Class in order: Chandigarh turns to Haryana Act to tame unregulated coaching centres
Chandigarh: In a decisive move to address the growing concerns around unregulated private coaching institutes and dummy admissions, the UT education department is set to propose the adoption of the Haryana Registration and Regulation of Private Coaching Institutes Act, 2024, for Chandigarh.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
This step comes about an year after the central government issued guidelines on coaching centres, and is now being followed by a push to give them legal teeth.
The proposal will be sent to the Government of India for approval under Section 87 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966, allowing the extension of Haryana's legislation to the Union Territory. Officials said the move will enable a formal legal framework for registration, monitoring, and regulation of coaching centres — something the city has long lacked despite growing pressure from educators, parents, and student groups.
A key feature of the Haryana legislation is the formation of district-level regulatory authorities tasked with overseeing coaching institutes. These authorities are composed of senior officials from multiple departments, including education, police, municipal administration and district administration. Chandigarh's proposed regulatory authority will follow this multi-departmental model but will be adjusted to fit the Union Territory's administrative structure.
The Act grants regulatory authorities civil court-like powers to inspect, inquire and enforce compliance. It defines specific offences and stipulates penalties recoverable as arrears of land revenue, with fines ranging from Rs 25,000 for first violations to Rs 1 lakh for repeat offences. Continued non-compliance may result in cancellation of registration. Further, the Act mandates that coaching institutes employ at least one full-time counsellor to address student mental health and stress-related concerns.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
It also requires the establishment of grievance redressal committees with fixed timeframes for complaint resolution.
"Though the timings and infrastructure facilities at coaching centres are monitored, a proposed extension of the Haryana Act is being sent to the Centre for consideration and approval for regulation of these centres by way of an appropriate legal framework," said director, school education, Chandigarh, Harsuhinder Pal Singh Brar.
"Once approved, a formal framework will be in place towards effective regulation of these centres, which is the need of the hour to ensure safety and wellbeing of children.
"
While the central guidelines issued in Jan 2024 laid down a broad policy direction — including registration norms, counselling requirements, and anti-exploitation measures — they were advisory in nature. Chandigarh was among the few places where the Centre had designated a nodal officer, with Brar himself appointed to the role.
However, enforcement remained limited due to the lack of a statutory framework.
Officials maintain that the aim of regulation is not to oppose private coaching but to ensure it remains a support system rather than a substitute for formal schooling. While coaching centres may help students prepare for competitive exams, their unchecked growth and rising influence have raised concerns about student well-being, academic imbalance, and the spread of dummy school practices.
By adopting a legal framework, the UT administration hopes to bring clarity, accountability, and safeguards that protect children's education without disrupting their connection to regular schools.
BOX- How Haryana Act goes beyond central guidelines
Unlike the Centre's advisory guidelines, the Haryana Act is a binding law with enforcement powers. It mandates separate registration for each coaching branch, prohibits misleading terms like "recognised," and bars enrolment of students below 16. It clearly defines penalties, which are recoverable as arrears, and grants civil court powers to authorities. It also makes grievance redressal committees and mental health counsellors compulsory, with fixed 30-day timeline for complaint resolution.
These provisions, absent or loosely defined in the guidelines, make the Haryana Act stricter and more enforceable.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Reducing acute dependence, countering China's near monopoly: India readies Rs 5,000 crore scheme for rare earth minerals
The incentives in India's proposed programme will be distributed through a reverse bidding mechanism. (AI image) India is readying a plan to reduce its acute dependence on China for rare earth minerals. The move comes at a time when China has imposed export curbs on rare earths and Indian industry has raised alarm bells on shortage of magnets and other components. India is looking at a Rs 3,500-Rs 5,000 crore scheme to promote the production of rare earth minerals and derived magnets domestically, with approval expected within two weeks, according to a senior government official. "The priority is to start domestic-critical mineral production in the shortest time period," the official told ET. China dominates global supply of rare earth magnets and has implemented export restrictions. These essential minerals, vital for manufacturing automobiles, electric vehicles (EVs) and renewable energy infrastructure, face supply constraints. The incentives in India's proposed programme will be distributed through a reverse bidding mechanism. This initiative follows an internal ministerial assessment that highlighted the necessity to diversify supply sources, given the substantial reliance on imports from China. Also Read | India bleeds Pakistan dry: Water at 'dead' levels in Pakistan's dams; bigger Indus river plans in the works - top points to know "Fresh steps are being taken to boost domestic availability of critical minerals," the official said, noting that a minimum of five major Indian companies have informally shown interest in manufacturing these materials during discussions with government authorities. India's Rare Earth Requirements The automotive sector has highlighted concerns about Chinese restrictions and requested governmental assistance. In April, Beijing introduced mandatory special export licences for seven rare earth elements and associated magnets. In India, manufacturers of EVs and wind turbines represent the primary consumers of rare earth elements, accounting for more than 50% of the projected domestic demand of 4010 metric tonnes in 2025. The overall requirement is anticipated to reach 8220 metric tonnes by 2030. Also Read | 'Dramatic decline…watch out…': China's exports to US dip sharply amid Trump trade war; why India needs to be on the guard Additionally, the government intends to modify the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act to bolster the critical mineral initiative. Beyond regulatory adjustments, the Centre anticipates limited but commercially viable domestic production of rare earth permanent magnets to commence later this year. Financial support has been allocated to Midwest Advanced Materials Private Ltd, Hyderabad, by the ministry of science and technology. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
News18
7 hours ago
- News18
12-Hour Workday In Bengaluru Soon? What We Know So Far
Last Updated: The Karnataka government proposes revising work norms to allow 12-hour workdays, sparking opposition from IT/ITeS employee unions. The plan includes a 48-hour weekly cap. The Karnataka government has stirred debate with its proposal to revise working hour norms, potentially allowing private firms to implement 12-hour workdays, including overtime. The move has sparked strong opposition from employee unions, particularly in the IT/ITeS sector. While the government has clarified that the weekly work limit will remain capped at 48 hours, the plan to increase the daily limit from 9 to 10 hours — plus possible overtime — has raised concerns about employee well-being, work-life balance, and job exploitation. What Is the Proposal? The Karnataka government has proposed to amend the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1961, to increase daily working hours from nine to 10 hours in the state, and to allow up to 12 hours of work a day with overtime. The proposal, if approved, would also raise the quarterly overtime limit from 50 to 144 hours, according to The Hindu. The draft amendments, circulated by Karnataka's labour department to stakeholders, reportedly were aimed at aligning state regulations with directions from the Union government. It had asked all states to consider increasing working hour limits. What Do IT Employee Unions Say? The proposal has triggered strong resistance from IT employees' associations. The union representatives argue that such long workdays will increase stress, lower productivity, and violate the spirit of employee rights. Bengaluru, the country's biggest IT hub, is situated in Karnataka. The Karnataka State IT/ ITeS Employees Union on Wednesday strongly opposed the proposal and called upon 'the entire working class to come in resistance against the Karnataka government move to increase the working hours in IT/ITES/BPO sector to 12 hours a day." In a statement, the KITU said, 'The proposed amendment to the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act attempts to normalise a 12-hour work day. The existing Act only allows a maximum of 10 hours work per day, including overtime." It said the amendment will allow the companies to go for a two-shift system instead of the currently existing three shift system, and one third of the workforce will be through out from their employment. The KITU said, 'The proposal to amend the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishment Act to facilitate 12-hour working day is presented in a meeting called by the labour department on June 18, with various stakeholders in the industry." What Government Says Labour Minister Santosh Lad on June 19 issued a detailed statement explaining the government's intent behind the proposed amendment. In his clarification, Santosh Lad assured that the weekly 48-hour cap remains unchanged, and the proposal complies with International Labour Organization (ILO) standards and domestic labour laws. 'There is no violation of any international convention or standard," he stated. 'The 10-hour period is inclusive of a one-hour rest interval, meaning the active working time per day would remain 9 hours," he said. Currently, as per the current law under Section 7 of the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1961, the daily work limit is 9 hours, including a 1-hour break. However, with the proposed additional one hour a day, employees will get to choose five working days instead of six. He also said the proposal is currently under consultation, with stakeholder meetings already held, and no final decision has been made yet. 'The government of Karnataka is committed to the welfare of its entire workforce. We are in active dialogue with all stakeholders to ensure the final decision is holistic, balanced, and beneficial for all," he added. The labour department defended these proposals saying that the Union government has already 'directed" states to amend working hours limits. The department also said similar decision has been taken by Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand also, according to Deccan Herald. Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 21, 2025, 14:20 IST News business 12-Hour Workday In Bengaluru Soon? What We Know So Far
Indian Express
7 hours ago
- Indian Express
What new Registration Bill says, why it was introduced
The Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) has invited suggestions on the new draft Registration Bill 2025, which seeks to replace the 117-year-old Registration Act of 1908. The Bill, the MoRD says, will digitise the registration of property documents, enhance transparency, and maintain digital records. Can it deliver? The Registration Bill, 2025 was introduced to establish a modern framework for registration of land documents, and a more citizen-centric approach. Some key features include: Online/offline registration: End-to-end registrations, from the presentation of documents to their submission, can either be done at the office of the Sub-Registrar or via electronic means. Identity verifications will be carried out via Aadhaar or through an offline verification process (Section 29 (3)). No person can be denied registration of their documents if they do not possess an Aadhaar number (Section 29 (4)). Expanded list of compulsory docs: The Bill expands the list of compulsory registration of documents under Section 12 with the inclusion of agreement of sale, power of attorneys (POAs), sale agreements, mortgage by deposit of title deed, and merger and demerger of companies under the Companies Act, 2013 (Section 12(f-j)). The Bill also provides for simplified optional registration under Section 13 that Section 12 does not cover but fails to specify which documents come under this category, leaving it to wide interpretation. Introducing new positions: In addition to the post of Inspector General of Registration, the Bill introduces Additional and Assistant Inspector Generals of Registration. Section 4(5) states: 'The appropriate government may prescribe the terms and conditions of service, and the duties of the officers appointed under sub-section (4) and authorise them to exercise all or any powers and duties of the Inspector General of Registration.' Reasons for refusal/cancellation: Section 58 of the Bill lists the reasons upon which a document may be refused for registration, including documents submitted without true translation, erasure of content from the documents, documents submitted after the prescribed period of four-months (this is not applicable on wills), or if the person concerned is a minor, mentally incapable or deceased. Section 64(3) states that the Inspector General of the Registration is vested with the power to cancel any registration that appears to be made based on false information, in breach of the provisions of the Act, or if the document was made on a transaction that was found to be conducted against the law. Such reasons must be recorded in writing before passing an order. An appeal can be filed against such an order within 30 days. Reduced imprisonment: The penalties prescribed in the current Act are seven years imprisonment with a fine or both, whereas the new draft bill reduces the imprisonment to three years, along with a fine, or in some cases, both. Why did the current Act need reform? The pre-Independence Registration Act, 1908 provided for registration of various property-related documents. Citizens needed to visit the registration office and submit documents to the Sub-Registrar for the registration process. These documents were required to be presented by persons themselves or their appointed agents. With growing technological advancements and hassle-free methods, 'several states and union territories have already introduced innovations such as online document submission and digital identity verification under the existing 1908 Act,' the MoRD says. As the role of the registered documents increased in both public and private transactions, parallel systems had to be designed to sustain the growing demands. This necessitated an updation of the Act itself — which the Registration Bill 2025 seeks to do. What are some concerns surrounding the Bill? The Bill aims to digitise processes of registration, reduce the risk of title fraud, improve approval rates, and reduce disputes. However, with the maintenance of digital records, important information with regards to e-signatures will be maintained in a digital archive, which may require more robust cybersecurity systems. The Bill may also delegate the registration functions to the Common Services Centres (CSCs). Allowing CSCs to facilitate processes that involve valuation of stamp duty, transfer of title, etc, processes that require legal implications, may create procedural gaps. The portal for suggestions on the draft Bill remains open until June 25.
