CPM seeks release of cadres over clashes with BJP men

1
2
Dindigul: The CPM, led by MPs in Madurai and Dindigul, on Saturday held protests in their respective districts after several party cadres were injured in a clash with BJP and Hindu Munnani members at a street-corner meeting organised by the party on Friday at Thadikombu in Dindigul.
Based on complaints from both parties, police arrested people from both sides and remanded them on Saturday.
The altercation occurred on Friday morning, at one of the meetings organised as part of a statewide public campaign by CPM in Thadikombu to highlight people's demands and criticise Union govt policies. An argument ensued between CPM cadres and BJP-Hindu Munnani members who were nearby over criticism regarding the Murugan devotees conference in Madurai.
The verbal confrontation escalated into a scuffle. Tensions rose again near Dindigul govt medical college hospital where the injured were taken.
Police finally dispersed the crowd and detained several cadres from CPM, BJP, and Hindu Munnani.
CPM state secretary P Shanmugam condemned the arrest of CPM cadres in this connection. "BJP and Hindu Munnani cadres were the ones engaging in violent acts that led to our cadres being hospitalised.
Hindu Munnani members are trying to create a distraction and even going as far as labelling us as extremists. People of Tamil Nadu know who really engages in hate and communal extremism for political gain," he said.
The senior CPM leader demanded immediate release of the arrested cadres and action against all BJP and HM cadres responsible for the assault. In Madurai, MP Su Venkatesan condemned the Murugan devotees conference being held in Madurai saying religious hate politics of the BJP must be rejected.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Hindustan Times

39 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

Tejasvi Surya slams Bengaluru Metro over fare hike, demands release of fare fixation report

BJP MP from Bengaluru South, Tejasvi Surya, has once again turned up the heat on the Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited (BMRCL), demanding that it immediately release the Fare Fixation Committee's (FFC) report, which led to the recent revision in Namma Metro ticket prices. Bengaluru South MP Tejasvi Surya.(PTI) Also Read - Bengaluru bike taxi riders protest outside Vidhana Soudha to lift the ban, detained In a post on social media platform X, Surya questioned BMRCL's lack of transparency, asking why the report had not yet been made public despite repeated calls. He also took a broader swipe at the city's approach to public transport, saying it lacked vision, aesthetics, and respect for the commuter. 'Why are you not making it public? What is it that you want to hide?' the MP asked. 'This isn't a matter of national security. Commuters have the right to know what justified such steep fare hikes.' Surya said he had personally reminded BMRCL's Managing Director on Friday to disclose the committee's findings. The FFC is a statutory body constituted under the Metro Railways (Operations and Maintenance) Act, 2002, responsible for recommending fare structures. Drawing comparisons with international transit systems, Surya cited the Moscow Metro as a model example of urban mobility done right. He praised the Russian capital's metro for its ultra-high frequency (80-second intervals), dense radial connectivity, affordable pricing, and architecturally stunning stations. Also Read - Karnataka man kills wife for excessive watching of Instagram reels: Report 'Public transport isn't just about movement,' he wrote. 'It's about ambition, aesthetics, and respect for the commuter. But this sentiment is missing in Bengaluru.' He urged BMRCL to learn from global best practices and focus not only on operational efficiency but also on commuter experience and affordability. Surya reiterated that public transport in a growing urban centre like Bengaluru should be the cheapest, fastest, and most accessible mode of mobility, not a financial burden on its users. The recent fare revision by BMRCL has faced sharp criticism from regular metro users and urban mobility advocates alike. While the corporation has defended the move citing rising operational costs and expansion efforts, it has yet to explain how the fares were calculated — something the still-unreleased FFC report is expected to clarify.

The Print

an hour ago

• The Print

India's queer politics isn't about Right vs Left. It's a matter of privilege

For queers on the Left, the very idea defies imagination. We love a good Caitlyn Jenner roast and know that Black Republicans exist because we've attempted to enjoy SNL once or twice, but we draw the line at gay Manuvadis. To be fair, the question holds: The white-picket ideals of conservatism don't really align with technicolour queerness. So, why are some queers Right-wing? In a university hostel room somewhere, a newly minted Left-liberal gay kid has just come across the question and can't quite wrap his head around it. How can you be queer and Right-wing? That's the hottest political question among the Indian queer community. It isn't whether you will vote for Narendra Modi or Rahul Gandhi. It is: How can you be queer and vote for the BJP? The answer is arrived at rather quickly: the Left is nothing if not efficient, at least when it comes to wokeness. As with everything else riddled with problems, the p-word is guilty here, too. When you have caste and class privilege, there are few things to strive for than the right to marry. (Clearly, the feminist movement hasn't managed to truly touch the gays.) But the vast majority of India's urban, upper caste queers—those who deign to leave the closet, at least—straddle a happy middle. My ex-best friend, for example, doesn't know his Right from his Left anymore. He grew up loving religion, reading Amish Tripathi books, and placing his hopes for a squeaky-clean India on the BJP. Now, he knows capitalism sucks and industries are killing the earth, but doesn't quite see himself as a Leftist: He's not nearly fond enough of tote bags. A few months ago, a bike-loving lesbian said she'd vote for the BJP because it might just fix the Delhi roads. But when asked about the larger politics behind that vote, she offered a humble 'I guess I stopped caring about what was happening out there.' To her, all parties are equally bad, but at least the BJP seems to be doing something. This batch of gays and lesbians has it all. They're politically promiscuous, religiously vague, and free to boo either side as and when required. Also read: Is there an Indian way to be gay? Most of us learn about queerness from American TV Being queer in a Trump world If Right-wing gays and transpersons are a walking contradiction for those on the Left, the latter are far too militant for those on the Right. They're disillusioned with the Left's infighting, its insistence on making labels and language the battleground, and how it has strict rules for how to be queer. 'I am conservative because I think the Left often goes too far with polarising gender issues. India's conservatism is more realistic than the Left,' said a 22-year-old social media executive who identifies as gay. A Delhi-based gay man who works in his family business thinks that the queer narrative in Indian Left is based on Western ideas. 'The whole pronouns game, where you can identify as anything… There are a lot of other ways we can handle these situations, but we cannot let the Western narrative control the conversation. These things are highly influenced by geopolitics—they've created a business out of it. They don't want to actually do anything,' he said. They're not entirely wrong about the self-righteousness and militancy of the Left. Even I've been known to run for the hills at the first sight of a janeu. But is queerness inherently Left? 'If you treat queerness as not just about who you love or sleep with, but rather as a political project, then obviously queerness leans more Left. And I don't think that queerness can ever align right, given its fundamental belief in equal rights,' said Anish Gawande, a national spokesperson for the NCP. 'Again, Right and Left are such vague terminologies in a Trump world,' he added. Gawande also reminded me that queerness in India is not necessarily a Right/Left issue as it is in the West. Mohan Bhagwat, for instance, has said that queer individuals are human beings. At the Hiroshima G7 summit in 2020, PM Modi talked about having made a new law to secure trans rights. One can see how some queer people might find space for themselves in the Indian Right wing. It remains a single-plank bridge, though. While the Left seeks to connect the queer struggle with that of caste and religious minorities, the Right sees it as a futile effort. 'If your goal is to cross a river and you stand on two boats instead of staying in one boat, do you think you can cross this river? You'll just fall in the middle,' said the Delhi-based businessman. India's queer politics isn't about a red pill vs blue pill divide. It plays out in vastly different ways across regions and for communities within the community. Perhaps the question we should be asking isn't 'How can someone be queer and Right-wing', but 'How can a queer political identity emerge in India?' Or better yet, does it need to? Views are personal. (Edited by Theres Sudeep)

New Indian Express

an hour ago

• New Indian Express

BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Make in India criticism; calls narratives ‘outdated, misinformed'

NEW DELHI: In a sharp rebuttal to Rahul Gandhi's post questioning the success of PM Narendra Modi's 'Make in India' initiative, the BJP on Saturday accused Congress leader of spreading false narratives and undermining the country's growth. Gandhi, in a post on 'X', had cast doubt on the success of the 'Make in India' initiative, stating that PM Modi has 'mastered the art of slogans' rather than providing solutions. Responding to his remarks, BJP leaders, including its national IT head Amit Malviya and others, said that the Congress leader fails to see the transformation as he is too preoccupied with undermining the country's development. In his post, Gandhi claimed that India's manufacturing sector has hit record lows despite the 'Make in India' push, alleging that the country is being reduced to a market for others. Malviya said, 'Rahul Gandhi's narratives are outdated, misinformed, and disconnected from reality. India is building. India is growing. India is leading'. He asserted that India has evolved from being an importer to becoming a global manufacturing powerhouse. Malviya noted that India is now the world's second-largest mobile phone producer, growing from two manufacturing units in 2014 to over 300 units in 2025.