Starmer's trade deal with Trump is an unforgivable betrayal of British farmers

Great showman that he is, Donald Trump casually dropped papers containing the tariff deal on the ground and waited for the Prime Minister to pick them up – or so it appeared. If it was deliberate it was smart. It served to underline to his core voters in US farming states that the president had their backs, and had the Brits scrabbling around for crumbs beneath his table.
The White House statement on the deal unequivocally paints American farmers as the winners: 'The deal includes billions of dollars of increased market access… especially in agriculture, dramatically increasing access for American beef, ethanol, and virtually all of the products produced by our great farmers.'
It is not hard to see who the losers are. The import of 1.4 billion litres of bioethanol annually – spookily the exact size of the UK market – is a direct threat to the UK's two bioethanol plants in Hull and Teesside. There is already talk of closure. It would be surprising if our US competitors, with their lower costs and greater economies of scale, did not ensure that they undercut our producers so that they do fold and we become reliant on US imports for evermore thereafter. So much for Labour's commitment to national fuel security.
The Government has so far avoided publishing impact statements that must surely have been produced before the deal was agreed. The knock-on effect on our agricultural base will be even more serious.
Vivergo Fuels, our largest bioethanol producer, estimates that 1,220 farming jobs are at risk on the 12,000 farms that supply them with wheat. More seriously, many arable farmers are already thinking of giving up. When the subsidy was often the only profit and that has now all but been removed.
And when the reliable bioethanol market for wheat that fails to meet the milling standard, usually for weather related reasons, disappears along with a much needed floor in the wheat price, the risk of carrying on growing cereals will be too great for many. The price of bread may well rise as a result. The option for many farmers would have been to go into beef production instead, but with 13,000 tons of tariff free US beef coming our way that industry also looks shaky.
One can forgive the Government for deciding that the greater good lay in protecting jobs in manufacturing industries and that farmers had to take one for the team. What is unforgivable is leaving our farmers at a huge disadvantage. The unilateral disarmament approach to subsidies had already left our farmers vulnerable to well subsidised overseas competitors.
The imposition of inheritance tax on family farms – but, significantly, not on institutionally owned ones – has then loaded a massive cost onto farmers. Meanwhile only US farmers with assets over $27.22 million (for married couples) need to pay it.
Prime Minister, if you are going to shaft us in trade deals, at least acknowledge it and look at what can be done to compensate through other policies.
Jamie Blackett is a farmer and the author of Red Rag to a Bull and Land of Milk and Honey

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Sky News

23 minutes ago

• Sky News

Former Centrica chief Laidlaw in frame to chair embattled BP

Sam Laidlaw, the former boss of Centrica, is among the candidates being considered as the next chairman of BP, Britain's besieged oil and gas exploration giant. Sky News has learnt that Mr Laidlaw is being considered by BP board members as a potential successor to Helge Lund, who announced in April that he would step down. BP's chair search comes with the £62bn oil major in a state of crisis, as industry predators circle and the pace of its strategic transformation being interrogated by shareholders. Elliott Management, the activist investor, snapped up a multibillion pound stake in BP earlier this year and is pushing its chief executive, Murray Auchincloss, to accelerate spending cuts and ditch a string of renewable energy commitments. Mr Lund's departure will come after nearly a quarter of BP's shareholders opposed his re-election at its annual meeting in April - an unusually large protest given that his intention to step down had already been announced. BP's senior independent director - the Aviva chief executive Amanda Blanc - is said to be moving "at pace" to complete the recruitment process. A number of prominent candidates are understood to be in discussions with headhunters advising BP on the search. Mr Laidlaw would be a logical choice to take the role, having transformed Centrica, the owner of British Gas, during his tenure, which ended in 2014. Since then, he has had a long stint - which recently concluded - on the board of miner Rio Tinto, which has been fending off activist calls to abandon its London listing. He also established, and then sold, Neptune Energy, an oil company which was acquired by Italy's Eni for nearly £4bn in 2023. Last December, Mr Laidlaw was appointed chairman of AWE, the government-owned body which oversees Britain's nuclear weapons capability. He also has strong family connections to BP, with his father, Christopher Laidlaw, having served as its deputy chairman during a long business career. One person close to BP said the younger Mr Laidlaw had been approached about chairing the company during its previous recruitment process but had ruled himself out because of his Neptune Energy role. The status of his engagement with BP's search was unclear on Saturday. Another person said to have been approached is Ken MacKenzie, who recently retired as chairman of the mining giant BHP. Mr MacKenzie headed BHP during a period when Elliott held a stake in the company, and is said to have a good working relationship with the investor. Shares in BP have continued their downward trajectory over the last year, having fallen by nearly a fifth during that period. The company's valuation slump is reported to have drawn renewed interest in a possible takeover bid, with rivals Shell and ExxonMobil among those said to have "run the numbers" in recent months. Reports of such interest have not elicited any formal response, suggesting that any deal is conceptual at this stage. BP is racing to sell assets including Castrol, its lubricants division, which could command a price of about $8bn.

The Guardian

24 minutes ago

• The Guardian

Council approves radical Folkestone development amid fears of legal action

One of the biggest and most radical recent seaside redevelopment projects in the UK has been given the go-ahead by planners in Kent despite opposition from residents. The development at Folkestone harbour was approved by a planning committee this week after a two-hour debate. Initial plans had been turned down five months before, but a revised application for 410 homes and 54 commercial units was finally put through by local councillors by a vote of nine in favour, two against and two abstaining. Speaking on the decision to approve, the councillor Adrian Lockwood acknowledged the scrutiny the plans had come under, but said the council 'cannot block the blocks. These are going to be built.' He added: 'We love the harbour and it's hugely successful. I fear we're going to lose some of the amazing things that have been done down there, but I can't see any material reasons to refuse this application and potentially subject this council to legal action.' The company behind the development, Folkestone Harbour and Seafront Development Company (FHSDC), claimed the construction would generate £21m a year for the local economy and create more than 700 long-term jobs. A spokesperson for FHSDC hailed the approval of the development as a 'once-in-a-generation opportunity to secure real, lasting prosperity' for the town that would unlock 'a transformational set of benefits for Folkestone'. Many in Folkestone, however, are unimpressed with the development, feeling that the units will destroy the natural beauty of the town's coast and beachfront. Mark Hourahane, the vice-chair of the New Folkestone Society – a 'voice for the community' – lamented the decision to approve the development, saying the new buildings would 'permanently and irreversibly change the appearance' of Folkestone's seafront. 'Whilst the New Folkestone Society acknowledges there have been minor tweaks to the 'harbour plan' since it was unveiled in 2023, our survey showed that 91% of 1,350 people who took it were against the plans for the plots around the station. We are deeply disappointed that it has now been approved,' he said. There are also concerns about the financial feasibility of the plans. Luxury flats that have already been built on the seafront have not sold well, and a construction on the site of the former Leas Pavilion was paused in March due to apparent financial issues. Tony Vaughan, the MP for Folkestone and Hythe, expressed reservations about the harbour project, echoing concerns that it would not fit into the town's landscape and would be unaffordable for locals. 'The strength of feeling among many local people about the development has been significant and understandable,' he said. 'I think that people worry about the development's impact on the local heritage and character of the seafront, and feel like a development of this nature is not what Folkestone needs when there is a housing crisis in the local area. Folkestone desperately needs more affordable housing.' Folkestone & Hythe district council has been approached for comment.

BBC News

25 minutes ago

• BBC News

How di security palava Nigeria dey face fit affect food supply and price

As kasala dey increase for Nigeria, especially for northern part of di kontri, wia unknown gunmen, Boko Haram/ISWAP, bandits, herders and farmers dey clash, di place wey dem also sabi for big farming don dey face serious palava. As rainy season dey try reach im peak, farmers dey fear to go farm becos dem no wan risk dia life or make bandits kidnap dem. For recent weeks, kasala wey happun for North east, North west and North central don claim many lives and properties. Dis areas na places wey dey produce plenty food for Nigeria. Recently, Ministry of Agriculture for Nigeria release one internal memo wey tok say make dia staff fast for three days sake of food wahala for di kontri. Dis move show how serious di mata be. For 2024 alone, World Food Program report say kasala, insecurity, inflation and climate wahala go make hunger worse for Nigeria, and say 26.5 million pipo go face serious hunger. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) tok say food inflation rate for October 2024 na 39.16% compared to 31.52% for October 2023. Experts believe say insecurity na one of di major reasons wey cause dis kain inflation. Experts still tok say goment need to do more to fight insurgency or find modern farming ways becos farmers for north dey fear to go farm. How security wahala fit affect food security and price dis year? Secretary of All Farmers Association of Nigeria (AFAN), Dr Yunusa Halidu, tell BBC Pidgin say insecurity na one of di reasons wey dey cause food wahala and food inflation. "Before dis insecurity wahala, many states for north dey farm plenty food, and food dey cheap for market," oga Halidu tok. "If no be for insecurity, Zamfara alone fit feed di whole kontri afta harvest." E believe say na insecurity cause di food inflation wey Nigeria dey face. "Lack of food na one of di reasons why food price rise for recent years, and na insecurity cause am. You know say di more pipo dey need sometin, di more di price go up," e tok. E mention say some northern states dey produce rice, wey Nigerians dey chop well-well, but rice and oda food production don reduce. "States like Borno, Yobe, Katsina, Zamfara, Sokoto and Kebbi sabi farm rice, but sake of insecurity, dem dey produce small rice now." Halidu add say "Na only Jigawa for all di northern states dey farm witout security wahala, sake say bandits no too dey dia." E still tok say if federal goment fit solve insecurity and provide farming support, Nigeria no go get food wahala and food go cheap for evribodi. Wetin be di solution? Dr Angarawai Ijantiku Ignatius wey sabi farming well-well and be Country Representative for International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) for Kano, tell BBC Pidgin say federal goment need to embraced and invest for modern farming. "But no mata di modern innovation, we still need land. But for small scale, we get wetin we dey call homegrown food. Pipo fit use bucket or cement bag put soil and plant yam, pepper or onion for house. E fit feed family of two or three." E tok say anoda modern way na make goment provide community-based place wey farmers fit plant and harvest. "We get new technology wey we dey call community-based farming programme, wia we go give farmers free training on di new method. How dem fit farm and harvest quick and distribute am for community," Dr Ignatius tok. "But for dis one, we need community vigilante to protect farmers." E also tok say dem suppose dey help farmers get fertiliser by using compost, since some places bandits no dey allow dem go outside village. But e still tok say homegrown food na just support, e no fit reach evriwia. On di oda hand, anoda expert wey sabi security mata for Kano, Dr Auwal Abdullahi, tok say Nigerian goment suppose try anoda way to fight insurgency. E tell BBC Pidgin say for over 10 years, goment dey use force fight insurgents, but e suggest say make dem try dialogue. "Make goment understand and work wit security pipo, community and gada intelligence. For farming season, goment need to work wit community and if possible, negotiate wit bandits" im tok. E say dis method work for Birnin Gwari local goment for Kaduna State. Dr Abdullahi also tok say if dem use peaceful method to tok to bandits make dem drop arms and stop banditry, kidnapping and cattle rustling, farmers go fit go farm and e go help Nigeria economy grow.