Independent financial adviser deems Amara's takeover offer at S$0.895 a share ‘fair and reasonable'
[SINGAPORE] The independent financial adviser (IFA) appointed for the takeover bid for hotel group Amara has deemed the offer at S$0.895 a share to be 'fair and reasonable'.
It has therefore advised the company's directors considered to be independent to recommend shareholders to accept the offer, said the company on Tuesday (May 27) via a bourse filing.
In Apr 28 this year, Amara received an offer of S$0.895 per share from a consortium led by property company Hwa Hong, which was formerly listed on the Singapore Exchange.
This values the hotel group at about S$514.6 million and represents a premium of 27 per cent over Amara's closing price of S$0.705 on Apr 23 before the company called for a trading halt the following day.
Other partners of the consortium include a fund sponsored by Hwa Hong and Malaysia-based Newfields, property company Wing Tai, as well as Albertsons Capital, whose shareholders are Albert Teo, Amara's chairman and chief executive, and his daughter Dawn Teo, Amara's chief operating officer.
The consortium has set up a special-purpose vehicle called DRC Investments, with the intention to privatise Amara over low trading liquidity and challenging macroeconomic conditions.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
W Capital was appointed the IFA for the deal on May 7, and Amara lost its free float on May 15, which meant that the Singapore Exchange will be suspending the trading of its shares at the close of the offer on Jun 10, given that less than 10 per cent of the company's shares are now held by the public.
The S$0.895 offer price also represents a 42.1 per cent, 44.8 per cent, 46.7 per cent and 48.9 per cent premium over Amara's volume-weighted average price for the one-month, three-month, six-month and 12-month periods up to and including the last traded day, respectively.
In a circular issued by Amara on May 27, the company said that the IFA had looked at several factors when determining the offer to be fair and reasonable.
The IFA noted that the offer price fell within its estimated range of values between S$0.888 and S$0.959 per share. Amara's share had also never closed above the offer price of S$0.895 before the deal was announced, and is at about a 27 per cent premium of its closing price of S$0.705 on Apr 23.
Shares of Amara went up 1.1 per cent or S$0.01 to close at S$0.90 on Tuesday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Asus fends off bid to ban US laptop imports in Lenovo patent dispute
Lenovo has accused Asus' computers of infringing patents related to wireless communications, diagonal touchpad scrolling and other technology. PHOTO: UNSPLASH Asus fends off bid to ban US laptop imports in Lenovo patent dispute WASHINGTON - Taiwanese electronics maker Asus on June 20 defeated rival Lenovo's bid to block American imports of Asus' Zenbook laptops and other computers as part of a patent dispute between the two companies. The ruling by the US International Trade Commission was a defeat for Hong Kong-based Lenovo in a patent fight with Asus that extends to California federal court and Europe's Unified Patent Court. Lenovo has accused Asus' computers of infringing patents related to wireless communications, diagonal touchpad scrolling and other technology. The commission's order on June 20, which upheld an ITC judge's preliminary decision from February, can be appealed to the Washington-based US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Spokespeople for Lenovo and Asus did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the decision. Lenovo, the world's largest PC maker, sued Asus in San Jose, California, and at the ITC in 2023, alleging that technology in Asus' Zenbook Pro and Zenbook Flip 14 laptops infringed a variety of its patents. Lenovo asked the California court for an unspecified amount of monetary damages, including lost profits and royalties, and an order permanently blocking the alleged infringement. The California lawsuit was paused during the ITC proceedings. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
AsiaOne
7 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Australia social media teen ban software trial organisers say the tech works, World News
SYDNEY - Some age-checking applications collect too much data and no product works 100 per cent of the time, but using software to enforce a teenage social media ban can work in Australia, the head of the world's biggest trial of the technology said on Friday (June 20). The view from the government-commissioned Age Assurance Technology Trial of more than 1,000 Australian school students and hundreds of adults is a boost to the country's plan to keep under 16s off social media. From December, in a world first ban, companies like Facebook and Instagram owner Meta, Snapchat and TikTok must prove they are taking reasonable steps to block young people from their platforms or face a fine of up to A$49.5 million (S$41 million). Since the Australian government announced the legislation last year, child protection advocates, tech industry groups and children themselves have questioned whether the ban can be enforced due to workarounds like Virtual Private Networks, which obscure an internet user's location. "Age assurance can be done in Australia privately, efficiently and effectively," said Tony Allen, CEO of the Age Check Certification Scheme, the UK-based organisation overseeing the Australian trial. The trial found "no significant tech barriers" to rolling out a software-based scheme in Australia, although there was "no one-size-fits-all solution, and no solution that worked perfectly in all deployments," Allen added in an online presentation. Allen noted that some age-assurance software firms "don't really know at this stage what data they may need to be able to support law enforcement and regulators in the future. "There's a risk there that they could be inadvertently over-collecting information that wouldn't be used or needed." Organisers of the trial, which concluded earlier this month, gave no data findings and offered only a broad overview which did not name individual products. They will deliver a report to the government next month which officials have said will inform an industry consultation ahead of the December deadline. A spokesperson for the office of the eSafety Commissioner, which will advise the government on how to implement the ban, said the preliminary findings were a "useful indication of the likely outcomes from the trial. [[nid:705771]] "We are pleased to see the trial suggests that age assurance technologies, when deployed the right way and likely in conjunction with other techniques and methods, can be private, robust and effective," the spokesperson said. The Australian ban is being watched closely around the world with several governments exploring ways to limit children's exposure to social media.
Business Times
8 hours ago
- Business Times
Walmart to pay US$10 million to settle US FTC lawsuit over money transfer fraud
[NEW YORK] Walmart has agreed to pay US$10 million to settle a US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) civil lawsuit accusing the world's largest retailer of ignoring warning signs that fraudsters used its money transfer services to fleece consumers out of hundreds of millions of US dollars. The settlement was filed on Friday (Jun 20) in Chicago federal court, and requires approval by US District judge Manish Shah. Walmart also agreed not to process money transfers it suspects are fraudulent, or help sellers and telemarketers it believes are using its services to commit fraud. 'Electronic money transfers are one of the most common ways that scammers tell consumers to send them money, because once it's sent, it's gone for good,' said Christopher Mufarrige, director of the FTC's consumer protection bureau. 'Companies that provide these services must train their employees to comply with the law and work to protect consumers.' The Bentonville, Arkansas-based retailer did not admit or deny wrongdoing in agreeing to settle. Walmart said that it was pleased to settle and shared the FTC's goal of protecting consumers from fraudsters, including from fraud-induced money transfers. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up In its June 2022 complaint, the FTC accused Walmart of turning a blind eye to fraudsters who used its money transfer services to cash out at its stores. Walmart acts as an agent for money transfers by companies such as MoneyGram, Ria and Western Union. Money can be hard to trace once delivered. The FTC said fraudsters used many schemes that included impersonating Internal Revenue Service agents, impersonating family members who needed money from grandparents to avoid jail, and telling victims they won lotteries or sweepstakes but owed fees to collect their winnings. Shah dismissed part of the FTC case last July but let the regulator pursue the remainder. Walmart appealed from that decision. Friday's settlement would end the appeal. REUTERS
