SteamOS vs Windows : The Ultimate Test on a High-End Gaming Laptop
What if your gaming laptop could ditch Windows entirely and still deliver a seamless, high-performance gaming experience? That's the bold promise of SteamOS, Valve's Linux-based operating system designed specifically for gamers. While Linux has long been seen as a niche option in the gaming world, SteamOS is making waves by offering a streamlined, gaming-first alternative to traditional setups. But how does it hold up when installed on a powerhouse like the ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14? This compact yet formidable laptop, with its AMD Ryzen 9 processor and Radeon RX 6700S GPU, seems like a perfect match for SteamOS's ambitions—but does the reality live up to the hype?
ETA Prime demonstrates what happens when you pair SteamOS with high-end gaming hardware. From the installation process to real-world performance benchmarks, you'll discover how this operating system tackles popular titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Doom Eternal. But it's not all smooth sailing—challenges like limited hardware compatibility and missing customization options reveal where SteamOS still has room to grow. Whether you're a Linux enthusiast, a curious gamer, or simply looking for a Windows alternative, this deep dive into SteamOS on the Zephyrus G14 offers a glimpse into the future of gaming laptops. SteamOS on Gaming Laptops Hardware Overview: The ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14
The ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14 is a compact yet powerful gaming laptop, making it an ideal candidate for testing SteamOS. Its hardware specifications are tailored for high-performance gaming and demanding tasks, offering a robust platform for evaluating the operating system. Key specifications include: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS with 8 cores, 16 threads, and a maximum clock speed of up to 5 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS with 8 cores, 16 threads, and a maximum clock speed of up to 5 GHz. Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 6700S GPU featuring 8 GB of dedicated VRAM, optimized for modern gaming titles.
AMD Radeon RX 6700S GPU featuring 8 GB of dedicated VRAM, optimized for modern gaming titles. Memory: 16 GB of RAM, making sure smooth multitasking and game performance.
16 GB of RAM, making sure smooth multitasking and game performance. Display: A 16:10 aspect ratio, offering a taller vertical resolution compared to the standard 16:9, enhancing productivity and gaming visuals.
This hardware configuration is well-suited for testing Steam, providing a balance of power and efficiency that aligns with the operating system's gaming-focused design. Installing SteamOS: A Smooth Start with Some Caveats
For this evaluation, SteamOS Hollow 3.624 was installed on the ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14. The installation process was straightforward, with the system booting up without significant issues. SteamOS offers several built-in features that cater to gamers, including: TDP Control: This feature allows users to adjust power consumption and thermal output directly within the operating system, allowing better performance management.
This feature allows users to adjust power consumption and thermal output directly within the operating system, allowing better performance management. Gaming Optimization: SteamOS provides a streamlined interface tailored for gaming, minimizing distractions and focusing on performance.
Despite the smooth installation, certain limitations became evident. GPU settings were primarily managed through the BIOS, restricting manual adjustments within SteamOS itself. Additionally, features like RGB keyboard customization—a popular aspect of gaming laptops—were unavailable, limiting personalization options for users who value aesthetic customization. SteamOS Installed on a Powerful Gaming Laptop
Watch this video on YouTube.
Take a look at other insightful guides from our broad collection that might capture your interest in SteamOS. Gaming Performance: Smooth Gameplay with a Few Hiccups
To evaluate gaming performance, several popular titles were tested at 1440p resolution with high settings. The results demonstrated that SteamOS is capable of delivering a strong gaming experience under the right conditions. Key findings include: Cyberpunk 2077: Playable performance was achieved with FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) enabled, maintaining a balance between visual quality and frame rates.
Playable performance was achieved with FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) enabled, maintaining a balance between visual quality and frame rates. Doom Eternal: The game delivered consistently high frame rates without requiring significant adjustments, showcasing the system's capability for fast-paced action titles.
The game delivered consistently high frame rates without requiring significant adjustments, showcasing the system's capability for fast-paced action titles. The Witcher 3 and Spider-Man 2: Both games ran smoothly with minimal tweaks, highlighting SteamOS's ability to handle graphically intensive titles.
However, not all games performed flawlessly. Titles like Doom: The Dark Ages encountered compatibility issues, reflecting SteamOS's occasional struggles with specific game engines or configurations. When compared to Windows, performance differences ranged from 10 to 25 frames per second (FPS), depending on the game and settings. While Steam demonstrated commendable performance overall, it occasionally lagged behind Windows in terms of raw frame rates, particularly in more demanding scenarios. Challenges and Limitations
While SteamOS shows promise as a gaming platform, several challenges and limitations were observed during testing: Aspect Ratio Issues: The laptop's native 16:10 aspect ratio was not fully supported, with many games defaulting to the more common 16:9 format. This resulted in black bars at the top and bottom of the screen, detracting from the immersive experience.
The laptop's native 16:10 aspect ratio was not fully supported, with many games defaulting to the more common 16:9 format. This resulted in black bars at the top and bottom of the screen, detracting from the immersive experience. Hardware Compatibility: The limited availability of gaming laptops with AMD dedicated GPUs for SteamOS testing posed a challenge. While the Radeon RX 6700S performed well, broader hardware support is essential for wider adoption. Nvidia GPUs, for instance, face significant driver compatibility issues with SteamOS, further limiting options for users.
The limited availability of gaming laptops with AMD dedicated GPUs for SteamOS testing posed a challenge. While the Radeon RX 6700S performed well, broader hardware support is essential for wider adoption. Nvidia GPUs, for instance, face significant driver compatibility issues with SteamOS, further limiting options for users. Software Limitations: Certain features, such as RGB keyboard customization, were unavailable. This lack of support for personalization features reduces the appeal of SteamOS for gamers who prioritize customization.
These challenges highlight areas where SteamOS requires further refinement to compete effectively with Windows as a gaming platform. Addressing these issues will be crucial for its future development and adoption. SteamOS as a Gaming Platform: Potential and Progress
SteamOS demonstrated impressive performance on the ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14, particularly when paired with AMD hardware. The operating system's gaming-focused features, such as TDP control and a streamlined interface, add value for users seeking to optimize their gaming experience. Games ran smoothly at high settings, showcasing the platform's potential as a viable alternative to Windows for gaming laptops.
However, challenges such as aspect ratio compatibility, limited hardware support, and occasional game-specific issues underscore the need for continued development. SteamOS remains a work in progress, with room for improvement in areas like software optimization and broader hardware compatibility. For gamers considering SteamOS, it offers a promising alternative but may not yet fully replace Windows for all use cases.
This evaluation provides valuable insights into the current state of SteamOS, highlighting its strengths and areas for growth. As the platform continues to evolve, it has the potential to become a more competitive option for gaming laptops, offering a streamlined and performance-focused experience for enthusiasts and developers alike.
Media Credit: ETA PRIME Filed Under: Gaming News, Top News
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
FTC approves $13.5bn advertising merger but bars coordination over political content
Omnicom's $13.5bn acquisition of rival Interpublic can move forward on the condition the new company does not enter agreements with others to steer ad dollars towards or away from publishers based on political content, the US Federal Trade Commission said on Monday. The agreement with the agency would still allow individual advertisers to specify where their ads are shown, the FTC said. It would also settle potential claims from the FTC's nascent investigation into possible coordination with media watchdogs who have been accused by Elon Musk of helping orchestrate advertiser boycotts of social media platform X. 'Today's settlement does not limit either advertisers' or marketing companies' constitutionally protected right to free speech,' said Andrew Ferguson, the FTC chairman. Spokespeople for the companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Omnicom entered the all-stock deal to buy Interpublic in December, creating the world's largest advertising agency. In the US, the firm would become the largest media buying ad agency, the FTC said. Ferguson had previously criticized settlements that require companies to change their behavior, rather than spin off assets, calling them difficult to enforce. 'The history of collusion in the market for media-buying services, and the increased potential for collusion post-merger, make this a rare instance where the imposition of a behavioral remedy is appropriate,' he said. Monday's agreement would require the company to hand over related documents and file annual compliance reports for five years. The settlement requires final approval from the FTC, which is led by three Republican commissioners, after a public comment period. Two of the commissioners voted to enter the proposed settlement on Monday and one was recused.
Finextra
2 hours ago
- Finextra
Fiserv unveils stablecoin for banks
Fintech giant Fiserv is making a crypto play, unveiling plans for a digital asset platform, including a stablecoin for financial institutions. 1 Recent US action towards stablecoin regulation has seen banks up their interest in such coins. In May, the Wall Street Journal reported that JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo have held discussions on potentially launching a stablecoin, while Santander is reportedly exploring its own effort. Fiserv is now offering to help banks make the move. Using stablecoin infrastructure from Paxos and Circle, FIUSD is being pitched as a bank-friendly coin, offering clients an efficient and interoperable digital asset service for their banking and payment flows. Offering FIUSD across the company's global multi-sided network - which includes relationships with 10,000 financial institution clients and six million merchant locations processing 90 billion transactions annually - will provide instant scale for the coin, says Fiserv. Set to arrive by the end of the year, FIUSD will be offered through existing Fiserv technology at no additional cost to clients and be interoperable with other stablecoins, with a deal already in place with PayPal for its PYUSD. Fiserv say it is also exploring the use of deposit tokens to maintain the benefits of stablecoins in a more capital-friendly structure for banks. Takis Georgakopoulos, COO, Fiserv, says: 'With our scale, reach, and technology leadership, Fiserv is uniquely positioned to advance stablecoin-powered payments and help democratize access to blockchain financial services.
Coin Geek
2 hours ago
- Coin Geek
Amazon, Walmart, JPMorgan explore stablecoins as GENIUS advances
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... It's yet again another big week for stablecoins. On June 17, the United States Senate passed the GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins) by a 68–30 vote. The GENIUS Act is a proposed bill that, if passed, will establish America's first federal framework for stablecoins. A few of its key provisions: all stablecoins must be backed 1:1 by cash or short-term Treasuries, issuers must disclose reserves and undergo audits, and there will be a licensing regime for both large and small stablecoin issuers. The bill also makes it difficult for Big Tech companies to issue a stablecoin without unanimous approval from the Treasury, Fed, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The proposed bill also outlines anti-money laundering (AML) and consumer protection requirements. In totality, the GENIUS Act is the government's attempt to regulate stablecoins for the first time. The next step is for the bill to head to the House, where it's expected to pass without resistance. After that, it will land on President Donald Trump's desk, and based on his own social media post, he seems eager to sign it. Source: Truth Social | @realDonaldTrump But even though the bill has a few stops left on its journey before becoming law, companies are wasting no time getting their stablecoin initiatives in motion. Amazon, Walmart, and JPMorgan position themselves for a stablecoin future Even before the GENIUS Act advanced this far, banks and financial institutions began laying the groundwork for stablecoin products, betting on the legislation's eventual passage. Now, we're starting to see retail giants like Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) and Walmart (NASDAQ: WMT) inch into the stablecoin world as well. Recently, rumors surfaced that Amazon and Walmart are exploring the idea of internal-use stablecoins. Shortly afterward, JPMorgan (NASDAQ: JPM) filed a trademark for a blockchain-based product called JPMD, which many speculate stands for 'JPMorgan Dollar,' and believe will be a stablecoin, even though JPMorgan's filing did not explicitly use the word 'stablecoin.' These corporates saw the early movers in crypto, especially those who launched stablecoins like Circle, generate a significant amount of revenue from their stablecoin offering, so they are now positioning themselves to do the same. With the GENIUS Act on track to pass, their plans to do this have accelerated. The commercial use-case for stablecoins At the moment, Amazon and Walmart's stablecoin plans seem to be focused on internal use; they are closed-loop tokens used within their walled gardens and suppliers' networks. This isn't exactly a new concept; it resembles what Circle, the issuer of USDC, has already started doing through its Circle Payment Network. The benefit of doing this is that instead of relying on credit card networks, which charge 2–3% per transaction, or bank transfers, which can take several days, a stablecoin-based system allows retailers to settle transactions instantly and at significantly lower costs. Amazon and Walmart's interest tracks with a broader trend in corporate America: the ongoing push to cut costs and run lean. Stablecoins offer a way to reduce the cost of payment settlement, improve efficiency, and potentially unlock new streams of revenue for their issuers. That revenue doesn't just come from cost savings either. Stablecoin issuers, under the GENIUS Act, must back tokens 1:1 with cash or equivalents. The issuers typically opt for short-term Treasuries (T-bills) as their cash equivalents, which means the issuers earn the yield on those T-bills, which is around 4% in today's economic environment. If you're managing billions in reserves, that passive yield being raked in from stablecoins becomes significant. The biggest obstacle for corporate stablecoins But these newfound commercial stablecoin strategies don't come without obstacles. For an internal stablecoin to work, the people and companies you do business with also need to be part of your stablecoin network. Let's say Amazon starts paying vendors using its stablecoin. Vendors will benefit from faster transaction settlement, but they will want a way to convert those tokens into fiat that can be redirected to their other business operations. If every major company starts issuing its own proprietary stablecoin, we'll end up with a fragmented ecosystem where every issuer will need to devise a way for their network partners to exchange their stablecoins for cash. It's unclear whether retailers will build their offramps or take advantage of existing, highly liquid infrastructure like Circle's payment network. But any supplier, vendor, or partner doing business in stablecoins will want a fast and frictionless way to convert their stablecoins to cash. Could stablecoins replace global payments We are in an era where, each day, stablecoins are becoming more embedded into the fabric of the global financial system. In today's high-interest environment, where rates are significantly higher than they were five years ago during the zero-interest rate policy era, every company is under pressure to cut costs and improve operational efficiency. Stablecoins are emerging as a solution for this when it comes to payments and settlements. But it is not all smooth sailing for stablecoin issuers. Stablecoins only work at scale if the entities a company transacts with also accept them and, even more importantly, have a way to exit those positions. Companies are beginning to roll out stablecoins and launch payment networks, but so far, we've heard much more about announcements than the outcomes of these systems. Who's actually settling transactions in stablecoins? What's the user experience like? We don't really have answers to those questions at this point in time. There will be even bigger hurdles if companies want to make their stablecoins consumer-facing. At that point, they have to convince everyday users to go out of their way to obtain a stablecoin and then use it instead of just pulling out a credit card or paying with cash. That adds a layer of friction to the payment process that might not be worth the hassle for most consumers. There isn't enough real-world data to conclude how all of this will play out. But in theory, stablecoins could become a central part of, or even a replacement for, a major piece of the traditional financial infrastructure: domestic and international payments. However, one thing is certain: As legislation like the GENIUS Act advances and rumors about household-name corporations experimenting with stablecoins spread, incumbents like Circle reap the rewards. On June 17, after news broke that the GENIUS Act had cleared the Senate, shares of CRCL jumped from $149.15 to $199.59, a 38% spike powered by one strong headline about stablecoins. Watch: Breaking down solutions to blockchain regulation hurdles title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">
