Syria expects first transfer with U.S. bank 'within weeks', governor says
FILE PHOTO: Bundles of Syrian currency notes are stacked up as an employee counts money at Syrian central bank in Damascus, Syria, January 12, 2025. REUTERS/Firas Makdesi/File Photo
Syria expects first transfer with U.S. bank 'within weeks', governor says
DAMASCUS - Syria expects to have its first transaction with a U.S. bank "in a matter of weeks", Syrian central bank governor Abdelkader Husriyeh said on Thursday, a day after a high-level meeting between Syrian and U.S. commercial banks.
The resumption of transfers between Syrian and U.S. banks would be a key milestone in the push by Syria's new rulers to reintegrate the country into the global financial system after 14 years of civil war.
Husriyeh on Wednesday held a virtual conference bringing together Syrian banks, several U.S. banks and U.S. officials, including Washington's Syria Envoy Thomas Barrack, with the aim of speeding up the reconnection of Syria's banking system to the global financial system.
This follows U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement in May that all sanctions on Syria would be lifted. That has been followed up with executive orders formally lifting some of the measures.
Syria's reintegration into the global financial system would be a major step towards enabling the kind of large financial transactions needed to kickstart its reconstruction and economic activity, and help rein in a highly informal, cash-based economy.
Husriyeh extended a formal invitation to U.S. banks to re-establish correspondent banking ties following the ouster of former Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad, whose crackdown on 2011 protests resulted in Western countries imposing one of the world's strictest sanctions regimes.
"We have two clear targets: have U.S. banks set up representative offices in Syria and have transactions resume between Syrian and American banks. I think the latter can happen in a matter of weeks," Husriyeh told Reuters.
Among the banks invited to Wednesday's conference were JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley and CitiBank, though it was not immediately clear who attended. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
41 minutes ago
- Straits Times
In Los Angeles' Little Persia, US strikes on Iran met with celebration
A U.S flag hangs in a street of Los Angeles' \"Little Persia\" where about 500,000 Iranian-Americans live, in Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 21, 2025. REUTERS/Tim Reid A sign calling for the overthrow of the Islamic government in Iran is placed behind glass in a bookstore in an Iranian-American area of Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 22, 2025. REUTERS/Tim Reid In Los Angeles' Little Persia, US strikes on Iran met with celebration - and angst LOS ANGELES - In the cafes and restaurants of Little Persia, a Los Angeles enclave of about half a million Iranian-Americans, hatred for Iran's Islamic government is red hot and widely felt. What's less agreed upon is whether American and Israeli forces should have launched strikes on nuclear and military facilities in Iran, including the dropping of 30,000-pound U.S. bunker-busting bombs ordered by President Donald Trump on Saturday. Within this huge Iranian diaspora in western Los Angeles, the largest Persian community outside Iran, Iranian Jews interviewed by Reuters said they are all in on Israeli and U.S. bombing raids, and want to see more. Iranian Muslims in the area - also called Little Tehran or Tehrangeles - were more ambivalent, with many suspicious of Israel and wary of America getting embroiled in another Middle Eastern conflict. Most of the two dozen people who spoke to Reuters did not want their full names published or their pictures taken, such is their fear of the Islamic Republic led by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. All still have relatives there. Reza, a 38-year-old college professor who left Iran 15 years ago, says he received a call from an Iranian official last year from his sister's mobile phone. He was told that if he did not stop publishing anti-Islamic Republic posts on his social media accounts, his sister could be in danger. "It's a very sensitive topic. I am definitely happy Israel and the U.S. are destroying their nuclear program. I don't trust the Iranian regime having access to nuclear technology," said Reza, an Iranian Muslim. "But I'm also sad for my family there. The people are suffering. It's a very scary time. And I do not like the U.S. getting involved in another war." Three blocks away, outside a Starbucks coffee shop, seven men, mostly Iranian Jews, were discussing the war between Israel and Iran, now in its second week, and the bombing of three nuclear sites by the U.S. on Saturday. The world braced on Sunday for Iran's response after the U.S. joined Israel in the biggest Western military action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 revolution. Outside the Starbucks, the mood was celebratory. "This regime should not exist anymore, they torture their own people, they put their own people in prison. These mullahs are causing problems all across the Middle East and the world," said Shawn, 72, a mortgage broker. Iran has so far not followed through on its threats of retaliation against the United States and has said it will consider all possible responses. Iran says its nuclear ambitions are peaceful and its U.N. Ambassador has accused Israel and the U.S. of destroying diplomacy. Sol, 58, who left Iran in 1983 and has relatives in Iran and Israel, said the group outside Starbucks had been celebrating since Israel began striking Iran earlier this month. "Israel is doing a very good job. God Bless them," he said. "We want those mullahs out!" Roozbeh, 48, a mechanical engineer who left Iran in 2007, said he was worried about his parents and two brothers still in Iran and had just spoken to them. "They are in the north. Israel bombed it for the first time yesterday," he said. "I hope the Israeli military action will bring down the regime, of course." Younger Iranian-Americans also expressed their hatred for the Islamic Republic - but were far more skeptical about Israeli and U.S. strikes on the country. Raha, 33, was born in the U.S. Her parents fled Iran during the 1979 revolution, which led to the overthrow of the U.S.-backed government and the creation of the Islamic Republic. Raha has visited relatives in Iran about 10 times. On one visit she says she had an encounter with the "morality police," because her hijab headdress had slipped. She recalled the 2022 death of Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old Kurdish-Iranian who died in a hospital in Tehran, the Iranian capital, after being arrested for not wearing her hijab in accordance with the Islamic government's standards. Raha said she and her friends celebrated when an Israeli strike killed the head of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps this month. "That's a good thing. We want them all down," Raha said. "I absolutely want to see the regime in Iran fall." REUTERS Check out ST's Food Guide for the latest foodie recommendations in Singapore.
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Netanyahu says Israel close to meeting its goals in Iran
ISRAEL is very close to completing its goal of removing the dual threats of Iran's ballistic missiles and nuclear programme, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday. He promised not to let Israel be dragged into a war of attrition but also said he would not end the Iran campaign prematurely. 'We won't pursue our actions beyond what is needed to achieve them, but we also won't finish too soon. When the objectives are achieved, then the operation is complete and the fighting will stop,' he told Israeli reporters. 'I have no doubt that this is a regime that wants to wipe us out, and that's why we embarked on this operation to eliminate the two concrete threats to our existence: the nuclear threat, the ballistic missile threat. We are moving step by step towards achieving these goals. We are very, very close to completing them,' he said. He said Iran's Fordow nuclear site had been very badly damaged by US bunker-buster bombs overnight but the extent of damage remained to be seen. Tehran has vowed to defend itself at all costs. Asked about the whereabouts of Iran's 60 per cent enriched uranium, Netanyahu said: 'We've been following that very closely. I can tell you that it's an important component of a nuclear programme. 'It's not the sole component. It's not a sufficient component. But it is an important component and we have interesting intel on that, which you will excuse me if I don't share with you,' he said. At least until Israel's first strikes against its enrichment installations on June 13, Iran was refining uranium to up to 60 per cent purity, a short step from the roughly 90 per cent that is bomb-grade and far higher than the 3.67 per cent cap imposed by a 2015 nuclear deal, which Iran respected until the year after US President Donald Trump pulled out in 2018. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
‘Slim to none': US strikes on Iran leave hopes for nuclear diplomacy in tatters
A handout satellite image made available by Maxar Technologies shows damage at the Isfahan nuclear technology centre after US airstrikes on June 22. PHOTO: EPA-EFE 'Slim to none': US strikes on Iran leave hopes for nuclear diplomacy in tatters PARIS/ISTANBUL - In a bid to defuse the conflict over Iran's nuclear programme, foreign ministers from Europe's top three powers hurried to meet their Iranian counterpart on June 20 in Geneva. Those hopes collapsed on June 21 when US President Donald Trump ordered airstrikes on Iran's three main nuclear sites, in support of Israel's military campaign. 'It's irrelevant to ask Iran to return to diplomacy,' Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araqchi, visibly angry, told reporters in Istanbul on June 22, promising a 'response' to the US strikes. 'It's not time for diplomacy now.' Mr Trump, who said the US airstrikes 'obliterated' the sites, warned in a televised speech on June 21 that the US could attack other targets in Iran if no peace deal was reached and urged Tehran to return to the negotiating table. Reuters spoke to seven Western diplomats and analysts who said the prospect of negotiations was negligeable for now, with an unbridgeable gap between Washington's demand for zero enrichment by Iran and Tehran's refusal to abandon its nuclear programme. 'I think the prospects of effective diplomacy at this point are slim to none,' said Mr James Acton, co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a think tank headquartered in Washington. 'I'm much more worried about escalation, both in the short and the long term.' According to European diplomats, the three European allies - Britain, France and Germany - were not made aware of Mr Trump's decision to strike Iran ahead of time. French President Emmanuel Macron had promised on June 21 - just before the US strikes - to accelerate the nuclear talks, following a call with his Iranian counterpart. One European diplomat, who asked not to be identified, acknowledged there was now no way of holding a planned second meeting with Iran in the coming week. In the wake of the US military action, any European diplomatic role appears likely to be secondary. Mr Trump on June 20 dismissed Europe's efforts towards resolving the crisis, saying Iran only wanted to speak to the United States. Three diplomats and analysts said any future talks between Iran and Washington would likely be through regional intermediaries Oman and Qatar, once Tehran decides how to respond to the US airstrikes on its nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. The attacks leave Iran with few palatable options on the table. Since Israel began its military campaign against Iran on June 13, some in Tehran have raised the prospect of withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) to signal Iran's determination to accelerate enrichment, but experts say that would represent a considerable escalation and likely draw a forceful response from Washington. Mr Acton, of the Carnegie Endowment, said Iran's most obvious means for retaliation is its short-range ballistic missiles, that could be used to target US forces and assets in the region. But any military response by Iran carried the risk of miscalculation, he said. 'On the one hand, they want a strong enough response that they feel the US has actually paid a price. On the other hand, they don't want to encourage further escalation,' he said. European effort ended in failure Even before the US strikes, the June 20 talks in Geneva showed little sign of progress amid a chasm between the two sides and in the end no detailed proposals were put forward, three diplomats said. Mixed messaging may have also undermined their own efforts, diplomats said. European positions on key issues like Iran's enrichment programme have hardened in the past 10 days with the Israeli strikes and the looming threat of US bombing. The three European powers, known as the E3, were parties to a 2015 nuclear deal that Mr Trump abandoned three years later during his first term. Both the Europeans and Tehran believed they had a better understanding of how to get a realistic deal given the E3 have been dealing with Iran's nuclear programme since 2003. But the Europeans have had a difficult relationship with Iran in recent months as they sought to pressure it over its ballistic missiles programme, support for Russia and detention of European citizens. France, which was the keenest to pursue negotiations, has in the last few days suggested Iran should move towards zero enrichment, which until now was not an E3 demand given Iran's red line on the issue, two European diplomats said. Britain has also adopted a tougher stance more in tune with Washington and that was expressed in Geneva, the diplomats said. And Germany's new government appeared to go in the same direction, although it was more nuanced. 'Iran has to accept zero enrichment eventually,' said one EU official. A senior Iranian official on June 21 showed disappointment at the Europeans' new stance, saying their demands were 'unrealistic', without providing further details. In a brief joint statement on June 2, which acknowledged the US strikes, the European countries said they would continue their diplomatic efforts. 'We call upon Iran to engage in negotiations leading to an agreement that addresses all concerns associated with its nuclear programme,' it said, adding the Europeans stood ready to contribute 'in coordination with all parties'. Mr David Khalfa, co-founder of the Atlantic Middle East Forum, a Paris-based think tank, said Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's government had taken advantage of the Europeans for years to gain time as it developed its nuclear programme and ballistic missile capabilities. 'The European attempt ended in failure,' he said. However, the Europeans still have one important card to play. They are the only ones who, as party to the nuclear accord, can launch its so-called 'snapback mechanism', which would reimpose all previous UN sanctions on Iran if it is found to be in violation of the agreement's terms. Diplomats said, prior to the US strikes, the three countries had discussed an end-August deadline to activate it as part of a 'maximum pressure' campaign on Tehran. 'Multiple channels' for US talks In total, the US launched 75 precision-guided munitions, including more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles, and more than 125 military aircraft in the operation against the three nuclear sites, US officials said. US Defecse Secretary Pete Hegseth on June 22 warned Iran against retaliation and said both public and private messages had been sent to Iran 'in multiple channels, giving them every opportunity to come to the table'. Five previous rounds of indirect negotiations between the United States and Iran collapsed after a US proposal at the end of May called for Iran to abandon uranium enrichment. It was rejected by Tehran, leading to Israel launching its attack on Iran after Mr Trump's 60-day deadline for talks had expired. Iran has repeatedly said from then on that it would not negotiate while at war. Even after Israel struck, Washington reached out to Iran to resume negotiations, including offering a meeting between Mr Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian in Istanbul, according to two European diplomats and an Iranian official. That was rebuffed by Iran, but Mr Araqchi did continue direct contacts with US Special envoy Steve Witkoff, three diplomats told Reuters. One of the challenges in engaging with Iran, experts say, is that no one can be sure of the extent of the damage to its nuclear programme. With the IAEA severely restricted in its access to Iranian sites, it is unclear whether Tehran has hidden enrichment facilities. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on June 22 that most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow, the site producing the bulk of Iran's uranium refined to up to 60 per cent, had been moved to an undisclosed location before the US attack there. Mr Acton, of the Carnegie Endowment, said that - putting aside from the damage to its physical installations - Iran had thousands of scientists and technicians involved in the enrichment programme, most of whom had survived the US and Israeli attacks. 'You can't bomb knowledge,' he said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
