The ‘sneaky' add-on cost online shoppers should know about
With just a few clicks, online shoppers fill their cart with items.
But before they can enter their payment details they're hit with last-minute cash grabs featuring everything from recommended add-on products to pop-ups alerting them that if they spend another $30 they qualify for free shipping.
Now shipping insurance is quietly appearing at the checkout, promising to better protect parcels for just a few extra dollars.
Touted as a necessary add-on, it's being criticised by business owners and experts who say it's merely a dressed-up junk fee.
Australian consumer law states retailers are responsible for goods purchased from them until they reach the customer.
If a product is lost, damaged or stolen, they have to investigate the issue and provide a reasonable solution that could include a refund or replacement, regardless of whether shipping insurance was purchased.
But Jeannie Paterson, professor of law at the University of Melbourne and director of the Centre for AI and Digital Ethics said most shoppers aren't clued up when it comes to what's covered.
'They (consumers) don't know their rights under consumer law, so they think they don't have that protection if they don't opt in for it,' she told The Sunday Times.
But Professor Paterson said if nothing else shipping insurance does provide one benefit that goes beyond the law — peace of mind. Jeannie Paterson is a Professor of Law at the University of Melbourne and Director of the Centre for AI and Digital Ethics. Credit: Supplied
'What it does mean is if the goods don't arrive then you don't have to have an argument with the seller about whose responsibility it is, even though you're covered regardless,' she said.
According to an Australian Competition and Consumer Commission spokesperson 'businesses offering these products and services should be clear about what these additional products or services, such as shipping insurance, provide consumers above their existing statutory rights'.
But this is seldom the case. Insurance is often subtly tacked on at the bottom of an order, sometimes as an automatic add-on, meaning customers must deselect if they don't want the service.
Some websites offer protection through a third-party service while others appear to use a self-managed system. Price and terms also vary widely across retailers, with little to no transparency about what's being offered.
Professor Paterson said it was 'problematic' when insurance is automatically added at the checkout.
'Most behavioural studies show that by the time consumers get to the checkout they're committed to the product, they think they know the price so they're not necessarily conscious that there may be other add-on prices,' she said.
She refers to these features as 'dark patterns', manipulative tactics designed to persuade customers to make purchases they may not fully understand or didn't intend.
'It's a default they either don't notice, or they think, 'Oh, I better take it because it's been offered to me',' she said.
Professor Paterson thinks some retailers are taking advantage of unsuspecting customers, while others are ill-informed and believe it's in their customer's best interest.
The latter rings true for Perth-based clothing brand StreetX.
Operations manager Will Hart said the business experienced an 'uptick in delivery issues' in 2020 after a surge in online orders during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Insurance service Route was added to the website as an opt-out feature in a bid to streamline the returns process for customers after lengthy claim delays were experienced with Australia Post. StreetX's store on William Street in Perth. Credit: Facebook
The service, used by 13,000 big-name brands across the globe, covers lost, stolen, or damaged items for a fee paid by the customer. Mr Hart confirmed the money goes entirely to Route.
Some StreetX customers have been caught out paying for the insurance without realising it. Mr Hart has been contacted by people who questioned the fee after noticing it on their receipt. He said after explaining the feature, they were happy to have paid for it.
Mr Hart said it's automatically applied to cover the business and 'most importantly to protect the customer'.
He assured that all delivery issues are chased up, but StreetX does not compensate for problems that arise at the hands of the courier — this is where Route comes in.
'If we delay the order delivery by nine days, or a T-shirt arrives with a hole then of course we are going to compensate because it's the fault of ourselves,' he said.
'But we are not going to compensate for things that are lost at the fault of someone else.
'With Route, you're going to get a better outcome, you're going to get the exact same items that were lost, or the exact retail amount of your order, including shipping fees as well.'
Professor Paterson said business owners should educate themselves before handballing their statutory obligation.
'Ignorance to the law is no excuse and they (retailers) should go and find out who is responsible,' she said.
'If they are worried about their couriers not acting properly then that's a matter for them and they should be taking out the insurance with the courier.' Lucy Keig is the Founder and Design Director of Sydney-based clothing label Patience Made. Credit: Supplied
Lucy Keig, founder and design director of Sydney-based clothing label Patience Made, has never offered shipping insurance to customers.
Charging shoppers for a 'potentially pointless' feature doesn't sit well with her.
'I did a bit of research and found customers paying around $5 for 'insurance' didn't necessarily protect the customer or the business owner,' she said.
There hasn't been any demand for shipping insurance from Patience Made customers, and Ms Keig has no plans to introduce it.
Professor Paterson thinks new rules are needed to ensure customers aren't taken advantage of.
'I think it would be great if the ACCC put up clear guidelines and an information campaign, so consumers are aware of this add-on and don't fall into it,' she said.
'We probably need a prohibition on unfair trading which deals with dark patterns that nudge or sludge consumers into buying things they don't need or aren't in their interests.'
Ms Keig agreed that changes need to be made.
'More information needs to be provided to the customer at checkout to explain what this additional money actually covers,' she said.
'I'm not sure asking the customer to insure their order is the solution. Maybe we need to look at postage options in Australia to better support infrastructure for ecommerce.'
The ACCC urges consumers to find out what's being offered before they purchase shipping insurance and to raise any issues about their parcels with businesses directly.
'If there is a problem with a courier or mail delivery service for a product purchased online, consumers should first raise the issue with the online business they purchased the product from,' a spokesperson said.
'If the issue can't be resolved, consumers should contact their local state or territory consumer affairs or fair-trading authority who may be able to assist consumers with their dispute with the business.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Important' to assert American military deterrence around the globe
Shadow Finance Minister James Paterson says it is 'important' to assert American deterrence around the globe. 'I think it is very important to reassert American deterrence,' Mr Paterson told Sky News host Sharri Markson. 'Not just in the Middle East but globally.'
Perth Now
3 hours ago
- Perth Now
Expert's advice to motorists concerned that petrol prices will surge
Australian motorists worried about tensions in the Middle East affecting prices at the pump have been sent a clear message: 'Fill up now.' US President Donald Trump's administration carried out an attack on three nuclear sites in Iran on Saturday. It comes after Israel launched attacks on Iran earlier this month. Oil prices are expected to rise as a result of the escalation in conflict, however experts have spoken out to ease fears of immediate surges. 'It's really important for Australians today to understand that what we have seen again over the weekend, while it is another escalation above and beyond the escalation we saw the weekend before it, this is the Middle East,' NRMA spokesperson Peter Khoury said. 'Unfortunately, flare-ups are all too often and all too common.' The regional benchmark for oil in Australia, Tapis, is expected to increase in price by tonight, Khoury said. 'We don't know by how much,' he said. Based on what we're seeing out of the US, it could be $3 or $4 a barrel.' A possible way for Iran to retaliate against the US and Israel is to close off the Strait of Hormuz. The strait is a vital trade route used to transport 20 per cent of the world's crude oil, or about 20 million barrels per day. The Iranian parliament has backed closing the strait in response to the US attacks, though this must be approved by Iran's national security council. Oil prices could shoot above $100 per barrel if the strait is closed for a prolonged period, according to Goldman Sachs and consulting firm Rapidan Energy. JPMorgan analysts view the risk of Iran closing Hormuz as low because the US would view such a move as a declaration of war. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday called on China to help prevent Iran from closing the strait. Rubio said it would be 'economic suicide' for Iran to close the strait because the Islamic Republic's oil exports also pass through the waterway. Currently, it remains open. Khoury said this is 'the most important thing'. 'We do not want Australians panicking,' he said. 'Yes, there is speculation about what could happen in the next days and weeks, but it is the Middle East and anything can happen. 'The other important thing for Australians to know tonight is that if you live in Sydney, Brisbane, Melbourne, Adelaide or Perth, fill up now.' A combination of prices being at or near the bottom of the cycle and turmoil in the Middle East mean now is the time to buy. 'Prices are either in the high $1.60s or in the low $1.70s,' Khoury said. 'That has everything to do with the domestic price cycles in those capital cities. 'The wholesale price in Australia has gone up about eight cents a litre since two Fridays ago when the escalation really flared up between Israel and Iran. 'It will go up again, is the expectation, based on the US decision to attack Iran over the weekend. 'But it's only gone up eight cents a litre in the last week and a bit. 'There's a lot of speculation about what could happen. It's really important that Australians focus on what is happening. 'And what is happening if you live in those bigger cities is that prices are pretty good.' NRMA spokesperson Peter Khoury has urged Australian motorists not to panic, but to fill up now for the cheapest petrol prices. Credit: 7NEWS Khoury advised motorists to check fuel prices near them and find the best deal. 'You can find some real bargains,' he said. 'On any given day, there can be huge gaps in the price of the cheapest service station and the price of the most expensive. 'In Sydney today, it's 70 cents a litre. 'Regardless of what's going on in the Middle East or anywhere else, and regardless of where we are in the price cycle, do your research, use the information that you have access to that motorists in other countries don't have. 'We fought hard to get that made public. It's there for you to use.' When asked when the conflict overseas will affect local prices, Khoury said it normally takes about seven to 10 days. Our service stations are yet to buy the more expensive barrels but when that happens, it will have a flow on effect. 'The NRMA will be monitoring those prices really carefully over the next days and weeks, because what we won't tolerate, obviously, is oil companies manipulating what's going on overseas to put their prices up any higher than they should go,' he said. Khoury also emphasised that even if the strait is closed, it would not create a similar crisis to those caused by other recent global conflicts. 'In 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine, Russia being the second-largest producer of oil,' he said. 'That created an initial shock.' 'Obviously, the world was going to enforce sanctions, and they did. That created an even bigger shock. 'At the same time that that happened, the COVID supply crisis that affected the whole world hit its peak. So we all came out of COVID lockdown at the same time. 'The whole world came out of lockdown at the same time. Demand for oil spiked. Supply could not keep up. So we had probably the worst supply issue or challenge in our lifetime. 'And then Russia invaded Ukraine. 'All of those things had to happen at the same time for Tapis, our regional oil price, to hit $133 a barrel. 'It's currently at $76 a barrel. 'So to get back to those record high prices that we saw back in 2022, you would need a catastrophe at that level to affect global supply. 'We're not there yet, clearly, based on oil prices and the wholesale price. 'And I think that's what we want Australians to focus on tonight.' -With NBC
The Advertiser
3 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Call for laws to stop harm to consumers, firms online
Australia needs new laws and regulations to prevent significant harm to consumers and businesses from the exploitative practices of US tech giants. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission issued the warning in its final Digital Platform Services report on Monday, following five years of monitoring social networks, online marketplaces, app stores and search engines. The 408-page report issued six recommendations but also raised future areas of concern including a lack of competition in cloud computing and artificial intelligence (AI) services, and risky behaviour involving online video games. The report comes six months after the federal government launched a public consultation into digital competition proposals, and after several tech firms complained to US officials about Australia's current digital media laws. The commission's tenth and final report highlighted four existing and two new recommendations to address anti-competitive and harmful behaviour from online platforms, and chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said existing laws were not equipped to protect Australians. "While these services have brought many benefits, they have also created harms that our current competition and consumer laws cannot adequately address," she said. "This is why we continue to recommend that targeted regulation of digital platform services is needed to increase competition and innovation and protect consumers in digital markets." Existing recommendations included a ban on unfair trading practices, enforceable codes of conduct for designated digital platforms including competition protections, and mandatory processes to help consumers, including removing scams and harmful apps, verifying advertisers, and introducing a digital ombudsman to handle disputes. A consumer survey conducted for the report found more than eight in 10 Australians supported the introduction of an independent dispute resolution body to handle complaints. Support was highest for the policing of general online marketplaces, like Amazon, Temu and eBay, followed by social networks such as Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn, and online messaging platforms. The report also recommended the continued monitoring of online services and a permanent Digital Platform Regulators Forum comprised of existing media regulatory bodies to collaborate on streamlined legal reforms. Future areas of concern for the commission included the regulation of digital video games, such as the risk of accidental in-game spending, consumer harm from paid loot-boxes, and clear purchasing contracts. The report also noted concerns about a lack of competition in generative AI services and cloud computing, which could be dominated by firms including Amazon, Microsoft and Google. "Harms to competition in the generative AI sector could hamper innovation, result in lower quality products and services, and force Australian businesses and consumers to pay more than they otherwise would to utilise this technology," Ms Cass-Gottlieb said. The report completes the inquiry called by then-treasurer Josh Frydenberg in February 2020, and the Labor government has since committed to several changes based on its recommendations, including a ban on unfair trading practices. The government's consultation into proposed digital competition changes, including laws to govern app marketplaces, online advertising and social media, closed in February. Australia needs new laws and regulations to prevent significant harm to consumers and businesses from the exploitative practices of US tech giants. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission issued the warning in its final Digital Platform Services report on Monday, following five years of monitoring social networks, online marketplaces, app stores and search engines. The 408-page report issued six recommendations but also raised future areas of concern including a lack of competition in cloud computing and artificial intelligence (AI) services, and risky behaviour involving online video games. The report comes six months after the federal government launched a public consultation into digital competition proposals, and after several tech firms complained to US officials about Australia's current digital media laws. The commission's tenth and final report highlighted four existing and two new recommendations to address anti-competitive and harmful behaviour from online platforms, and chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said existing laws were not equipped to protect Australians. "While these services have brought many benefits, they have also created harms that our current competition and consumer laws cannot adequately address," she said. "This is why we continue to recommend that targeted regulation of digital platform services is needed to increase competition and innovation and protect consumers in digital markets." Existing recommendations included a ban on unfair trading practices, enforceable codes of conduct for designated digital platforms including competition protections, and mandatory processes to help consumers, including removing scams and harmful apps, verifying advertisers, and introducing a digital ombudsman to handle disputes. A consumer survey conducted for the report found more than eight in 10 Australians supported the introduction of an independent dispute resolution body to handle complaints. Support was highest for the policing of general online marketplaces, like Amazon, Temu and eBay, followed by social networks such as Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn, and online messaging platforms. The report also recommended the continued monitoring of online services and a permanent Digital Platform Regulators Forum comprised of existing media regulatory bodies to collaborate on streamlined legal reforms. Future areas of concern for the commission included the regulation of digital video games, such as the risk of accidental in-game spending, consumer harm from paid loot-boxes, and clear purchasing contracts. The report also noted concerns about a lack of competition in generative AI services and cloud computing, which could be dominated by firms including Amazon, Microsoft and Google. "Harms to competition in the generative AI sector could hamper innovation, result in lower quality products and services, and force Australian businesses and consumers to pay more than they otherwise would to utilise this technology," Ms Cass-Gottlieb said. The report completes the inquiry called by then-treasurer Josh Frydenberg in February 2020, and the Labor government has since committed to several changes based on its recommendations, including a ban on unfair trading practices. The government's consultation into proposed digital competition changes, including laws to govern app marketplaces, online advertising and social media, closed in February. Australia needs new laws and regulations to prevent significant harm to consumers and businesses from the exploitative practices of US tech giants. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission issued the warning in its final Digital Platform Services report on Monday, following five years of monitoring social networks, online marketplaces, app stores and search engines. The 408-page report issued six recommendations but also raised future areas of concern including a lack of competition in cloud computing and artificial intelligence (AI) services, and risky behaviour involving online video games. The report comes six months after the federal government launched a public consultation into digital competition proposals, and after several tech firms complained to US officials about Australia's current digital media laws. The commission's tenth and final report highlighted four existing and two new recommendations to address anti-competitive and harmful behaviour from online platforms, and chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said existing laws were not equipped to protect Australians. "While these services have brought many benefits, they have also created harms that our current competition and consumer laws cannot adequately address," she said. "This is why we continue to recommend that targeted regulation of digital platform services is needed to increase competition and innovation and protect consumers in digital markets." Existing recommendations included a ban on unfair trading practices, enforceable codes of conduct for designated digital platforms including competition protections, and mandatory processes to help consumers, including removing scams and harmful apps, verifying advertisers, and introducing a digital ombudsman to handle disputes. A consumer survey conducted for the report found more than eight in 10 Australians supported the introduction of an independent dispute resolution body to handle complaints. Support was highest for the policing of general online marketplaces, like Amazon, Temu and eBay, followed by social networks such as Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn, and online messaging platforms. The report also recommended the continued monitoring of online services and a permanent Digital Platform Regulators Forum comprised of existing media regulatory bodies to collaborate on streamlined legal reforms. Future areas of concern for the commission included the regulation of digital video games, such as the risk of accidental in-game spending, consumer harm from paid loot-boxes, and clear purchasing contracts. The report also noted concerns about a lack of competition in generative AI services and cloud computing, which could be dominated by firms including Amazon, Microsoft and Google. "Harms to competition in the generative AI sector could hamper innovation, result in lower quality products and services, and force Australian businesses and consumers to pay more than they otherwise would to utilise this technology," Ms Cass-Gottlieb said. The report completes the inquiry called by then-treasurer Josh Frydenberg in February 2020, and the Labor government has since committed to several changes based on its recommendations, including a ban on unfair trading practices. The government's consultation into proposed digital competition changes, including laws to govern app marketplaces, online advertising and social media, closed in February. Australia needs new laws and regulations to prevent significant harm to consumers and businesses from the exploitative practices of US tech giants. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission issued the warning in its final Digital Platform Services report on Monday, following five years of monitoring social networks, online marketplaces, app stores and search engines. The 408-page report issued six recommendations but also raised future areas of concern including a lack of competition in cloud computing and artificial intelligence (AI) services, and risky behaviour involving online video games. The report comes six months after the federal government launched a public consultation into digital competition proposals, and after several tech firms complained to US officials about Australia's current digital media laws. The commission's tenth and final report highlighted four existing and two new recommendations to address anti-competitive and harmful behaviour from online platforms, and chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said existing laws were not equipped to protect Australians. "While these services have brought many benefits, they have also created harms that our current competition and consumer laws cannot adequately address," she said. "This is why we continue to recommend that targeted regulation of digital platform services is needed to increase competition and innovation and protect consumers in digital markets." Existing recommendations included a ban on unfair trading practices, enforceable codes of conduct for designated digital platforms including competition protections, and mandatory processes to help consumers, including removing scams and harmful apps, verifying advertisers, and introducing a digital ombudsman to handle disputes. A consumer survey conducted for the report found more than eight in 10 Australians supported the introduction of an independent dispute resolution body to handle complaints. Support was highest for the policing of general online marketplaces, like Amazon, Temu and eBay, followed by social networks such as Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn, and online messaging platforms. The report also recommended the continued monitoring of online services and a permanent Digital Platform Regulators Forum comprised of existing media regulatory bodies to collaborate on streamlined legal reforms. Future areas of concern for the commission included the regulation of digital video games, such as the risk of accidental in-game spending, consumer harm from paid loot-boxes, and clear purchasing contracts. The report also noted concerns about a lack of competition in generative AI services and cloud computing, which could be dominated by firms including Amazon, Microsoft and Google. "Harms to competition in the generative AI sector could hamper innovation, result in lower quality products and services, and force Australian businesses and consumers to pay more than they otherwise would to utilise this technology," Ms Cass-Gottlieb said. The report completes the inquiry called by then-treasurer Josh Frydenberg in February 2020, and the Labor government has since committed to several changes based on its recommendations, including a ban on unfair trading practices. The government's consultation into proposed digital competition changes, including laws to govern app marketplaces, online advertising and social media, closed in February.
