New abnormal

After 4 days of combat ending with a ceasefire on 10 May, India claimed to have created a "New Normal" in relations with Pakistan. In reality, this sets the stage for continued hostility between two nuclear powers; a perpetual state of suspended conflict. Such endless strategic instability under the shadow of nuclear weapons will be dangerously unpredictable since any future escalation could go beyond the nuclear threshold. This in fact is a "New Abnormal" which requires Pakistan to further strengthen its conventional and nuclear deterrence to neutralise future Indian adventurism as it did during the May crisis.
Indian allegations of Pakistan's involvement in the Pahalgam terrorist incident on 22 April were meant to justify its aggression. No evidence has been provided so far and according to their own official sources, the investigation is still ongoing. This reinforces Pakistan's assessment that this incident was an Indian false-flag operation for achieving Prime Minister Modi's internal and external objectives.
Internally, Modi sought to use the crisis for electoral mobilisation in toughly contested forthcoming state elections. A senior India's politician, Yashwant Sinha, has conceded as much in a television interview. The same tactics were used by Modi in February 2019 by staging the Pulwama terrorist incident leading to the clash with Pakistan which ensured a massive electoral victory for him.
Externally, Modi used the visit to India by US Vice President Vance to demonise Pakistan just as India had done in 2000 during President Clinton's visit by conducting the Chattisingpura massacre. The Modi government also wanted to try and derail perceived improvement in Pakistan-US relations following President Donald Trump's appreciation of Pakistan's counter-terrorism cooperation in Afghanistan and the American interest in Pakistan's mineral potential. An added objective was to weaponise water by illegally holding the Indus Water Treaty in abeyance.
However, the Indian plan backfired, diplomatically and militarily. No country, not even Indian allies like the US or Russia or those in QUAD, blamed Pakistan for the Pahalgam attack. The statement adopted by UN Security Council did not either accuse Pakistan or refer to Pahalgam as part of Indian Territory. Moreover, the Indian attack thereafter was not endorsed by any country. Instead, the international community called for a ceasefire and de-escalation. As such, India stood totally isolated.
Militarily, the outcome of the Indian aggression was even worse for Modi. While innocent Pakistani civilians were killed and some mosques were destroyed on 6-7 May, India lost six of its advanced fighter aircraft in the aerial combat. In response to subsequent Indian attacks on military targets, Pakistan carried out its own robust response in which 24 Indian military assets were destroyed or damaged. This compelled India to seek a ceasefire which was first offered by India's own army and air force spokespersons. Eventually, the Americans bailed out India by brokering a ceasefire. President Trump also called for a dialogue to resolve the Kashmir dispute and offered to mediate a solution. This proved to be a further blow for India since Modi's claim about normalcy in Kashmir was exposed along with greater international focus on the dispute as a nuclear flashpoint.
However, since Modi and his media minions had built up a frenzied war hysteria, acceptance of the ceasefire was seen as succumbing to American pressure, leading to a strong backlash against his government. Seeking damage limitation, Modi claimed that the military operation had been "paused" and that he had set a new normal or new red-line according to which India would react militarily against Pakistan in case of any terrorist attack without waiting for proof of Pakistani involvement. As such India claimed the right to act unilaterally, pre-emptively and repeatedly, behaving as judge, jury and executioner. Modi also claimed to have called Pakistan's nuclear bluff by not submitting to "nuclear blackmail". As such, India claimed to create space for military operations below the nuclear threshold.
This Indian attempt to enforce compellence and coercion against a nuclear power is both unrealistic and dangerous. The glaring fact is that Pakistan effectively deterred India through conventional means and at no point was the nuclear option even considered. More to the point, India itself avoided resort to its Cold Start or Dynamic Response doctrine for war under the nuclear threshold. As such, Pakistan did not need to implement its Full Spectrum Deterrence option. Consequently, Pakistan's conventional capabilities proved sufficient for credible deterrence. Moreover, the so-called "New Normal" ended with Indian acceptance of a ceasefire - just as in the crisis of 2001-2002 and 2019 which is not "New" by any measure.
Even objective Indian security analysts have recognised is that while nuclear deterrence prevented outbreak of a full scale war, strategic stability between the two nuclear powers has been undermined. For instance it is claimed that "mere presence of its nuclear arsenal gave Pakistan space for conventional action" and that India "climbed the escalation ladder but lacked an endgame", which "exposed the gap between Modi's bombastic rhetoric and India's strategic calculations". It is also recognised that Modi's new normal is a "hallow" doctrine without any strategic thought behind it and aimed essentially at the domestic audience.
From its perspective, Pakistan ensured that deterrence held at all levels - conventional and nuclear - reinforcing that no space exists for conventional war between nuclear powers. Pakistan also demonstrated the required conventional capability to deter a much larger military threat.
Pakistan now needs to capitalise on these developments. National defence capabilities in both conventional and strategic domains need to be continuously upgraded. In this regard, our partnership with China has proved to be invaluable which requires further enhancement. Similarly, collaboration with allies like Turkey and Azerbaijan must be strengthened. India should be actively projected on a sustained basis as a reckless rogue state that promotes terrorism in Pakistan, has weaponised water and pursues policies that undermine strategic stability, not only between nuclear powers but also other South Asian neighbours.
That is the only way to ensure national security in the future of a "New Abnormal".

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Recorder

3 hours ago

• Business Recorder

Fresh sirens in north Israel warning of Iran missiles: army

OCCUPIED JERUSALEM: Sirens sounded in several areas of northern Israel on Monday, after the army reported a fresh barrage of Iranian missiles, at least the third salvo in less than two hours. 'A short while ago, sirens sounded in several areas in northern Israel following the identification of missiles launched from Iran toward the State of Israel,' a military statement said, adding in another statement about 10 minutes later that people were allowed to leave shelters. Earlier on Monday, sirens wailed across Israel for over 30 minutes as the military warned of multiple missile barrages launched from its arch-foe. 'Search and rescue forces are operating in several locations across the country in which reports of fallen projectiles were received,' the military added. Following the first wave, Israel's Magen David Adom rescue service reported no casualties 'except a number of anxiety cases and people injured while seeking shelter'. 16 hurt, building hit in Israel after Iran missiles: rescue services, TV Israeli media reported an impact in the area of Ashdod in the south. The full extent of the damage in Israel after 11 days of war with Iran is not known due to military censorship rules, but at least 50 impacts have been acknowledged nationwide and 24 people have died, according to official figures. Israel launched large-scale attacks on Iran on June 13 targeting its missile and nuclear facilities, as well as military leaders and security services. Aerial assaults raged between the two foes early Monday, while Tehran vowed retaliation over the bunker-buster bombs American warplanes unleashed at the weekend on three nuclear sites.

Express Tribune

4 hours ago

• Express Tribune

Iranian ambassador accuses US and Israel of sabotage ahead of nuclear talks

Listen to article Iranian Ambassador Reza Amiri Moghaddam on Sunday accused the United States and Israel of sabotaging peace by launching deadly strikes on Iranian territory just two days before scheduled nuclear talks with American representatives. Speaking at a press conference in Islamabad, Amiri said the attacks on June 13 killed Iranian commanders and were a direct attempt to derail a diplomatic meeting planned for June 15. 'The Zionist regime and the United States do not want resolution through diplomacy,' he stated. The ambassador labelled the Israeli government as 'illegitimate' and accused it of acting as a 'US military outpost' in the Middle East. He stressed that Iran is a member of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and operates under the strict oversight of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), unlike Israel. Citing two US intelligence reviews, Amiri reiterated that Iran's nuclear programme is peaceful. 'Our Supreme Leader has clearly stated we are committed to peaceful nuclear development,' he said, adding that the programme exists 'in the minds of our scientists' and cannot be destroyed by missiles. He said Iran will defend itself and has already shown that Israel was unable to intercept Iranian-made missiles. 'When the Zionist regime failed to defend itself, America was brought in,' Amiri claimed, adding that Washington struck Iran again on Sunday morning. Amiri warned the US that 'in war, we will determine where America will feel pain,' while stating that Iran is supported by Muslims around the world. He thanked Pakistan's government, media, scholars, and politicians for their solidarity and support. Amiri also expressed gratitude to the United Nations Security Council members who condemned Israeli aggression alongside Pakistan. He dismissed calls for regime change in Iran, claiming that all American presidents have attempted to interfere in Iranian governance through diplomacy or force. 'The Iranian people will never accept leadership imposed by Israel or the United States,' he said. The ambassador said the city of Isfahan, a densely populated area near Iran's nuclear infrastructure, suffered unspecified damage in recent strikes, while the Fordow nuclear site remained unaffected due to its remote location. He concluded by thanking Pakistan for its 'brave and honourable support,' affirming Iran's continued resistance against foreign aggression and its stance against 'genocidal regimes' in Gaza and beyond.

Business Recorder

5 hours ago

• Business Recorder

Iran's supreme leader asks Putin to do more after US strikes

ISTANBUL/MOSCOW: Iran's supreme leader sent his foreign minister to Moscow on Monday to ask President Vladimir Putin for more help from Russia after the biggest U.S. military action against the Islamic Republic since the 1979 revolution over the weekend. U.S. President Donald Trump and Israel have publicly speculated about killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and about regime change, a step Russia fears could sink the Middle East into the abyss. While Putin has condemned the Israeli strikes, he has yet to comment on the U.S. attacks on Iranian nuclear sites though he last week called for calm and offered Moscow's services as a mediator over the nuclear programme. A senior source told Reuters that Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi was due to deliver a letter from Khamenei to Putin, seeking the latter's support. Iran has not been impressed with Russia's support so far, Iranian sources told Reuters, and the country wants Putin to do more to back it against Israel and the United States. The sources did not elaborate on what assistance Tehran wanted. The Kremlin said that Putin would receive Araqchi but did not say what would be discussed. Araqchi was quoted by the state TASS news agency as saying that Iran and Russia were coordinating their positions on the current escalation in the Middle East. Putin has repeatedly offered to mediate between the United States and Iran, and said that he had conveyed Moscow's ideas on resolving the conflict to them while ensuring Iran's continued access to civil nuclear energy. The Kremlin chief last week refused to discuss the possibility that Israel and the United States would kill Khamenei. Putin said that Israel had given Moscow assurances that Russian specialists helping to build two more reactors at the Bushehr nuclear power plant in Iran would not be hurt in air strikes. Russia, a longstanding ally of Tehran, plays a role in Iran's nuclear negotiations with the West as a veto-wielding UN Security Council member and a signatory to an earlier nuclear deal Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018. Iran weighs retaliation against US for strikes on nuclear sites But Putin, whose army is fighting a major war of attrition in Ukraine for the fourth year, has so far shown little appetite in public for diving into a confrontation with the United States over Iran just as Trump seeks to repair ties with Moscow.