Sunday book pick: In ‘Small Boat', no one is at fault when 27 migrants drown in international waters
'I had no more opinion on the migrants than I did on migration policy or the right to asylum, relations between North and South, problems, solutions, the woes of the world, injustice: I was not required to have an opinion on the migrants.'
The troubles of the unnamed narrator in Small Boat begin when, in November 2021, after receiving distress calls from migrants sinking in the sea, she tells them that help is on the way. To her colleague, off the microphone, she says, 'You will not be saved.' Some four hours later, with help yet to arrive, she signs off the small boat as 'rescued'. Of the 29 migrants onboard, only two survive. The remaining 27, including a young girl, sink to the bottom of the sea, making this 'accident' the worst of its kind since the Channel opened in 2018 for the passage of migrants from France to England.
Unlike the rest of us, for whom France is an idyll, a romantic getaway, the migrants, 'under no circumstances, barring catastrophe', would like to be returned to France. In fact, things have been so bad for them there that they are willing to risk it all to be shipped off to England, also famously racist and coloniser par excellence. These migrants who have turned up from Iraq, Sudan, Syria, and everywhere else are fleeing war and poverty. In the end, like the final act of a cruel joke, the water currents drag their bodies back to the French waters. If only they had the decency to remain in the English jurisdiction, then the narrator wouldn't have been answerable for this mess.
Drowned without noticing
A first respondent at the Coast Guard's office in France, she's been rounded up by the police for negligence. It's not the police's moral duty, but because the call is on record, they are compelled to take action. The recordings are played on loop and scrutinised for an unpardonable slip-up, a monstrous mistake on her part. But, she did as she was taught – she took their calls, recorded their geolocation, and assured them of help without true sincerity. She acted perfectly in accordance with her role and, barring the quip with her colleagues, did not overstep her boundaries in her interactions with the sinking migrants. However, as the 'last link' in the chain, it is easiest to pin the blame on her.
Still, she's not without heart. She watches thousands of migrants cross the Channel every day – to what future, she doesn't know. The man who was on the phone with her on the fateful day wanted nothing more than to arrive safely and perhaps work at a supermarket in England. Of course, she did not know that. These migrants 'were sunk long before they sank, they were washed up well before they drowned.'
The second part of the novel – short and harrowing – is told from the perspective of those onboard. It feels strange to call them 'passengers' as though they were taking a recreational ride on a lovely sea. The cold sea lashes against these ill-protected migrants – what good are lifejackets and tubes in such choppy waters anyway – and the 'icy hands' of companions start to float apart. Delecroix's sober lines on these final moments sent a shiver down my spine: 'In spite of the life jacket, each person's head tipped over to one side, water silently entering their mouths, their noses, as they drowned, without even noticing.'
The narrator reminds the police that she neither wishes good nor ill on these migrants, she repeats that she has no opinion on their status. She has enough worries of her own and the state of the world doesn't bother her any more as it does anyone else in her country. However, on her part, she would like to make it clear that she doesn't want these migrants to 'leave' either. She might be accused of 'moral insensivity, lack of empathy, and dehumanisation', but her neutral stand towards these refugees, in some ways, makes her appear more empathetic than those who have outright washed their hands off all responsibility.
Who's to blame?
In the final segment, we learn that the narrator has been suspended from her job. She lives by the sea and looks out at it in disbelief and wonder. It is by chance that the luckiest of us find ourselves on land – all of Earth is water and the land pushes back the sea every minute of every day to prevent being swallowed whole. She had come to love the sea but now she realises the sea is not something to love, but to be revered and be scared of. Her philosophical musings are punctuated by her anguish – she, too, feels wronged. Not just for being caught but because she is also at sea herself, and has been for a long time. Her husband has left and she's raising their daughter all alone. In a moment of anger, she lashes out at everyone else in the world who is enjoying the 'drama at sea' from the comfort of their homes. The judgment and condemnation are quick to arrive, but no one jumps into the water to help when the small boats are tossed into the sea.
A few days ago, I watched French filmmaker Alain Resnais's 1956 documentary Night and Fog (Nuit et Brouillard) about the atrocities behind the walls of Hitler's concentration camps. When the war was over and the Nazis were being tried for their crimes, the Kapo, the SS, the officers all said, 'I'm not responsible.' And yet, millions were being murdered while the wives of the Nazi men kept clean homes and their children went to school. The narrator of the films asks, 'Who among us keeps watch from this strange watchtower to warn of the arrival of new executioners. Are their faces really so different from ours?' In a similar vein, Delecroix's narrator says, 'What she called absentmindedness seemed to me so remarkable, so common, and so universal – indeed the basis of everyday life – that one could only conclude that all of us are monsters, that is to say, none of us is.'
As the boat carrying the migrants was sinking in the sea, each one of us was exactly where we were supposed to be – the narrator in her cubicle watching the disaster happen, the politicians sharpening their anti-immigrant rhetoric, and the rest of us watching it on our screens and crossing our hearts.
Was I responsible? No.
Were you? No.
Then who was?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"Our Turn To Act Without Delay": Iran's Warning After US Bombs Nuclear Sites
New Delhi: Hours after the United States joined Israel's war against Iran by bombing Tehran's three key nuclear sites, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned of retaliation "without delay". LIVE UPDATES Hossein Shariatmadari, Khamenei's representative, told an Iranian media that as a first step, they will launch a missile attack on the US naval fleet in Bahrain and close the Strait of Hormuz. "It is now our turn to act without delay. As a first step, we must launch a missile strike on the US naval fleet in Bahrain and simultaneously close the Strait of Hormuz to American, British, German, and French ships," Shariatmadari said as quoted by Iran International. Iran has previously, on multiple occasions, threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz but never followed through. The Strait of Hormuz lies between Oman and Iran and links the Gulf north of it with the Gulf of Oman to the south and the Arabian Sea beyond. About a fifth of the world's total oil consumption passes through the strait. OPEC members Saudi Arabia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and Iraq export most of their crude via the strait, mainly to Asia. The US Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain, is tasked with protecting commercial shipping in the area. US responds to Strait of Hormuz closure threat Former Pentagon official Michael Rubin warned Iran that it would "suffer the most" if it tried to close the Strait of Hormuz, adding that it might cause short-term disruptions in the oil supply to several countries and to some degree in India. According to him, if Tehran shuts the narrow waterway, it would be "committing suicide". "40 per cent of the fuel that goes through the Strait of Hormuz ends up in Asia, most of that in China, but also to some degree in India, and so there might be a short disruption. However, there is an ability to have an alternate supply. The United States is a major supplier right now. Also, remember that Iran needs to import gasoline. So the Iranians might rhetorically talk about closing the Strait of Hormuz, but militarily, they cannot do that for more than a day," he told news agency ANI. Ex-US Treasury Department official, Jonathan Schanzer, also warned that the US will respond with "unbelievable force" if Iran attempts to close the Strait of Hormuz. "Any attempt to close the Strait of Hormuz right now will be met with probably unbelievable force from the United States. Now that this has started, it's not that difficult to imagine the French or the Brits coming in to clear the lanes. I see the Iranians as being absolutely suicidal if they go down this route, and I do get a sense that we could be at a pivotal moment. It doesn't mean that Iran won't try to attack, but I think asymmetrically is much more likely than through conventional means," Schanzer said. The US on Sunday bombed Tehran's three key nuclear sites - Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan - in a first-ever direct US military involvement in the conflict. It came days after US President Donald Trump said he would take as long as two weeks to decide whether the US should enter the conflict on Israel's side. One of the Iranian nuclear sites, Fordow, was Iran's most secretive and heavily protected nuclear facility, which only the US had the firepower to destroy. According to Trump, the American planes "completed a very successful attack". In retaliation, Tehran launched new strikes on Israel. In a post on X, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said that "sirens were sounding across Israel due to another Iranian missile launch".
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Iran- Israel War: Khamenei's close aide calls for missile strike on US naval fleet: ‘Now our turn to act'
Iran-Israel War: Hossein Shariatmadari, the Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's representative, has reportedly called for immediate retaliation following the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Shariatmadari's statement comes hours after US B-2 bombers struck three nuclear facilities in Iran. Shariatmadari, the managing editor of Kayhan and also known to be Ali Khamenei's close confidante, has said that Iran should launch a missile strike on the US naval fleet in Bahrain and close the Strait of Hormuz to American, British, German, and French ships. 'It is now our turn to act without delay. As a first step, we must launch missile strike on the US naval fleet in Bahrain and simultaneously close the strait of Hormuz to American, British, German, and French ships,,' Shariatmadari was quoted as saying in Kayhan newspaper. The Strait of Hormuz is a strait between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. It provides the only sea passage from the Persian Gulf to the open ocean and is one of the world's most strategically important choke points President Donald Trump announced on Saturday night that the United States has entered Israel's war against Iran by bombing three nuclear sites of the Islamic Republic in the second week of the conflict. Speaking from the White House on Saturday night (US time), President Trump dubbed Iran as "the bully of the Middle East" and warned that the Islamic country "must now make peace." Trump's statement came after the US attacked three Iranian nuclear sites — Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow — further escalating the ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel.
New Indian Express
3 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Amit Shah's remarks on use of English language just his opinion, says Palaniswami
COIMBATORE: After Union Home Minister Amit Shah said a time will come soon when those speaking English in the country would 'feel ashamed', AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K Palaniswami said that was just Shah's opinion. 'His remarks were on the basis that people are giving importance to English instead of their mother tongue, and that mother tongue is important for each of them,' Palaniswami said. Addressing media persons at the Coimbatore International Airport on Saturday, he said, 'The people of Tamil Nadu will punish the DMK in the 2026 Assembly election. We have already condemned the DMK minister and DMK functionaries for their abusive speech. DMK functionaries have a habit of spreading abusive messages during public meetings, and on their social media handles,' said Palaniswmi. Further, he said former minister and AIADMK deputy propaganda secretary K Pandirajan had clearly explained about what the AIADMK government did about the Keezhadi excavation when J Jayalalithaa was the chief minister, and after her death. Palaniswami also extended his greetings to Hindu Munnani, organisers of the Lord Murugan conference at Madurai. 'It is a democratic right for an organisation to worship gods that are dear to them, and based on that right, an organisation is holding a religious conference.' Speaking about International Yoga Day, he said 'Yoga is important for physical and mental wellbeing, and I thank Prime Minister Narendra Modi for organising the event.'
