50 years later: how the World Cup launched cricket into mainstream consciousness
Just mention World Cup and instantaneously football chimes into memory. It is an organic mental reflex, as this quadrennial championship is perhaps the biggest draw in sport and on a par with the Olympics. But, equally, in those countries that were a part of the British Empire of the past, World Cup also means the one linked with cricket.
And today (June 21) marks a special moment in the cricket World Cup's journey, as exactly 50 years ago, the West Indies won the inaugural trophy after defeating Australia by 17 runs at Lord's. Much water has flowed down the Thames since then while the willow game's premier tournament continues to evolve.
Diverse notes
Cricket as a whole has found its diverse notes in the permanence of Tests, fluidity of ODIs and hyper-kinetic blitz of T20Is. Still, the conventional World Cup consisting of ODIs has maintained its unique appeal over five decades.
Back in 1975, Clive Lloyd's men, all muscle and mayhem, were the rockstars. It almost seemed pre-ordained that the stars from the Caribbean would seize the title. The same tournament, in the initial stages, also revealed a tentative approach from some teams.
The first World Cup fixture, which pitted host England against India, witnessed Sunil Gavaskar remaining unbeaten on 36 from 174 balls. It was just that the classical Test opener got trapped in his shell. Years later, in a 1987 World Cup match at Nagpur, Gavaskar hammered an unbeaten 103 off a mere 88 deliveries against a stunned New Zealand. It was the Little Master's life coming full circle in ODIs.
In the 1975 edition, cricket witnessed one of its greatest superstars make his presence felt. More than his batting, it was Vivian Richards the fielder who soared with his panache. He effected three run-outs in the final as the Aussies lost their breath. As the years rolled by, Richards, powerful shots and steely gaze, proved why he would always be seen as one of the greatest ever batters.
The all-rounder element was also reiterated by him, as his off-spin was a handy option within a team that often relied on its speed merchants. The West Indies made it two-in-a-row by claiming the title in 1979, Richards pulverising the England attack with his unbeaten 138.
Test matches, as a consequence of their five-day structure, often expose flaws and widen the gap between teams. ODIs, in contrast, shrink those spaces and allow even a David to dream about tripping a Goliath. Bowlers having a fixed number of overs often means batters are never subjected to the scrutiny that happens in a Test.
Tipping point
The tipping point was 1983, when Kapil's Devils turned the world upside down with their ecstatic victory over Lloyd's men in the summit clash at Lord's. A paltry 183 was defended, Kapil plucked an incredible catch to dismiss Richards, and for many, Balwinder Singh Sandhu castling Gordon Greenidge, while the opener shouldered arms, remains a nostalgic highlight.
It was also a championship which featured one of the greatest ODI knocks, an innings that has acquired a mythical allure. Kapil's 175 not out against Zimbabwe, and this after his team was reduced to 17 for five, has been resigned to being embalmed in a few newspaper pictures because the BBC crew inexplicably never covered this game!
When Kapil held aloft the World Cup at Lord's, it also launched a change in the power structure of cricket. It galvanised a new audience, expanded the market and soon commercial heft was vested in India, and to this day it remains that way. But beyond the financial pulls and pressures, Kapil's team stressed the value of quality all-rounders, and it is these players who gave him multiple winning options through the tournament.
Historically, the World Cup has added layers to cricket and the way we interpret it. In the 1987 edition in India and Pakistan, Allan Border used the championship as a crucible to forge a strong Aussie unit. He held the cup at Eden Gardens, and it marked a decisive shift in Australia's fortunes which remain in the ascendant even today.
Dean Jones propagated this adrenaline-thumping mix of frenetic batting, sharp fielding and some acerbic words at the opposition. It was a template that many players, including Virat Kohli, have adopted.
Cut to the 1992 World Cup in Australia and New Zealand, and cricket found another dimension. New Zealand captain Martin Crowe promoted the concept of the pinch-hitter atop the order, through Mark Greatbatch, and was equally adept at slowing down things by employing spinner Dipak Patel when the opposition stepped out to bat.
It was a championship which Imran Khan wrested for Pakistan even as he talked up young Inzamam-ul-Haq as the next great batter. The 1992 edition also had an aesthetic twist. The players donned coloured clothing. By this time, the World Cup was also seen as this springboard for teams, perceived as the lesser ones, to stun the critics.
And 1996 was Sri Lanka's turn, as Arjuna Ranatunga's men upset the Aussies in the final at Lahore. In Aravinda de Silva, Sanath Jayasuriya and Muttiah Muralitharan, Ranatunga had three aces who could outwit any rival.
The Big Three forms
The next three championships (1999, 2003 and 2007) belonged to Australia, as Steve Waugh first and Ricky Ponting twice held the cup. Mathew Hayden, Adam Gilchrist and Glenn McGrath proved their mettle, and the Aussie conveyor belt brooked no opposition.
The tide turned when India won the 2011 edition at home, with Captain Cool M.S. Dhoni lending his finishing touch even if it was Yuvraj Singh who set the entire base for India's bull run in that event. That Sachin Tendulkar, who first turned out for India in 1989, rates this triumph as the finest in his career is an indicator of how relevant the World Cup still is, both for emotional recall and as a behemoth among sporting brands.
As the years went past, with the exception of England in 2019, it was normal service all over again, as Australia prevailed in 2015 and 2023, with the last being a heart-break for Rohit Sharma and Company at Ahmedabad. Through its continuing journey, the World Cup holds infinite value among players and followers. It is a truism that cannot be denied even in this age of the Indian Premier League and other T20 indulgences. It also throws up fresh heroes like Ben Stokes and Travis Head, to name a few.
That a Kohli and a Rohit are perhaps stretching their ODI careers towards a hopeful swansong in the 2027 edition is further validation of the magnetic appeal of the World Cup. Even Javed Miandad dragged his career on until a tragic run-out in the 1996 World Cup quarterfinal against India in Bengaluru ended it.
While bilateral ODIs and T20Is shrink and cricket veers towards franchise T20 leagues, the World Cup will remain this vital destination that determines a player's halo. And gratitude is owed to Lloyd's champions — those buccaneering men, elastic on the field and forever enduring in their appeal.
That a Kohli and a Rohit are perhaps stretching their ODI careers towards a hopeful swansong in the 2027 edition is further validation of the magnetic appeal of the World Cup.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
41 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Stroke of genius: Kunal Pradhan on tennis's Lorenzo Musetti and the beauty of the backhand
Lorenzo Musetti, 23, of Tuscany, Italy, lasted three-and-a-half sets against Carlos Alcaraz in the semi-final of the French Open, before pulling up with cramps. Musetti plays against Carlos Alcaraz at this year's French Open. (Reuters) For about 120 of the 145 minutes they spent on court, Musetti gave the champion a run for his money. It was perhaps inevitable that the Italian would lose; he hadn't beaten the Spaniard in any of their last five meetings. Still, this was more than just another semi-final loss in the annual cycle of Grand Slam tournaments. For many, it was personal. Musetti, ranked No. 7, is the best single-handed backhand player in the world today. The leader of a dying breed of men and women who have been sidelined by sports science — the one-handed backhand return is deemed too weak, with the evolution of carbon-fibre racquets, nylon strings and vibration dampeners that offer greater power and control — but who still press on with it. Grigor Dimitrov and Stefanos Tsitsipas are the others in the top 30 who have a single-handed backhand. But only eight men in the top 100 employ the most elegant stroke in tennis . On the women's tour, there are none in the top 70, and only three in the top 100. These are the impractical, romantic madcaps who persevere no matter how many coaches and pundits tell them to switch. For them, there is pride in playing the shot. The fluid arc as the single-handed backhand falls into a slice or rises into a topspin for a flourishing follow-through is the kind of poetry in motion nothing else in tennis can ever be. These are professional players who want to win, but this is a stroke that defines their love of the game — a nod, if you will, to Don Budge, Ken Rosewall, Rod Laver, John McEnroe, Martina Navratilova, Steffi Graf, Stefan Edberg, Pete Sampras, Justine Henin and Roger Federer — and without it, there would be no point at all. Poetry in motion: Stefanos Tsitsipas at the French Open in 2021. (Getty Images) Talking about a revolution The problem with the single-handed backhand, Navratilova said in 2016, is that it practically takes a genius to hit one. Navratilova, who won 18 Grand Slam singles titles, used a single-handed backhand — not the most elegant avatar of the stroke, but an efficient mix of slices and top spins that set up one of the most aggressive serve-and-volley games in history. What Navratilova said nine years ago is particularly important since she had a view from across the net of what would turn out to be perhaps the most important innovation in sport since Dick Fosbury's flop in the 1968 Mexico Olympics changed the high-jump forever. Here's a short summary of what happened. In 1954, Chris Evert, Navratilova's great rival, was born into a tennis family in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Her father, Jimmy Evert, was a professional coach. Chris was five when she first stepped on court, and when Jimmy realised she couldn't generate enough power on her backhand side, he encouraged her to try using both hands — a temporary retrieval plan for a young girl, borrowed from the Australians Vivian McGrath and John Bromwich, who used it in the 1930s. Chris found that the stroke worked perfectly. The repeat motion, with a use of the stronger right hand for support, was a bit like hitting a forehand from the other side. So what if it compromised on reach; she could compensate for that with greater fitness. And so what if it didn't look that great; it got the job done. When Evert started climbing the ranks — as a 14-year-old who made the semi-final of a senior event, a 15-year-old who defeated World No. 1 Margaret Court, a 16-year-old invited to the US Open, and a 19-year-old double Grand Slam champion — the world started to take note of this odd double-handed system that relied on supreme fitness and hanging back at the baseline to offer greater consistency and power. Over the next decade, while Evert and Navratilova were locked in a battle of philosophies in women's tennis, it helped the double-handed cause that Jimmy Connors burst on the men's side with a similar stroke that was encouraged by his mother Gloria Connors. And it helped that Bjorn Borg emerged with an even stranger double-handed style that had a straighter backswing, inspired by his early days as a hockey player. And so, the revolution — albeit not a pretty one — was being televised. A parting shot It took a couple of decades from the Evert-Connors era for the balance to shift. Great champions such as Sampras and Federer on the men's side and Graf and Henin on the women's side concealed the fact that change was truly upon us, until we woke up one morning in today's sports-tech-ruled world. A world in which Musetti, Dimitrov and Tsitsipas, with zero Grand Slam titles between them, are the last samurais fighting for a stroke in danger of being lost in time. A stroke that, as Navratilova said, now requires a genius to play it. But therein lies the hope that it's not all over; that someone will rise to not just celebrate the shot but also triumph with it. For what is sport without a dash of genius?
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
NBA powerhouse Kevin Durant buys minority stake in 2025 Champions League-winning club Paris Saint-Germain
NBA powerhouse Kevin Durant, who plays for the Phoenix Suns, has bought a minority stake in the 2025 Champions League-winning club Paris Saint-Germain (PSG). The Ligue 1 club confirmed the development through a social media post. Qatar Sports Investment, which is the majority shareholder of PSG, have signed an investment and strategic partnership agreement with Kevin Durant. Kevin Durant has bought a minority stake in Ligue 1 club Paris Saint-Germain. (AP) However, the financial terms of the deal have not been put in the public domain. 'Kevin Durant, NBA superstar and global entrepreneur through Boardroom Sports Holdings, is investing in Paris Saint-Germain in partnership with Qatar Sports Investments. This strategic collaboration spans commercial ventures, investment opportunities, and content production initiatives,' Paris Saint-Germain said in a social media post. Kevin Durant happens to be a two-time NBA champion and one of the league's most talked-about shot makers. Durant is also the first four-time men's gold medallist in Olympic basketball history. He achieved the feat when the US took gold at last year's Paris Olympics. Speaking about buying a stake in PSG, Kevin Durant said in an official statement, 'It is an honour to partner with QSI and be a shareholder in Paris Saint-Germain—a club and city that is deeply close to my heart.' 'This club has big plans and I look forward to being part of the next phase of growth and exploring new investment opportunities with QSI,' he added. This is not the first time that Kevin Durant has made a sporting investment. In 2020, he acquired a five per cent stake in the Major League Soccer club Philadelphia Union. "Together with Kevin, we look forward to developing ambitious initiatives that will drive the continued global growth of Paris Saint-Germain and QSI," PSG president Nasser Al Khelaïfi said in an official release. According to ESPN, as a part of this deal, Durant's personal investment vehicle - Boardroom Sports Holdings and QSI will collaborate on a wide range of commercial, investment and content production initiatives.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
After a 26-year ban, South Korean clubs will be allowed to sign foreign goalkeepers
In 1999, three years before the country co-hosted the World Cup, South Korea banned its football clubs from signing foreign goalkeepers. The idea back then was to create a deep pool of homegrown custodians. Twenty-six years later, that decision has been reversed. Starting with the 2026 season, the K-League clubs will be allowed to sign overseas goalkeepers. According to the K League United website, the competition's board noted that the 'restrictions on a specialised position had led to a disproportionate rise in wages'. It forced them to remove the ban to ensure there was wage parity. The decision was taken at a board meeting on Thursday, the league said in a statement. 'The board said it took into consideration the fact that foreign players were restricted from registering as goalkeepers, a specialised position, resulting in excessive salary increases for domestic players compared to field players,' it added. 'The number of clubs has increased significantly since the time the foreign goalkeeper restriction was introduced, so even if foreign goalkeepers were allowed, domestic goalkeepers would still have enough playing time. As a result, from 2026, the K-League will remove the stipulation that the goalkeeper must be a domestic player from the K-League's competition guidelines, which will apply to both the K-League 1 and K-League 2.' When the South Korean league banned its clubs from registering foreign players as keepers in 1999, it had eight teams. The reason back then was that the domestic keepers did not get enough playing time. South Korea's K-League 1 has now expanded to 12 teams, with a second tier introduced in 2013. Clubs from both divisions will be allowed to sign foreign goalies. The three goalkeepers in South Korea's most recent international squad — Kim Seung-gyu, Kim Dong-heon and Lee Chang-geun — for their FIFA World Cup qualification matches against Iraq and Kuwait earlier this month, all play in the domestic league.
