Philippines, U.S., hold joint maritime drills for seventh time
MANILA, June 5 (Reuters) - The Philippines and United States militaries have sailed together in the South China Sea for a seventh time to boost interoperability between the two sides, Manila's armed forces said on Thursday.
The exercises, held on Wednesday in waters off the provinces of Occidental Mindoro and Zambales and away from contested features, included joint operations near shorelines as well as fire support.
"The MCA (maritime cooperative activity) is a demonstration of both nations' resolve to deepen cooperation and enhance interoperability in line with international law," the Philippine armed forces said in a statement.
The joint sail also showcased the Philippine vessel Miguel Malvar, a 118-metre guided missile frigate commissioned last month. It is one of two corvettes built by South Korea's Hyundai Heavy Industries (329180.KS), opens new tab under the Philippines' military modernisation programme.
Military engagements between the treaty allies have soared under President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., who has pivoted closer to Washington in response to China's growing presence in the South China Sea.
China claims sovereignty over nearly all the South China Sea, including parts of the exclusive economic zones of Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
Putin says Russia will hold military exercises with China in 2025
ST PETERSBURG, Russia, June 18 (Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday that Russia will hold joint military exercises with China in 2025.
Telegraph
4 days ago
- Telegraph
The most powerful conventional engine of warfare ever built is headed for Iran
'Admiral, we have a problem.' 'OK, where is the nearest carrier?' So goes the start of most operational discussions in the Pentagon. And with good reason. A US Carrier Strike Group (CSG) boasts formidable firepower. It centres on a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier with 65-70 fighter jets, including multiple types of F-18 Hornet and now increasingly F-35C stealth jets, plus radar/command-and-control planes and an assortment of helicopters. Traditionally the carrier was supported by two Arleigh Burke class destroyers and one Ticonderoga class cruiser (although increasingly this is becoming three Arleigh Burkes as the Ticos reach the end of their life). These mighty warships can create a defence bubble resistant even to hypersonic and ballistic weapons, and bombard shore targets a thousand miles away with Tomahawk cruise missiles. Somewhere nearby below the surface, will be found a nuclear powered attack submarine, armed with more Tomahawks and torpedoes. With its own intelligence and surveillance bubble around it, a US carrier group is the most powerful, versatile and well defended conventional weapons system-of-systems ever created. And now there are about to be two of these in the US Central Command (CENTCOM) area of responsibility – the Middle East. The USS Carl Vinson has been there for a while now, conducting strikes against the Houthis and keeping watch once they stopped shooting back. Meanwhile the USS Nimitz is coming fast from west of the Philippines to the Malacca Strait and presumably onwards to the Gulf. This is significant for a couple of reasons. First, the maths when I was last involved in ops planning said you need two carriers in theatre as a pre-condition for any major US action. The carrier move doesn't mean US involvement in the Israel/Iran conflict is imminent, but it's one of the things they would do before getting stuck in. It gives President Trump more options. There are also significant consequences for Freedom of Navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. On this I need to be very clear – Iran absolutely has the ability to close this strait. Between their mine layers, boarding ability, fast attack craft, uncrewed surface drones, midget submarines and mobile ballistic missiles (in that order) they can either physically close it (with mines) or, by mixing the above, create the insurance conditions for ships to deem it not worth the risk, which amounts to the same thing. Mine clearance is one of the US Navy's few weaknesses. If the Iranians choose to close the Strait it will be difficult to do much about it. Their mass, mobility and dispersal makes striking back difficult. The US had to expend more than a billion dollars' worth of munitions to pound the Houthis into their current ceasefire: Iran would be much harder to crack. But we shouldn't assume that the Nimitz and her group can't move into the Iranian missile envelope and operate there. The Gulf of Oman is a much more carrier-friendly environment than the Red Sea, and US carriers have operated there under the fire of Iranian-supplied missiles for months. Having said the Iranians can close the strait, I don't think they will. Too many countries – such as China, India and indeed the Iranians themselves – need it to stay open. More likely in my view is that they will seek to contest the Strait in some form, relearning the lessons that they originally taught the Houthis. Boarding operations, hijackings, harassment and targeted missile attacks are more likely. And we know from the Red Sea what happens next. Ships stop going through and oil prices climb: and unlike the Red Sea, there's no alternative route for the Strait of Hormuz. This is why the Nimitz is coming, and why there are B-2 Stealth bombers deployed to Diego Garcia, doubtless with Massive Ordnance Penetrators – the unique US weapon which could finish off even the toughest, deepest-buried Iranian nuclear facilities. 'Don't mess around in the Strait or we'll have to get involved,' is the blunt message behind the latest carrier move. This is, and always has been, the beauty of a well formed Strike Group – setting the conditions to avoid conflict by being ready to join in if that fails.
Reuters
5 days ago
- Reuters
US aircraft carrier heads west from S.China Sea amid Middle East tensions
HANOI, June 16 (Reuters) - U.S. aircraft carrier USS Nimitz left the South China Sea on Monday morning heading west, according to data from ship tracking website Marine Traffic, after a reception for its planned port call in central Vietnam was cancelled. The carrier had planned to visit Danang City later this week, but two sources, including one diplomat, said a formal reception slated for June 20 had been called off. One of the sources said the U.S. Embassy in Hanoi had informed him about the cancellation, due to "an emergent operational requirement". The embassy didn't immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. The Nimitz Carrier Strike Group conducted maritime security operations in the South China Sea last week, as "part of the U.S. Navy's routine presence in the Indo-Pacific," according to the website of the Commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet. Data from Marine Traffic showed the carrier on Monday morning was moving west in the direction of the Middle East, where the battle between Israel and Iran is escalating.
