Twenty dead and dozens injured as suicide bomber targets Syrian church
No group has claimed responsibility for the attack, but the Syrian Interior Ministry identified the perpetrator as a member of the Islamic State group.
At least 20 people have been killed following a suicide bombing inside a packed church in Syria.
Another 53 people are believed to have been wounded after the incident in Dweil'a in the outskirts of Damascus.
It happened as people were praying inside the Mar Elias Church.
No group has claimed responsibility for the attack, but the Syrian Interior Ministry identified the perpetrator as a member of the Islamic State group.
He is said to have entered the church with at least one accomplice and fired at the people there before detonating himself with an explosive vest. Church Bishop Moussa Khoury said the attacker also threw a grenade into the church after forcing his way in during afternoon mass.
Syrian Information Minister Hamza Mostafa condemned the bombing, calling it a terrorist attack.
'This cowardly act goes against the civic values that brings us together,' he said on X (formerly Twitter).
'We will not back down from our commitment to equal citizenship - and we also affirm the state's pledge to exert all its efforts to combat criminal organisations and to protect society from all attacks threatening its safety.'
The Mirror reports one eyewitness said he saw the attacker accompanied by two others, who fled as he was driving near the church.
'He was shooting at the church - he then went inside the church and blew himself up,' he said.
But Meletius Shahati, a priest, said there was a second gunman who shot at the church door before the other person detonated himself.
Security forces and first responders rushed to the church as reports of the attack emerged.
Panicked survivors appeared in shock outside the church in the aftermath, and reporters at the scene witnessed one lady fall to her knees and burst into tears.
A photo shared by Syrian state media meanwhile showed the church's pews covered in debris and blood.
It's the first major terror attack of its kind to take place in Syria since Bashar al-Assad was overthrown by rebels at the end of last year.
Interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa vowed to protect religious minorities upon coming to power, though recent months have seen some outbreaks of sectarian violence as rival groups attempt to assert their place within the new power structure.
In March, over 100 members of the Alawite ethnic group - a minority once favoured by the Assad regime - were killed by militia groups who affiliated themselves with the government.
Armed men stormed across the coastal city of Banias and asked people if they were Alawite before threatening or killing them, Amnesty International said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Syria's Christians ask 'Why us?' after suicide bombing at Damascus church
DAMASCUS, June 23 (Reuters) - Syrian Christians were struggling on Monday to understand why their community was targeted in a suicide attack and whether they can rely on the Islamist-led government's assurances of protection. Syria's health ministry said the toll from Sunday's attack on the Mar Elias Church in the Dweila neighborhood had risen to 25 dead and more than 60 wounded. The interior ministry said the suicide bomber was a member of Islamic State who entered the church, opened fire and detonated an explosive vest. There was no claim of responsibility by the Islamic State group. On Monday, funeral announcements were posted on the door of the church. Members of the security forces stood outside it and other churches. "I wonder why they target us. We had no interest in any of the events that happened in our country. We have no interests besides Syria living in peace," said Bassim Khoury, a Christian resident of Damascus. "We did not carry weapons, we did not stand against anyone. We did not ask for government positions. None of us wants to become president, no one wants to run the government... Why would this happen to this peaceful people?" The attack fed fears among Syria's minorities that their communities are more exposed to attacks and harassment since Islamist-led rebels toppled former leader Bashar al-Assad in December. In March, hundreds of Alawites - the minority from which Assad hails - were killed in Syria's coastal provinces and dozens were kidnapped and killed in Damascus. In May, an armed raid on a Damascus nightclub and the killing of a woman at another venue led some bars to close. Christian residents of Damascus told Reuters that Muslim sheikhs had come to their neighbourhoods in the last six months to urge them to convert to Islam and to stop consuming alcohol. The violence has prompted questions about whether Syria's new rulers have full control over armed elements despite promises by Interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa - formerly a member of Al Qaeda - to rule inclusively for all of the diverse religious and ethnic groups. "We're in a country that must protect everyone," said Jean Bahri, another Christian resident of Damascus. Nibras Youssef, from Dweila, said people has already been on edge over the security situation, in which armed men and boys who said they were official security force members produced no relevant identification papers. "You see a 13-year-old holding a weapon and you cannot say anything to them," said Youssef. Sharaa expressed his condolences, calling Sonday's attack a "criminal bombing that hurt the whole Syrian people". Several Syrian ministers, as well as church leaders and other foreign officials, condemned the attacks. Candlelit vigils and church services were held elsewhere in Syria in solidarity with the parishioners at Mar Elias.
New Statesman
4 hours ago
- New Statesman
Donald Trump has left Keir Starmer stranded
Photo by Suzanne Plunkett-Pool/Getty Images. Reports of Donald Trump's isolationism have been greatly exaggerated. On Thursday night, one Labour MP, Jon Pearce, went as far as to call Trump 'a pacifist'. But while the US president has assumed many guises during his political career, that has never been one of them. Trump's first term saw the US twice launch strikes on Syria, assassinate Iran's General Qasem Soleimani, and drop the 'mother of all bombs' on Islamic State in Afghanistan. Aggressive unilateralism, rather than pure isolationism, has been the hallmark of his foreign policy. The attempted destruction of Iran's nuclear facilities this weekend marks an intensification rather than an abandonment of this approach. For Keir Starmer, Trump's actions have been politically exposing. 'There is nothing the president said that suggests he's about to get involved in this conflict,' Starmer told journalists at last week's G7 summit in Canada. As late as Friday evening, after Trump declared that he would decide whether to bomb Iran 'within the next two weeks', government sources were confident that diplomacy could prevail. David Lammy, along with his French and German counterparts, met the Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, in an attempt to persuade the country to seek a negotiated settlement with the US. Trump's decision to intervene – with the UK notified only shortly before – left Starmer stranded in the middle. Britain, as cabinet ministers were swift to make clear, did not participate in the strikes. Trump made no request to use the joint US-UK airbase in Diego Garcia, a demand that some believe would have left the government in danger of breaching international law (Starmer, let's recall, explicitly opposed the 2003 Iraq War on legal grounds). But though it's not a participant, Britain has been far from a critic. 'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon, and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat,' stated Starmer. This matter-of-fact declaration has seen him outflanked from the left and the right. Kemi Badenoch, who is close to historian Niall Ferguson (a polemical champion of US intervention), declared that 'by targeting Iran's nuclear sites, the US has taken decisive action against a regime that fuels global terror and directly threatens the UK'. Nigel Farage offered a more cautious endorsement: 'Reform UK stands behind the military actions of the USA overnight.' The Greens and Labour left MPs, meanwhile, have condemned the intervention as a breach of international law. The government, by contrast, remains in the realm of ambiguity. A Foreign Office source denies Iranian claims that Lammy 'expressed regret' over the US strikes during a phone call yesterday with his Iranian counterpart, describing this as an 'inaccurate' account. But the most telling exchange came last night between Starmer and Trump. 'They discussed the actions taken by the United States last night to reduce the threat and agreed that Iran must never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon,' a Downing Street spokesperson said. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Once again, it is the neutral, passive tone that stands out. Even at a greater distance from events, Starmer declined the opportunity to offer a positive endorsement of the US intervention. The Prime Minister has every reason to strive for 'de-escalation' in the Middle East. Public opinion is firmly against British intervention, the domestic terror threat is rising, and Iran's parliamentary vote to close the Strait of Hormuz – through which 20 per cent of the world's oil passes – could unleash new economic turmoil. As such, Starmer is walking a precarious tightrope, eschewing both outright support and criticism of the US. But as Trump raises the spectre of 'regime change' – the very opposite of de-escalation – can Starmer keep his balance? This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here [See also: How Donald Trump plunged America into a blind war] Related
Scottish Sun
4 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Notorious Iranian prison is BLITZED as ‘Israel blows up gate to Evin jail in bid to free Ayatollah's fiercest critics'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) TEHRAN'S notorious Evin Prison has been blitzed by an Israeli airstrike, according to officials A drone is thought to have blown up the jail's gates in an apparent effort free the regime's fiercest critics. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 Evin Prison is notorious for holing up political prisoners Credit: Twitter 4 Footage shows a major explosion at its gates, and the IDF announced it had struck Credit: Twitter 4 A dingy workshop inside the walls of Evin Prison Credit: AP The prison is notorious for shackling political prisoners, journalists and even Brits on bogus charges. Isareli PM Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly called for Iran's people to rise up against the regime. Busting out its ardent critics could be an attempt fan the flames of rebellion, by returning anti-Ayatollah activists to the streets. The IDF acknowledged the strike: "Following orders from PM Netanyahu and Defense Minister Katz, the IDF is striking regime and security targets in central Tehran — including the Basij HQ, Evin Prison, the 'Israel destruction clock,' IRGC internal security HQs, and more." Some political prisoners have been banged up in the hellhole for decades. Reports on the horrific conditions have come from those who manage to make it out. Marziyeh Amirizadeh, 43, spent 259 days in Evin, Iran's most notorious prison, where British mother Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe was also held. Here, Marziyeh reveals the horror she endured – and how she rebuilt her life after her release as told to Kate Graham. More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos. Like us on Facebook at TheSunUS and follow us on X at @TheUSSun
