logo
Civil servants rack up £75,000 in expenses giving away Chagos Islands

Civil servants rack up £75,000 in expenses giving away Chagos Islands

Telegraph26-04-2025

Civil servants racked up almost £75,000 in expenses during the negotiations to give away the Chagos Islands, The Telegraph can reveal.
Foreign Office diplomats landed taxpayers with the large bill for travel to and from Mauritius, covering business class flights, hotel stays and taxis.
It comes on top of the estimated £9-£18 billion price that Britain will pay when handing over the strategically important Indian Ocean archipelago.
Critics said that Rachel Reeves's new Office for Value for Money (OVM) should investigate the spending, revealed by The Telegraph under freedom of information laws.
Figures released by the Foreign Office show that a team of just eight negotiators racked up the £75,000 bill.
The bulk of the spending was on 19 flights for officials on British Airways and Air Mauritius, of which 17 were business class.
The team clocked up £68,452 in air fares, with the most expensive being a return flight with BA in December which cost £6,338.
A further £3,458 was spent on hotel stays by the negotiators, at resorts in Mauritius where rooms cost up to £230 per night.
The remainder included £237 on meals, £104 for taxis and rail fares, and £1,444 worth of fees for flight changes and bookings.
The negotiations took place the end of August and in mid-December, when temperatures in the Indian Ocean islands average 27C.
At the same time Britain was battered by seasonal storms while the South of England endured its wettest Autumn in a century, according to the Met Office.
James Cartlidge, the shadow defence secretary, said: 'Taxpayers will be horrified to hear that Labour are wasting so much money in order to negotiate wasting a whole lot more.
' Rachel Reeves's brand new OVM isn't looking at Chagos because, according to the Treasury, treaties are 'outside their remit'.
'That needs to change – wasting tens of thousands of pounds gadding about to waste billions of pounds renting islands we already own is far from value for money.'
The Foreign Office said that all the flights were in line with its 'strict rules' that business class can only be used for journeys longer than 10 hours.
It added that negotiators had only booked hotel rooms when there was not enough space to accommodate them at the High Commissioner's residence.
'In-person negotiations are essential to delivering such a complex agreement that is in the UK's national interests. In order to minimise cost, the negotiating rounds were split between the UK and Mauritius,' the department said in a statement.
The revelation comes after it emerged that Mauritius is demanding even more money from British taxpayers under the deal to hand over Chagos.
Under the controversial agreement thrashed out by Labour, the UK would already pay an estimated £9 billion to £18 billion.
No 10 would relinquish control to Mauritius, which is 1,500 miles from the archipelago and has never previously governed it.
Britain would then take out a 99-year lease on the biggest island, Diego Garcia, which is a key military base used by the US air force.
The deal has proved highly controversial in the UK and US but unexpectedly received the approval of Donald Trump at the start of this month.
Following the US president's sign off, Mauritian negotiators tabled demands for even larger lease payments and a new pot of development funding.
A Foreign Office spokesman said the negotiations in person 'were vital to delivering an agreement that secures the full operation of the base on Diego Garcia', adding: 'The UK Government has robust rules in place to ensure any expenditure is carefully checked and provides value-for-money for the taxpayer...
'As much as possible, the negotiators stayed at the High Commissioner's residence while in Mauritius for the negotiations.
'The agreement is rooted in a rational and hard-headed determination to protect UK security. Once signed it will protect the base on Diego Garcia and cement UK and US presence in the Indo-Pacific for generations to come.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reform can go further in its plan to woo back non-doms
Reform can go further in its plan to woo back non-doms

Spectator

time20 minutes ago

  • Spectator

Reform can go further in its plan to woo back non-doms

We will hear plenty of familiar criticisms of the plan unveiled by Reform yesterday to bring non-doms, as wealthy foreigners who enjoy a special tax regime in the UK are known, back. It will make Britain a magnate for tax dodgers and money launderers. It will increase inequality. And the only jobs it creates will be as servants of the super-rich. In fact, however, the only problem with the Reform plan is that it doesn't go far enough. The party should be a lot more ambitious as it prepares for a potential government. It will certainly be a major change. After a decade over which all the political debate has been about how to impose higher taxes on the rich, Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform, will this week set out plans to bring them back. A new 'Britannia Card' will allow both foreigners and returning expats to pay a flat fee of £250,000, in return for which their worldwide income would be exempt from most UK taxes for 10 years. The money raised would then be distributed in the form of a 'Britannia worker's dividend' to low-paid employees, with a bonus worth an estimated £600 to £1,000 a year. Reform's plan has the potential to change the economic argument There are legitimate criticisms of the Reform plan. It may be complex to implement, and earmarking the income generated for a 'dividend', while politically clever, may prove too fiddly. The tax system needs simplification, not yet more complex allowances. And yet, it has the potential to change the economic argument. It is already clear that the Labour-Tory consensus on driving out the non-doms has been a disaster for the British economy, while the Starmer government's determination to put up taxes on the rich has led to an exodus of wealth and talent. Reform has recognised how damaging that has become, worked out that the UK needs to attract wealth, and recognised that the entrepreneurs and business owners who have left the UK need to be bought back. Indeed, extending the tax break to returning British nationals may well prove the most significant part of the package. But Reform could afford to go even further with their plan. The £250,000 flat fee may well need to come down if the UK is to compete with similar deals available in Italy and Greece or the zero taxes levied in Dubai and the Caribbean. A much lower annual threshold may well generate more revenue overall. And it should extend the offer to foreign entrepreneurs, with a far lower rate of Capital Gains Tax to start-ups who want to move from their high-tax bases in Paris, Stockholm or Madrid to a far more lightly taxed London, Cambridge or Bristol. The important point, however, is this. As the non-doms and the wealthy flee the Chancellor's Rachel Reeves's increasingly punitive tax regime, she will now have to defend her decisions against a very clear alternative. As the disaster of taxing success becomes clear, that will become harder and harder – and Reform's alternative will look a lot more attractive.

Air India flight from Birmingham forced to divert over 'bomb threat on board'
Air India flight from Birmingham forced to divert over 'bomb threat on board'

Daily Mirror

time23 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Air India flight from Birmingham forced to divert over 'bomb threat on board'

A Delhi-bound Air India flight - the same carrier that suffered a devastating fatal crash earlier this month - was forced to land in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in response to a bomb threat An Air India flight has been forced to divert over a bomb threat on board. The plane was due to fly to Delhi after leaving Birmingham Airport on Saturday, but was forced to divert mid-flight to Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia. Officials took immediate action to make sure the passengers and crew on board were safe, with Air India saying the plane landed safely in Riyadh, where all necessary security checks were performed, according to the Times of India. A spokesperson for the airline said: "Flight AI114 from Birmingham to Delhi on June 21 received a bomb threat and was consequently diverted to Riyadh, where where it landed safely and completed security checks." It follows an Air India plane disaster when a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner crashed after taking off from Ahmedabad airport on June 12. A staggering 52 British nationals died when the London-bound Boeing Dreamliner plane smashed into the city of Ahmedabad earlier in June, making it the most deadly aviation disaster involving people from the UK since 9/11. The crash, which unfolded less than a minute after take-off, is so far believed to have claimed 270 lives, including 30 people on the ground. But as they try and come to terms with their loss, many grieving families have still not been able to see the bodies of their loved ones. Back in the UK, some have called on the Government to do more. After questions mounted over why British consular staff had not been dispatched to local hospitals, Foreign Office minister Hamish Falconer told the Commons that the Foreign Office had set up its reception centre at a hotel close to the airport "because we thought that would be the best place to receive British nationals", rather than the hospital itself "where, tragically, there are no living British nationals". The pilot of the doomed flight has been praised for 'saving dozens of lives' with his final decision seconds before his plane crashed. But India Air pilot Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, who died in the impact, has now been described as a 'hero' for diverting his plane into a patch of grassland and avoiding a direct hit on the doctors' hostel, saving countless lives. He sent a mayday message to air control less than a minute after the plane took off from Ahmedabad airport, with the aircraft reaching a height of 650ft before beginning a rapid descent. As well as being a pilot, the 55-year-old from Mumbai was also the primary carer for his elderly father, Pushkaraj, who was once an officer with India's Ministry of Civil Aviation.

Foreign Office updates Turkey travel advice for tourists
Foreign Office updates Turkey travel advice for tourists

Daily Record

time23 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Foreign Office updates Turkey travel advice for tourists

The government agency has issued fresh advice for the country. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) has given an update for travel to Turkey. The country is a popular choice for Brits looking for sunshine with more than four million visitors from the UK last year. Tourists have long been attracted to its vibrant cities like Antalya and Istanbul, but the Foreign Office has now issued fresh advice for some British nationals about entering the country. The advice is for Brits who want to enter Turkey from Iran. ‌ On Friday, June 20, it issued an alert about Turkey, which reads: "If you are a British national wanting to cross the land border from Iran into Turkey, you will need to request facilitation from the British Embassy in Ankara by contacting the FCDO before travelling to the border, indicating whether you are contacting from Iran or from the UK on behalf of a relative. ‌ "You will need to provide personal details (name, date of birth, details of travel document used to enter Turkey). This is required by the Turkish authorities. "The usual entry requirements will apply, including that British nationals can enter without a visa for up to 90 days in any 180-day period. If you intend to leave Iran overland, you do so at your own risk. "In Iran, holding a British passport or having perceived connections to the UK can be reason enough for the Iranian authorities to detain you." Elsewhere, government guidance explains that "if you are affected by a crisis abroad [you should] call the FCDO on (+44) (0)207 008 5000," reports Coventry Live. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) provides travel guidance to help British nationals make informed decisions about foreign travel, with a focus on their safety and security. It offers information on potential risks and advice on how to stay safe while abroad. It is responsible for regularly updating its advice. ‌ Brits have been warned previously of passport requirements for the country. To enter Turkey, you must ensureensure your passport has an 'expiry date' of at least 150 days beyond your arrival date and includes at least one blank page for visa stamps. If your travel document is substandard or you try to enter with a passport reported as lost or stolen, you'll be denied entry at the border. ‌ In March tourists were issued advice from the FCDO regarding ongoing protests and demos in the country. They warned that "demonstrations may become violent. The police response has included use of tear gas and water cannons." Recent tensions in the region, sparked by events in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories, have led to significant protests outside diplomatic missions associated with the conflict, especially Israeli diplomatic missions in Ankara and Istanbul, as reported by the Liverpool Echo. The FCDO strongly urges all UK tourists in Turkey to "avoid all demonstrations and leave the area if one develops. Local transport routes may be disrupted." Additionally, the government body cautions: " FCDO advises against all travel within 10km of the Turkey-Syria border." This advice is still in place due to ongoing conflict in Syria.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store