India close to finalising comprehensive bilateral trade deal with US

Mumbai: India is close to finalising a comprehensive Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) with the US, which is expected to facilitate zero-duty imports under the production-linked incentive (PLI) schemes and enhance bilateral trade, targeted to reach $500 billion by 2030, according to a report released on Monday.
As United States Vice President J.D. Vance, accompanied by his family, arrived in India, the report further mentioned that the BTA also opens pathways for high-end US tech imports in defence, clean energy and advanced manufacturing.
Despite the global upheaval, India's consumption-driven economy, demographic dividend, and relatively low export dependency position it favourably, said the report by Asit C. Mehta Investment Interrmediates Ltd (ACMIIL), a Pantomath Group company.
With merchandise exports to the US accounting for only 2.1 per cent of India's GDP, the country is less vulnerable to external shocks compared to other export-heavy economies.
The report underscores India's potential to benefit from supply chain diversification, especially as the US imposes steep tariffs on Chinese imports.
'India's 26 per cent reciprocal tariff is moderate in comparison, improving its appeal as a manufacturing and trading partner,' the report mentioned.
India's economic resilience is underscored by strong macro fundamentals, with a projected GDP growth of 6.5 per cent for FY26 and a commitment to fiscal prudence as the fiscal deficit is expected to reduce to 4.9 per cent in FY25.
The Reserve Bank of India has shifted towards a more accommodative monetary stance, with anticipated repo rate cuts expected to stimulate private investment.
According to the report, a key structural advantage lies in India's demographics — 51 per cent of the population is under 40, driving consumption, with Gen Z and millennials emerging as the primary spenders.
On the market front, technical and valuation indicators point toward a bottoming out, creating conditions conducive for medium- to long-term equity outperformance.
The government's policy support, including the 'Make in India' initiative and a focus on ease of doing business, continues to strengthen various sectors, the report noted.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

2 hours ago

• Business Standard

Iran MPs approve Hormuz closure, US warns of oil, trade disruption

Iran's Parliament, known as the Majlis, has approved the closure of the Strait of Hormuz following US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, according to a report by state media outlet PressTV on Sunday, 22 June 2025. The report cites senior lawmaker Esmaeil Kowsari. Kowsari, a member of the Majlis Committee on National Security and Foreign Policy, said lawmakers had reached an agreement to close the strait in response to US actions and the lack of an international response. Kowsari said, 'The Parliament has come to the conclusion that it should close the Hormuz Strait, but the final decision lies with the Supreme National Security Council.' The Strait of Hormuz, situated at the entrance to the Persian Gulf, is one of the world's most important trade routes, especially for oil imports. It is estimated that around 20 per cent of the global oil supply — about 17 to 18 million barrels per day — passes through the strait. It is also a major route for the export of liquefied natural gas (LNG), particularly from Qatar. Reacting to Iran's decision, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the move 'economic suicide'. Speaking to Fox News, Rubio said, 'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil.' Rubio further added, 'If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake. It's economic suicide for them if they do it. And we retain options to deal with that, but other countries should be looking at that as well. It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours.' Importantly, the strait is the only maritime route connecting the Persian Gulf to open seas. It is used by major oil-producing countries, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait and the UAE. The media report from PressTV also warns that any interruption in the Strait of Hormuz could cause global oil prices to surge and undermine international energy security. Citing experts, the report warned that a major disruption in the strait could halt operations at multinational companies within days due to fuel shortages. India, which imports about 80 per cent of its oil, is likely to feel the impact of any disruption in the strait. The route is also critical for ships travelling to and from Indian ports. According to a report by The Hindu on 13 June, any disruption in the Strait of Hormuz could lead to a 40–50 per cent rise in shipping costs and delays of up to 15–20 days.

Economic Times

2 hours ago

• Economic Times

Will India's AI Action Summit redefine global AI governance?

Then there's the tech in between After Britain, South Korea and France, it's India's turn to host the next AI Action Summit. GoI has invited public comments until June 30 to shape the summit, which sets the tone for AI governance. India is expected to bring global majority perspectives from the margins to the mainstream and exhibit a unique approach to the delicate balancing acts involved in AI there is the question of whether to regulate, and if so, how. The recent US proposal to ban state AI laws for 10 years is seen by many as pro-innovation. By contrast, the EU's AI Act takes a more precautionary, product-safety approach. China's approach tends to tailor regulation to authoritarian state control. Beyond this dichotomy, India is often seen as capable of offering a third way. The summit presents an opportunity for India to showcase elements of this approach and take on the equally thorny question of how open or closed AI development should be. On openness, India can push beyond the binary of 'open or closed' approaches to releasing AI base models. Some argue that AI models must be kept under the control of a small number of people. Others argue that base models should be released with no restrictions. India has no interest in a future where a handful of US and Chinese companies hold the key to advanced AI models and can arbitrarily restrict their use. At the same time, however, openness should not be understood in a purely libertarian way where people can do whatever they want with these we need is a truly open approach that enables independent evaluation of how the foundation models work so that they can be used to innovate without inadvertently importing the latest US political, one-upmanship-driven ideas or Chinese state censorship. Demanding this openness and transparency, followed by independent testing and evaluation, should be a key goal for India with its new AI Safety Institute (ASI). Additionally, ASI must take the lead in ensuring that systems, particularly in high-impact domains such as public services, are secure and reliable. With its 'Safe and Trusted AI' pillar, the IndiaAI mission is encouraging projects on bias mitigation, privacy enhancement and governance testing-themes that should reflect in the summit's agenda-and affirming the stance taken by the EU to push for 'Trustworthy AI'. It is key here, however, that trustworthiness, privacy and safety are not merely demanded of AI systems but rather achieved through effective governance frameworks. Many of the purported benefits of AI are undermined if the data is not secure, if the system responses are unreliable or biased, and if the public turns against the technology due to high-profile scandals. A telling case is that of the 'Child Benefits Scandal' in the Netherlands, where an opaque and discriminatory system mistakenly flagged thousands of families for benefits-related fraud. In response, the Netherlands is working towards improving AI accountability through human rights impact assessments and public databases of government AI systems. Public trust in AI systems can only be achieved through robust transparency and accountability practices. Centring global conversations and policy imperatives on open, transparent and rights-protecting AI development reduces uncertainty and offers a level playing field for smaller players, even if it is not enshrined in dedicated legislation but through an ecosystem of institutional oversight via ASI and adaptation of existing laws, as is the preference of the IndiaAI logic is straightforward-when a tech is built to be rights-respecting and safe, more people trust it, and therefore more people use it, particularly when it can be independently verified. It's a win-win for commerce, rights and the global majority, such frameworks are necessary because without close attention to the impact of AI models, the region risks becoming a testing ground for nascent and half-baked technology that is developed elsewhere. Their absence could result in 'innovation arbitrage,' a term used to refer to the exploitation of regulatory gaps to deploy questionable technology. The harms of AI-driven systems without oversight are well-documented-be it opaque, unaccountable data collection practices that give people no real choice, or flawed algorithmic decisions that impact people's education, employment and healthcare. In demanding openness, transparency, and security, India has an opportunity to work with the global majority countries to develop shared approaches and demands. Demanding such inclusion and space for leadership would allow us to leverage our collective expertise to ensure 'access for all'-a key goal of GoI. The AI Impact Summit is the moment to bring like-minded countries together and lay out a roadmap for how AI development can be driven in a way that benefits the global majority and allows for individual and regional autonomy, instead of cementing hegemony. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Looking for quick buck in unlisted shares? Better think twice! Small finance banks struggle with perception. Will numbers turn the tide? Aadit Palicha on Zepto dark store raid, dark patterns, and IPO China rare earths blockade: Will electric vehicles assembly lines fall silent? Flames below deck: The silent threat lurking in cargo holds Is India ready to hit the aspirational 8% growth mark? For medium- to long-term investors with moderate risk appetite: 6 large-cap stocks with an upside potential of up to 40% Sin goods, but not sin stocks from a long-term perspective: 6 stocks from liquor industry with an upside potential of up to 34%

Time of India

2 hours ago

• Time of India

Will India's AI Action Summit redefine global AI governance?

Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills After Britain, South Korea and France, it's India's turn to host the next AI Action Summit . GoI has invited public comments until June 30 to shape the summit, which sets the tone for AI governance . India is expected to bring global majority perspectives from the margins to the mainstream and exhibit a unique approach to the delicate balancing acts involved in AI there is the question of whether to regulate, and if so, how. The recent US proposal to ban state AI laws for 10 years is seen by many as pro-innovation. By contrast, the EU's AI Act takes a more precautionary, product-safety approach. China's approach tends to tailor regulation to authoritarian state control. Beyond this dichotomy, India is often seen as capable of offering a third way. The summit presents an opportunity for India to showcase elements of this approach and take on the equally thorny question of how open or closed AI development should openness, India can push beyond the binary of 'open or closed' approaches to releasing AI base models. Some argue that AI models must be kept under the control of a small number of people. Others argue that base models should be released with no has no interest in a future where a handful of US and Chinese companies hold the key to advanced AI models and can arbitrarily restrict their use. At the same time, however, openness should not be understood in a purely libertarian way where people can do whatever they want with these we need is a truly open approach that enables independent evaluation of how the foundation models work so that they can be used to innovate without inadvertently importing the latest US political, one-upmanship-driven ideas or Chinese state censorship. Demanding this openness and transparency, followed by independent testing and evaluation, should be a key goal for India with its new AI Safety Institute (ASI).Additionally, ASI must take the lead in ensuring that systems, particularly in high-impact domains such as public services, are secure and reliable. With its 'Safe and Trusted AI' pillar, the IndiaAI mission is encouraging projects on bias mitigation, privacy enhancement and governance testing-themes that should reflect in the summit's agenda-and affirming the stance taken by the EU to push for ' Trustworthy AI '.It is key here, however, that trustworthiness, privacy and safety are not merely demanded of AI systems but rather achieved through effective governance frameworks. Many of the purported benefits of AI are undermined if the data is not secure, if the system responses are unreliable or biased, and if the public turns against the technology due to high-profile scandals.A telling case is that of the 'Child Benefits Scandal' in the Netherlands, where an opaque and discriminatory system mistakenly flagged thousands of families for benefits-related fraud. In response, the Netherlands is working towards improving AI accountability through human rights impact assessments and public databases of government AI systems. Public trust in AI systems can only be achieved through robust transparency and accountability global conversations and policy imperatives on open, transparent and rights-protecting AI development reduces uncertainty and offers a level playing field for smaller players, even if it is not enshrined in dedicated legislation but through an ecosystem of institutional oversight via ASI and adaptation of existing laws, as is the preference of the IndiaAI logic is straightforward-when a tech is built to be rights-respecting and safe, more people trust it, and therefore more people use it, particularly when it can be independently verified. It's a win-win for commerce, rights and the global majority, such frameworks are necessary because without close attention to the impact of AI models, the region risks becoming a testing ground for nascent and half-baked technology that is developed elsewhere. Their absence could result in 'innovation arbitrage,' a term used to refer to the exploitation of regulatory gaps to deploy questionable technology. The harms of AI-driven systems without oversight are well-documented-be it opaque, unaccountable data collection practices that give people no real choice, or flawed algorithmic decisions that impact people's education, employment and demanding openness, transparency, and security, India has an opportunity to work with the global majority countries to develop shared approaches and demands. Demanding such inclusion and space for leadership would allow us to leverage our collective expertise to ensure 'access for all'-a key goal of GoI. The AI Impact Summit is the moment to bring like-minded countries together and lay out a roadmap for how AI development can be driven in a way that benefits the global majority and allows for individual and regional autonomy, instead of cementing hegemony.