wider pattern
LONDON, June 23 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Investors don't seem that bothered about the United States' dramatic intervention in Israel's war with Iran. Despite President Donald Trump's decision to bomb three of the Islamic Republic's nuclear facilities over the weekend, asset prices hardly budged. History does suggest geopolitical flashpoints aren't always long-term headaches for investors – but the data doesn't conclusively prove they've made the right call. On Monday morning, the STOXX 600 declined 0.1%, meaning the European equity benchmark is only down around 2.5% since Israeli attacks on June 13. German and Saudi 10-year bond yields rose marginally. The U.S. S&P 500 was also due to drop only 0.1% on opening, according to futures prices collected by LSEG. And Brent oil contracts for August delivery rose just 0.6% to trade at $77 a barrel, admittedly above the $66 level seen earlier this month, but hardly pricing in major disruptions. This all seems highly premature. While Trump called on Sunday for peace following what could reasonably be seen as an act of war, he continues to post on social media about the possibility of Iranian regime change. Iran's parliament has already approved actions to block the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20% of the world's daily oil supply passes. As such, markets should be braced for further escalation, not less. One explanation might be that investors know that geopolitical storms are often just squalls. A JPMorgan study, opens new tab of 36 different political and martial flashpoints between Germany's invasion of France in 1940 and Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 found that the S&P 500 returned 0.3% in the three months afterwards, against 1.3% over the same period in calmer times. But over six months the returns were the same. Oil-related shocks are, admittedly, different. The 1990 Gulf War saw the S&P 500 drop 20% in the two months after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in August, although it recovered these losses by February 1991. But after the five-month Arab oil embargo in 1973, the S&P was still lower five years later. Investors' sangfroid may reflect confidence that Trump's attacks are a run-of-the-mill geopolitical squall. More likely, they see the latest crisis as a potential oil shock, but one that the U.S. can easily contain. There's some logic in that: even if Iran tries to block Hormuz, a move its Supreme National Security Council still needs to approve, the U.S. Fifth Fleet in Bahrain might stop it. Meanwhile, restricting oil exports would hurt Tehran too. Yet the geopolitical received wisdom could easily be wrong, especially if a cornered Iranian regime starts to fear that Trump and Israel will push to replace it, and resorts to drastic measures. In that scenario, markets' relative calm might still quickly turn to panic. Follow George Hay on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Stocks falter but avoid sell-off after US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites
London's FTSE closed down on Monday as traders awaited Tehran's response to US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend. The FTSE 100 index closed down 16.61 points, 0.2%, at 8,758.04. The FTSE 250 ended 27.55 points lower, 0.1%, at 21,120.95, but the AIM All-Share rose just 0.15 of a point at 759.29. In European equities on Monday, the CAC 40 in Paris closed down 0.7%, and the DAX 40 in Frankfurt ended 0.3% lower. 'The markets are not yet reacting with any degree of panic to the US air strike on Iran's nuclear facilities as they await to see how Tehran responds,' said Russ Mould, at AJ Bell. Israel said it struck 'regime targets' in the city, escalating tensions a day after US air strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Iran, in turn, fired missile barrages at Israel and vowed retaliation against the US, as both sides intensified attacks on the war's 11th day. But fears of a further sharp spike in the oil price were not realised, although the outlook remains uncertain. Stephen Innes, at SPI Asset Management, said: 'Everything hinges on Iran's response – and whether it's a symbolic jab or a haymaker that knocks the Strait of Hormuz offline. That narrow bottleneck, through which 20% of global oil flows, has morphed from geographic trivia to a live wire pulsing beneath the entire financial complex.' He added: 'If Hormuz does shut – even for a week – the 100 dollars per barrel oil scenarios that everyone's scribbled in the margins go front and centre.' On Monday, Brent oil traded lower at 76.39 dollars a barrel, down from 76.49 dollars on Friday. Safe haven gold was quoted higher at 3,387.65 dollars an ounce against 3,366.36 dollars. Gold miners Endeavour Mining and Fresnillo climbed 2.9% and 2.6% respectively. Goldman Sachs said: 'Aside from energy supply disruptions and price increases, spillovers from the Iran-Israel war should be limited, since most countries have very limited trade exposure (outside of energy products) to Iran, Israel or the Middle East more broadly.' On Wall Street, markets were higher at the time of the London close on Monday as another Federal Reserve official put the case for an interest rate cut at the July meeting. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 0.2%, the S&P 500 was 0.4% higher, and the Nasdaq Composite gained 0.5%. A key US central bank official called for an interest rate cut as early as July if inflation effects from President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs remain limited. The comments by Federal Reserve vice chair for supervision Michelle Bowman came days after Fed governor Christopher Waller said the bank could lower rates as soon as next month – amid differences among officials on how they should respond to levies. 'Should inflation pressures remain contained, I would support lowering the policy rate as soon as our next meeting in order to bring it closer to its neutral setting and to sustain a healthy labour market,' Ms Bowman said in prepared remarks for a conference in Prague. In its policy meeting last week, the Fed held its benchmark lending rate at a range between 4.25% and 4.50%, keeping it unchanged so far this year. The comments saw bond yields drop. The yield on the US 10-year Treasury was quoted at 4.31%, narrowed from 4.40%. The yield on the US 30-year Treasury was quoted at 4.84%, slimmed from 4.91%. The pound was quoted up at 1.3501 dollars at the time of the London equities close on Monday, compared with 1.3467 dollars on Friday. The euro stood higher at 1.1545 dollars against 1.1521 dollars. Against the yen, the dollar was trading at 146.37 yen, up compared with 145.89 yen. In the UK, economic activity picked up in June. The flash UK composite purchasing managers index (PMI) rose to a three-month high of 50.7 points in June, from May's final tally of 50.3, S&P Global said. The services flash PMI rose to a three-month high of 51.3 in June, from 50.9 in May. The manufacturing PMI spiked to a five-month high of 47.7, though staying in negative territory, from 46.4 in May. Elliott Jordan-Doak, at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said the PMI suggests that business confidence is staging a 'fragile recovery after being battered by tariff threats and tax increases. That said, rising geopolitical stress is likely to be added to the growing list of worries facing businesses'. Elsewhere, Spectris surged 16%. It agreed to a buyout from private equity firm Advent International, although a rival bid could emerge from Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (KKR). Advent will pay £37.63 in cash per Spectris share for the provider of high-tech instruments, test equipment and software, an offer consideration that includes a 28 pence dividend. The bid values the entire issued and to be issued share capital of Spectris at around £3.8 billion. It implies an enterprise value of £4.4 billion. However, a rival bidder could yet emerge after KKR, the New York-based private equity firm, said it continues to engage 'constructively' with Spectris, although it added there 'can be no certainty' that any firm offer will be made. KKR, meanwhile, was thwarted in its consortium's effort to acquire Assura. Assura recommended the new cash-share offer from peer Primary Health Properties, describing it as 'fair and reasonable'. Under the terms of the increased Primary Health Properties offer, Assura shareholders would receive 0.3865 new Primary Health Properties shares and 12.5 pence in cash. In addition, Assura shareholders would be entitled to receive a special dividend of 0.84p per Assura share. Based on the Primary Health Properties closing share price of 103.5p on Friday last week, the fresh Primary Health Properties offer implies a total value to be received by Assura shareholders of 53.3p for each Assura share. This represents a premium of 5.8% to the value of the best and final cash offer of 50.42p per Assura share, made by Sana Bidco, a consortium made up of KKR and property investor Stonepeak Partners. Assura shares fell 0.2%. Primary Health fell 4.2%. One Health Group shot up 11%. It reported strong growth in annual sales and profit as it delivered more surgical procedures to NHS patients. Pre-tax profit rose 36% to £1.5 million in the financial year that ended March 31 from £1.1 million the year prior, as revenue climbed 23% to £28.4 million from £23.0 million. Chief executive Adam Binns said: 'We have delivered a strong performance in all our three drivers of growth; more patients, more operating theatre capacity and a record number of new surgeons applying to provide their services to the group.' The biggest risers on the FTSE 100 were Endeavour Mining, up 70.00 pence at 2,356.00p, National Grid, up 28.00p at 1,077.00p, Fresnillo, up 36.00p, at 1,443.00p, ConvaTec, up 6.80p at 289.80p, and Bunzl, up 48.00p at 2,320.00p. The biggest fallers on the FTSE 100 were NatWest, down 12.30p at 494.30p, Mondi, down 29.00p at 1,170.00p, easyJet, down 12.40p at 506.60p, Marks & Spencer, down 7.90p at 354.00p, and AB Foods, down 44.00p at 2,033p. Tuesday's global economic calendar has US consumer confidence data and house price figures. Tuesday's local corporate calendar has half-year results from cruise operator Carnival and a trading statement from distribution and outsourcing company Bunzl. Contributed by Alliance News.
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
British state is ‘feeble and overbearing', Starmer says as he unveils industrial overhaul
The British state has been 'overbearing and feeble' and 'too exposed to global volatility' Sir Keir Starmer has said, as he outlined plans to overhaul the government's relationship with industries. In the Industrial Strategy published on Monday, the government has backed UK industries it thinks have the potential to grow, with the aim of creating jobs and prosperity across Britain and Northern Ireland. Artificial intelligence (AI), offshore wind power, and electric vehicle batteries are among the sectors which feature. The strategy aims to help realise Labour's mission pledge to create sustained economic growth, which ministers want to see become the highest in the G7. In the strategy's foreword, alongside chancellor Rachel Reeves and business secretary Jonathan Reynolds, Sir Keir said that 'when new opportunities present themselves, Britain often finds itself too regulated to take advantage'. The ministers added: 'The result is a state that is both overbearing and feeble, poorly serving an economy that has become too reliant on one place, too exposed to global volatility and too sluggish to take advantage of transitions like the move to homegrown clean energy '. They said that the strategy marks a 'new approach' and accounts for a decade-long plan to make Britain an attractive country to invest in. The industrial strategy focuses on eight areas. As well as the main strategy, on Monday the government also published five separate 'sector plans', with more details on distinct policy areas: advanced manufacturing, creative industries, clean energy, digital and technology, and professional and business services. Plans for the defence, financial services and life sciences sectors will come later. The ministers said that the eight sectors had been 'identified as those best placed to create the wealth, jobs, and higher wages our country needs in every community'. The five sector plans published on Monday emphasised the opportunities for growth across the regions and nations of the UK. Edinburgh's robotics and agri-tech research hubs, and the space industry of the Oxford to Cambridge corridor featured among advanced manufacturing industries. Onshore and offshore wind in south-west Wales, and heat pump producers in Northern Ireland feature in the clean energy sector plans, while Birmingham and Manchester's AI and cyber industries are highlighted in the plan for digital technology. Several of the sector plans also address the changes which AI could have upon their industries. The creative industries for example, will need to 'embrace new technology', one document says, insisting the Government will maximise the value of AI, while 'protecting and incentivising human creativity'. The strategy includes details on several ways the Government wants to make it easier for firms to do business, such as tackling 'high industrial electricity costs' and reducing 'regulatory burdens'. It also says ministers will 'remove planning barriers' and 'ensure our tax system supports growth'. As part of the plans, energy costs for businesses will be cut by scrapping green levies to help them compete with foreign rivals. From 2027, a new British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme will cut costs by up to £40 per megawatt hour for over 7,000 manufacturing firms by exempting them from levies on bills including the renewables obligation, feed-in tariffs and the capacity market. The strategy comes after the latest figures indicated the economy shrank by 0.3% in April, the biggest monthly contraction in gross domestic product for a year-and-a-half, as businesses felt the impact of Donald Trump's tariffs and domestic pressure as a result of hikes to firms' national insurance contributions.
