Impact of VAT increase suspension on local government budgets

Parliament's Settlement on VAT Hike: Implications for Municipal Budgets
Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers
Following the scrapping of the planned 0.5% increase in Value-Added Tax (VAT), initially scheduled to come into effect on May 1, 2025, several previously approved municipal budgets have also been set aside, further complicating local government financial planning.
This suspension means that not only is the national budget process delayed, but local government budgets—previously approved and scheduled for implementation—are also temporarily on hold, affecting service delivery and development projects at the municipal level.
The ripple effects underscore the broader economic and administrative uncertainty created by the legal and political developments surrounding the VAT hike.
On April 27, 2025, Parliament entered into an out-of-court settlement concerning the contentious VAT hike and the broader 2025 Fiscal Framework.
The settlement, sanctioned by the Cape High Court, suspends the implementation of VAT increases and sets aside the resolutions adopted by Parliament's two Houses—the National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces—regarding the Fiscal Framework.
This means that the original Appropriation Bill, which details government spending and allocates funds to various departments, has been withdrawn and is no longer before Parliament.
As a result, Parliament said the scheduled budget votes—crucial steps in the legislative process, are currently on hold.
It also stated that municipal budgets, already approved for the current financial year, are being set aside.
What Happens Next?
Parliamentary spokesperson Moloto Mothapo explained that a new Appropriation Bill and revised budget instruments must be drafted and introduced through the upcoming Budget Speech.
Once these are tabled, the legislative Houses must reschedule their review and approval processes.
'A new Appropriation Bill and revised budget instruments will need to be introduced, after which the budget votes will be scheduled afresh by the legislative framework and parliamentary procedures,' Mothapo stated.
He emphasised that the National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces must review and restructure their programs accordingly.
The respective Programme Committees will set new timelines to ensure that all legislative steps are completed efficiently and that the budget is passed within the legally prescribed timeframes, in line with the Money Bills and Related Matters Act, 2009.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

IOL News

2 hours ago

• IOL News

Exploring the 2023/24 funding of South African political parties

Political parties represented in Parliament and the nine provincial legislatures shared more than R3.24 billion in 2023/24, according to lobby group My Vote Counts. Image: Bongani Shilubane / Independent Newspapers Political parties represented in Parliament shared over R3.24 billion in 2023/24 through private funding, allocation from Parliament and provincial legislatures, and the Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC). According to lobby group My Vote Counts (MVC), the ANC received the lion's share of nearly R1.72bn and the DA was allocated about R655 million, while the EFF got over R309m. The list does not include uMkhonto weSizwe Party as it only contested elections for the first time in May last year following its establishment in December 2023. In the 2023/24 financial year, the IEC received disclosure reports from Parliament and all nine provincial legislatures in respect of the funding of represented political parties. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ An amount of about R1.56bn from Parliament and nine provincial legislatures was allocated to 15 represented political parties. The ANC's R1.72bn allocation includes R905m from Parliament and provincial legislatures, R527m through private funding, and R286m from the IEC-administered represented political parties and multi-party democracy funds, according to MVC. The DA received R311m from Parliament and provincial legislatures, R213m through private funding, and R121m from the IEC. The EFF's R309m includes R180m from Parliament and provincial legislatures, R79m from the commission, and R51m in private funding. A few months ago, the National Assembly's Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs voted to double two crucial limits in the Political Funding Act. This means the disclosure threshold and donations cap could be raised from R100,000 to R200,000 and R15m to R30m, respectively. The MVC was among several organisations that objected during the public participation process, after which the committee unanimously voted to adopt a report and resolution recommending the increase. 'In passing the resolution, the committee chose to disregard both relevant empirical considerations and the public interest, in favour of political expediency,' the group accused the committee. It noted that funding through the represented political parties' fund (RPPF), as revealed in Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana's Budget, barely increases over the next few financial years. 'This belies the passion with which parties spoke about the need for more funding during the parliamentary processes... If parties are indeed so desperate for additional funding, why did they accept a Budget that offers them a real-term reduction in public funding?' it asked. The amount allocated to represented parties through the RPPF in 2022/23 was R342m, and R322m is the adjusted appropriation for 2024/25. The R850m for 2023/24 was an anomaly as an additional amount was distributed to parties to allow them to prepare for the 2024 national and provincial elections.

The South African

8 hours ago

• The South African

Tensions grow between SASSA and the National Treasury

SASSA and the National Treasury were at loggerheads this week in Parliament. New SASSA CEO Themba Matlou, who's barely been in the job permanently for two months, had to answer to the Parliament portfolio committee on social development. At the centre of tensions between SASSA and the National Treasury are conditions attached to the R265-billion budget allocation. On one hand, you have the High Court ruling back in January 2025 that said SASSA was being 'deliberately exclusionary.' And now you have the National Treasury wanting to see have SASSA is reviewing, suspending and cancelling grants to keep the budget in check … It's a little farfetched to expect SASSA SRD R370 applicants to have a smartphone and data for monthly verifications. Image: File Unfortunately, this puts the South African Social Security Agency in a highly compromised position. If it doesn't actively exclude grant recipients, the National Treasury will say conditions to its budget allocation are not being met. However, after the High Court ruling earlier this year, civil society is watching closely to see how the agency 'increases grant inclusivity.' As such, SASSA CEO Themba Matlou told the committee this week that its new review process for social grants will comply with the National Treasury's requirements. The first necessity is a quarterly report, due at the end of July, that proves the number of grants reviewed, suspended, cancelled and money saved by the agency. Meanwhile, it's the elderly who suffer and must travel to SASSA offices to have their identity verified. Image: File Key to the agreement between SASSA and the National Treasury is the agency must improve its income, biometric and governmental verification systems. Meanwhile, it's overtly clear that these new digital processes are impacting poor beneficiaries who don't have access to smartphones and data. Nevertheless, when the National Treasury allocated R265 billion budget to SASSA, it had the following provisos. 'SASSA must introduce bank income checks on grants. It must conduct large-scale database checks at least twice a year. It must finalise agreements with SARS and NSFAS to verify beneficiaries' income. And it must intensify biometric checks on suspicious applications,' reports GroundUp . SASSA's first report is due to the National Treasury next month. Image: File As a result, these reviews have already started being implemented. Specifically, Child Support, Old-Age, Disability and Care Dependency grants were flagged for undisclosed income and alternative forms of identification. Instead of the usual three-month review period, affected individuals had their grants withheld until they completed in-person verification at a SASSA office. However, Matlou and SASSA has come under fire over these latest verification policies. And he told Parliament he is aware of the frustration. 'Through beneficiary education, we emphasise that citizens have a responsibility to assist the government to save money. And beneficiaries need to notify SASSA when their financial circumstances have changed,' explained Matlou. Furthermore, the agency says it will start rolling out service kiosks at offices to help clients with remote biometric identity verification. 'The goal is to make biometrics compulsory for all SASSA applicants, whether you are trying to access the social assistance programme with or without identification,' concluded Matlou. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

IOL News

12 hours ago

• IOL News

Will SA bear the cost of Eskom's R257bn air quality compliance?

Cooling towers at an Eskom coal-based power station in Duhva. Image: Mike Hutchings/Reuters SOUTH Africa's electricity crisis is about to get worse, not just because of load shedding, but because of the staggering cost of cleaning up Eskom's toxic air pollution. In a tense engagement with the National Council of Provinces (NCOP) Select Committee on Agriculture, Land Reform and Mineral Resources, Eskom executives dropped a bombshell: full compliance with stricter air quality laws would cost R257 billion in capital expenditure and R6.3bn per year in operational costs — potentially hiking electricity tariffs by 10%. Even more alarming? Without compliance, 22 gigawatts of Eskom's coal fleet — nearly half its capacity — could be forcibly shut down after 2030 due to sulphur dioxide violations. The revelations came as Eskom's chief executive, Dan Marokane, and Deputy Minister of Electricity and Energy, Samantha Graham-Mare, faced tough questions from MPs over the utility's financial constraints, its slow transition to cleaner energy, and the devastating health impacts of coal pollution on communities. Eskom has already spent R3bn on emission reduction projects, with another R15.6bn allocated over the next five years. But this is a drop in the ocean compared to what is needed. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Marokane admitted that while Eskom currently met SO² and nitrogen oxide limits, post-2030 regulations present an existential threat. The utility's proposed 'compromise' solution — focusing on SO² reductions at Kusile and Medupi, along with particulate matter upgrades at six other stations — would still require R77bn in capital and R2.1bn per year in operational costs. But even this plan is in jeopardy. Only R15.6bn has been budgeted for emissions projects over the next five years — far short of what's needed. Perhaps the most damning admission came from Deidre Herbst, Eskom's Senior Manager for Environment, who revealed that retrofitting the aging coal fleet for full compliance could take up to 14 years and more than R257bn — only for many of these plants to be decommissioned shortly afterward. 'Given the time frames, refitting most plants would be imprudent, constituting fruitless and wasteful expenditure,' Herbst said. Several power stations — Matla, Duvha, and Kriel — will shut down before flue-gas desulfurisation (FGD) plants can even be installed. Others, such as Lethabo, Tutuka, Matimba, and Kendal, will close shortly after FGD completion. 'Majuba and Matimba are in sparsely populated areas, limiting the health impact and cost benefit,' Herbst said — an utterance that drew sharp criticism from MPs who accused Eskom of downplaying the health risks to rural communities. MPs did not hold back in their criticism. DA MP Nico Pienaar demanded answers on why R40bn was being spent on diesel generation — money that could instead fund FGD plants. 'What happens if the new FGD plant isn't built and diesel turbines aren't closed, as per the World Bank agreement?' he asked. The DA's Sune Boshoff was even more scathing: 'Gauteng looks terrible when the wind blows. Is Eskom not wasting money on upgrading structures that won't exist much longer?' She slammed the projected 10% tariff hike to fund compliance, asking why alternative technologies and international funding were not being aggressively pursued. The EFF's Moses Kennedy pressed Eskom on whether independent health impact assessments had been conducted near Kendal, Matla, and Duvha stations, where residents suffer from chronic respiratory illnesses. Herbst admitted that while health benefits from cleaner stoves had been studied, power station health assessments were still lacking. Eskom's much-touted Just Energy Transition (JET) also came under fire. The state-owned utility's air quality offset programme — meant to provide cleaner energy alternatives to 96 000 households in Mpumalanga — has reached only 5 500 homes so far. Herbst claimed the rollout would accelerate, but MPs remained sceptical. Meanwhile, Northern Cape representatives Henri van den Berg (FF+) and Patricia Mabilo (ANC) pushed for green hydrogen and ammonia projects, arguing that they could create jobs. Deputy Minister Graham-Mare revealed that the EU had pledged €7bn for energy transition projects, including aviation sector decarbonisation. But with coal-dependent regions such as Mpumalanga facing massive job losses, MPs questioned whether the transition was truly 'just'. Marokane hinted at a controversial solution: nuclear energy. 'Most countries are building nuclear,' he said, suggesting that South Africa's Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) should reconsider its stance. 'Nuclear stimulates economies and industrialisation.' Yet, with Eskom's finances in shambles and R50bn earmarked for new technologies — including a Medupi FGD plant — the feasibility of nuclear expansion remained doubtful. Eskom's dilemma is clear: Spend R257 billion to comply with air quality laws, raising tariffs by 10%. Risk 22 GW of shutdowns if they don't comply, plunging SA into darkness. Face public outrage over health impacts and job losses in coal regions. As Deputy Minister Graham-Mare admitted, 'This is about balancing interests with limited resources.' But for millions of South Africans choking on coal pollution and struggling with soaring electricity costs, that balance feels dangerously skewed. The question remains: Will Eskom clean up its act—or will South Africans pay the price for its failure? Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.