US shifts Africa security strategy amid global pivot

AP image
Africa should take greater ownership of its own security challenges. That was the message recently communicated by General Michael Langley, head of US Africa Command (USAFRICOM).
The unit is part of the US Department of Defense and is responsible for all defence operations and security cooperation on the African continent.
The announcement comes as the United States rethinks its military strategy in Africa, signalling a significant shift in its approach to security on the continent.
This adjustment aligns with a broader strategic pivot under the Trump administration, which is prioritising homeland security and a leaner, more lethal military force, while reducing the US military footprint overseas, including in Africa.
But what could it mean for the continent?
Africa's global relevance
With its growing population and vast natural resources, Africa is strategically important to Europe and the United States.
"Africa is a strategic partner with a large and growing youth population — projected to double by 2045 according to the African Economic Outlook," Adib Saani, a foreign policy and security analyst, told DW. "The continent is rich, holding vast mineral resources and strategic reserves like uranium that both Western and Eastern countries heavily rely on."
The continent was also home to 11 of the world's 20 fastest-growing economies in 2024.
"The US and others engage with Africa not just out of goodwill but because these resources are vital for running industries worldwide," Saani said. "This makes the relationship mutually beneficial — a win-win for Africa and the rest of the world."
However, the Trump administration's defence strategy has shifted focus away from protecting the US from threats emanating from abroad, including countering terrorist organisations such as the so-called "Islamic State" (IS) militant group and al-Qaeda, which have expanded their presence and capabilities in Africa.
'Sharing the burden' of US-Africa security operations
Previously, US military efforts in Africa combined defence, diplomacy and development.
"America has been a close partner in countering violent extremism, especially in Eastern and West Africa," Saani explained. "We have relied heavily on US logistics, training and intelligence sharing to address these threats. In terms of human security, the US has also contributed through USAID and other programs that have helped lift many out of poverty."
USAFRICOM head Langley said the military's priorities now focus on homeland protection, encouraging instead "burden sharing" with African partners. He said the goal is to build local military capacity to enable independent operations and reduce reliance on US forces.
This shift was evident during the latest African Lion joint military exercise. The annual event is the largest military exercise on the continent and emphasises combined air, land and sea operations with more than 40 participating nations.
The latest edition, in May, lacked the US-led efforts usually apparent and instead focused on collaboration and cooperation.
What could reduced US involvement mean?
Yet foreign policy analyst Adib Saani warned that a diminished US presence could create a power vacuum, emboldening militant networks and undermining years of counterterrorism efforts.
"If the US withdraws its support, it would hit us hard. It could embolden terrorists to carry out more lethal and audacious attacks, knowing there is no major power backing our fight.
This would also dampen the morale of our soldiers who face these threats daily, and place significant economic pressure on affected countries," he said.
USAFRICOM currently deploys roughly 6,500 personnel across Africa and has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in security assistance. Without that, Saani worries that Africa will not be able to be fully independent in terms of security.
"It will be difficult in terms of logistics and technology — we are simply not there yet.
Security is a shared responsibility and works best when it involves multiple actors. In my opinion, Africa cannot do it alone."
Russia, China step in to fill security vacuum
African countries will need to look for other allies — both new and old, say experts. China has already launched extensive military training programs for African forces, replicating aspects of the US military model, while Russian mercenaries have established themselves as key security partners in North, West and Central Africa.
"China's approach in the past has mainly been economic," Saani explained. The US, he pointed out, has primarily focused on military support, in addition to providing economic help. "The Russians have strong presence with both economic and military involvement. It feels like everyone is competing for attention. The clear message is that there's a need to diversify partnerships. We can't rely solely on the US; we may also need to engage more with the Russians and others.
"
Can Africa succeed alone?
Some voices say the lack of US support could be a wake-up call for African countries, forcing them to consider their own resources and rise to the challenge.
African nations must now take the opportunity to review their security resources, Saani said, and collaborate more closely.
"Building up our defense industry is also critical. This means developing industrial capacity and enhancing the capabilities of our armed forces," he added.
"We also need to tackle corruption to ensure that funds are not getting lost in people's pockets but are instead used to improve people's lives."

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Hindustan Times

17 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

Which lawmakers are backing War Powers Resolution against Trump? Full list

Following American airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, a fresh War Powers resolution has been tabled in the US House. As reported by Newsweek, the bipartisan resolution is backed by Rep. Ro Khanna, a Democrat from California, and Rep. Thomas Massie, a Republican from Kentucky. Their goal: to limit President Donald Trump's authority to engage in war without congressional approval. Over 45 Congress members are backing War Powers Resolution against Donald Trump.(AP) Also read: Iran Israel war news LIVE updates: Khamenei's advisor says US bases used in attacks are 'legitimate targets' The strikes were carried out on June 22 on Iran's Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites. Trump called the attack 'very successful.' However, the move raised alarms across party lines, with some lawmakers questioning its constitutionality and warning of a larger regional conflict. Democrats, Republicans raise constitutional concerns Massie stated, 'The Constitution does not permit the executive branch to unilaterally commit an act of war.' He stressed that Congress alone holds the power to declare war. Khanna, echoing similar views, said, 'Stopping Iran from having a nuclear bomb is a top priority, but dragging the U.S. into another Middle East war is not the solution.' Senator Tim Kaine, a Democrat from Virginia, introduced a companion bill in the Senate, reiterating the need for congressional authority before military escalation. Dozens of House Democrats back the measure The resolution has gained traction with over 45 lawmakers supporting it. Among them are Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Pramila Jayapal, Ilhan Omar, Jamie Raskin, and Bennie Thompson. The list also includes multiple representatives from California, Illinois, Texas and New York. Full List of Members of Congress Backing the War Powers Resolution Representative Ro Khanna, Democrat -California Representative Thomas Massie, Republican- Kentucky Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Democrat -New York Representative Val Hoyle, Democrat- Oregon Representative Rashida Tlaib, Democrat- Michigan Representative Pramila Jayapal, Democrat- Washington Representative Donald Beyer, Democrat- Virginia Representative Lloyd Doggett, Democrat- Texas Representative Greg Casar, Democrat- Texas Representative Ayanna Pressley, Democrat- Massachusetts Representative Delia Ramirez, Democrat- Illinois Representative Summer Lee, Democrat- Pennsylvania Representative Ilhan Omar, Democrat- Minnesota Representative Jesus "Chuy" Garcia, Democrat- Illinois Representative Nydia Velazquez, Democrat- New York Representative James McGovern, a Massachusetts Democrat Representative Chellie Pingree, a Maine Democrat Representative Mark Pocan, a Wisconsin Democrat Representative Veronica Escobar, a Texas Democrat Representative Paul Tonko, a New York Democrat Representative Becca Balint, a Vermont Democrat Representative Bonnie Watson Coleman, a New Jersey Democrat Representative Henry "Hank" Johnson, a Georgia Democrat Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, a Washington, D.C., Democrat Representative Sara Jacobs, a California Democrat Representative Janice Schakowsky, an Illinois Democrat Representative Lateefah Simon, a California Democrat Representative Christopher Deluzio, a Pennsylvania Democrat Representative Gwen Moore, a Wisconsin Democrat Representative Mike Thompson, a California Democrat Representative Yassamin Ansari, an Arizona Democrat Representative Bennie Thompson, a Mississippi Democrat Representative Luis Correa, a California Democrat Representative Betty McCollum, a Minnesota Democrat Representative Marcy Kaptur, an Ohio Democrat Representative Mark DeSaulnier, a California Democrat Representative Stephen Lynch, a Massachusetts Democrat Representative Andre Carson, an Indiana Democrat Representative Mary Gay Scanlon, Democrat- Pennsylvania Representative Joaquin Castro, Democrat- Texas Representative Maxwell Frost, Democrat- Florida Representative Al Green, Democrat- Texas Representative Debbie Dingell, Democrat- Michigan Representative Jamie Raskin, Democrat- Maryland Representative Melanie Stansbury, Democrat- New Mexico Representative Sylvia Garcia, Democrat- Texas Representative Teresa Leger Fernandez, Democrat- New Mexico Representative Diana DeGette, Democrat- Colorado Senator Tim Kaine, Democrat- Virginia With Congress currently out of session, Khanna urged an immediate return to Washington for a vote. Whether the measure advances remains uncertain, given Republican control of both chambers. Iran's foreign minister condemned the U.S. strikes, calling them a 'grave violation' of international law. The country vowed to defend its sovereignty, leaving the possibility of retaliation open. FAQs What is the War Powers Resolution introduced by Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie? It's a House measure that seeks to block President Trump from taking further military action against Iran without congressional approval. How many lawmakers support the resolution? As of now, over 45 members of Congress, including one senator, have publicly supported it. Why did Trump strike Iran's nuclear sites? The US carried out the strikes after Israel warned that Iran was close to developing a nuclear weapon. Trump said the action was successful. Will the resolution succeed? It's uncertain. With Republicans in control of both chambers, the resolution faces major hurdles.

Hindustan Times

27 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

Anti-Trump 'No More War' protests: List of states and cities to host demonstrations

Amid rising tensions following the US military strike on Iran, the 50501 movement and other activist groups are planning "No More War" protests across the country on Sunday. This comes after President Donald Trump's announcement on Saturday evening, when he revealed that the US had attacked Iranian sites in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. The strike marks the first US intervention in the ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel. Anti-Trump 'No More War' protests are being organised nationwide following a US military strike on Iran. (Photo by Alex Kent / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA / Getty Images via AFP)(Getty Images via AFP) Also Read: What are the main US military bases in the Middle East? Iran threatens retaliation after US strikes key nuclear sites The 50501 movement, which advocates for 50 protests across all 50 states, is today mobilizing activists for "No More War" protests. Posts shared by various 50501 factions and other activist groups, including the Answer Coalition, highlight multiple cities and states nationwide where these demonstrations will take place. According to Newsweek, these states and cities include: Asheville, North Carolina Baltimore Cincinnati, Ohio Columbus, Ohio Los Angeles Louisville, Kentucky Manchester, New Hampshire Milwaukee New York City Phoenix Providence, Rhode Island Richmond, Virginia San Marco, Texas Seattle Springfield, Missouri Washington, DC More protests can be announced in other states and cities later in the day. Also Read: Operation Midnight Hammer timeline: Here's how US carried out 18 hour long mission against Iran Another set of anti-Trump protests planned in July Another wave of national anti-Trump protests is set to take place across the U.S. on July 17, organized under the banner Good Trouble Lives On. The demonstrations are inspired by the legacy of civil rights icon Congressman John Lewis. These protests are being planned across the US in various cities such as New York, Washington DC, Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco, with people invited to 'March in Peace, Act in Power." The protests, outlined in their downloadable "Host Toolkit" for organizers, have three main objectives. These goals wish to put an end to 'the extreme crackdown on civil rights by the Trump administration," "the attacks on Black and brown Americans, immigrants, trans people, and other communities," and "the slashing of programs that working people rely on, including Medicaid, SNAP, and Social Security."

Business Standard

28 minutes ago

• Business Standard

US signals willingness to renew talks with Iran, avoid prolonged war

The Trump administration on Sunday signalled a willingness to renew talks with Iran and avoid a prolonged war in the aftermath of a surprise attack on three of the country's nuclear sites as US officials assessed Tehran's nuclear ambitions and the threat of retaliation against American interests. President Donald Trump, who had addressed the nation from the White House on Saturday night, allowed his national security team to speak for him the next morning, staying quiet on social media and scheduling no public appearances. The coordinated messaging by his vice president, Pentagon chief, top military adviser and secretary of state suggested a confidence that any fallout from the attack would be manageable and that Iran's lack of military capabilities would ultimately force it back to the bargaining table. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said at a news conference that America does not seek war with Iran while Vice President JD Vance said the strikes have given Tehran the possibility of returning to negotiate with Washington. Operation Midnight Hammer, involved decoys and deception, and met with no Iranian resistance, according to Hegseth and Air Force Gen Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. This mission was not and has not been about regime change, Hegseth added. Caine said the goal of the operation destroying nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan had been achieved. Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction, Caine said. Vance said in a television interview that while he would not discuss sensitive intelligence about what we've seen on the ground, he felt very confident that we've substantially delayed their development of a nuclear weapon. Pressed further, he told NBC's Meet the Press that I think that we have really pushed their program back by a very long time. I think that it's going to be many many years before the Iranians are able to develop a nuclear weapon. The vice president said the US had negotiated aggressively' with Iran to try to find a peaceful settlement and that Trump made his decision after assessing the Iranians were not acting in good faith. "I actually think it provides an opportunity to reset this relationship, reset these negotiations and get us in a place where Iran can decide not to be a threat to its neighbours, not to a threat to the United States and if they're willing to do that, the United States is all ears, Vance said. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on CBS's Face the Nation that "there are no planned military operations right now against Iran, unless, unless they mess around and they attack" US interests. Trump has previously threatened other countries, but often backed down or failed to follow through, given his promises to his coalition of voters not to entangle the United States in an extended war. It was not immediately clear whether Iran saw the avoidance of a wider conflict as in its best interests. Much of the world is absorbing the consequences of the strikes and the risk that they could lead to more fighting across the Middle East after the US inserted itself into the war between Israel and Iran. Airstrikes starting on June 12 by Israel that targeted Iran's nuclear facilities and generals prompted retaliation from Iran, creating a series of events that contributed to the US attack. While US officials urged for caution and stressed that only nuclear sites were targeted by Washington, Iran criticized the actions as a violation of its sovereignty and international law. Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said Washington was fully responsible for whatever actions Tehran may take in response. They crossed a very big red line by attacking nuclear facilities," he said at a news conference in Turkey. I don't know how much room is left for diplomacy. China and Russia, where Araghchi was heading for talks with President Vladimir Putin, condemned the U.S. military action. The attacks were a gross violation of international law, said Russia's Foreign Ministry, which also advocated returning the situation to a political and diplomatic course. A Turkish Foreign Ministry statement warned about the risk of the conflict spreading to a global level. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the United Kingdom was moving military equipment into the area to protect its interests, people and allies, but that he was focused on finding a solution. The leaders of Italy, Canada, Germany and France agreed on the need a rapid resumption of negotiations. France's Emmanuel Macron held talks with the Saudi crown prince and sultan of Oman. Iran could try to stop oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz, which could create the same kind of inflationary shocks that the world felt after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Oil prices have increased in the financial markets as the war between Israel and Iran had intensified, climbing by 21 per cent over the past month. The Pentagon briefing did not provide any new details about Iran's nuclear capabilities. Hegseth said the timeline for the strikes was the result of a schedule set by Trump for talks with Iran about its nuclear ambitions. Iran found out" that when Trump "says 60 days that he seeks peace and negotiation, he means 60 days of peace and negotiation," Hegseth said. "Otherwise, that nuclear program, that new nuclear capability will not exist. He meant it. That statement was complicated as the White House had suggested last Thursday that Trump could take as much as two weeks to determine whether to strike Iran or continue to pursue negotiations. But the U.S. benefited from Iran's weakened air defences as it was able to conduct the attacks without resistance from Iran. Iran's fighters did not fly, and it appears that Iran's surface to air missile systems did not see us throughout the mission," Caine said. Hegseth said that a choice to move a number of B-2 bombers from their base in Missouri earlier Saturday was meant to be a decoy to throw off Iranians. He added that the US used other methods of deception as well, deploying fighters to protect the B-2 bombers that dropped 14 bunker-buster bombs on Iran's site at Fordo. The strikes occurred Saturday between 6:40 pm and 7:05 pm in Washington, or roughly 2:10 am on Sunday in Iran. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)