Administrators reveal staggering debts of Whyalla Ports with at least $194 million owed
The administrators of Whyalla Ports Pty Ltd have told creditors the company owes at least $194 million, but the true amount is still unclear.
Accounting firm William Buck held the first creditors' meeting for the company on Thursday, revealing $25 million was owed to trade creditors with a further $63 million listed as a lease liability.
The largest slice is owed to Golding's and its parent company NRW, a key mining contractor, with a secured debt of $106 million.
However, administrator Michael Brereton said they were waiting to receive financial records from Whyalla Ports directors.
"One of the first things we did on our appointment was to issue a notice to the directors to complete what's called the report on company affairs and property," Mr Brereton said.
"That was issued immediately … [and] we have yet to receive those from the directors, so we don't have all the financial information.
"[I] think one of the problems they face is that the company operated on the basis that it held the port.
"Based on the litigation and the legislation that's been passed, it's become apparent that maybe the company didn't have control of the ports.
"So I suspect they're having some problems trying to work through 'What are the financial records of the company?'"
In early June, the ports became another casualty in the ongoing fallout since the Whyalla Steelworks was tipped into administration by the state government.
The company, Whyalla Ports Pty Ltd, was involved in a Federal Court case launched by Whyalla Steelworks administrators KordaMentha, which wants control of the port so it can sell the steelworks as an integrated asset.
Parent company GFG Alliance said when the state government passed new laws to "clarify" that the port was owned by OneSteel, it was left with "no option" but to push the port into administration.
KordaMentha has since abandoned the legal action it began. However, a counterclaim from GFG Alliance is still being pursued over the ownership of some assets.
During today's meeting, Mr Brereton said a lease agreement between OneSteel and Whyalla Ports was terminated on March 27.
"The company was not trading on our appointment," Mr Brereton said.
"The company was dispossessed of all its plants and equipment at that time and its right to provide services to customers."
One Whyalla creditor, who wished to remain anonymous, previously told the ABC they were owed between $100,000 and $200,000 by Whyalla Ports.
They said they feared they may never receive the money due to the dispute over the port's ownership.
CEO of Sudel Industries and creditor Kevin Moore said he was owed roughly $20,000 from Whyalla Ports.
"Basically, I've already written that money off. I don't think we'll see it."
Although the paperwork has not been filed, it is understood that the company will more than likely apply for a deed of company arrangement (DOCA) at its next meeting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
21 minutes ago
- ABC News
Former Vic Opposition Leader John Pesutto avoids bankruptcy
The Liberal Party's administrative committee has agreed to save former Victorian Liberal leader John Pesutto from bankruptcy as he struggles to cover the legal costs he owes colleague Moira Deeming.
ABC News
37 minutes ago
- ABC News
Tasmania's election campaign should be fought on the budget, business leader and economist say
When Labor declared it had tabled a motion of no-confidence in Premier Jeremy Rockliff, it listed three main reasons. They were the potential privatisation of public assets, the failure to deliver the new Spirit of Tasmania ferries on time, and the state of the Liberal government's budget. On that budget, here are a few quick figures: Now, with Tasmania in an election campaign, business leaders and economists are hoping to hear the major parties' plans for repairing the balance sheet. The Tasmanian Chamber of Commerce and Industry's Michael Bailey says as the election is largely about the budget, the campaign should be fought on it. "Tasmania has a spending problem at the moment. "We need to make sure that we can get our spending back under control." That partially refers to the fact the state has a history of spending more than it budgets for, particularly in health. Here's how the Liberals and Labor have been treating the issue of spending and budget repair: Elections are often a big-spending affair. The Liberals have previously been accused of pork barrelling (slang for bribing the electorate for their votes), but they say they are simply listening to community concerns. Labor also promised a whole heap of community grants last election. The main difference is the relevant department would eventually assess them to decide if they were worthy of spending money on. There are also a whole heap of other policies, such as the stamp duty exemption for first home buyers, that will cost taxpayers money. And those spending promises really add up. Economist Saul Eslake says Treasury data shows the 2018 and 2021 elections each added $1.4 billion of spending to the budget without any mention of how to pay for the promises. Last year's was even more expensive. "[The levy is] about the only election commitment that hasn't been met since the election. "Labor would've spent an additional $2 billion over five years if they had won. "So, to hope that that wouldn't be repeated in the election campaign would be a bit like Samuel Johnson's definition of second marriage — a triumph of hope over experience." At the moment, 40 per cent of Tasmania's money comes from the carve up of GST. Around a third is own-source revenue. Mr Eslake has put forward several options to raise more money, including collecting more payroll tax from businesses, raising car registration fees, adding a duty on the purchase of expensive new motor vehicles — "with appropriate concessions for pensioners and other low-income earners". He also suggested switching stamp duty to a land tax and increasing mining royalties. He says Tasmania collects about $40-50 million a year less than it would if its scheme was equivalent to those of other states. Money could also be found by asking the salmon industry to pay royalties for the use of Tasmanian waters. "That wouldn't solve Tasmania's problems, of course, but it would make a useful contribution to reducing the deficit over time." All of these ideas have been rejected by the major parties. Mr Rockliff also pointed out that legislative changes in 2023 meant the salmon industry now pays for its own regulation. "The salmon companies cost government. They return that to government, so it's cost neutral and that's been a significant reform under our government," he said. Another way to raise revenue, selling off state-owned companies and government business enterprises has been ruled out by both major parties already. As have any new taxes. Growing the economy is also a big part of how both major parties plan to get the state out of debt. As part of that, the Liberals have been waging a war on red tape, and if some of Labor's new policies are anything to go by, they're planning to do the same. When asked about increasing revenue, Labor leader Dean Winter talked about growing the economy by unlocking $25 billion in renewable energy developments. Premier Jeremy Rockliff on the other hand said investments in key services such as health, education and community safety would help increase revenue. The TCCI's Michael Bailey is less worried about the revenue side of things. "You don't give someone with a spending problem more money," he says. Mr Bailey wants the parties to find efficiencies in the public service, arguing that it's grown by 30 per cent since the COVID pandemic. "We know that we're borrowing to pay for those wages," he said. "They do wonderful work, but it's simply too big for what Tasmania can afford right now, so we would argue that that's the first thing that should be looked at." Both major parties have revealed their plans to find some savings, and they include the creation of new units. The Liberals' plan, which was announced in March, is called the Efficiency and Productivity Unit (EPU); Labor has the Review and Evaluation Unit (REU). Two names and slightly different descriptions for two things that will do very similar things — examine the effectiveness and value for money of government programs to try and identify savings. The Liberals are assuming they will be able to cut spending to the point where in three years' time overall government expenses will be less than they are this year. They hope to find savings through: Labor's plans to "save the budget more than half a billion dollars", while not outlined in an alternative budget, were part of leader Dean Winter's budget reply speech. They hope to do this by: This list is far from extensive, however, none of the policies have been costed by treasury. If the party that wins government does not right the ship, Mr Eslake estimates Tasmania is heading to a debt of $16 billion by 2035 with repayments to hit $750 million a year. "We've gone from in the middle of the past decade, being a net creditor, that is having more money in the bank than the government owes by way of debt, to now having debt and other liabilities," Mr Eslake said.
ABC News
38 minutes ago
- ABC News
Hundreds of homes to convert to renewables
Rachel Mealey: Re-wiring Australian homes to run off renewable electricity and cut emissions is a big project, but in one New South Wales postcode, dozens of houses have already been switched over. A pilot program in northern Illawarra has so far seen 60 homes converted to run entirely on renewable energy, with the aim of every home in the region changing over. Experts say the grid can handle the added load, but it's not cheap to get started. Joanna Crothers reports. Joanna Crothers: Tosca Lloyd and her family have had their eyes on converting their Wollongong home to run off renewables for several years. Tosca Lloyd: I think the climate impacts of coal and gas is the primary motivator for us and our family. Joanna Crothers: Her family is one of the lucky few to benefit from the Electrify 2515 pilot program, which is aiming to convert 500 homes in the 2515 postcode to run entirely off renewable energy. 60 homes in the New South Wales Illawarra postcode have already been converted, with a further 440 signed up to the program. But those homeowners are looking at a fairly steep bill. Tosca Lloyd: So we got a really big solar system, quite a large battery, induction, ducted heating for our whole house and an electric heat pump. We also had a bunch of rewiring done. All of that cost around $40,000, but we only ended up being out of pocket around $32,000. Joanna Crothers: The Federal Government is subsidising the pilot as part of Australia's push to reach net zero by 2050. Almost $5.5 million has been given to the program so far by Australia's Renewable Energy Agency. Rewiring Australia founder and chief scientist Dr Saul Griffith says he wants to prove that it's possible to convert millions of homes off gas. Saul Griffith: So we know that 11 million Australian households have got to get to zero emissions by probably 2040. We thought we'd try to really accelerate what that looks like in one community. Joanna Crothers: Professor Tania Urmee works in Murdoch University's School of Engineering and Energy in WA. She agrees that the program can work without crippling power grids, but says getting everybody on board with such big changes will be the biggest challenge. Tania Urmee: It's not an easy thing. We need to look at social issues like energy equity issues. You are setting up whole new ideas into a real practice. The whole energy generation needs to start from home. If that social learning happens, then it is good. Joanna Crothers: The Illawarra region, with the city of Wollongong and Port Kembla, has become a hub for renewable development both domestically and in industry. Dr Griffith says he's hopeful the scheme will eventually become affordable for low-income households too. Saul Griffith: So we've incentivised the program with small subsidies. They're larger for the lower-income households. They're lower for the top-income households. Joanna Crothers: Australia's Renewable Energy Agency has confirmed it's also funding a home electrification pilot for 500 homes in South Australia. Rachel Mealey: Joanna Crothers there with additional reporting by Nicholas McLaren and Brooke Chandler.
