He's one of Australia's leading minds on super - and he's got a sensible idea about changing Albo's laws. But do YOU think Jim Chalmers will budge on his flawed tax grab?
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has declared Labor has a 'mandate' for a sweeping plan to tax superannuation before assets are sold - despite a warning it could amount to a new form of death duties.
Labor needs the Greens' support in the Senate to pass its Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions bill that would see a new 15 per cent tax levied on unrealised gains on balances above $3million.
The Opposition and superannuation groups are opposed to the idea of taxing assets in a self-managed super fund before they are sold, based on the paper or notional value of holdings.
Labor's policy would mark a radical departure from the usual practice of applying the capital gains tax once something has been sold.
Now a leading superannuation expert - Professor Robert Breunig, the director of the Australian National University's Tax and Transfer Policy Institute - has argued the government should consider a change to its proposal.
Prof Breunig said the government should look into allowing the unrealised gains tax to be paid years later, when someone eventually sells an asset.
He likened it to the standard practice of paying undue council rates after a house had been sold.
'If you're going to tax unrealised gains, I think you should be giving people the opportunity to defer paying the tax until they dispose of the property,' he said.
'That would be my preferred policy.'
But Chalmers on Wednesday rebuffed a suggestion Labor would revisit the concept of taxing unrealised gains, even though someone inheriting a self-managed super fund could be left with a new tax liability.
'First of all, we're not changing the policies we took to the election,' he told the National Press Club.
'We've got a mandate for that change... What we're looking for here is an opportunity to build on the progress that we've made, including in the economy as you point out.
'We're looking for, not opportunities to go back on the things that we have got a mandate for, we're looking for new ideas.'
'Inheritance' tax accusations
Labor's tax on super balances above $3million could effectively amount to an inheritance tax, along with a new tax on franking credits - or tax refunds for owning shares in a company that has already paid company tax.
Senator James Paterson, the Opposition's finance spokesman, said the government needed to explain if taxing unrealised gains on super amounted to an inheritance tax by stealth.
'Labor's super tax grab has been on the public record for two years,' he told Daily Mail Australia.
'The Albanese Government should be able to fully explain the implications of their policy, including for people's wills.
'We should not be reliant on independent experts, the media or the Opposition to explain how this policy will work in practice.
'Jim Chalmers must be upfront about how his unrealised capital gains tax interacts with franking credits and inheritance.'
A self-managed super fund can be passed on to a dependent or left to someone in a will.
Professor Breunig said someone inheriting a self-managed super fund with more than $3million, upon the death of a parent, would effectively be paying a new form of inheritance tax with the 15 per cent tax on unrealised gains.
'Yes, sure it is, but that's true of a lot of our taxes - that's true with council rates,' he told Daily Mail Australia.
'It would be an inheritance tax if you were somehow paying back taxes on it - you inherit the liability.'
A self-managed super fund, with a balance above $3million, would be subject to an unrealised gains tax if there was a property in the portfolio, under the government's Division 296 plan.
That would be a departure from existing rules allowing someone to avoid paying the capital gains tax on a property they inherited, outside of a super fund.
Prof Breunig said Treasury would benefit from being able to tax unrealised gains in a super portfolio, catching out those who left property in a self-managed super fund.
'Currently, we have a subsidy in the system that subsidies people passing out wealth to their children and you're kind of removing that subsidy,' he said.
'That is one of the attractions of the unrealised gains tax.'
Future of the tax
The Greens want the $3million threshold lowered to $2million but indexed for inflation.
Prof Breunig said that would mean applying an unrealised gains tax to accounts typically producing an annual annuity, or guaranteed retirement living income, of $100,000.
'Two million's too low - how much money do people need to have a comfortable retirement?' he said.
'Now you're talking about a lifetime income stream that's more like $100,000, which for a lot of people isn't that much relative to how much they made in their lifetime.'
Australian abolished inheritance taxes at a national level in 1979, with all the states getting rid of that tax by 1981.
Labor's planned tax doesn't effectively levy a new charge on a superannuation fund balance being transferred to a loved one.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Major update after British couple faced being deported from Australia over devastating diagnosis
A British couple who have spent nearly a decade in Australia have been granted permanent residency, avoiding deportation in a last-minute decision by the federal government. Rob O'Leary and Jessica Mathers, who met while working in Sydney in 2017, were concerned they might be forced to return to the UK due to visa issues linked to Jessica's medical condition. But on Thursday, they took to social media to share their visas were approved: 'We are proud to announce we are Australia's newest permanent residents!' 'This morning, we received the life-changing news we've been hoping for, our visa has been granted!' The couple's immigration struggle had started in 2020 after Ms Mathers was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS). The condition is a chronic and degenerative disease which affects the central nervous system, disrupting the brain's ability to communicate with the body. Ms Mathers received treatment in Australia under the Reciprocal Health Care Arrangement with the UK, which gives British citizens access to some Medicare services. When the couple applied for permanent residency, officials rejected the application and cited her MS diagnosis. The potential future cost of Ms Mathers' condition to the Australian economy formed the basis for the refusal. After they lost their appeal to overturn the decision in 2023, legal advice suggested the couple's case had little chance of success without direct ministerial involvement. The couple then decided to launch a public campaign to stay in Australia. Their story struck a chord with thousands of supporters, and a petition calling on the government to intervene attracted over 27,000 signatures. With their visas now secured, the pair have credited local Wentworth MP Allegra Spender for her advocacy behind the scenes. 'She shared that the Minister for Immigration, Tony Burke, personally contacted her to confirm the decision!' they said on Facebook, thanking the politician for her support. The pair said the decision has finally allowed them to turn the page after nearly five years of uncertainty and fighting to remain in Australia. 'Rob has proudly called Australia home for nearly 10 years, and Jess for 8,' they said. 'We're so grateful that our contributions have been recognised, and that we can finally move forward with clarity and security.' The prolonged visa battle meant the couple had to put their life on pause as they faced the threat of being deported at any moment. 'There are so many things we've put on hold, just in case we had to leave,' they said. 'But now, with this door wide open, we feel more focused and excited than ever to build our future in the country we love.' They also shared that their families back in the UK were overjoyed by the news and are already planning visits to celebrate with them in person. Now on holiday to mark their eighth anniversary as a couple, Rob and Jess said they plan to host a special celebration with family and friends to mark the milestone. A spokesperson for the Department of Home Affairs told Daily Mail Australia they do not comment on individual cases for privacy reasons. 'All non-citizens who wish to enter or remain in Australia must satisfy the requirements of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act) and Migration Regulations 1994, including identity, health, security and character requirements,' they said.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Glencore says Australia copper smelter unviable, asks for government help
MELBOURNE, June 20 (Reuters) - Glencore (GLEN.L), opens new tab has called its Mount Isa copper smelter unviable and is waiting to hear back on its requests for assistance from state and federal governments to keep the facility open amid tough global conditions, it said on Friday. The UK-listed miner has been sounding the alarm in local media about its Mount Isa smelting business in Queensland state as its related mining operations are set to close next month. It will then have to procure copper concentrate to process when excess global smelting capacity has pushed global processing fees to historic lows. "A combination of unprecedented smelting market conditions, high costs like energy, gas and labour, and a shortage of copper concentrates is currently making the Mount Isa copper smelter unviable," Glencore said in a statement. Glencore said it has approached both federal and Queensland state governments for support to keep the copper smelter and refinery operating. Several lawmakers visited the plant on Friday including Australia's industry and science minister, Tim Ayres, and Queensland resources minister, Dale Last. The state and federal governments have engaged extensively with Glencore to explore options for a viable path forward for the smelter, which is a critical asset for regional and state economies, the ministers said in a joint statement. "Any closure of the Mount Isa copper smelter would have a detrimental impact on Australia's sovereign capability and other facilities downstream that rely on the smelter," Ayres said in the statement, without giving any details on what options there might be to provide Glencore with any funding. Glencore said that it had put forward ideas for a "regional solution that would bridge the current economic gap and enable the smelter and refinery to continue operating." "We want to continue operating the smelter and refinery and look forward to hearing feedback from both federal and Queensland governments on a possible way forward,' said Troy Wilson, chief operating officer for Glencore's Australian metals business, in a statement.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Urgent warning to Aussies with a side hustle from UberEats delivery drivers to OnlyFans models
Australians working side hustle jobs are set to get a rude tax bill as the government cracks down on gig economy roles. The Australian Taxation Office is now directly contacting digital platforms to identify potential income taxpayers - meaning those with a side hustle can no longer hide. CPA Australia, which represents Certified Practising Accountants, warned the ATO's new sharing economy reporting regime was targeting everyone from social media influencers to food deliverers. Jenny Wong, the group's tax lead, said this meant Australians doing gig economy jobs with the likes of UberEats, DoorDash, Airtasker, YouTube and even OnlyFans risked a big tax bill if they failed to declare their income from these platforms. 'Until this year, individuals have been required to self-declare the income from their side-hustles,' she said. 'Now nothing will go under the radar. If you deliver food with DoorDash, work some casual jobs through Airtasker, or make content for Patreon, YouTube or OnlyFans, these sites are now reporting your earnings to the tax office. 'Though people might not consider earnings from digital platforms as income in the same way as their regular job, it is all viewed the same way by the ATO. 'Chances are that many people have simply not been declaring this income at tax time. That all changes now.' Ms Wong said the tax office was also targeting those who rented out items online. 'If you use a website to rent out a car parking space or your designer handbag, this income will be recorded, and you'll need to pay tax,' she said. The tax office's sharing economy reporting regime is expanding, meaning it will now be aware of all income earned from gig economy jobs in the 2024-25 financial year, above the $18,200 tax-free threshold. 'So, if you've had a successful year earning money through advertising revenue and streaming subscriptions, as well as through gifts and gratuities, the ATO will be expecting you to cough up,' she said. 'Yes, this even includes free cars, holidays, clothes and anything else you're lucky enough to receive as a form of payment. 'Depending on how much you've earned during the year, this could be a significant amount, maybe even tens of thousands of dollars.' What can be claimed on tax? Australian workers can claim items worth up to $300 in one financial year if they are used exclusively for work purposes, including a handbag used to carry a laptop computer and home office furniture. But H&R Block's director of tax communications Mark Chapman said these items had to be used to generate an income. 'Let's be clear: to claim items like bags or sunglasses, they must be used in the course of earning income; and if there's any personal use, only the work-related portion can be claimed. And as always, records are essential,' he said. 'Items of capital equipment (such as furniture, computers and associated hardware and software) which cost less than $300 can be written off in full immediately.' Australians working from home can claim 70 cents an hour on their tax, as a fixed rate claim method, provided they had proof since July 2024, in the form of diary entries, rosters or time sheets. Purchases made before June 30 can also be claimed as a tax deduction. 'With many retailers running end of financial year specials, any purchases you make now can be deducted in this year's tax return so from a cash flow point of view, you can minimise the time between purchase and tax deduction,' Mr Chapman said. What's the biggest misunderstanding about tax claims? Tax planning accountant Ben Johnston, a director of Johnston Advisory, said he had encountered many Australians during his three-decade career who thought the entire cost of a work-related item could be claimed on tax - because of those end of financial year sale campaigns on television. 'The benefits of tax deductions are so overstated where leading into the financial year - Officeworks, Dick Smith, Harvey Norman - all encouraging and really making people have urgency to spend money where it's actually really dumb to spend money to save tax,' he told Daily Mail Australia. 'Our tax system confuses and misleads people to spend money they don't need to just to save tax. 'A lot of people think they spend $10 on stationery and they get $10 back in tax when in fact they might be lucky to get $3.20 back. 'The notion of something being a hundred per cent tax deductible gets confused with being 100 per cent refundable and it's so false and retailers really prey on it.' Mr Johnston said he was frustrated by how many people didn't realise a tax claim simply reduced someone's taxable income. This led to them spending money falsely hoping to save money, even if it didn't necessarily put them into a lower marginal tax bracket. 'A refund's actually a false economy in a lot of ways - a lot of people don't understand that,' he said. 'Someone earning $200,000 a year - the most they get back out of that $10 is $4.70. 'If you're an apprentice, that hasn't worked a full year or only earned under $20,000, you spent $10, they get no money back because they don't pay tax. 'You only spend money on what you need for work - if you spend money incentivised for tax, then you're stupid; you're only getting a proportion of it back based on what your tax bracket is.'
