Treasury praises budget, opposition labels it 'cosmetic'

Lawmakers from the treasury benches hailed the Punjab government's 2025-26 budget as "historic" and "tax-free," while opposition legislators dismissed it as a self-promotional exercise for the Sharif family, highlighting continued neglect in critical sectors across the province.
On the third consecutive day of the general discussion on the annual budget, treasury members lauded Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz's leadership, asserting that they now enjoyed the freedom to voice their concerns — something they claimed had been suppressed in the past.
Opposition lawmakers, primarily from Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), criticized the budget as anti-people, lacking substance and practical relief. They described it as "a budget of words" rather than action.
Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarian (PPPP) MPA Mumtaz Ali Chang voiced disillusionment, stating that he had hoped Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz would back her passionate opposition speeches with meaningful action.
"This budget is a letdown, especially for South Punjab," he said.
Ramesh Singh Arora praised the budget and said that the religious and sacred sites of minority communities were fully protected under the current government.
PTI lawmaker Qazi Ahmad Akbar criticised the ruling party for naming projects after the Sharif family and claimed that while Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa had allocated over 34% to the social sector, Punjab's allocation was a mere 9%.
"Instead of making jobs in Punjab, the government is busy boasting about sending people abroad after offering training," he said.
Other opposition members, including Tayyab Rashid and Khalid Zubair Nisar, lamented the neglect of development projects in their constituencies.
"Billions are allocated for education, yet children in villages have no shoes on their feet or pencils in their hands," Nisar said.
The House was adjourned until June 23 at 11 am by Chairman Raja Shaukat after completion of the day's agenda.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Express Tribune

28 minutes ago

• Express Tribune

Textile industry for adopting proposals

Listen to article Pakistan Hosiery Manufacturers and Exporters Association (PHMA) and Pakistan Readymade Garments Manufacturers and Exporters Association (PRGMEA) have jointly urged the government to consider and implement the textile industry's key budget proposals through the Federal Board of Revenue's (FBR) budget anomaly committee. The demand came during a post-budget meeting of both associations, which was attended by PHMA Chairman Abdul Hameed, former PHMA chairmen Naseer Butt and Shehzad Azam Khan, PRGMEA Chairman Dr Ayyazuddin and former PRGMEA chairmen Ijaz Khokhar and Sohail Afzal Sheikh. Meeting participants stressed that the government must not only examine industry recommendations through the anomaly committee but also implement the committee's final report once compiled. PHMA Chairman Abdul Hameed pointed out that Pakistan's value-added textile, apparel, bed wear, home textile and towel sectors contribute over $11 billion in annual exports and provide livelihoods to millions. He expressed concern over the replacement of the simplified Final Tax Regime (FTR) with the more complex Normal Tax Regime (NTR), which now subjects exporters to both 1% minimum tax and 1% advance tax on export proceeds, regardless of the actual profit. Former PHMA chairman Naseer Butt, while speaking at the meeting, said that dual taxation was counterproductive for an already distressed export sector. He warned that many small and medium enterprises (SMEs) were operating on thin margins and may be forced to close down if the policy was not reversed immediately. Shehzad Azam Khan, also a former PHMA chairman, highlighted the issues of refund delays, rising production costs and inflation. He stressed that exporters were burdened with more taxes than their earnings and demanded that the government urgently facilitate timely refunds and ensure stable energy pricing. PRGMEA Chairman Dr Ayyazuddin, in his remarks, raised concerns over changes to the Export Facilitation Scheme (EFS), particularly the removal of zero-rating on local purchases and the imposition of sales tax on imported cotton yarn. He emphasised that these changes undermine the very objective of the EFS, which was introduced to reduce liquidity pressure and digitise export procedures. Ex-PRGMEA chairman Ijaz Khokhar said that Pakistan's regional competitors like Bangladesh and Vietnam provide tax-free access to raw material for exporters, giving them an edge in international markets. He called for restoring the original EFS framework under SRO 957(I)/2021.

Express Tribune

42 minutes ago

• Express Tribune

Court shields foreign students at Harvard

A federal judge on Friday indefinitely paused Donald Trump's bid to block Harvard from enrolling foreign students as the US president said a "deal" with the Ivy League school was in the works, reported AFP. The order by District Judge Allison Burroughs will allow international students to continue to attend the elite university while a lawsuit filed by Harvard plays out in the courts. Trump, who has cut federal grants for Harvard and tried a host of different tactics to block the institution from hosting international students, said that his administration has been holding negotiations with Harvard. "Many people have been asking what is going on with Harvard University and their large-scale improprieties that we have been addressing, looking for a solution," Trump said in a post Friday on Truth Social. "We have been working closely with Harvard, and it is very possible that a deal will be announced over the next week or so," he said. "If a settlement is made on the basis currently being discussed, it will be mindboggingly historic, and very good for our country." Trump did not provide any details about the purported "deal." The Trump administration has sought to remove Harvard from an electronic student immigration registry and instructed embassies to deny visas to international students hoping to attend the Massachusetts-based university. Harvard has sued the Department of Homeland Security and other agencies to block the efforts, arguing that they were illegal and unconstitutional. Harvard previously secured two temporary restraining orders from Burroughs against the government's move to bar international students, and the judge extended it with a preliminary injunction on Friday. International students accounted for 27 per cent of total enrollment at Harvard in the 2024-2025 academic year and are a major source of income. In court filings, Harvard argued that Trump's actions were "retribution for Harvard's exercising its First Amendment rights to reject the government's demands to control Harvard's governance, curriculum, and the 'ideology' of its faculty and students."

Express Tribune

an hour ago

• Express Tribune

EU cracks down on pet cruelty with new law

Cutting tails or ears will be banned in most cases. Photo: BBC Compulsory microchips as well as bans on ear-cropping and tail-docking are among a set of new rules to protect cats and dogs that European lawmakers approved Thursday. The European Union is home to more than 72 million dogs and 83 million cats, according to the European Commission, which so far has only regulated health requirements for them related to travel within the bloc. But an uptick in trafficking pushed the EU to propose a set of common rules for breeding, housing and handling the animals, whose sales generate an estimated 1.3 billion euros ($1.5 billion) annually. The European Parliament in Strasbourg voted on a text put forward by the commission in 2023, which introduces minimum welfare criteria for dogs and cats in kennels and shelters. Lawmakers also voted to ban the keeping or selling of dogs and cats in pet shops, a provision not included in the original text, meaning buyers would have to buy them directly from breeders or kennels. "With this proposal, we would create the first-ever minimum rules, giving member states the possibility to go beyond these standards," said the text's rapporteur, Veronika Vrecionova of the hard-right ECR group. Approved with 457 votes in favour and 17 against, the bill says all dogs and cats should be identified with a subcutaneous microchip when they are sold - a system already in use in some member states - and registered in an EU database. That would increase traceability and tackle illegal traffic, predominantly of dogs, with animal protection groups singling out eastern EU countries like Romania and Bulgaria. Painful mutilations, like cutting tails or ears, will also be banned in most cases, as will electric, choke and spiked collars without safety stoppers. The law also prohibits inbreeding and the breeding of animals with accentuated traits, such as overly short legs, that could affect their welfare. The measures enjoyed broad consensus among political groups but the extent of their application had been the cause of contention, leading to some amendments. An exception for breeders keeping a small number of animals, which had upset some on the left, was weakened by parliament, which lowered the threshold for breeders to qualify. Yet other exemptions opposed by animal rights activists remained. The ban on mutilations, for example, is less stringent for hunting dogs. Similarly, coercive collars will still be allowed to train police, military and border patrol dogs.