Adidas, Puma expected to hike sportswear prices following Nike as US tariffs hit
LONDON: Adidas and Puma are likely to hike prices for running shoes and sportswear in the United States, following Nike's lead, analysts and investors said on Thursday, as U.S. tariffs on imports drive costs up for retailers.
Nike on Wednesday said it would raise prices next week, charging up to $10 more for shoes currently costing more than $150, while keeping prices stable for products under $100. It is the biggest sportswear company by sales and market cap.
'That was the moment Adidas and Puma were waiting for,' said Robert Krankowski, sporting goods analyst at UBS.
Both German sportswear brands recently said they would not be the first movers in raising prices, instead waiting to see what rivals do.
'We should probably expect a similar decision from both Adidas and Puma because … this is not Nike-specific, it is an industry issue. Everyone will be impacted by the tariffs,' Krankowski added.
U.S. President Donald Trump has imposed a blanket 10% tariff on all imports, and hit China with a higher tariff of 30%. More worrying for sportswear brands, the key footwear and clothing manufacturing hub of Vietnam faces the threat of a steep 46% tariff returning in July.
Nike described the announced price increases as part of its normal seasonal planning, without mentioning tariffs.
Puma said on Thursday it is in talks with its U.S. partners but has not decided whether or how it would adjust prices. Adidas did not immediately reply to a request for comment on its pricing plans.
'Historically, when the leading brand adjusts its prices, competitors tend to follow suit shortly thereafter,' said Federico Borin, an analyst at Janus Henderson.
How high other brands raise prices will depend on their assessments of U.S. shoppers' willingness to pay, which varies based on how in-demand their sneakers or running shoes are.
Adidas, which has enjoyed a surge in sales thanks to trendy vintage shoes such as the $100 Samba and $120 Gazelle, could easily raise prices, said Simon Jaeger, portfolio manager at Flossbach von Storch in Cologne, Germany, which holds shares in Adidas and Nike.
Nike's price increases are relatively modest, Jaeger added, but 'what concerns me more is that the U.S. consumer in general is not as strong as a couple of years ago.'
U.S. consumer sentiment slumped further in May while one-year inflation expectations surged, according to the University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers on Friday.
Given weaker demand, sportswear brands will have to carefully manage their inventories at retailers, Jaeger said, to avoid oversupplying and being forced to discount.
Puma, whose sales in the U.S. have been slowing, may have less room to hike prices than Adidas, said UBS' Krankowski.
Puma has said it aims to sell 4 million to 6 million pairs of its $100 Formula 1-inspired Speedcat sneaker this year but sales have been slower than expected, raising the question of whether it should hike the shoe's price.
'Puma doesn't have a massive first-mover advantage because the other brands are taking more momentum,' Krankowski said.
Read More Prada not looking at M&A, CEO says
More expensive brands are also adapting as Nike hikes prices.
Running-focused On, whose adult sneakers sell for $130 and up, plans to increase prices in July on certain products in the U.S., saying this is part of its ambition to be the 'most premium' global sportswear brand and not a reaction to tariffs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
5 hours ago
- Time Business News
Protecting Your Growth: Why a Business Transactions Attorney in Wisconsin Is Essential for Mergers and Acquisitions
In today's fast-paced commercial landscape, growth through mergers and acquisitions (M&A) is more common than ever. Whether you're a small business owner considering the sale of your company or a growing enterprise planning to acquire a competitor, these complex deals involve far more than handshakes and spreadsheets. One of the most critical—yet often overlooked—elements of a successful M&A deal is legal representation. Specifically, working with an experienced business transactions attorney in Wisconsin can be the key to protecting your interests and ensuring long-term success. Wisconsin is home to a diverse business community—from legacy family-owned companies to tech startups and agricultural enterprises. As the market continues to evolve, businesses are increasingly turning to strategic acquisitions to expand operations, increase market share, or diversify offerings. At the same time, retiring owners are seeking smooth exit strategies that maintain the legacy of their companies. These high-stakes transactions involve multiple legal, financial, and operational risks. A business transactions attorney in Wisconsin provides the legal guidance necessary to navigate due diligence, draft clear and enforceable agreements, and address regulatory or tax implications that could derail a deal if overlooked. Mergers and acquisitions involve more than just signing a contract. Each step of the process—from preliminary negotiations to post-closing integration—comes with potential pitfalls. Without proper legal representation, parties may face unexpected liabilities, tax exposure, or disputes that could have been avoided with clear contractual language. Attorneys with business transaction experience help structure deals in ways that align with the client's financial and strategic goals. For buyers, this might mean conducting comprehensive due diligence to uncover liabilities or problematic contracts. For sellers, it could involve securing favorable terms, protecting intellectual property, or ensuring a smooth transition of ownership. Additionally, Wisconsin-specific legal considerations—such as employment law, state taxes, and local regulatory issues—must be factored into any deal. An attorney familiar with Wisconsin's business environment can anticipate and mitigate risks that a general legal advisor might miss. Working with a business transactions attorney during an M&A process often includes: This non-binding document outlines the basic terms of the transaction and sets the tone for further negotiations. A thorough review of the target business's financials, contracts, employee agreements, intellectual property, and pending litigation is essential for buyers. This legally binding contract outlines the specifics of the transaction, including purchase price, asset or stock transfers, representations and warranties, and indemnity clauses. Depending on the nature of the business, an acquisition might trigger review from regulatory bodies or require licensing updates. Attorneys also assist with employment transitions, non-compete agreements, escrow arrangements, and earn-out provisions. If you're considering a merger, acquisition, or other high-level business deal, don't leave your company's future to chance. Bakke Norman is a respected firm serving Wisconsin's business community with trusted legal services across all phases of commercial transactions. Their attorneys bring a deep understanding of both legal and business strategy to every deal, helping clients close transactions with confidence and clarity. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
USA Today
6 hours ago
- USA Today
What's next for Bahama Breeze? Owners say big change is coming.
A little over a month after 15 locations were abruptly closed, owners of the Caribbean-inspired chain signal the brand could soon come to an end. Owners of the Bahama Breeze restaurant chain signaled this week that the brand is no longer a priority, and they are considering selling the Caribbean-inspired chain a little over a month after shuttering over a dozen locations. Darden Restaurants CEO Ricardo Cardenas said in an earnings call on Friday, June 21 that they "will be considering strategic alternatives" for Bahama Breeze, such as selling the brand to a new owner or "converting restaurants to other Darden brands." The company's portfolio incudes Olive Garden, LongHorn Steakhouse, Ruth's Chris Steak House and Yard House, among others. Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle. "After further review, we have made the difficult decision that these remaining locations and the Bahama Breeze brand are not a strategic priority for us," Cardenas said in the call. The company abruptly closed down 15 restaurant locations in mid-May, leaving what they call their 28 "highest performing" restaurants currently in operation. The company has not issued a projected timeline of either a sale or restaurant conversions and has not disclosed if there is an interested buyer. Cardenas said the company does not expect a potential sale to have a "material impact" on their financial results. The restaurants first opened in the 90's in Florida, where half of their remaining locations remain. Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Virginia all have two locations, according to the chain's website, while the states of Delaware, Michigan, New Jersey, South Carolina and Washington have one location. Which Bahama Breeze locations have closed? The following restaurants have closed, as confirmed by a Darden Restaurants spokesperson to USA TODAY: Contributing: Fernando Cervantes Jr., USA TODAY. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her atkapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr.
Miami Herald
7 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Nike fumbles its biggest launch of the year
Nike desperately needs a comeback. Sales are down, and the brand has been grasping for ways to win back the audience it used to own - especially women. In the past few months, it's shuffled leadership, made sweeping organizational changes, and promised a new era. But there's been one initiative everyone has watched more closely than the rest. Related: Nike's house is not in order, and customers may pay the price This wasn't just a product drop. It was supposed to be a cultural reset, the kind of launch that makes headlines and stirs hype on TikTok before a single item even hits the site. A move that signals Nike gets it - that it can keep pace with the brands Gen Z and Millennial women actually want to wear. Internally, it was treated like a major turning point. And externally, anticipation was sky-high. But without warning, the launch is off the calendar. No update. No rollout. Just a quiet delay, and a whole lot of unanswered questions. And that's a this was the one drop Nike couldn't afford to miss. Image source: Nike/Skims The highly anticipated NikeSKIMS line, a collaboration with Kim Kardashian's $4 billion shapewear empire SKIMS, has been officially delayed. Nike then-President of Consumer and Marketplace Heidi O'Neill had said the partnership, originally scheduled to launch this spring, brought together the best of both brands, "unlock[ing] an incredible opportunity to disrupt the industry with our shared passion and commitment to innovation." The line is now expected to debut later this year, according to Bloomberg. No new date has been confirmed, and the delay wasn't caused by suppliers or shipping issues. Instead, it was an internal decision, one Nike and Kardashian made to "get the product right." Related: Nike delivers bad news for customers "We will invite even more athletes into sport and movement with product that makes them feel strong and sexy," the company said. The line was supposed to include apparel, footwear, and accessories. But in the time since it was announced, O'Neill - a key architect of the partnership - has exited the company. Meanwhile, Nike's new CEO, Elliott Hill, has been doubling down on the SKIMS partnership as a high-stakes brand revival strategy. But now, with no launch in sight, that strategy is looking shakier by the day. This delay wouldn't be such a big deal if Nike wasn't already under so much pressure. Nike's third-quarter revenues were $11.3 billion, down 9% from the same time last year, according to its recent earnings report. Meanwhile, Nike (NKE) stock has declined nearly 20% year to date, and investor sentiment continues to weaken. That kind of context turns a simple delay into something louder...a major red flag in the middle of an attempted reinvention. It also raises questions about internal alignment. If this was the moment to reconnect with the female consumer, what happened behind the scenes to justify hitting pause? Nike maintains the partnership is strong. But now it's facing the tough task of rebuilding buzz around a launch that's already lost momentum. And when the SKIMS line finally lands, let's hope the moment hasn't passed Nike by. Related: Kim Kardashian's billion-dollar brand just made a major move The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
