logo
Sharia courts have no legal standing: Top court slams Kazi ruling in divorce case

Sharia courts have no legal standing: Top court slams Kazi ruling in divorce case

India Today29-04-2025

The Supreme Court, in a recent ruling, reaffirmed that all Sharia courts, including entities referred to as "Kazi courts", "Darul Qaza", or "Kaziayat courts", hold no legal status under Indian law and directives or decisions issued by these bodies are not binding, nor can they be enforced through legal means.The bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ahsanuddin Amanullah made the observations while ruling on an appeal by a Muslim woman who had challenged an order by the Allahabad High Court upholding a family court's decision to deny her maintenance.advertisementThe Suprem Court cited the 2014 ruling in Vishwa Lochan Madan vs Union of India, which had clarified that neither Sharia courts nor their fatwas enjoy recognition in Indian law. The top court reiterated that such institutions have no judicial standing and their pronouncements are not enforceable unless voluntarily accepted by the concerned parties and not in conflict with statutory law.
In the current case, the family court had denied maintenance to the petitioner on the ground that she was responsible for the marital discord. Its conclusion relied heavily on a "settlement deed" presented before a "Kazi court" in Bhopal in Madhya Pradesh.The Supreme Court strongly criticised this approach, stating that courts cannot rely on the declarations of non-judicial bodies like Sharia courts to determine legal entitlements. "Such declarations, even if voluntarily accepted, are at best applicable between the consenting parties and cannot bind third parties," the judgment noted.advertisementThe petitioner was married on September 24, 2002 as per to Islamic rituals. It was the second marriage for both parties. In 2005, the husband had filed for divorce before a "Kazi court", which was dismissed after a settlement. Three years later, in 2008, he initiated a second divorce proceeding in a "Darul Qaza" court. That same year, the wife filed a petition for maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code.In 2009, after the Sharia body permitted the divorce, a formal talaqnama was pronounced.The family court, however, ruled against the woman, stating that the husband had not abandoned her, instead, it blamed her behaviour for the breakdown of the marriage. The court further held that since it was the couple's second marriage, there was no presumption of dowry demand — a reasoning the Supreme Court dismissed as speculative and inconsistent with legal principles."The family court's observation that there was no likelihood of dowry demand because it was a second marriage is baseless and contrary to legal reasoning," the Supreme Court held. It also clarified that the so-called settlement deed presented before the Kazi court could not be the basis for denying maintenance.The top court directed the husband to pay Rs 4,000 per month as maintenance to the petitioner from the date she filed her petition in the family court.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Citing left-wing extremism, US issues advisory cautioning against travel in parts of Odisha
Citing left-wing extremism, US issues advisory cautioning against travel in parts of Odisha

New Indian Express

time18 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Citing left-wing extremism, US issues advisory cautioning against travel in parts of Odisha

BHUBANESWAR: The US has flagged parts of Odisha in its travel advisory, urging its citizens to exercise increased caution while travelling. Citing concerns over terrorism, crime and civil unrest, the US Department of State has issued a Level-2 alert for India, warning of sporadic incidents linked to left-wing extremism in parts of the country. The presence of Maoist activities in Odisha has awarded the state a place among 14 Indian states where travellers' safety may be compromised included in the advisory. The June 18 advisory warned its citizens against travel to south-western Odisha, which it lists among regions impacted by Maoist violence. It specifically lists attacks targeting security forces and government officials in rural areas, including those bordering Chhattisgarh and Andhra Pradesh. 'Attacks against officers of the Indian government continue to occur sporadically in the rural parts of Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand that share a border with Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal, and Odisha. Southwest areas of Odisha are also affected,' the advisory stated. While the state capital, Bhubaneswar, and major urban areas have been cited as unaffected by these restrictions, the US government has asked its employees to obtain special authorisation before travelling to regions beyond the capital.

Bengal child rights commission sends notice to BJP's Amit Malviya
Bengal child rights commission sends notice to BJP's Amit Malviya

Hindustan Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Bengal child rights commission sends notice to BJP's Amit Malviya

Kolkata: The West Bengal Commission for Protection of Child Rights has served a show cause letter to Amit Malviya, head of the national information technology cell of the Bharatiya Janata Party, for posting a photograph of a minor girl after her unnatural death in Bengal's South 24 Parganas district on June 16, a commission official said. BJP leader Amit Malviya. (File Photo) Targeting chief minister Mamata Banerjee, Malviya alleged in a social media post on June 19 that the girl was gangraped and murdered. He attached a photo in which the minor's face was digitally blurred. 'The commission took suo motu cognizance of Malviya's post because the minor could be easily identified despite an effort to digitally blur her face. This is a violation of the Juvenile Justice Act,' a commission official said requesting anonymity. Malviya, a BJP national executive member and co-incharge of the party's West Bengal unit, also alleged in his post that the incident had a communal angle. He wrote: '...Mamata Banerjee's governance has been an unmitigated disaster for women's safety. Worse still, the administration is suppressing the incident, citing 'communal sensitivity' — because the victim is Hindu and the accused are Muslim. This is not secularism. This is state-sponsored injustice...' The West Bengal police issued a rebuttal on X on June 20, calling Malviya's allegation a lie and stating that post mortem examination had revealed that the minor died after consuming poison and there was no evidence of sexual assault whatsoever. 'Lies Again! Efforts are being made from certain quarters to spread misinformation about the death of a minor girl four days back. Facts are, an unnatural death of a minor girl happened. The body was recovered from her house in observance of all formalities. Inquest and post mortem, under proper videography, was done to ascertain the cause of death. Based on the complaint by the mother of the deceased, FIR in Jibantala PS was also registered,' the state police said. 'The post mortem report reveals that there was no sexual assault whatsoever and the death was caused by consumption of unknown poison. Investigation is in progress. A criminal case is being started against the person who shared the photograph of the deceased minor girl on social media in violation of the Hon'ble Apex Court guidelines and also attempted to fuel communal disharmony,' the post added. Malviya did not comment on his post and the commission's show cause letter till Sunday afternoon. Bengal BJP unit's chief spokesperson Samik Bhattacharya said: 'Answers to all questions raised will be given in due time.'

‘My entire career is derailed': Analyst says accidental file download led to termination and blacklisting
‘My entire career is derailed': Analyst says accidental file download led to termination and blacklisting

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘My entire career is derailed': Analyst says accidental file download led to termination and blacklisting

An Indian professional has shared a distressing account of how a single mistake during his resignation period derailed his career, highlighting the precarious nature of employee exits and background verifications in the country's competitive job market. The lack of documentation has had serious consequences for the analyst's job search.(Pexel) The individual, who worked as a senior analyst in the oil and gas research domain with experience in business process automation, posted his story anonymously on Reddit, saying he had been with the same company for over four years and was well-regarded in his role. However, he says things took a dramatic turn while he was serving his notice. Also read: Malaysian woman says boss demanded live location during holiday or be marked absent 'While serving my notice, I was trying to take some of my personal files to my personal drive and I accidentally downloaded some company files along with it,' he wrote. 'There was no malicious intent — I genuinely didn't think it would cause an issue, and I was wrapping up some pending work.' The incident was flagged as a data breach by the company, leading to an immediate revocation of his resignation and termination of employment. 'What's worse — I don't have any exit documents. No experience letter, no clearance, nothing — just a termination letter,' he added. The lack of documentation has had serious consequences for the analyst's job search. 'Now when I apply to other companies, I can't pass background verification. In fact, in a recent BGV with another reputed firm, my old company red-flagged me.' He admits to having made a poor judgment call, but said the punishment feels disproportionate. 'I understand I made a mistake. I should've been more careful and transparent. But now it feels like my entire career is derailed over one bad judgment call.' In India, background verification is a standard procedure for white-collar jobs, and missing or negative exit records can severely hinder future employment. The analyst says recruiters often ghost him after the checks. 'I'm finding it really hard to even get a chance to explain myself to recruiters.' The emotional toll has been immense. 'This situation has really taken a toll on my confidence and mental peace,' he wrote, concluding the post with a plea: 'If there's anyone who's willing to help or even just guide me, I'd be really grateful.' Take a look at the post: The post prompted responses from users offering advice and solidarity. A user wrote, 'I think your only option is meet with HR and explain your side of story n beg them' Another added, 'It looks like an honest mistake. Reach out to HR and plead. This is the only way of resolution.' Also read: Donald Trump's post on peace after bombing Iran's nuclear sites is redefining irony

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store