logo
AI tool put to test sifting public views on botox and fillers

AI tool put to test sifting public views on botox and fillers

Business Mayor14-05-2025

Chris Vallance
Senior Technology Reporter Getty Images
An artificial intelligence (AI) tool has been used to sort through comments about botox and lip fillers, that were submitted as part of a public consultation, in what officials said was the first use of this kind in the UK.
Officials set the tool to work sifting responses to a Scottish government consultation on regulating non-surgical cosmetic procedures.
They found it came up with 'nearly identical' results, when compared to humans set the same task.
It is hoped the tool, dubbed 'Consult', will spare civil servants from similar time-consuming tasks in future, and save taxpayers an estimated £20m.
Consult is one of a planned set of government AI-powered tools that have collectively been dubbed 'Humphrey' after the wily senior civil servant, Sir Humphrey Appleby, from the classic 1980s sitcom Yes, Minister. The series often took aim at excessive bureaucracy in government.
In this trial the AI tool examined 2,000 submissions. But public consultations, which gather the views of UK citizens on issues under consideration by ministers, can generate tens of thousands of responses.
It was able to identify themes amongst the responses, and counted and catalogued answers accordingly – with human experts checking its work at both stages.
Consult's findings were then examined to see how they compared to a team of human experts working in parallel.
Technology secretary Peter Kyle said the initial success of the trial meant that Consult would be used across government 'very soon'.
'After demonstrating such promising results, Humphrey will help us cut the costs of governing and make it easier to collect and comprehensively review what experts and the public are telling us on a range of crucial issues,' he wrote.
The government hopes £45bn can be saved by wider public sector use of AI technology. 'Humans in the loop'
The government says that Consult is currently still in its trial stage and more evaluation will take place before any final decision to roll it out more widely.
There would always be 'humans in the loop' checking Consult's work, the government added.
Officials have also sought to address some of the persistent concerns about AI systems.
One is that they sometimes invent information – a failing known as 'hallucinating'.
Because the AI was only being asked to carry out a relatively limited task, officials said hallucination would not be a major problem.
Such AI tools, built using what are known as 'large language models' have also displayed bias, as they adsorb the prejudices inherent in the human-generated data on which they are trained.
But experts who worked with Consult had found it reduced bias overall, the government said, by removing opportunities for individual human analysts to 'project their own preconceived ideas'.
Consult has also been tested to check it can handle language containing spelling mistakes and other errors.
However, for now it only works in English, and responses in other languages spoken within the UK such as Welsh would need to be translated into English first.
READ SOURCE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Iranians Beaten by Regime Condemn Foreign Interference
Why Iranians Beaten by Regime Condemn Foreign Interference

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why Iranians Beaten by Regime Condemn Foreign Interference

An empty cell inside the high security Evin Prison in Tehran, Iran, on Feb. 10, 1986. Credit - Kaveh Kazemi—Getty Images What began as a war on Iran's nuclear program has developed into something far more imperial. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,'' President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social on Sunday. 'But if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' On Monday, Israel did its part, launching airstrikes not on military or nuclear sites, but on what Defense Minister Israel Katz called 'government repression bodies in the heart of Tehran.' Among the targets was the entrance to Evin Prison, notorious for holding political prisoners. Yet the war is finding no visible support among Iranians once imprisoned there—the activists who have risked their lives opposing the regime Washington and Tel Aviv want to change. 'This is exactly what the hardline groups supporting the system wanted,' explains twice-jailed Isa Saharkhiz, referring to Israel's military assault. 'And now, after the U.S. attacks, they are shouting slogans about closing the Hormuz Strait.' Read More: How U.S. Strikes May Have Inadvertently Helped the Iranian Regime Saharakhiz placed his name among more than 500 activists and groups that on Sunday condemned the assault on Iran, and voiced 'serious opposition to any foreign interference.' The statement—by advocates of a democratic Iran that answers to its people—was posted in Persian on Telegram, the messaging platform on which Saharkhiz also chatted with TIME. 'The civil society has been urging Iran's ruling system to continue talks with the U.S. and to reach a peaceful agreement and even establish diplomatic relations between Tehran and Washington, and expand political, economic, and trade relations between Iran and the U.S.,' he said. 'But the Israeli attack last week, which was against international law and regulations, helped to disrupt the talks and to begin a terrible war.' That moderate approach was championed by Iran's now-vanquished reformist movement, which surged almost three decades ago with the 1997 election of a gentle librarian and cleric named Mohammad Khatami as Iran's President. Saharkhiz had worked with him earlier, and took a prominent place in his Ministry of Culture, and later among the private newspapers that thrived in the fleeting years that greater personal freedoms seemed within reach. The reformists included activists who overran the U.S. Embassy, supporters of the 1979 revolution that brought theocracy to power who had since found its religious rule heavy-handed and intrusive. But Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamanei, saw the movement as a challenge to the unelected, authoritarian clerics that held ultimate power. The reformists' last gasp came in 2009, when hundreds of thousands took to the streets saying the Presidential election had been stolen from the reformist candidate. In the crackdown that answered it, Saharkhiz was among the hundreds of politicians, activists, professors, and journalists facing arrest. He did not come easily. After eluding arrest, officials kidnapped his daughter and threatened to assault her if Saharkhiz did not surrender. When he relented, he was beaten so badly he was hospitalized for weeks. In 2024, in a lawsuit filed by his son, a U.S. District court ruled Iran should pay $5 million for Saharkhiz's torture during imprisonment. Read More: A New Middle East Is Unfolding Before Our Eyes Aren't his feelings about the war complicated by his feelings about the regime it targets? 'No, not at all,' Saharkhiz replied. 'This is the view that me and many of my friends have had throughout the last two or three decades, and would propagate in the newspapers and magazines that we published, all of which were banned. Arrest and imprisonment has not changed our views.' 'I remember,' he went on, 'that back during the presidency of Khatami, when reformists had a majority in the 6th parliament, I wrote an article and proposed that a meeting be arranged between Joe Biden, who was at that time the head of the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, and his counterpart in the Iranian parliament, as representatives of the two nations. If I'm not mistaken, Biden had proposed travelling to Tehran at that time.' The meeting did not happen, though Biden was Vice President when then-President Barack Obama negotiated a pact that effectively sidelined Iran's nuclear program until Trump withdrew from it in 2018. The withdrawal emboldened Iranian hardliners who in April alone carried out at least 110 executions, and have crowded Evin Prison with political prisoners—some of whom were reportedly injured by Israel's strike on the facility. A week earlier, as the airstrikes began, several prisoners, including women's rights advocate Reza Khandan, wrote a letter to judicial officials requesting freedom from the prison during the Israeli assault, noting that their ward 'doesn't even have a single fire extinguisher.' Contact us at letters@

Holders of Argentina 1.5 billion euro GDP warrants file for US recognition of English judgments
Holders of Argentina 1.5 billion euro GDP warrants file for US recognition of English judgments

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Holders of Argentina 1.5 billion euro GDP warrants file for US recognition of English judgments

By Rodrigo Campos NEW YORK (Reuters) -Holders of Argentina's 1.5 billion euro-denominated GDP warrants filed on Monday for U.S. courts to recognize English court judgments that hold Argentina liable for that debt. Hedge funds holding around 48% of the securities issued between 2005 and 2014 sued Argentina in 2019 and London's High Court ruled in their favor last October, leaving Argentina on the hook. "While the claimants remain open to finding a consensual resolution with respect to the sums outstanding under the English Judgments ... they intend to vigorously enforce their rights in any and all appropriate forums," said a statement from law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, which represents certain holders. In order to be able to enforce the judgments against Argentine assets in the United States, the U.S. court must recognize the outcome of the process in the English courts. The statement says that to secure a $20 billion program with the International Monetary Fund announced in April, "it appears that Argentina evidently made representations to the Fund that it was engaged in active, good-faith efforts to resolve the English Judgments to address the Fund's lending into arrears guidelines. No negotiations are ongoing, and to the extent Argentina represented that they were, that representation was incorrect." The IMF did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether Argentina misrepresented its efforts to clear this debt. The Argentine government did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Quinn Emanuel statement also cites the IMF program target of Argentina regaining access to international capital markets. "There should not be, nor can there be in practice, any market access until and unless Argentina resolves its default under the English Judgments," the statement said.

Holders of Argentina 1.5 billion euro GDP warrants file for US recognition of English judgments
Holders of Argentina 1.5 billion euro GDP warrants file for US recognition of English judgments

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Holders of Argentina 1.5 billion euro GDP warrants file for US recognition of English judgments

By Rodrigo Campos NEW YORK (Reuters) -Holders of Argentina's 1.5 billion euro-denominated GDP warrants filed on Monday for U.S. courts to recognize English court judgments that hold Argentina liable for that debt. Hedge funds holding around 48% of the securities issued between 2005 and 2014 sued Argentina in 2019 and London's High Court ruled in their favor last October, leaving Argentina on the hook. "While the claimants remain open to finding a consensual resolution with respect to the sums outstanding under the English Judgments ... they intend to vigorously enforce their rights in any and all appropriate forums," said a statement from law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, which represents certain holders. In order to be able to enforce the judgments against Argentine assets in the United States, the U.S. court must recognize the outcome of the process in the English courts. The statement says that to secure a $20 billion program with the International Monetary Fund announced in April, "it appears that Argentina evidently made representations to the Fund that it was engaged in active, good-faith efforts to resolve the English Judgments to address the Fund's lending into arrears guidelines. No negotiations are ongoing, and to the extent Argentina represented that they were, that representation was incorrect." The IMF did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether Argentina misrepresented its efforts to clear this debt. The Argentine government did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Quinn Emanuel statement also cites the IMF program target of Argentina regaining access to international capital markets. "There should not be, nor can there be in practice, any market access until and unless Argentina resolves its default under the English Judgments," the statement said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store